scholarly journals Correction to: Renal dysfunction reduces the diagnostic and prognostic value of serum CC16 for acute respiratory distress syndrome in intensive care patients

2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinle Lin ◽  
Wuyuan Tao ◽  
Jian Wei ◽  
Jian Wu ◽  
Wenwu Zhang ◽  
...  

An amendment to this paper has been published and can be accessed via the original article.

2019 ◽  
Vol 144 (14) ◽  
pp. 978-981 ◽  
Author(s):  
Tobias Bertram Vogt ◽  
Barbara Sensen ◽  
Stefan Kluge

AbstractThe Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome is still a very severe condition in intensive care patients. Prone positioning is known to improve outcome in patients with moderate to severe ARDS. Therefore proning in these patients is nowadays to be regarded as a standard of care. The risks of proning are reasonably low – if proning is done correctly. Therefore a method of proning in a step-by-step-approach is shown in this article.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jinle Lin ◽  
Wuyuan Tao ◽  
Jian Wei ◽  
Wu Jian ◽  
Wenwu Zhang ◽  
...  

Abstract Background: A contradictory tendency between occurrence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) and serum club cell protein 16 (CC16) level, However, renal dysfunction (RD) separately raised serum CC16 in our current observation. The purpose of this study was to find the limitation caused by renal dysfunction in the diagnostic performance of CC16 on ARDS in intensive care unit (ICU) patients. Method: We measured serum CC16 in 479 ICU patients. Patients were divided into six subgroups: control, acute kidney injury (AKI), chronic kidney dysfunction (CKD), ARDS, ARDS+AKI, and ARDS+CKD. The cutoff value, sensitivity and specificity of serum CC16 were assessed by receiver operating characteristic curves. Result: Serum CC16 increased among the ARDS group when compared to the control group, which helps identify ARDS and predicts the outcome in patients with normal renal function. However, level of serum CC16 was similar among ARDS+AKI, ARDS+CKD, AIK and CKD groups. Consequently, when compare to AKI and CKD, specificity for diagnosing whether ARDS or ARDS with renal failure decreased from 86.62% to 2.82% or 81.70% to 2.12%. Consistently, a cutoff value of 11.57 ng/mL was overturned from previously at 32.77 ng/mL or 33.72 ng/mL. Moreover, its predictive value for mortality is prohibited before 7 day but works after 28 day. Conclusion: Renal dysfunction limits the specificity, cutoff point, and predictive value at 7-day mortality of CC16 in diagnosing ARDS among ICU patients.


Author(s):  
Marina Ðarkele ◽  
Agnese Ozoliòa ◽  
Olegs Sabeïòikovs ◽  
Andrejs Ðíesters ◽  
Alise Silova ◽  
...  

Abstract Acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) is common and multi factorial, clinically described as an inflammatory lung disorder that is associated with major morbidity and high mortality in intensive care patients. Recently, investigators have revised the AECC criteria from 1994. To diagnose ARDS and discover its severity we presently use Berlin definition criteria. An important role in developing of ARDS may be through a disbalance between reactive oxygen species (ROS), which have both oxidant and antioxidant compartments. The pathogenesis of ARDS is very complex, and unfortunately, the dynamic development of ARDS in an individual patient is difficult to recognise. ROS can initiate cellular tissue damage by modifying lipids, proteins and DNA, which can seriously compromise cell life ability or induce a large number of cellular responses through generation of secondary reactive species, leading, at last, to cell death by necrosis or apoptosis. Studies have shown that many patients with organ malfunction at admission to the intensive care units (ICU) show decreased antioxidative properties, worsening the harmful effects of lipid peroxidation. That is the reason why predicting development of ARDS has great value for intensive care specialists.


2020 ◽  
pp. e1-e9
Author(s):  
Filippo Binda ◽  
Federica Marelli ◽  
Alessandro Galazzi ◽  
Riccardo Pascuzzo ◽  
Ileana Adamini ◽  
...  

Background At the height of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, Italy had the highest number of deaths in Europe; most occurred in the Lombardy region. Up to 4% of patients with COVID-19 required admission to an intensive care unit because they developed a critical illness (eg, acute respiratory distress syndrome). Numerous patients with acute respiratory distress syndrome who had been admitted to the intensive care unit required rescue therapy like prone positioning. Objectives To describe the respiratory management of and the extensive use of prone positioning in patients with COVID-19 at the intensive care unit hub in Lombardy, Italy. Methods A total of 89 patients (67% male; median age, 59 years [range, 23-80 years]) with confirmed COVID-19 who were admitted between February 23 and March 31, 2020, were enrolled in this quality improvement project. Results Endotracheal intubation was required in 86 patients (97%). Prone positioning was used as rescue therapy in 43 (48%) patients. Significantly more younger patients (age ≤ 59 years) were discharged alive (43 of 48 [90%]) than were older patients (age ≥ 60 years; 26 of 41 [63%]; P < .005). Among the 43 patients treated with prone ventilation, 15 (35% [95% CI, 21%-51%]) died in the intensive care unit, of which 10 (67%; P < .001) were older patients. Conclusions Prone positioning is one strategy available for treating acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with COVID-19. During this pandemic, prone positioning can be used extensively as rescue therapy, per a specific protocol, in intensive care units.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document