scholarly journals Dental implant care and trouble among dependent patients based on the questionnaire survey among Japanese dental practitioners

2020 ◽  
Vol 20 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Sato ◽  
Shigeto Koyama ◽  
Chikahiro Ohkubo ◽  
Shin Ogura ◽  
Ryutaro Kamijo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Japanese Society ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Actual State ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
Care Problems ◽  
Implant Treatment

Abstract Background Self-care and professional care of implants may prove difficult for elderly people who require nursing care. However, the actual state of care and problems remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the actual state of implant problems in elderly people living in their own home or in a nursing home who received visiting dental treatment. Methods We mailed questionnaire survey forms to 2339 representatives or specialists who were members of the Japanese Society of Oral Implantology, the Japanese Society of Gerodontology or the Japan Prosthodontic Society. We narrowed down the respondents to those who provided visiting dental treatment, and analyzed the actual state of implants observed during visiting dental treatment (type, care, problems, countermeasures, etc.). Results Of the 924 dentists who responded to the questionnaire survey, 291 (22%) provided visiting dental treatment. While the majority of implant types encountered in the previous 12 months were root-form implants, there were still a certain number of blade and subperiosteal implants. Daily implant care involved mostly cleaning with a toothbrush + auxiliary tools. The most frequent implant problems encountered in the past were difficulty in cleaning and peri-implantitis. Medication and antiphlogistic treatment were most frequently adopted as countermeasures to implant problems, followed by observation. When we classified the results into those for the dentists who provided implant treatment and those for the dentists who did not, we found that many of the dentists who did not provide implant treatment opted for observation or medication, while those who provided implant treatment also implemented removal of superstructure, retightening of screws, repair and so forth. Conclusions We found that many of the implant troubles encountered by dentists who provided visiting dental care were difficulty in cleaning or peri-implantitis, and that the actions taken against these troubles varied depending on the experience of the dentist performing the implant treatment. Our study also revealed that dentists who provide visiting dental care need to acquire knowledge and skills of implant treatment, to have actions prepared in case they encounter such cases, or to closely coordinate with dentists who specialize in implants.

scholarly journals Dental implant care and trouble among dependent patients based on the questionnaire survey among Japanese dental practitioners

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Sato ◽  
Shigeto Koyama ◽  
Chikahiro Ohkubo ◽  
Shin Ogura ◽  
Ryutaro Kamijo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Japanese Society ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Actual State ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
Care Problems ◽  
Implant Treatment

Abstract BackgroundSelf-care and professional care of implants may prove difficult for elderly people who require nursing care. However, the actual state of care and problems remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the actual state of implant problems in elderly people living in their own home or in a nursing home who received visiting dental treatment. MethodsWe mailed questionnaire survey forms to 2339 representatives or specialists who were members of the Japanese Society of Oral Implantology, the Japanese Society of Gerodontology or the Japan Prosthodontic Society. We narrowed down the respondents to those who provided visiting dental treatment, and analyzed the actual state of implants observed during visiting dental treatment (type, care, problems, countermeasures, etc.). ResultsOf the 924 dentists who responded to the questionnaire survey, 291 (22%) provided visiting dental treatment. While the majority of implant types encountered in the previous 12 months were root-form implants, there were still a certain number of blade and subperiosteal implants. Daily implant care involved mostly cleaning with a toothbrush + auxiliary tools. The most frequent implant problems encountered in the past were difficulty in cleaning and peri-implantitis. Medication and antiphlogistic treatment were most frequently adopted as countermeasures to implant problems, followed by observation. When we classified the results into those for the dentists who provided implant treatment and those for the dentists who did not, we found that many of the dentists who did not provide implant treatment opted for observation or medication, while those who provided implant treatment also implemented removal of superstructure, retightening of screws, repair and so forth. Conclusions We found that many of the implant troubles encountered by dentists who provided visiting dental care were difficulty in cleaning or peri-implantitis, and that the actions taken against these troubles varied depending on the experience of the dentist performing the implant treatment. Our study also revealed that dentists who provide visiting dental care need to acquire knowledge and skills of implant treatment, to have actions prepared in case they encounter such cases, or to closely coordinate with dentists who specialize in implants.

scholarly journals Maintenance considerations in elderly dependent patients with implants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Sato ◽  
Shigeto Koyama ◽  
Chikahiro Ohkubo ◽  
Shin Ogura ◽  
Ryutaro Kamijo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Japanese Society ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Actual State ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Care Problems ◽  
Implant Treatment ◽  
Oral Implantology

Abstract Background Self-care and professional care of implants may prove difficult for elderly people who require nursing care. However, the actual state of care and problems remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the actual state of implant problems in elderly people living in their own home or in a nursing home who received visiting dental treatment. Methods We mailed questionnaire survey forms to 2339 representatives or specialists who were members of the Japanese Society of Oral Implantology, the Japanese Society of Gerodontology or the Japan Prosthodontic Society. We narrowed down the respondents to those who provided visiting dental treatment, and analyzed the actual state of implants observed during visiting dental treatment (type, care, problems, countermeasures, etc.). Results Of the 924 dentists who responded to the questionnaire survey, 291 (22%) provided visiting dental treatment . While the majority of implant types encountered in the previous 12 months were root-form implants, there were still a certain number of blade and subperiosteal implants. Daily implant care involved mostly cleaning with a toothbrush + auxiliary tools. The most frequent implant problems encountered in the past were difficulty in cleaning and peri-implantitis. Medication and antiphlogistic treatment were most frequently adopted as countermeasures to implant problems, followed by observation. When we classified the results into those for the dentists who provided implant treatment and those for the dentists who did not, we found that many of the dentists who did not provide implant treatment opted for observation or medication, while those who provided implant treatment also implemented removal of superstructure, retightening of screws, repair and so forth. Conclusions We found that many of the implant troubles encountered by dentists who provided visiting dental care were difficulty in cleaning or peri-implantitis, and that the actions taken against these troubles varied depending on the experience of the dentist performing the implant treatment. Our study also revealed that dentists who provide visiting dental care need to acquire knowledge and skills of implant treatment, to have actions prepared in case they encounter such cases, or to closely coordinate with dentists who specialize in implants.

scholarly journals Maintenance considerations in elderly dependent patients with implants

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuji Sato ◽  
Shigeto Koyama ◽  
Chikahiro Ohkubo ◽  
Shin Ogura ◽  
Ryutaro Kamijo ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Questionnaire Survey ◽  
Japanese Society ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Actual State ◽  
Field Surveys ◽  
Treatment Type ◽  
Care Problems ◽  
Implant Treatment ◽  
Oral Implantology

Abstract Background Self-care and professional care of implants may prove difficult for elderly people who require nursing care. However, the actual state of care and problems remains unknown. In this study, we investigated the actual state of implant problems in elderly people living in their own home or in a nursing home who received visiting dental treatment due to their inability to visit a dental clinic.MethodsWe mailed questionnaire survey forms to 2339 representatives or specialists who were members of the Japanese Society of Oral Implantology, the Japanese Society of Gerodontology or the Japan Prosthodontic Society. We narrowed down the respondents to those who provided visiting dental treatment, and analyzed the actual state of implants observed during visiting dental treatment (type, care, problems, countermeasures, etc.).ResultsOf the 924 dentists who responded to the questionnaire survey, 291 (22%) provided visiting dental treatment. While the majority of implant types encountered in the previous 12 months were root-form implants, there were still a certain number of blade and subperiosteal implants. Daily implant care involved mostly cleaning with a toothbrush + auxiliary tools (such as interdental brushes). The most frequent implant problems encountered in the past were difficulty in cleaning and peri-implantitis. Medication and antiphlogistic treatment were most frequently adopted as countermeasures to implant problems, followed by observation. When we classified the results into those for the dentists who provided implant treatment and those for the dentists who did not, we found that many of the dentists who did not provide implant treatment opted for observation or medication, while those who provided implant treatment also implemented removal of the upper structure, retightening of screws, repair and so forth.Conclusions Since this survey was a questionnaire survey, future field surveys are necessary, it may be necessary for dentists who provide visiting dental treatment to acquire knowledge and skills for implant treatment or coordinate closely with experts.

scholarly journals Exploring Dentist Opinions on the Provision of Intravenous Sedation in Primary Dental Care for UK Armed Forces Personnel

2019 ◽  
Vol 185 (7-8) ◽  
pp. e1187-e1192
Author(s):  
Dave Edwards ◽  
Richard Ramsey ◽  
John Breeze ◽  
Mark Dermont
Keyword(s):  
Dental Care ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Dental Anxiety ◽  
Armed Forces ◽  
Operational Experience ◽  
Aeromedical Evacuation ◽  
Routine Treatment ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
The Uk ◽  
Military Patients

Abstract Introduction: Anxiety toward dental treatment can lead to preventable morbidity, most notably oral pain and infection. This is of concern to the UK Armed Forces (UK AF), as dental care may not be immediately accessible during deployments and exercises, necessitating aeromedical evacuation. Current Defence Policy states that serving UK AF personnel requiring sedation to tolerate routine dental treatment are to have their Joint Medical Employment Standard (JMES) reviewed to restrict their deployability and employability. This article explores current sedation delivery, dentist opinion, and adherence to policy. Materials and Methods: The total number and type of intravenous (IV) sedation appointments over a 6-month period was assessed using surgical logbooks. Questionnaires were sent to all dentists in primary care responsible for treating military patients to ascertain their attitudes toward the requirement for sedation in support of recruitment and deployability. Ten-year retrospective data analyses were used to identify current trends in sedation use in the UK AF. Results: Responses were received from 117/137 (85%) dentists. All of the responding Civilian Dental Practitioners felt that there was a requirement for IV sedation in contrast to the Royal Navy (RN), where over a quarter (28%) disagreed. The majority, 48 (81%), of Army dentists felt that military patients unable to tolerate routine treatment under local anesthesia alone should not deploy on operations, compared with 7 (63%) of their civilian counterparts. Overall, 72 (62%) respondents felt that patients unable to tolerate routine treatment without sedation should not be recruited. Conclusions: Civilian Dental Practitioners in the sample indicated that they were less likely to recommend a patient for JMES review, less likely to prevent patients from deploying and less likely to believe that individuals requiring sedation for routine treatment should not be recruited into the UK AF. These attitudes are contrary to current Defence direction and could increase the risk of UK AF personnel experiencing morbidity on deployment requiring aeromedical evacuation. Over the longer term, civilianization of Defence dentistry is likely to reduce collective operational experience and Defence must ensure that clinicians understand the management of anxious patients in the military context and their responsibilities in relation to JMES. Furthermore, policy limiting the recruitment of personnel with significant dental anxiety is not being robustly adhered to. Based on the number of dental procedures undertaken under IV sedation in the UK AF, consistent application of this policy would not affect recruitment at an organizational level, but would limit the risk of deploying these personnel. Further work is required to understand dental anxiety within the UK Armed Forces so that the operational morbidity risks can be quantified and provision appropriately planned.

Dental care for elderly people by general dental practitioners

BDJ ◽  
1990 ◽  
Vol 168 (3) ◽  
pp. 108-112 ◽  
Author(s):  
F A Hamilton ◽  
D W Sarll ◽  
A A Grant ◽  
H V Worthington
Keyword(s):  
Elderly People ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Dental Practitioners

scholarly journals The Impact of Dementia on Oral Health and Dental Care, Part 2: Approaching and Planning Treatment

2020 ◽  
Vol 9 (2) ◽  
pp. 31-37 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew Geddis-Regan ◽  
Kathryn Kerr ◽  
Charlotte Curl
Keyword(s):  
Dental Care ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
Health And Social Care ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
Planning Treatment ◽  
Diagnosis Of Dementia ◽  
Secondary Care Setting ◽  
Specialist Practice ◽  
The Impact

Dementia has been described as the biggest health and social care challenge of this century; its impact on dental care cannot be ignored. Dementia affects cognitive ability and decision making, so it is important that oral healthcare professionals are conversant with current mental capacity legislation and issues that may be raised when treatment planning for patients living with the condition. This second article in the series considers the impact of dementia on dental care provision and covers a range of issues which are relevant to both general and specialist practice. These include assessment of capacity, use of different treatment modalities, such as sedation and general anaesthesia, and the factors that may be relevant when deciding to offer treatment or to refer to a secondary care setting for dental treatment. Advanced care planning is detailed to support general dental practitioners considering the longer-term wishes of their patients with an early diagnosis of dementia.

A Care Pathway for Children Unable to Accept Dental Care within the General Dental Services Involving the Use of Inhalation Sedation and General Anaesthesia

2015 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
pp. 29-34 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allyson R Shepherd ◽  
Halimah Ali
Keyword(s):  
General Anaesthesia ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Care Pathway ◽  
Treatment Modalities ◽  
General Anaesthetic ◽  
Dental Services ◽  
Inhalation Sedation ◽  
Dental Practitioners ◽  
The Right

Dental treatment is the commonest reason for a child to be in hospital in the UK. This is a shocking statistic for a preventable disease. How can we reduce the high numbers of dental general anaesthetics? It is essential that dental treatment under general anaesthesia (GA) is fully justifiable, ensuring that the right patients receive the right treatment. Guidance for general dental practitioners on when to refer a child for a dental GA is discussed. Treatment planning for this dentally high-risk group of children requires a holistic approach. It is complex and requires an experienced and competent clinical team, including dental care professionals with additional postgraduate qualifications. Often, alternative treatments are successful and a GA can be avoided. An audit of 85 patients referred for GA with Oldham Community Dental Service demonstrated 35% of patients accepted treatment with local anaesthesia only, 25% required inhalation sedation and only 25% were actually referred on for GA. Treatment for this group of patients must include the availability and provision of appropriate alternative treatment modalities, with the right staff and facilities, including those for dental general anaesthetic sessions. Ongoing follow-up within the general dental services is essential for this group of patients.

scholarly journals Assessment of Parent's Preference to General or Local Anesthesia for Children undergoing Dental Treatment

2015 ◽  
Vol 6 (3) ◽  
pp. 154-160 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sutharshana Vellingiri
Keyword(s):  
Patient Satisfaction ◽  
General Anesthesia ◽  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Well Being ◽  
Healthcare Services ◽  
Pediatric Dentistry ◽  
Parental Satisfaction ◽  
Dental Practitioners

ABSTRACT Background Investigators have begun to address the relationship of parental satisfaction with dental care for children since the dentist/physician and the patient are all aware of the services being provided. These determining characters are essential for compliance of the patient, as patient satisfaction is directly related to health-related issues, needs, and practice. Patient satisfaction has an important role in determining the utilization of the healthcare services and the compliance behavior of the patients. Factors which can influence the patients’ decision to seek care and follow through to the completion of the treatment process can affect the physiologic and functional outcomes of the treatment. Hence, this survey was done to evaluate parent's preference to general or local anesthesia in their children's dental treatments. Materials and methods In this survey, a modified and adapted questionnaire from a previously tested survey that was used to assess parental satisfaction with dental treatments under general anesthesia in pediatric dentistry, was used to assess parents’ preference to general or local anesthesia. Parents whose children were going to undergo treatments in Department of Pedodontics, Saveetha Dental College, was issued with this questionnaire and clinical examination of teeth present and treatment to be done was examined. Results Ninety-seven percent of the parents preferred local anesthesia to general anesthesia. Parents preferred general anesthesia most only in case child below the age of 3 and when multiple settings are required of and their knowledge about anesthesia and its side effects was found to low and preferred local anesthesia in most cases. Conclusion Parents play a unique role in dental care and over all well being of the child. Some parents and dental practitioners prefer the presence of a parent with their child during the delivery of in-office dental care. Parents are aware of their child's previous dental experiences and are also aware of the child's interest and fear. Most of the parent's preference was to local anesthesia (97%) and preferred general anesthesia under given circumstances. How to cite this article Vellingiri S, Gurunathan D. Assessment of Parent's Preference to General or Local Anesthesia for Children undergoing Dental Treatment. World J Dent 2015;6(3):154-160.

scholarly journals Dental Care in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (1) ◽  
pp. 13
Author(s):  
Erfan Shamsoddin ◽  
Lisa M. DeTora ◽  
Marcos Roberto Tovani-Palone ◽  
Barbara E. Bierer
Keyword(s):  
Public Health ◽  
Health Care ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Dental Care ◽  
Dental Treatment ◽  
Care Delivery ◽  
Care Needs ◽  
The Public ◽  
Dynamic Relationship ◽  
Dental Practitioners

Given the dynamic relationship between oral and general health, dental care must not be neglected even during a public health emergency. Nevertheless, the fear of contracting the infection appears to have caused instances of dental treatment avoidance. In these times of uncertainty, regulatory and public health organizations have made numerous and sometimes controversial recommendations to practitioners and to the public about how to secure their oral health care needs. Dentists, as advocates of oral health, should actively maintain their practices while considering local epidemiological reports and recommendations regarding prevention of SARS-CoV-2 infection. Providing appropriate safety measures, accurate triage and prioritization of patients, notice to susceptible communities, remote health care delivery when appropriate, and epidemiological reports of COVID-19 (whenever possible) are all critical considerations for dental practitioners.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document