scholarly journals Can low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) accelerate bone healing after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures? A retrospective study

2021 ◽  
Vol 22 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Ryo Murakami ◽  
Takaki Sanada ◽  
Miyu Inagawa ◽  
Hiroki Yoshitomi ◽  
Eisaburo Honda ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Intramedullary screw fixation is considered the standard treatment for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound (LIPUS) is a well-known bone-healing enhancement device. However, to the best of our knowledge, no clinical study has focused on the effect of LIPUS for postoperative bone union in proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. This study aimed to investigate the effect of LIPUS treatment after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Methods Between January 2015 and March 2020, patients who underwent intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures were investigated retrospectively. All patients underwent intramedullary screw fixation using a headless compression screw with autologous bone grafts from the base of the fifth metatarsal. The time to restart running and return to sports, as well as that for radiographic bone union, were compared between groups with or without LIPUS treatment. LIPUS treatment was initiated within 3 weeks of surgery in all cases. Results Of the 101 ft analyzed, 57 ft were assigned to the LIPUS treatment group, and 44 ft were assigned to the non-LIPUS treatment group. The mean time to restart running and return to sports was 6.8 and 13.7 weeks in the LIPUS treatment group and was 6.2 and 13.2 weeks in the non-LIPUS treatment group, respectively. There were no significant differences in these parameters between groups. In addition, the mean time to radiographic bone union was not significantly different between the LIPUS treatment group (11.9 weeks) and the non-LIPUS treatment group (12.0 weeks). The rate of postoperative nonunion in the LIPUS treatment group was 0% (0/57), while that in the non-LIPUS treatment group was 4.5% (2/44). However, this difference was not statistically significant. Conclusions There were no statistically significant differences regarding the time to start running, return to sports, and radiographic bone union in patients with or without LIPUS treatment after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures. Therefore, we cannot recommend the routine use of LIPUS to shorten the time to bone union after intramedullary screw fixation for proximal fifth metatarsal stress fractures.

2017 ◽  
Vol 39 (2) ◽  
pp. 250-258 ◽  
Author(s):  
David A. Porter

Fifth metatarsal fractures, otherwise known as “Jones” fractures, occur commonly in athletes and nonathletes alike. While recent occurrence in the popular elite athlete has increased public knowledge and interest in the fracture, this injury is common at all levels of sport. This review will focus on all three types of Jones fractures. The current standard for treatment is operative intervention with intramedullary screw fixation. Athletes typically report an acute episode of lateral foot pain, described as an ache. Radiographic imaging with multiple views of the weightbearing injured foot are needed to confirm diagnosis. If these images are inconclusive, further magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) or computed tomography (CT) is used. Nonoperative treatment is not commonly used as the sole treatment, except when following reinjury of a stable screw fixation. While screw selection is still controversial, operative treatment with intramedullary screw fixation is the standard approach. Technical tips on screw displacement are provided for Torg (types I, II, III) fractures, cavovarus foot fractures, recurrent fractures, revision surgery, occult fractures/high-grade stress reactions, and Jones’ variants. Excellent clinical outcomes can be expected in 80% to 100% of patients when using the intramedullary screw fixation to “fit and fill” the medullary canal with threads across the fracture site. Most studies show the timing for return to sports with optimal healing to be seven to twelve weeks after fixation. Level of Evidence: Level V, expert opinion.


2012 ◽  
Vol 40 (11) ◽  
pp. 2578-2582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masashi Nagao ◽  
Yoshitomo Saita ◽  
So Kameda ◽  
Hiroaki Seto ◽  
Ryo Sadatsuki ◽  
...  

Background: Internal fixation is advocated as the primary treatment for fifth metatarsal Jones fractures in athletes; however, screw insertion site discomfort and refracture can occur especially in competitive athletes. The ideal implant has not been determined. Hypothesis: Headless compression screw fixation of proximal fifth metatarsal Jones fractures is an effective treatment approach especially in competitive athletes. Study Design: Case series; Evidence level, 4. Methods: We studied 60 athletes treated surgically with a headless compression screw for fifth metatarsal Jones fractures (mean age, 19 years). The mean follow-up time was 178 weeks. We evaluated the clinical and radiographic outcomes of headless compression screw fixation of Jones fractures. Results: All athletes returned to full activity. The mean time to start running after surgery was 6.3 weeks (range, 3-12.7 weeks), and the mean time to full activity after surgery was 11.2 weeks (range, 6-25 weeks). One athlete suffered a delayed union, which healed uneventfully. One athlete suffered a nonunion and underwent reoperation for a screw exchange to an autogenous bone graft harvested from the iliac crest. No screw breakage was reported. No athlete suffered a refracture or discomfort in the screw insertion site. Conclusion: Headless compression screw fixation of fifth metatarsal Jones fractures provided excellent results, allowing athletes to return to full activity without both screw insertion site irritation and clinical refracture.


2021 ◽  
pp. 036354652199380
Author(s):  
Tim Hoenig ◽  
Adam S. Tenforde ◽  
André Strahl ◽  
Tim Rolvien ◽  
Karsten Hollander

Background: While some studies have failed to reveal any significant relationship between magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) grading and return to sports after bone stress injuries, others have reported either a linear or nonlinear relationship. Purpose: To evaluate the prognostic value of MRI grading for time to return to sports and rate of return to sports after bone stress injuries. Study Design: Systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: A systematic search was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Google Scholar. Studies reporting return to sports data after bone stress injuries using MRI grading systems were included in this review. The risk of bias was evaluated using the Quality in Prognosis Studies tool. Meta-analyses were performed to summarize the mean time to return to sports. The Pearson correlation was used to determine the relationship between time to return to sports and MRI grade. A meta-analysis of proportions was conducted to determine the percentage of athletes who successfully returned to sports. Results: A total of 16 studies with 560 bone stress injuries met inclusion criteria. Higher MRI-based grading was associated with an increased time to return to sports ( P < .00001). Pooled data revealed that higher MRI-based grading correlated with a longer time to return to sports ( r = 0.554; P = .001). Combining all anatomic locations, the mean time to return to sports was 41.7 days (95% CI, 30.6-52.9), 70.1 days (95% CI, 46.9-93.3), 84.3 days (95% CI, 59.6-109.1), and 98.5 days (95% CI, 85.5-112.6) for grade 1, 2, 3, and 4 injuries, respectively. Trabecular-rich sites of injury (eg, pelvis, femoral neck, and calcaneus) took longer to heal than cortical-rich sites of injury (eg, tibia, metatarsal, and other long-bone sites of injury). Overall, more than 90% of all athletes successfully returned to sports. Conclusion: The findings from this systematic review indicate that MRI grading may offer a prognostic value for time to return to sports after the nonsurgical treatment of bone stress injuries. Both MRI grade and location of injury suggest that individually adapted rehabilitation regimens and therapeutic decisions are required to optimize healing and a safe return to sports.


2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 419-427 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ki Won Young ◽  
Jin Su Kim ◽  
Hong Sup Lee ◽  
Hyuk Jegal ◽  
Young Uk Park ◽  
...  

Background: The treatment of fifth metatarsal stress fractures can be challenging. Various operative fixation methods have been reported for fracture management. Among them, intramedullary screw fixation has become increasingly popular. However, recent reports have described failures after screw fixation in athletes. The aim of this study was to determine the rates of clinical and radiographic healing, time to return to sport, and complications of elite athletes with proximal fifth metatarsal fractures treated with plantar plating. Methods: Thirty-eight athletes with fifth metatarsal stress fractures treated using a plantar plating technique in 3 hospitals from 2013 to 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Demographic data, radiographic evaluation, and the time until union and return to sports activities were collected and analyzed. A total of 38 patients underwent the plantar plating for a fifth metatarsal stress fracture with a mean follow-up of 23 (range, 12-49) months. Results: The mean time to the radiologic union, as determined by plain radiography, was 9.3 (range, 8-16) weeks. Although there were no nonunions or delayed unions during follow-up, 4 refractures developed (10.5%). All but 1 patient were able to return to their previous levels of sporting activity at 22.2 ± 4.5 (range, 12-40) weeks. Conclusion: With a minimum of 1-year follow-up, the described plantar plating technique could be an alternative method for the operative treatment of fifth metatarsal stress fractures without nonunion problems. Level of Evidence: Level IV, case series.


Author(s):  
Fahad Tanveer ◽  
Syed Asadullah Arslan ◽  
Haider Darain ◽  
Ashfaq Ahmad ◽  
Syed Amir Gilani ◽  
...  

Objective: To systematically review the role of low-intensity pulsed ultrasound on lumbar spondylolysis. Method: Literature search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, Web of Science, PEDro and Scopus databases to identify relevant studies published between 2010 and 2020 by using medical subject headings and applying Booleans, such as low-intensity pulsed ultrasound OR interventional ultrasound AND lumbar spine OR lumbar region AND spondylolysis OR stress fracture. Unpublished studies were hand-searched in the journals, abstracts of conferences were reviewed, and citation index was used for searching experts in the field and then contacting them for information. Studies included were the ones that had at least one of the following outcomes: bone union rate, treatment period to bone union and time to return to previous activities. Results: Of the 243 studies identified, 228(94%) were full text articles and only 2(0.8%) studies were critically appraised for qualitative synthesis based on bone union rate, treatment period to bone union, and time to return to previous activities. Conclusion: Low-intensity pulsed ultrasound was found to be effective for bone union and a useful therapy for quick return to playing sports in patients with lumbar spondylolysis. Key Words: Lumbar region, Spondylolysis, Interventional ultrasound, Systematic review.


The Knee ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 50-53 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nobuyuki Kumahashi ◽  
Yuji Uchio ◽  
Junji Iwasa ◽  
Kenzo Kawasaki ◽  
Nobuo Adachi ◽  
...  

2018 ◽  
Vol 6 (12_suppl5) ◽  
pp. 2325967118S0019
Author(s):  
Juan Pablo Zicaro ◽  
Carlos Yacuzzi ◽  
Nicolas Garrido ◽  
Ignacio Garcia-Mansilla ◽  
Matias Costa-Paz

Objectives The purpose of our study was to evaluate the clinical outcomes and failure rate of a series of patients who underwent meniscal repair with a minimum two-years of follow-up. Methods We retrospectively reviewed patients treated with meniscal repair between 2004 and 2016. We included patients with at least 2 years of follow-up. Surgical details such as the affected menisci, type of rupture and meniscal repair technique used were analyzed. Clinical and functional outcomes were evaluated using Lysholm and IKDC scores. Patients were studied with x-rays and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI). We analyzed the failure rate (defined as a re-rupture that required surgery). We compared failure rate for isolated meniscal repair vs associated with Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR). Also we compared patients operated before and after 2014. Results One hundred sixty nine patients were operated during that period of time. Ten patients did not meet inclusion criteria and forty were lost in follow-up. Out of the 119 patients evaluated, 35 had bucket-handle lesions, 25 tears in the posterior horn treated with all inside sutures and 59 body and posterior horn lesions treated with a combined suture technique. The mean postoperative Lysholm score was 85 (SD 14) and IKDC 70 (SD 10). The mean return to sports time was 8 months (range 2-19). An MRI was performed in 71 patients. The overall failure rate was 21% (24 /119) at a mean time of 20 months (range 2-60 months) and 26% (9/35) for bucket-handle lesions at a mean time of 21 months (range 2-60 months). Failure rate for the 48 isolated lesions was 20% at a mean of 23 months and 19% for 70 associated to ACLR at a mean of 17 months (p=0.53). Isolated bucket-handle lesions had failure rate of 27% at a mean of 27 months and when associated to ACLR this was 23% at a mean of 12 months (p=1.0) Overall failure rate for patients treated before 2014 was 27% (18/67) and 12% after 2014 (6/52) (p=0.03). For bucket-handle lesions before 2014 was 36% (8/23) and 8% after 2014 (1/12) (p=0.03). Isolated bucket-handle lesions failure rate was 45% (5/11) before 2014 and 0% (0/7) after 2014 (p=0.01) and when associated to ACLR, it was 25% (3/12) before 2014 and 20% (1/5) after 2014 (p=0.09). Conclusion Overall failure rate of our series was 21%. We found no differences between isolated lesions and associated to ACLR. There was a statistically significant difference regarding failure rate results for those operated before and after 2014. This might be the result of an improvement in the surgical devices, modifications in the technique and the number of sutures for each procedure.


2019 ◽  
Vol 70 (1) ◽  
pp. 49-53
Author(s):  
Mohammad-Reza Beyranvand ◽  
Soleyman Farrokhi ◽  
Hassan Peyvandi ◽  
Kambiz Soltaninejad ◽  
Shahin Shadnia

AbstractCardiovascular toxicity is the most common cause of fatality in the first 24 hours of poisoning with aluminium phosphide (AlP). Most often manifesting itself in cardiac dysrhythmias. The aim of this study was to evaluate the benefits of amiodarone prophylaxis against cardiac dysrhythmia in 46 patients with acute AlP poisoning. They were divided in two groups of 23: one receiving amiodarone and the other not (control). The treatment group received amiodarone prophylaxis in the initial intravenous bolus dose of 150 mg, followed by a drip of 1 mg/min for six hours and then of 0.5 mg/min for eighteen hours. Both groups were Holter-monitored for 24 hours since admission. Save for amiodarone, both groups received the same standard treatment. Amiodarone had a significant beneficial effect in reducing the frequency of ST-segment elevation and ventricular fibrillation plus atrial fibrillation (P=0.02 and P=0.01, respectively), but the groups did not differ significantly in mortality (9 vs 11 patients, respectively). The mean time between ICU admission and death (survival time) was significantly longer in the treatment group (22 vs 10 h, respectively; P=0.03). Regardless its obvious limitations, our study suggests that even though amiodarone alone did not reduce mortality, it may provide enough time for antioxidant therapy to tip the balance in favour of survival and we therefore advocate its prophylactic use within the first 24 h of AlP poisoning.


2007 ◽  
Vol 7 (3) ◽  
pp. 287-292 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jayshree Tuli ◽  
Sagun Tuli ◽  
Marc E. Eichler ◽  
Eric J. Woodard

Object In this paper, the authors compare the long-term outcomes of translaminar facet screw fixation (TFSF) and pedicle screw fixation (PSF) in the treatment of degenerative lumbosacral disease. Methods This prospective analytical study was performed to compare the long-term outcomes of TFSF and PSF for degenerative lumbosacral disease. Outcomes were defined as the need for reoperation for the development of a nonunion, end-fusion degeneration, or for explantation of hardware. Results A total of 77 patients were analyzed. Thirty-seven patients underwent PSF and 40 received TFSF. Twenty-three of the 77 patients required a reoperation: 13 (32.5%) of the 40 patients in the TFSF group and 10 (27%) of the 37 the patients in the PSF group. The overall mean time to reoperation (regardless of outcome) was 4.05 years. For patients in the TFSF group the mean time to reoperation was 2.94 years, whereas it was 4.35 years in the PSF group (p = 0.34). Nonunion was noted in seven of the 40 patients in the TFSF group and one of 37 in the PSF group. The mean time to surgery for nonunion for patients in the TFSF group was 3.46 years and for those in the PSF group it was 6.27 years (p = 0.04). Surgery for end-fusion degeneration was performed in two patients in the TFSF group and five in the PSF group (p = 0.43). Explantation of hardware was performed in two patients with TFSF and four patients with PSF. Multivariable analysis revealed a statistically significant difference in the time to surgery for nonunion between PSF and TFSF (p = 0.048), with a hazard ratio of 0.097 (95% confidence interval 0.01–0.98). Conclusions Findings from the current prospective study suggest that there is an increased risk of requirement for a reoperation for nonunion among TFSF cases compared with PSF cases.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document