scholarly journals The value of monitoring data in a process evaluation of hygiene behaviour change in Community Health Clubs to explain findings from a cluster-randomised controlled trial in Rwanda

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Juliet Waterkeyn ◽  
Anthony Waterkeyn ◽  
Fausca Uwingabire ◽  
Julia Pantoglou ◽  
Amans Ntakarutimana ◽  
...  
2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (7) ◽  
pp. e699-e709 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sheela S Sinharoy ◽  
Wolf-Peter Schmidt ◽  
Ronald Wendt ◽  
Leodomir Mfura ◽  
Erin Crossett ◽  
...  

2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Stuart JH Biddle ◽  
Sophie E O'Connell ◽  
Melanie Davies ◽  
David Dunstan ◽  
Charlotte Edwardson ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Office based workers accumulate high amounts of sitting time. SMArT (Stand More AT) Work aimed to reduce occupational sitting time and a cluster randomised controlled trial demonstrated it was successful in achieving this aim. The purpose of this paper is to present the process evaluation of the SMArT Work intervention. Methods Questionnaire data were collected from intervention participants at 6 (n=58) and 12 months (n=55). Questionnaires sought feedback on the different components of the intervention and experiences of evaluation measures. Control participants (n=37) were asked about the impact of the study on their behaviour and any lifestyle changes made during the study. Participants from both arms were invited to focus groups to gain a deeper understanding of their experiences upon completion of 12 month follow up. Results Focus group and questionnaire data showed a positive attitude towards the height-adjustable workstation with a high proportion of participants using it every day (62%). Most participants (92%) felt the education seminar increased their awareness of the health consequences of too much sitting and motivated them to change to their behaviour. Receiving feedback on their sitting time and support from the research team also encouraged behaviour change. The DARMA cushion and action planning/goal setting diary were seen to be less helpful for behaviour change. Benefits experienced included fewer aches and pains, improved cognitive functioning, increased productivity, more energy, and positive feelings about general health. Conclusions Key elements of the programme identified as facilitating behaviour change were: the educational seminar, the height-adjustable workstation, behavioural feedback and regular contact with research staff.


BMJ Open ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 10 (6) ◽  
pp. e033552 ◽  
Author(s):  
April Morrow ◽  
Katherine M Tucker ◽  
Tim J Shaw ◽  
Bonny Parkinson ◽  
Charles Abraham ◽  
...  

IntroductionIn multisite intervention trials, implementation success often varies widely across settings. Process evaluations are crucial to interpreting trial outcomes and understanding contextual factors and causal chains necessary for successful implementation. Lynch syndrome is a hereditary cancer predisposition conferring an increased risk of colorectal, endometrial and other cancer types. Despite systematic screening protocols to identify Lynch syndrome, the condition remains largely underdiagnosed. The Hide and Seek Project (‘HaSP’) is a cluster randomised controlled trial determining the effectiveness of two approaches to improving Lynch syndrome detection at eight Australian hospital networks. To enhance widespread implementation of optimal Lynch syndrome identification, there is a need to understand not only what works, but also why, in what contexts, and at what costs. Here we describe an in-depth investigation of factors influencing successful implementation of procedures evaluated in the HaSP trial.Methods and analysisA mixed-methods, theory-driven process evaluation will be undertaken in parallel to the HaSP trial. Data will include: interviews of Implementation Leads and Lynch syndrome stakeholders, pre–post implementation questionnaires, audio analysis of meetings and focus groups, observation of multidisciplinary team meetings, fidelity checklists and project log analysis. Results will be triangulated and coded, drawing on the Theoretical Domains Framework, Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research and Proctor’s implementation outcomes.Ethics and disseminationUse of a theory-based process evaluation will enhance interpretation and generalisability of HaSP trial findings, and contribute to the implementation research field by furthering understanding of the conditions necessary for implementation success. Ethical approval has been granted and results will be disseminated via publications in peer-reviewed journals and conference presentations. At trial completion, key findings will be fed back to sites to enable refinement of intervention strategies, both in the context of Lynch syndrome and for the possible generalisability of intervention components in other genetic and broader clinical specialties.HaSP trial registration numberAustralian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry (Identifier: ACTRN12618001072202). Registered 27 June 2018. http://www.ANZCTR.org.au/ACTRN12618001072202.aspx.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document