scholarly journals Simultaneous radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases: technical overview of the UCLA experience

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nzhde Agazaryan ◽  
Steve Tenn ◽  
Chul Lee ◽  
Michael Steinberg ◽  
John Hegde ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Fusion Algorithm ◽  
Patient Motion ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases ◽  
Actual Patient ◽  
Assignment Method ◽  
Institutional Experience ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose/objective(s) To communicate our institutional experience with single isocenter radiosurgery treatments for multiple brain metastases, including challenges with determining planning target volume (PTV) margins and resulting consequences, image-guidance translational and rotational tolerances, intra-fraction patient motion, and prescription considerations with larger PTV margins. Materials/methods Eight patient treatments with 51 targets were planned with various margins using Elements Multiple Brain Mets SRS treatment planning software (Brainlab, Munich, Germany). Forty-eight plans with 0 mm, 1 mm and 2 mm margins were created, including plans with variable margins, where targets more than 6 cm away from the isocenter were planned with larger margins. The dosimetric impact of the margins were analyzed with V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy values. Additionally, 12 patient motion data were analyzed to determine both the impact of the repositioning threshold and the distributions of the patient translational and rotational movements. Results The V5Gy, V8Gy, V10Gy, V12Gy volumes approximately doubled when margins change from 0 to 1 mm and tripled when change from 0 to 2 mm. With variable margins, the aggregated results are similar to results from plans using the lower of two margins, since only 12.2% of the targets were more than 6 cm away from the isocenter. With 0.5 mm re-positioning threshold, 57.4% of the time the patients are repositioned. Reducing the threshold to 0.25 mm results in 91.7% repositioning rate, due to limitations of the fusion algorithm and actual patient motion. The 90th percentile of translational movements in all directions is 0.7 mm, while the 90th percentile of rotational movements in all directions is 0.6 degrees. Median translations and rotations are 0.2 mm and 0.2 degrees, respectively. Conclusions Based on the data presented, we have switched our modus operandi from 2 to 1 mm PTV margins, with an eventual goal of using 0.5 and 1.0 mm variable margins when an automated margin assignment method becomes available. The 0.5 mm and 0.5 degrees repositioning thresholds are clinically appropriate with small residual patient movements.

scholarly journals Dosimetric study between a single isocenter dynamic conformal arc therapy technique and Gamma Knife radiosurgery for multiple brain metastases treatment: impact of target volume geometrical characteristics

2021 ◽  
Vol 16 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Michel Chea ◽  
Karen Fezzani ◽  
Julian Jacob ◽  
Marguerite Cuttat ◽  
Mathilde Croisé ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Irradiation Time ◽  
Geometric Characteristic ◽  
Gamma Knife Radiosurgery ◽  
Major Axis ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Gradient Index ◽  
Dynamic Conformal Arc Therapy ◽  
The Impact

Abstract Purpose To compare linac-based mono-isocentric radiosurgery with Brainlab Elements Multiple Brain Mets (MBM) SRS and the Gamma Knife using a specific statistical method and to analyze the dosimetric impact of the target volume geometric characteristics. A dose fall-off analysis allowed to evaluate the Gradient Index relevancy for the dose spillage characterization. Material and methods Treatments were planned on twenty patients with three to nine brain metastases with MBM 2.0 and GammaPlan 11.0. Ninety-five metastases ranging from 0.02 to 9.61 cc were included. Paddick Index (PI), Gradient Index (GI), dose fall-off, volume of healthy brain receiving more than 12 Gy (V12Gy) and DVH were used for the plan comparison according to target volume, major axis diameter and Sphericity Index (SI). The multivariate regression approach allowed to analyze the impact of each geometric characteristic keeping all the others unchanged. A parallel study was led to evaluate the impact of the isodose line (IDL) prescription on the MBM plan quality. Results For mono-isocentric linac-based radiosurgery, the IDL around 70–75% was the best compromise found. For both techniques, the GI and the dose fall-off decreased with the target volume. In comparison, PI was slightly improved with MBM for targets < 1 cc or SI > 0.78. GI was improved with GP for targets < 2.5 cc. The V12Gy was higher with MBM for lesions > 0.4 cc or SI < 0.84 and exceeded 10 cc for targets > 5 cc against 6.5 cc with GP. The presence of OAR close to the PTV had no impact on the dose fall off values. The dose fall-off was higher for volumes < 3.8 cc with GP which had the sharpest dose fall-off in the infero-superior direction up to 30%/mm. The mean beam-on time was 94 min with GP against 13 min with MBM. Conclusions The dose fall-off and the V12Gy were more relevant indicators than the GI for the low dose spillage assessment. Both evaluated techniques have comparable plan qualities with a slightly improved selectivity with MBM for smaller lesions but with a healthy tissues sparing slightly favorable to GP at the expense of a considerably longer irradiation time. However, a higher healthy tissue exposure must be considered for large volumes in MBM plans.

Dosimetric comparison of fractionated radiosurgery plans using frameless Gamma Knife ICON and CyberKnife systems with linear accelerator–based radiosurgery plans for multiple large brain metastases

2020 ◽  
Vol 132 (5) ◽  
pp. 1473-1479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eun Young Han ◽  
He Wang ◽  
Dershan Luo ◽  
Jing Li ◽  
Xin Wang
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Gamma Knife ◽  
Linear Accelerator ◽  
Treatment Time ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Planning System ◽  
Treatment Planning System ◽  
Normal Brain ◽  
Large Brain ◽  
The Mean

OBJECTIVEFor patients with multiple large brain metastases with at least 1 target volume larger than 10 cm3, multifractionated stereotactic radiosurgery (MF-SRS) has commonly been delivered with a linear accelerator (LINAC). Recent advances of Gamma Knife (GK) units with kilovolt cone-beam CT and CyberKnife (CK) units with multileaf collimators also make them attractive choices. The purpose of this study was to compare the dosimetry of MF-SRS plans deliverable on GK, CK, and LINAC and to discuss related clinical issues.METHODSTen patients with 2 or more large brain metastases who had been treated with MF-SRS on LINAC were identified. The median planning target volume was 18.31 cm3 (mean 21.31 cm3, range 3.42–49.97 cm3), and the median prescribed dose was 27.0 Gy (mean 26.7 Gy, range 21–30 Gy), administered in 3 to 5 fractions. Clinical LINAC treatment plans were generated using inverse planning with intensity modulation on a Pinnacle treatment planning system (version 9.10) for the Varian TrueBeam STx system. GK and CK planning were retrospectively performed using Leksell GammaPlan version 10.1 and Accuray Precision version 1.1.0.0 for the CK M6 system. Tumor coverage, Paddick conformity index (CI), gradient index (GI), and normal brain tissue receiving 4, 12, and 20 Gy were used to compare plan quality. Net beam-on time and approximate planning time were also collected for all cases.RESULTSPlans from all 3 modalities satisfied clinical requirements in target coverage and normal tissue sparing. The mean CI was comparable (0.79, 0.78, and 0.76) for the GK, CK, and LINAC plans. The mean GI was 3.1 for both the GK and the CK plans, whereas the mean GI of the LINAC plans was 4.1. The lower GI of the GK and CK plans would have resulted in significantly lower normal brain volumes receiving a medium or high dose. On average, GK and CK plans spared the normal brain volume receiving at least 12 Gy and 20 Gy by approximately 20% in comparison with the LINAC plans. However, the mean beam-on time of GK (∼ 64 minutes assuming a dose rate of 2.5 Gy/minute) plans was significantly longer than that of CK (∼ 31 minutes) or LINAC (∼ 4 minutes) plans.CONCLUSIONSAll 3 modalities are capable of treating multiple large brain lesions with MF-SRS. GK has the most flexible workflow and excellent dosimetry, but could be limited by the treatment time. CK has dosimetry comparable to that of GK with a consistent treatment time of approximately 30 minutes. LINAC has a much shorter treatment time, but residual rotational error could be a concern.

scholarly journals Influence of patient motion on quantitative accuracy in cardiac 15O-water positron emission tomography

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jonny Nordström ◽  
Hendrik J. Harms ◽  
Tanja Kero ◽  
Jens Sörensen ◽  
Mark Lubberink
Keyword(s):  
Motion Detection ◽  
Detection Algorithm ◽  
Clinical Effects ◽  
Average Deviation ◽  
Patient Motion ◽  
Motion Data ◽  
Positron Emission ◽  
Quantitative Accuracy ◽  
Pet Ct ◽  
Using Data

Abstract Background Patient motion is a common problem during cardiac PET. The purpose of the present study was to investigate to what extent motions influence the quantitative accuracy of cardiac 15O-water PET/CT and to develop a method for automated motion detection. Method Frequency and magnitude of motion was assessed visually using data from 50 clinical 15O-water PET/CT scans. Simulations of 4 types of motions with amplitude of 5 to 20 mm were performed based on data from 10 scans. An automated motion detection algorithm was evaluated on clinical and simulated motion data. MBF and PTF of all simulated scans were compared to the original scan used as reference. Results Patient motion was detected in 68% of clinical cases by visual inspection. All observed motions were small with amplitudes less than half the LV wall thickness. A clear pattern of motion influence was seen in the simulations with a decrease of myocardial blood flow (MBF) in the region of myocardium to where the motion was directed. The perfusable tissue fraction (PTF) trended in the opposite direction. Global absolute average deviation of MBF was 3.1% ± 1.8% and 7.3% ± 6.3% for motions with maximum amplitudes of 5 and 20 mm, respectively. Automated motion detection showed a sensitivity of 90% for simulated motions ≥ 10 mm but struggled with the smaller (≤ 5 mm) simulated (sensitivity 45%) and clinical motions (accuracy 48%). Conclusion Patient motion can impair the quantitative accuracy of MBF. However, at typically occurring levels of patient motion, effects are similar to or only slightly larger than inter-observer variability, and downstream clinical effects are likely negligible.

Management of multiple brain metastases via dual-isocenter VMAT stereotactic radiosurgery

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Allison N Palmiero ◽  
Denise Fabian ◽  
William St Clair ◽  
Marcus Randall ◽  
Damodar Pokhrel
Keyword(s):  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Stereotactic Radiosurgery ◽  
Multiple Brain Metastases

scholarly journals The impact of tumour regression in locally advanced carcinoma cervix during external beam radiotherapy and the need for adaptive planning

2016 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Ct Scan ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Target Volume ◽  
Ct Images ◽  
Tumour Regression ◽  
Target Coverage ◽  
Carcinoma Cervix ◽  
Advanced Carcinoma ◽  
The Impact ◽  
Planning Ct

Aim: To study the impact of tumour regression occurring during IMRT for locally advanced carcinoma cervix and study dose distribution to target volume and OARs and hence the need for any replanning. Materials and Methods: 40 patients undergoing IM-IGRT and weekly chemotherapy were included in the study. After 36 Gy, a second planning CT-scan was done and target volume and OARs were recontoured. First plan (non-adaptive) was compared with second plan (adaptive plan) to evaluate whether it would still offer sufficient target coverage to the CTV and spare the OARs after having delivered 36 Gy. Finally new plan was created based on CT-images to investigate whether creating a new treatment plan would optimize target coverage and critical organ sparing. To measure the response of the primary tumour and pathologic nodes to EBRT, the differences in the volumes of the primary GTV and nodal GTV between the pretreatment and intratreatment CT images was calculated. Second intratreatment IMRT plans was generated, using the delineations of the intratreatment CT images. The first IMRT plan (based on the first CT-scan or non adaptive plan) was compared with second IMRT plan (based on the second CT-scan or adaptive plan). Results: 35% patients had regression in GTV in the range of 4.1% to 5%, 20% in the range of 1.1%-2%, 15% in the range of 2.1%-3% and 20% in the range of 6%-15%. There was significant mean decrease in GTV of 4.63 cc (p=0.000). There was a significant decrease in CTV on repeat CT done after 36 Gy by 23.31 cc (p=0.000) and in PTV by 23.31 cc (p=0.000). There was a statistically significant increase in CTV D98, CTV D95, CTV D50 and CTV D2 in repeat planning CT done after 36 Gy. There was no significant alteration in OARs doses. Conclusion: Despite tumour regression and increased target coverage in locally advanced carcinoma cervix after a delivery of 36 Gy there was no sparing of OARs. Primary advantage of adaptive RT seems to be in greater target coverage with non-significant normal tissue sparing.

Outcome of patients with small-cell lung cancer: effect of changes in staging procedures and imaging technology on prognostic factors over 14 years.

1990 ◽  
Vol 8 (6) ◽  
pp. 1042-1049 ◽  
Author(s):  
M P Dearing ◽  
S M Steinberg ◽  
R Phelps ◽  
M J Anderson ◽  
J L Mulshine ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Brain Metastases ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazards ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Limited Stage ◽  
The Impact

In a study of 411 patients with small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) entered on therapeutic clinical trials between 1973 and 1987, we analyzed whether changes in the prognostic importance of pretreatment factors had occurred during the 14-year time period. After adjusting for other prognostic factors, brain involvement was associated with shorter survival in patients treated before December 1979 (P = .024) but not in patients treated thereafter (P = .54). The patients diagnosed before 1979 had brain metastases documented by radionuclide scan while computed cranial tomography (CCT) was more commonly used after 1979. Patients who had brain metastases diagnosed by radionuclide scan lived a shorter period of time than patients who had the diagnosis made by the more sensitive CCT scan (P = .031). In contrast, Cox proportional hazards modeling showed that liver metastases in patients were associated with shorter survival in patients treated after 1979 (P = .0007) but not in patients treated before then (P = .30). A larger proportion of patients had a routine liver biopsy before 1979 than after 1979 when more patients had the liver staged with less sensitive imaging studies and biochemical parameters. Patients with SCLC whose cancer was confined to the thorax but had medical or anatomic contraindications to intensive chest radiotherapy had similar survival compared with patients with limited-stage SCLC who were treated with combination chemotherapy alone (P = .68). From these data we conclude: (1) the sensitivity of the staging procedures used can affect the impact on survival of cancer involvement of a given site; and (2) patients with cancer confined to their chest with medical or anatomic contraindications to chest radiotherapy do not have a shorter survival than patients with limited-stage disease treated with chemotherapy alone.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document