Maximizing acceptance of clinical pharmacy recommendations to reduce length of hospital stay in a private hospital from Amman, Jordan

Abstract Background Clinical pharmacy interventions (CPI) usually require prior medical authorization. Physicians approve 80% of CPI and reject 20%. If pharmacists show that physicians should authorize all 100% CPI, the profession will step closer to a fully independent prescriber status. This study used an artificial neural network (ANN) model to determine whether clinical pharmacy (CP) may improve outcomes associated with rejected CPI. Method This is a non-interventional, retrospective analysis of documented CPI in a 100-bed, acute-care private hospital in Amman, Jordan. Study consisted of 542 patients, 574 admissions, and 1694 CPI. Team collected demographic and clinical data using a standardized tool. Input consisted of 54 variables with some taking merely repetitive values for each CPI in each patient whereas others varying with every CPI. Therefore, CPI was consolidated to one rejected and/or one accepted per patient per admission. Groups of accepted and rejected CPI were compared in terms of matched and unmatched variables. ANN were, subsequently, trained and internally as well as cross validated for outcomes of interest. Outcomes were length of hospital and intensive care stay after the index CPI (LOSTA & LOSICUA, respectively), readmissions, mortality, and cost of hospitalization. Best models were finally used to compare the two scenarios of approving 80% versus 100% of CPI. Variable impacts (VI) automatically generated by the ANN were compared to evaluate the effect of rejecting CPI. Main outcome measure was Lengths of hospital stay after the index CPI (LOSTA). Results ANN configurations converged within 18 s and 300 trials. All models showed a significant reduction in LOSTA with 100% versus 80% accepted CPI of about 0.4 days (2.6 ± 3.4, median (range) of 2 (0–28) versus 3.0 ± 3.8, 2 (0–30), P-value = 0.022). Average savings with acceptance of those rejected CPI was 55 JD (~ 78 US dollars) and could help hire about 1.3 extra clinical pharmacist full-time equivalents. Conclusions Maximizing acceptance of CPI reduced the length of hospital stay in this model. Practicing Clinical Pharmacists may qualify for further privileges including promotion to a fully independent prescriber status.

Download Full-text

Maximizing Acceptance of Clinical Pharmacy Recommendations May Reduce The Length of Hospital Stay in A Private Hospital From Amman, Jordan: Toward Fully Independent Pharmacist Prescribers

10.21203/rs.3.rs-66164/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Loai Saadah ◽

Amer Hayat Khan ◽

Syed Azhar Syed Sulaiman ◽

Iman Amin Basheti

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Clinical Pharmacy ◽

Private Hospital ◽

Outcome Measure ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

P Value ◽

Full Time ◽

Ann Model ◽

Intensive Care Stay ◽

Artificial Neural Network Ann

Abstract Background: Clinical pharmacy interventions (CPI) usually require prior medical authorization with 20% being rejected. If pharmacists prove to be more competent in this area (accept 100% of CPI), the profession will step closer to a fully-independent prescriber status. Objective: This study use an artificial neural network (ANN) model to determine whether clinical pharmacy (CP) may improve outcomes associated with rejected CPI. Setting: This is a non-interventional, retrospective analysis of documented CPI in a 100-bed, acute-care private hospital in Amman, Jordan.Method: Study consists of 542 patients, 574 admissions, and 1694 CPI. Team collected demographic and clinical data using a standardized tool. Input consisted of 54 variables with some taking merely repetitive values for each CPI in a given patient whereas others varying with every CPI. Therefore, CPI was consolidated to one rejected and/or one accepted per patient per admission. Groups of accepted and rejected CPI were compared with matched and unmatched variables. ANN were, subsequently, trained and internally as well as cross validated for outcomes of interest. Outcomes were length of hospital and intensive care stay after the index CPI (LOSTA & LOSICUA, respectively), readmissions, mortality, and cost of hospitalization. Best models were finally used to compare the two scenarios of approving 80% versus 100% of CPI. Variable impacts (VI) automatically generated by the ANN were compared to evaluate the effect of rejecting CPI. Main outcome measure: Lengths of hospital stay after the index CPI (LOSTA).Results: ANN configurations converged within 18 seconds and 300 trials. All models showed a significant reduction in LOSTA with 100% versus 80% accepted CPI of about 0.4 days (2.6 ± 3.4, median (range) of 2 (0 – 28) versus 3.0 ± 3.8, 2 (0 – 30), P-value = 0.022). Average savings with acceptance of those rejected CPI was 55 JD (~ 78 US dollars) and could help hire about 1.3 extra clinical pharmacist full-time equivalents. Conclusion: Maximizing acceptance of CPI reduces the length of hospital stay in this model. Pharmacists seem to be well-positioned to target gain the upper hand on prescribing in these situations.

Download Full-text

Comparison Of Different Anesthetic Techniques Used For Geriatric Patients Who Underwent TUR-P Operation: Single Center Experience

10.21203/rs.3.rs-49635/v1 ◽

2020 ◽

Author(s):

Ozge Gozcu ◽

Elzem Sen ◽

Haluk Sen ◽

Omer Bayrak

Keyword(s):

Intensive Care Unit ◽

Intensive Care ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Anesthetic Techniques ◽

Asa Score ◽

Intensive Care Stay ◽

Significant Difference ◽

Operation Duration ◽

The Cost

Abstract Objectives To investigate impacts that effect entrance to intensive care unit, mortality, and cost; according to demographical and clinical parameters of patients, and different anesthetic techniques performed on patients who underwent TUR-P operation. Methods Data of 234 patients aged 60 years and older who underwent TUR-P operations was evaluated retrospectively. The patients were examined in two groups as neuroaxial and general anesthesia groups. Charlson Comorbidity Index, preoperative laboratory parameters, presence of comorbidity, preoperative intensive care requirement, operation duration were obtained from hospital records. The cost calculation was based on the length of the patient's stay in hospital and intensive care unit. Results According to ASA score, no significant difference was observed among operation duration, length of hospital stay and intensive care unit stay. According to the CCI score, there was no significant difference among the operation time; however, when the patient's CCI was 3 and above 3, the duration of intensive care stay and hospital stay were significantly longer. The cost was increased significantly when CCI was 3 and above 3, but did not change according to the ASA score. Conclusions In our study, it was observed that the type of anesthesia did not affect the duration of surgery, rate of entrance to intensive care unit, length of intensive care stay, length of hospital stay, mortality and the cost. However, it was observed that the duration of hospitalization and rate of intensive care unit entrance increased in patients with CCI 3 and above, therefore the cost was increased.

Download Full-text

Pilonidal Sinus: How to Choose Between Excision and Open Granulation Versus Excision and Primary Closure?

Swiss Surgery ◽

10.1024/1023-9332.8.6.255 ◽

2002 ◽

Vol 8 (6) ◽

pp. 255-258 ◽

Cited By ~ 28

Author(s):

Perruchoud ◽

Vuilleumier ◽

Givel

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Pilonidal Sinus ◽

Primary Closure ◽

Average Length ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Healing Time ◽

Incision And Drainage ◽

The Mean ◽

Primary Healing

Aims: The purpose of this study was to evaluate excision and open granulation versus excision and primary closure as treatments for pilonidal sinus. Subjects and methods: We evaluated a group of 141 patients operated on for a pilonidal sinus between 1991 and 1995. Ninety patients were treated by excision and open granulation, 34 patients by excision and primary closure and 17 patients by incision and drainage, as a unique treatment of an infected pilonidal sinus. Results: The first group, receiving treatment of excision and open granulation, experienced the following outcomes: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time; 72 days; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 40; average off-work delay, 38 days; and average follow-up time, 43 months. There were five recurrences (6%) in this group during the follow-up period. For the second group treated by excision and primary closure, the corresponding outcome measurements were as follows: average length of hospital stay, four days; average healing time, 23 days; primary healing failure rate, 9%; average number of post-operative ambulatory visits, 6; average off-work delay, 21 days. The average follow-up time was 34 months, and two recurrences (6%) were observed during the follow-up period. In the third group, seventeen patients benefited from an incision and drainage as unique treatment. The mean follow-up was 37 months. Five recurrences (29%) were noticed, requiring a new operation in all the cases. Discussion and conclusion: This series of 141 patients is too limited to permit final conclusions to be drawn concerning significant advantages of one form of treatment compared to the other. Nevertheless, primary closure offers the advantages of quicker healing time, fewer post-operative visits and shorter time off work. When a primary closure can be carried out, it should be routinely considered for socio-economical and comfort reasons.

Download Full-text

Length of Hospital Stay in Infants Treated for Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome in Peninsula Regional Medical Center

PEDIATRICS ◽

10.1542/peds.137.supplement_3.483a ◽

2016 ◽

Vol 137 (Supplement 3) ◽

pp. 483A-483A

Author(s):

Nahid Rostami ◽

Diane Hitchens

Keyword(s):

Hospital Stay ◽

Medical Center ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Neonatal Abstinence Syndrome ◽

Abstinence Syndrome ◽

Regional Medical ◽

Regional Medical Center

Download Full-text

Indications and practice of enteral nutrition

Orvosi Hetilap ◽

10.1556/oh.2014.30066 ◽

2014 ◽

Vol 155 (51) ◽

pp. 2028-2033 ◽

Cited By ~ 1

Author(s):

Judit Hallay ◽

Dániel Nagy ◽

Béla Fülesdi

Keyword(s):

Risk Factors ◽

Treatment Outcome ◽

Enteral Nutrition ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Nutrition Therapy ◽

Present Review ◽

Hospitalised Patients ◽

Impact On Treatment ◽

Efficacy Of Treatment

Malnutrition in hospitalised patients has a significant and disadvantageous impact on treatment outcome. If possible, enteral nutrition with an energy/protein-balanced nutrient should be preferred depending on the patient’s condition, type of illness and risk factors. The aim of the nutrition therapy is to increase the efficacy of treatment and shorten the length of hospital stay in order to ensure rapid rehabilitation. In the present review the authors summarize the most important clinical and practical aspects of enteral nutrition therapy. Orv. Hetil., 2014, 155(51), 2028–2033.

Download Full-text

Effect of Chewing Gum on Bowel Motility in Women Undergoing Post-Operative Cesarean Section

International Journal of Innovative Research in Medical Science ◽

10.23958/ijirms/vol03-i06/04 ◽

2018 ◽

Vol 3 (06) ◽

Author(s):

Dr.Randa Mohammed AboBaker

Keyword(s):

Cesarean Section ◽

Hospital Stay ◽

Demographic Data ◽

Length Of Hospital Stay ◽

Chewing Gum ◽

Control Group ◽

Controlled Clinical Trial ◽

Bowel Motility ◽

Gum Chewing ◽

Significant Difference

Postoperative Ileus (POI) is one of the most common problems after obstetrics, gynecologic and abdominal surgeries. Sham feeding, such as gum chewing, accelerates the return of bowel function and the length of hospital stay. The present study aims to evaluate the effect of chewing gum on bowel motility in women undergoing post-operative cesarean section. Intervention study was used at the Postpartum Department of Maternity and Children Hospital, KSA. A randomized controlled clinical trial research design. Through a convenience technique, 80 post Caesarian Section (CS) women were included in the study. Data were collected through three tools: Tool (I): Socio-demographic data and reproductive history interview schedule. Tool (II): Postoperative Assessment Sheet. Tool (III): Outcomes of gum chewing and the length of hospital stay. Method: subjects were assigned randomly into two groups of (40) the experimental and (40) the control. Subjects in the study group were asked to chew two pieces of sugarless gum for 30 min/three times daily in the morning, noon, and evening immediately after recovery from anesthesia and in Postpartum Department; while subjects in the control group followed the hospital routine care. Each woman in both groups was tested abdominally using a stethoscope to auscultate the bowel sounds and asked to report immediately the time of either passing flatus or stool. Results: illustrated that a highly statistically significant difference was observed between the two groups concerning their gum chewing outcomes. Where, P = 0.000. The study concluded that gum chewing is safe, well tolerated and appears to be effective in reducing the incidence and consequences of POI following CS.

Download Full-text