scholarly journals Deep brain stimulation for treatment-refractory obsessive compulsive disorder: a systematic review

2014 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sina Kohl ◽  
Deva M Schönherr ◽  
Judy Luigjes ◽  
Damiaan Denys ◽  
Ulf J Mueller ◽  
...  
2021 ◽  
Vol 12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eduardo Varjão Vieira ◽  
Paula Ricci Arantes ◽  
Clement Hamani ◽  
Ricardo Iglesio ◽  
Kleber Paiva Duarte ◽  
...  

Objective: Deep brain stimulation (DBS) was proposed in 1999 to treat refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD). Despite the accumulated experience over more than two decades, 30–40% of patients fail to respond to this procedure. One potential reason to explain why some patients do not improve in the postoperative period is that DBS might not have engaged structural therapeutic networks that are crucial to a favorable outcome in non-responders. This article reviews magnetic resonance imaging diffusion studies (DTI-MRI), analyzing neural networks likely modulated by DBS in OCD patients and their corresponding clinical outcome.Methods: We used a systematic review process to search for studies published from 2005 to 2020 in six electronic databases. Search terms included obsessive-compulsive disorder, deep brain stimulation, diffusion-weighted imaging, diffusion tensor imaging, diffusion tractography, tractography, connectome, diffusion analyses, and white matter. No restriction was made concerning the surgical target, DTI-MRI technique and the method of data processing.Results: Eight studies published in the last 15 years were fully assessed. Most of them used 3 Tesla DTI-MRI, and different methods of data acquisition and processing. There was no consensus on potential structures and networks underlying DBS effects. Most studies stimulated the ventral anterior limb of the internal capsule (ALIC)/nucleus accumbens. However, the contribution of different white matter pathways that run through the ALIC for the effects of DBS remains elusive. Moreover, the improvement of cognitive and affective symptoms in OCD patients probably relies on electric modulation of distinct networks.Conclusion: Though, tractography is a valuable tool to understand neural circuits, the effects of modulating different fiber tracts in OCD are still unclear. Future advances on image acquisition and data processing and a larger number of studies are still required for the understanding of the role of tractography-based targeting and to clarify the importance of different tracts for the mechanisms of DBS.


2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (6) ◽  
pp. 16197-16203
Author(s):  
Luiz Henrique Salamoni Abad ◽  
João Vítor Andrade Fortuna Abrantes ◽  
Dominique Hayduk Montecino ◽  
Gabriel Rodrigues Carvalho ◽  
Laura Assis de Castro Paletta ◽  
...  

Neurosurgery ◽  
2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Amit Azriel ◽  
Sarah Farrand ◽  
Maria Di Biase ◽  
Andrew Zalesky ◽  
Elaine Lui ◽  
...  

AbstractBACKGROUND AND IMPORTANCEObsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) is a disabling psychiatric disorder, mainly treated with psychotherapy and pharmacotherapy. Surgical intervention may be appropriate for patients with treatment-refractory OCD. Deep brain stimulation (DBS) is an alternative for previously common ablative surgical procedures. Tractography has been proposed as a method for individualizing DBS treatment and may have the potential to improve efficacy.CLINICAL PRESENTATIONWe present a patient with treatment-refractory OCD previously treated with bilateral leucotomies, who underwent DBS surgery with targeting informed by tractography. Preoperative tractography to identify suitable DBS targets was undertaken. Structural images were also utilized for standard stereotactic surgical planning. The anteromedial globus pallidus internus (amGPi) was chosen as the target bilaterally after consideration of white matter projections to frontal cortical regions and neurosurgical approach. Bilateral amGPi DBS surgery was undertaken without adverse events. At 16-mo follow-up, there was a 48.5% reduction in OCD symptom severity as measured by the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale.CONCLUSIONThe amGPi can be a successful DBS target for OCD. This is the first known case to report on DBS surgery postleucotomies for OCD and highlights the utility of tractography for surgical planning in OCD.


2010 ◽  
Vol 67 (10) ◽  
pp. 1061 ◽  
Author(s):  
Damiaan Denys ◽  
Mariska Mantione ◽  
Martijn Figee ◽  
Pepijn van den Munckhof ◽  
Frank Koerselman ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Vol 90 (4) ◽  
pp. 469-473 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kevin K Kumar ◽  
Geoffrey Appelboom ◽  
Layton Lamsam ◽  
Arthur L Caplan ◽  
Nolan R Williams ◽  
...  

BackgroundThe safety and efficacy of neuroablation (ABL) and deep brain stimulation (DBS) for treatment refractory obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) has not been examined. This study sought to generate a definitive comparative effectiveness model of these therapies.MethodsA EMBASE/PubMed search of English-language, peer-reviewed articles reporting ABL and DBS for OCD was performed in January 2018. Change in quality of life (QOL) was quantified based on the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the impact of complications on QOL was assessed. Mean response of Y-BOCS was determined using random-effects, inverse-variance weighted meta-analysis of observational data.FindingsAcross 56 studies, totalling 681 cases (367 ABL; 314 DBS), ABL exhibited greater overall utility than DBS. Pooled ability to reduce Y-BOCS scores was 50.4% (±22.7%) for ABL and was 40.9% (±13.7%) for DBS. Meta-regression revealed no significant change in per cent improvement in Y-BOCS scores over the length of follow-up for either ABL or DBS. Adverse events occurred in 43.6% (±4.2%) of ABL cases and 64.6% (±4.1%) of DBS cases (p<0.001). Complications reduced ABL utility by 72.6% (±4.0%) and DBS utility by 71.7% (±4.3%). ABL utility (0.189±0.03) was superior to DBS (0.167±0.04) (p<0.001).InterpretationOverall, ABL utility was greater than DBS, with ABL showing a greater per cent improvement in Y-BOCS than DBS. These findings help guide success thresholds in future clinical trials for treatment refractory OCD.


Neurosurgery ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 65 (CN_suppl_1) ◽  
pp. 118-118
Author(s):  
Darrin J Lee ◽  
Robert Dallapiazza ◽  
Philippe De Vloo ◽  
Gavin Elias ◽  
Anton Fomenko ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document