scholarly journals The white test for intraoperative screening of bile leakage: a potential trigger factor for acute pancreatitis after liver resection—a case series

BMC Surgery ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Sophie Chopinet ◽  
Emilie Bollon ◽  
Jean-François Hak ◽  
Laurent Reydellet ◽  
Valéry Blasco ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Acute pancreatitis after liver resection is a rare but serious complication, and few cases have been described in the literature. Extended lymphadenectomy, and long ischemia due to the Pringle maneuver could be responsible of post-liver resection acute pancreatitis, but the exact causes of AP after hepatectomy remain unclear. Cases presentation We report here three cases of AP after hepatectomy and we strongly hypothesize that this is due to the bile leakage white test. 502 hepatectomy were performed at our center and 3 patients (0.6%) experienced acute pancreatitis after LR and all of these three patients underwent the white test at the end of the liver resection. None underwent additionally lymphadenectomy to the liver resection. All patient had a white-test during the liver surgery. We identified distal implantation of the cystic duct in these three patients as a potential cause for acute pancreatitis. Conclusion The white test is useful for detection of bile leakage after liver resection, but we do not recommend a systematic use after LR, because severe acute pancreatitis can be lethal for the patient, especially in case of distal cystic implantation which may facilitate reflux in the main pancreatic duct.

QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amr Ahmed Abd-Elaal Mahmoud ◽  
Hatem Sayed Saber ◽  
Mahmoud Mohamed Elsayed Ibrahim

Abstract Background Intra-operative bile leakage testing is very important in partial liver resection in living donor liver transplant as it allows detection of bile leaking points on the cut surface and decreases postoperative bile leak which is one of the most dreadful complication following liver transplant surgery. In this study we tried to assess the Effectiveness of White test versus conventional saline test in minimizing biliary leak in partial liver resection in living donor liver transplant. Objective In this study, we assess whether the White test is better than the conventional saline test for the intraoperative detection of biliary leakage in patients who will undergo partial liver resection as living donor liver transplant. Methodology In this study, we assess whether the White test is better than the conventional saline test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage in patients who underwent partial liver resection as a living donor liver transplant. This study included 60 patients who received partial liver resection as a living donor liver transplant. The conventional saline test (injecting an isotonic sodium chloride solution through the cystic duct) was carried out in 30 patients and the White test (injecting a fat emulsion solution through the cystic duct) was carried out in 30 patients Results Incidence of postoperative bile leakage was compared between the conventional method and the White test. Bile leakage occurred in 8 patients (26.7%) in the conventional method group and in 2 patients (6.7%) in the White test group. In addition, the White test detected intraoperative a significantly higher number of bile leakage sites compared with the conventional method. The White test is better than the conventional test for the intraoperative detection of bile leakage. Conclusion Based on our study, we recommend that surgeons investigating bile leakage sites during liver resections should use the White test instead of the conventional saline test.


BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (7) ◽  
pp. e049449
Author(s):  
Alessandra Cristaudi ◽  
Ignazio Tarantino ◽  
Andreas Scheiwiller ◽  
Andrea Wiencierz ◽  
Pietro Majno-Hurst ◽  
...  

IntroductionBile leakage is a frequent complication after liver resection associated with the need of interventional drainage, endoscopic retrograde cholangio pancreatography (ERCP) or reoperation. The intraoperative application of the white test could be a promising strategy to reduce the occurrence of bile leakages. Therefore, we propose to conduct the first multicentric randomised controlled trial with rate of postoperative bile leakage as primary endpoint with and without the white test.Methods and analysisThe Bile-Leakage Trial trial is an investigator-initiated randomised controlled, parallel group, double-blinded, multicentric, superiority trial in four Swiss centres. A total of 210 patients undergoing a resection of at least 2 liver segments will be randomly allocated intraoperatively to either the intervention (identification of open bile ducts with administration of 20–40 mL SMOFlipid5% in the bile tract) or the control group (identification with a white gauze on the liver resection surface).Primary outcome will be the comparison of the postoperative bile leakage rate in both groups within 30 days after liver resection, defined according to the classification of the International Study Group of Liver Surgery. Secondary outcomes will be operative and postoperative complication, including severity grade of the bile leakage, rate of ERCP, interventional drainage, morbidity, intensive care unit stay, and mortality.Ethics and disseminationThe cantonal ethics committees of all participating centres and Swissmedic approved the study. SMOFlipid20% consists of a mixture of oils, no side effects resulting from the intraoperative application of 20–40 mL in the biliary tract with consecutive enteral absorption are expected nor are side effects described in the literature. SMOFlipid20% will be diluted intraoperatively with isotonic saline solution to a concentration of 5%. The results of the BiLe-Trial will be submitted to a peer-reviewed journal regardless of the outcome. As this is an investigator-initiated trial, data are property of the sponsor investigator and can be obtained on request.Trial registration numberClinicaltrials.gov, ID: NCT04523701. Registered on 25 August 2020.Swiss National Clinical Trials Portal (SNCTP), ID: SNCTP000004200. Registered on 20 January 2021.Protocol versionV3.2_14-12-2020_clean.pdf


QJM ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 114 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Hesham Hasan Wagdi ◽  
Ahmed Khalil ◽  
Hatem Sayed Saber ◽  
Karim Mohamed Gamal Elden

Abstract Background Hepatic surgery will be always one of the most challenging surgical procedures due to its anatomical and pathophysiologic varieties. Various problems may complicate the post-operative course. Bile leak remains a serious complication after hepatectomy. Bile leaks can significantly impact morbidity, mortality, and cost of treatment. Bile leak increases risk of sepsis, need for further intervention, either radiological or return to theatre, prolongs duration of intensive care unit and hospital stay, and can precipitate liver failure and death. Objective To assess the post-operative bile leak complication after using white test versus conventional saline test Patients and Methods A prospective study on 50 Hepatectomy cases divided into two groups, the first group consist of 25 cases using white test and the second group consist of 25 cases using conventional saline test from January 2019 to January 2020, at Hepatobiliary unit of the general surgery department of Ain Shams university hospitals. Results The White test has clear advantages in comparison with other bile leakage tests: it precisely detects bile leakages, regardless of size; it does not stain the resection surface, allowing it to be washed off and repeated ad infinitum; and it is safe, quick, and inexpensive. The white test is a feasible and sensitive bile leakage test with no obvious disadvantages. It could be a possible standardized method to prevent bile leakage in major liver resection. Conclusion Now after we discussed our study and reviewed other opinions discussing the optimal methods for intraoperative bile leakage testing, we have now settled on White test using fat emulsion solution to be best of all tests.


2021 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
pp. 98-103
Author(s):  
Agnieszka Pawłowska-Kamieniak ◽  
Paulina Krawiec ◽  
Elżbieta Pac-Kożuchowska

Acute pancreatitis (AP) appears to be rare disease in childhood. In children, it has a different aetiology and course, and requires different management than in adult patients. The diagnosis of AP is based on at least two of the three criteria, which include typical clinical symptoms, abnormalities in laboratory tests and/or imaging studies of the pancreas. There are many known causes leading to AP in children including infections, blunt abdominal trauma, genetic factors, gallstone disease, metabolic disorders, anatomical defects of the pancreas, systemic diseases, as well as drugs, including antiepileptic drugs, and especially preparations of valproic acid. In our study, we present four cases of young patients diagnosed with acute pancreatitis as a complication of valproic acid therapy and we present a review of the literature. We believe that the activity of pancreatic enzymes should be monitored in children treated with valproate preparations in the case of clinical symptoms suggesting AP.


BMC Neurology ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Qiaoyu Gong ◽  
Shuping Liu ◽  
Yin Liu ◽  
Jiajia Yao ◽  
Xiujuan Fu ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Surgery is a potential trigger of Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a disorder which leads to an autoimmune-mediated attack of peripheral nerves. The present study was designed to explore clinical features of post-surgical GBS compared with those of general GBS in order to provide better clinical advice to patients undergoing surgery. Methods The medical records of GBS patients who were seen at 31 tertiary hospitals in southern China between January 1, 2013 and September 30, 2016 were retrospectively analyzed. Post-surgical GBS was defined as symptoms of GBS within 6 weeks after surgery. Clinical features of post-surgical GBS are described and are compared with general GBS. Results Among the 1001 GBS patient cases examined in this study, 45 (4.5%) patient cases exhibited symptoms of GBS within 6 weeks of undergoing surgery. Within this group, 36 (80.0%) patients developed initial symptoms of limb weakness. The average interval between surgery and symptom onset was 13.31 days. The most common type of surgery which triggered GBS was orthopedic surgery, followed by neurological surgery. Compared to general GBS, post-surgical GBS was characterized by a higher proportion of severe patients (Hughes functional grading scale (HFGS) score ≥ 3) upon admission and at nadir, higher HFGS scores at discharge, and longer hospital stays. Post-surgical GBS patients also had a significantly higher frequency of the acute motor axonal neuropathy subtype (37.9 vs. 14.2, respectively; P = 0.001). Conclusion Surgery is probably a potential trigger factor for GBS, especially orthopedic surgery. Infections secondary to surgery may play a role. The possibility of preceding (post-operative) infections was not excluded in this study. Clinical presentation of post-surgical GBS is characterized by a more severe course and poorer prognosis, and should be closely monitored. Trial registration chicTR-RRc-17,014,152.


Dose-Response ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 155932582090235
Author(s):  
Shih-Wei Lai ◽  
Cheng-Chan Yu ◽  
Cheng-Li Lin ◽  
Kuan-Fu Liao

Background/Objective: Some case series and case report have shown the association between the risk of acute pancreatitis and use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. The results of systematic studies were not consistent. Methods: A meta-analysis was performed to investigate the risk of acute pancreatitis associated with use of selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors. Results: There was no statistical association between the risk of acute pancreatitis and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors use (odds ratio: 1.19, 95% confidence interval: 0.93-1.51). Conclusions: Despite reaching no statistical significance, the possibility of the association between the risk of acute pancreatitis and selective serotonin reuptake inhibitors use cannot be totally excluded.


2017 ◽  
Vol 11 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-363 ◽  
Author(s):  
Omar Nadhem ◽  
Omar Salh

Acute pancreatitis is an important cause of acute upper abdominal pain. Because its clinical features are similar to a number of other acute illnesses, it is difficult to make a diagnosis only on the basis of symptoms and signs. The diagnosis of acute pancreatitis is based on 2 of the following 3 criteria: (1) abdominal pain consistent with pancreatitis, (2) serum lipase and/or amylase ≥3 times the upper limit of normal, and (3) characteristic findings from abdominal imaging. The sensitivity and specificity of lipase in diagnosing acute pancreatitis are undisputed. However, normal lipase level should not exclude a pancreatitis diagnosis. In patients with atypical pancreatitis presentation, imaging is needed. We experienced two cases of acute pancreatitis associated with normal serum enzyme levels. Both patients were diagnosed based on clinical and radiological evidence. They were successfully treated with intravenous fluids and analgesics with clinical and laboratory improvement. The importance of this case series is the unlikely presentation of acute pancreatitis. We believe that more research is needed to determine the exact proportion of acute pancreatitis patients who first present with normal serum lipase, since similar cases have been seen in case reports.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document