scholarly journals Contrast-induced nephropathy and oxidative stress: mechanistic insights for better interventional approaches

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Prit Kusirisin ◽  
Siriporn C. Chattipakorn ◽  
Nipon Chattipakorn

Abstract Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) or contrast-induced acute kidney injury (CI-AKI) is an iatrogenic acute kidney injury observed after intravascular administration of contrast media for intravascular diagnostic procedures or therapeutic angiographic intervention. High risk patients including those with chronic kidney disease (CKD), diabetes mellitus with impaired renal function, congestive heart failure, intraarterial intervention, higher volume of contrast, volume depletion, old age, multiple myeloma, hypertension, and hyperuricemia had increased prevalence of CIN. Although CIN is reversible by itself, some patients suffer this condition without renal recovery leading to CKD or even end-stage renal disease which required long term renal replacement therapy. In addition, both CIN and CKD have been associated with increasing of mortality. Three pathophysiological mechanisms have been proposed including direct tubular toxicity, intrarenal vasoconstriction, and excessive production of reactive oxygen species (ROS), all of which lead to impaired renal function. Reports from basic and clinical studies showing potential preventive strategies for CIN pathophysiology including low- or iso-osmolar contrast media are summarized and discussed. In addition, reports on pharmacological interventions to reduce ROS and attenuate CIN are summarized, highlighting potential for use in clinical practice. Understanding this contributory mechanism could pave ways to improve therapeutic strategies in combating CIN.

2014 ◽  
Vol 2014 ◽  
pp. 1-7 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Kalyesubula ◽  
Peace Bagasha ◽  
Mark A. Perazella

Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is now one of the three leading causes of acute kidney injury in the world. A lot is known about the risk factors of CIN, yet it remains a major cause of morbidity, end stage renal disease, prolonged hospital stay, and increased costs as well as a high mortality. Many patients undergoing contrast-based radiological investigations are treated with angiotensin converting inhibitors (ACE-Is) or angiotensin receptor blockers (ARBs) for their cardiac and renal benefits and their known mortality benefits. However, controversy exists among clinicians as to whether ACE-Is and ARBs should be continued or discontinued prior to contrast media exposure. In this paper we review the current evidence on ACE-I/ARB therapy for patients undergoing procedures involving use of contrast media and provide recommendations as to whether these drugs should be continued or held prior to contrast exposure.


2017 ◽  
Vol 44 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-155 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Clark ◽  
Martine Leblanc ◽  
Zaccaria Ricci ◽  
Claudio Ronco

Background/Aims: Delivered dialysis therapy is routinely measured in the management of patients with end-stage renal disease; yet, the quantification of renal replacement prescription and delivery in acute kidney injury (AKI) is less established. While continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) is widely understood to have greater solute clearance capabilities relative to intermittent therapies, neither urea nor any other solute is specifically employed for CRRT dose assessments in clinical practice at present. Instead, the normalized effluent rate is the gold standard for CRRT dosing, although this parameter does not provide an accurate estimation of actual solute clearance for different modalities. Methods: Because this situation has created confusion among clinicians, we reappraise dose prescription and delivery for CRRT. Results: A critical review of RRT quantification in AKI is provided. Conclusion: We propose an adaptation of a maintenance dialysis parameter (standard Kt/V) as a benchmark to supplement effluent-based dosing of CRRT. Video Journal Club “Cappuccino with Claudio Ronco” at http://www.karger.com/?doi=475457


2021 ◽  
Vol 36 (Supplement_1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Imen El Meknassi ◽  
Mrabet Sanda ◽  
Guedri Yosra ◽  
Zellema Dorsaf ◽  
Azzabi Awatef ◽  
...  

Abstract Background and Aims Acute post-infectious glomerulonephritis (APIGN) is a reactive immunological disease. Its prevalence in industrialized countries is declining contrasting with developed ones. It is uncommon in adults but the prognosis may be reserved. The aim of our study was to evaluate the epidemiological, clinical and histological features of APIGN as well as its prognosis. Method A retrospective and descriptive study was conducted in our department. Were included all cases of histologically proven APIGN between December 2006 and December 2017. Results We had collected 38 cases. The mean age was 37.7 ± 17.8 years. The sex ratio was 1.92. Twelve (31.6%) patients were diabetic and four of them had already a chronic kidney disease (CKD). APIGN was preceded by an infection in 27 cases with an average interval of 10 ± 5 days. The most common site of infection was the respiratory tract (15 cases). At presentation, 27 patients had nephritic syndrome and 13 had nephrotic-range proteinuria. Hematuria was observed in 97.4%, peripheral edema in 84.2% and hypertension in 73.7% of cases. Most patients (78.9%) had acute kidney injury and 10 (26.3%) patients required dialysis. Renal biopsy had shown benign acute glomerulonephritis in 31 cases and malignant form in 7 cases. An underlying nephropathy was found in 12 cases with mostly a diabetic nephropathy. Corticosteroids were used in 3 cases of benign APIGN and 5 cases of malignant form. During the follow-up, CKD was noted in 14(36.8%) patients including 7(18.4%) patients who progressed to end-stage renal disease. Poor prognostic factors were diabetes, the presence of an underlying nephropathy in the biopsy, acute kidney injury and the need for dialysis. Conclusion The APIGN is uncommon in adults, yet its prognosis may be reserved with progression to CKD.


2013 ◽  
Vol 2013 ◽  
pp. 1-7
Author(s):  
Melanie Chan ◽  
Marlies Ostermann

Patients with end-stage renal disease (ESRD) experience higher rates of hospitalisation, cardiovascular events, and all-cause mortality and are more likely to require admission to the intensive care unit (ICU) than patients with normal renal function. Sepsis and cardiovascular diseases are the most common reasons for ICU admission. ICU mortality rates in patients requiring chronic hemodialysis are significantly higher than for patients without ESRD; however, dialysis patients have a better ICU outcome than those with acute kidney injury (AKI) requiring renal replacement therapy suggesting that factors other than loss of renal function contribute to their prognosis. Current evidence suggests, the longer-term outcomes after discharge from ICU may be favourable and that long-term dependence on dialysis should not prejudice against prompt referral or admission to ICU.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Karen L. Krechmery ◽  
Diego Casali

Acute kidney injury (AKI) is a common syndrome encountered in critical illness and is associated with significant morbidity and increased mortality. Despite attempts to prevent the development of AKI, its incidence continues to rise, probably due to increased recognition in the setting of clearer definitions of the stages of AKI. Despite advances in the field of Nephrology, the treatment of AKI and its complications remains difficult in clinical practice. Critical care clinicians must have an understanding of the current definitions, pathophysiology, and treatment modalities. Renal replacement therapy (RRT) is a mainstay of treatment, but a lack of consensus regarding the optimal timing for initiation remains. There is a need for further research regarding both the timing of initiation of RRT and biomarkers that might allow earlier detection, differentiation of etiologies and monitoring of interventions. This review contains 3 figures, 4 tables, and 31 references Key Words: acute kidney injury (AKI), KDIGO, renal replacement therapy (RRT), risk, injury, failure, loss of kidney function, end stage renal disease (RIFLE), nephrology  


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aileen Ebadat ◽  
Eric Bui ◽  
Carlos V. R. Brown

Acute renal failure definitions have changed dramatically over the last 5 to 10 years as a result of criteria established through the following consensus statements/organizations: RIFLE (Risk, Injury, Failure, Loss of function, End stage renal disease), AKIN (Acute Kidney Injury Network), and KDIGO (Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes). In 2002, the Acute Dialysis Quality Initiative was tasked with the goal of establishing a consensus statement for acute kidney injury (AKI). The first order of business was to provide a standard definition of AKI. Up to this point, literature comparison was challenging as studies lacked uniformity in renal injury definitions. Implementing results into evidence-based clinical practice was difficult. The panel coined the term “acute kidney injury,” encompassing previous terms, such as renal failure and acute tubular necrosis. This new terminology represented a broad range of renal insults, from dehydration to those requiring renal replacement therapy (RRT). This review provides an algorithmic approach to the epidemiology, pathophysiology, diagnosis, prevention, and management of AKI. Also discussed are special circumstances, including rhabdomyolysis, contrast-induced nephropathy, and hepatorenal syndrome. Tables outline the AKIN criteria, most current KDIGO consensus guidelines for definition of AKI, differential diagnosis of AKI, agents capable of causing AKI, treatment for specific complications associated with AKI, and options for continuous RRT. Figures show the RIFLE classification scheme and KDIGO staging with prevention strategies. This review contains 1 management algorithm, 2 figures, 6 tables, and 85 references. Keywords: Kidney, renal, KDIGO, azotemia, critical, urine, oliguria, creatinine, dialysis


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document