scholarly journals Preoperative controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score as a predictor of long-term outcome after curative resection followed by adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II-III gastric Cancer

BMC Cancer ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Xuechao Liu ◽  
Deyao Zhang ◽  
Enzi Lin ◽  
Yongming Chen ◽  
Wei Li ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 294-294
Author(s):  
Chul Hyo Jeon ◽  
Han Hong Lee

294 Background: The role of controlling nutritional status (CONUT) score in predicting cancer survival remains uncertain. This study aimed to investigate the predictive value of the CONUT score and to develop a more appropriate scoring system beyond CONUT for gastric cancer (GC). Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 1307 patients who underwent curative gastrectomy between 2009 and 2015. The CONUT and three modified scores with modified lipid components (L-CONUT: albumin/total lymphocyte count [TLC]/low density lipoprotein, H-CONUT: albumin/TLC/high density lipoprotein, and T-CONUT: albumin/TLC/triglyceride) were calculated. The predictive value of each scoring system on long-term survival was assessed. Results: The values of the four nutritional scores were categorized into three groups (low, medium, and high). The CONUT (P < 0.001), L-CONUT (P < 0.001), H-CONUT (P < 0.001), and T-CONUT (P < 0.001) scores showed significant differences in overall survival in the three groups. Survival analysis according to the pathological stage showed that advanced age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status, male sex, and high H-CONUT score (HR, 3.93; 95% CI, 1.81–8.55; P = 0.001) were independent worse prognostic factors for overall survival in the stage I group. In the stage II group, CONUT score (HR, 5.077; 95% CI, 1.65–15.65; P = 0.005) was significantly associated with poor prognosis. In the stage III group, no scoring system showed significant results. Conclusions: In advanced GC (beyond stage II), the prognostic impact of the nutritional scoring system was uncertain. However, the H-CONUT score is a promising indicator of prognosis in stage I GC, and the CONUT score is useful for predicting long-term survival in stage II GC.


2015 ◽  
Vol 23 (2) ◽  
pp. 525-533 ◽  
Author(s):  
Katsunobu Sakurai ◽  
Masaichi Ohira ◽  
Tatsuro Tamura ◽  
Takahiro Toyokawa ◽  
Ryosuke Amano ◽  
...  

2003 ◽  
Vol 82 (4) ◽  
pp. 234-240 ◽  
Author(s):  
Juan J. Grau ◽  
Marta Martín ◽  
José Fuster ◽  
Manuel Pera ◽  
Juan C. García-Valdecasas ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Weifan Zhang ◽  
Xinhui Zhao ◽  
Zhao Liu ◽  
Hui Dang ◽  
Lei Meng ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: Few studies on the comparison among robotic, laparoscopic, and open gastrectomy had been reported in gastric cancer . The goal of this study was to evaluate the advantages of robotic-assisted gastrectomy (RAG) by comparing with laparoscopic-assisted gastrectomy(LAG) and open gastrectomy (OG). Methods: 147 gastric cancer patients who underwent gastrectomy were enrolled and retrospectively analyzed between January 2017 and July 2019. Short-term outcomes such as operation time, intraoperative estimated blood loss(EBL),number of retrieved lymph nodes, postoperative recovery, learning curve, and long-term outcome such as overall survival(OS) was compared among RAG, LAG and OG groups. Results: RAG group included 47 patients, 44 in the LAG, and 61 in the OG. Basic information such as gender, age, BMI, ASA degree were similar among three groups, and there were no statistically significances in pathological TNM staging, tumor resection extent, resection margin, methods of reconstruction( P >0.05). The cumulative sum(CUSUM) method showed that learning curve of RAG reached stability after 17 cases . For short-term outcomes, the RAG group had the shortest EBL( P =0.033), the shortest time to first flatus( P <0.001), shortest time to first intake liquid diet ( P =0.004),shortest postoperative hospital stay ( P =0.023)and the largest number of retrieved lymph nodes( P =0.044),the longest operation time( P <0.001), the most expensive treatment cost( P <0.001),however, there were no significant differences in postoperative drainage, postoperative white blood cell(WBC)count and early complications among three group( P >0.05). In addition to long-term outcome, similar OS was observed in three groups. Conclusion: Compared with LAG and OG, RAG has certain advantages in short-term outcomes and is a safe and reliable surgical method. But still need further prospective, multi-center research to confirm this.


1990 ◽  
Vol 45 (3) ◽  
pp. 169-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoshihiko Maehara ◽  
Sunao Moriguchi ◽  
Yoshihisa Sakaguchi ◽  
Yasunori Emi ◽  
Shunji Kohnoe ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Vol 34 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Atsushi Inaba ◽  
Tomohiro Kadota ◽  
Keiichiro Nishihara ◽  
Daiki Sato ◽  
Keiichiro Nakajo ◽  
...  

Abstract   Endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD) is the standard treatment for cT1a esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC), however its indication for the entire circumferential lesions is still controversial because of the risk of severe stricture after ESD. Therefore, several treatment options are performed based on physicians’ choice, however, each clinical course is unclear. This study aimed to clarify the long-term outcome after ESD for patients with entire circumferential cT1aN0M0 ESCC, comparing with esophagectomy or chemoradiotherapy. Methods Patients with entire circumferential cT1aN0M0 SESCC treated with ESD, chemoradiotherapy, or esophagectomy as the initial treatment between January 2010 and December 2016 in our institution were included. Patients who had a history of any malignancy at cStage II-IV within 5 years were excluded. The 5-year overall survival (OS), 5-year disease-free survival (DFS), stricture rate, refractory stricture rate (defined as requiring &gt;6 dilations), curative resection (defined as pT1a without lymphovascular invasion and negative for vertical margin in the pathological evaluation) rate of ESD, and complete response rate of chemoradiotherapy were evaluated for each treatment. Results Of the 48 eligible patients, 25/13/10 patients were performed ESD/chemoradiotherapy/esophagectomy as an initial treatment. Curative resections rate of ESD was 72%, and additional esophagectomy and chemoradiotherapy were performed in three and one patients with non-curative resection. Complete response rate of chemoradiotherapy was 100%, however, 4 patients had recurrence thereafter. No recurrences occurred after esophagectomy in all patients treated with esophagectomy. During median follow-up of 83 months, stricture and refractory stricture rate was 80/44% after ESD, 0/0% after chemoradiotherapy, and 20/10% after esophagectomy. The 5-year OS/DFS was 91/87% after ESD, 92/59% after chemoradiotherapy, and 90/90% after esophagectomy. Conclusion While some patients required additional treatments due to non-curative resection, the long-term survival after ESD for circumferential cT1aN0M0 ESCC was similar as those after chemoradiotherapy or esophagectomy. In contrast, the stricture and refractory stricture rate after ESD was higher than others. Further investigation in a large cohort is necessary to clarify the indication criteria of ESD for patients with the lesion.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document