Accuracy of the WSES classification system for pelvic ring disruptions: an international validation study

Abstract Background In 2017, a novel classification for pelvic injuries was established by the World Society of Emergency Surgery (WSES). We validated its effectiveness using nationwide real-world data. The roles of associated vascular injury and open fracture in this system were also evaluated. Methods Patients with pelvic fractures in the National Trauma Data Bank 2015 dataset were retrospectively studied. First, the mortality rates were compared by WSES classification. Second, independent predictors of mortality were evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression model. Patients with and without associated vascular injuries and the same hemodynamic and pelvic ring stability statuses were compared. Patients with associated vascular injuries were compared to the proportion of nonsurvivors and survivors with unstable pelvic ring injuries. Third, the outcomes were compared between patients with open pelvic fracture and closed pelvic fracture in the mild, moderate and severe WSES classes. Results During the 12-month study period, 44,163 blunt pelvic fracture patients were included. The mortality rates were 1.8%, 3.8% and 10.6% for the mild, moderate and severe WSES classes, respectively (p < 0.001). MLR analysis showed that unstable pelvic ring injury did not significantly affect mortality (p = 0.549), whereas open pelvic fracture and associated vascular injury were independent predictors of mortality (odds of mortality: open pelvic fracture 1.630, p < 0.001; associated vascular injury 1.602, p < 0.001). Patients with associated vascular injuries showed that there was no significant difference in the proportion of patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries between survivors and nonsurvivors (37.2% vs. 32.7%, p = 0.323). In all three classes, patients with open pelvic fractures had significantly higher mortality rates and infection rates than patients with closed fractures (mortality rates: minor 3.5% vs. 1.8%, p = 0.009, moderate 11.2% vs. 3.3%, p < 0.001, severe 23.8% vs. 9.8%, p < 0.001; infection rates: minor 3.3% vs. 0.7%, p < 0.001, moderate 6.7% vs. 2.1%, p < 0.001, severe 7.9% vs. 2.8%, p < 0.001). Conclusions Based on this nationwide study, the WSES guideline provides an accurate and reproducible classification of pelvic fractures. It is recommended that open/closed fractures and associated vascular injuries be evaluated as supplements of the WSES classification.

Download Full-text

Epidemiology and aetiology of male and female sexual dysfunctions related to pelvic ring injuries: a systematic review

International Orthopaedics ◽

10.1007/s00264-021-05153-8 ◽

2021 ◽

Author(s):

Giuseppe Rovere ◽

Andrea Perna ◽

Luigi Meccariello ◽

Domenico De Mauro ◽

Alessandro Smimmo ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Sexual Dysfunction ◽

Sexual Function ◽

Pelvic Fracture ◽

Pelvic Ring ◽

Pelvic Fractures ◽

Sexual Dysfunctions ◽

Fracture Type ◽

Ring Fracture ◽

Male And Female ◽

Pelvic Ring Injuries

Abstract Introduction Pelvic ring injuries, frequently caused by high energy trauma, are associated with high rates of morbidity and mortality (5–33%), often due to significant blood loss and disruption of the lumbosacral plexus, genitourinary system, and gastrointestinal system. The aim of the present study is to perform a systematic literature review on male and female sexual dysfunctions related to traumatic lesions of the pelvic ring. Methods Scopus, Cochrane Library MEDLINE via PubMed, and Embase were searched using the keywords: “Pelvic fracture,” “Pelvic Ring Fracture,” “Pelvic Ring Trauma,” “Pelvic Ring injury,” “Sexual dysfunction,” “Erectile dysfunction,” “dyspareunia,” and their MeSH terms in any possible combination. The following questions were formulated according to the PICO (population (P), intervention (I), comparison (C), and outcome (O)) scheme: Do patients suffering from pelvic fracture (P) report worse clinical outcomes (C), in terms of sexual function (O), when urological injury occurs (I)? Is the sexual function (O) influenced by the type of fracture (I)? Results After screening 268 articles by title and abstract, 77 were considered eligible for the full-text analysis. Finally 17 studies that met inclusion criteria were included in the review. Overall, 1364 patients (902 males and 462 females, M/F ratio: 1.9) suffering from pelvic fractures were collected. Discussion Pelvic fractures represent challenging entities, often concomitant with systemic injuries and subsequent morbidity. Anatomical consideration, etiology, correlation between sexual dysfunction and genitourinary lesions, or pelvic fracture type were investigated. Conclusion There are evidences in the literature that the gravity and frequency of SD are related with the pelvic ring fracture type. In fact, patients with APC, VS (according Young-Burgess), or C (according Tile) fracture pattern reported higher incidence and gravity of SD. Only a week association could be found between GUI and incidence and gravity of SD, and relationship between surgical treatment and SD. Electrophysiological tests should be routinely used in patient suffering from SD after pelvic ring injuries.

Download Full-text

Internal Fixation for Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries in Polytrauma Patients

N.N. Priorov Journal of Traumatology and Orthopedics ◽

10.17816/vto200916374-79 ◽

2009 ◽

Vol 16 (3) ◽

pp. 74-79

Author(s):

V A Sokolov ◽

E I Byalik ◽

Aleksey Maksimovich Fayn ◽

D V Evstigneev ◽

V A Sokolov ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Pelvic Ring ◽

Functional Results ◽

Symphysis Pubis ◽

Multiple Injury ◽

Scientific Research Institute ◽

Pelvic Fractures ◽

Basic Part ◽

Pelvic Ring Injuries ◽

Polytrauma Patients ◽

Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries

During the period from 1997 to 2008 three hundred twenty two polytrauma patients with unstable pelvic ring injuries were operated on at the department of concomitant and multiple injury of Sclifosovskiy Scientific-Research Institute for Emergency Care. External fixation of pelvic ring fragments was the basic part of antishock therapy. Avulsion of symphysis pubis was treated using original pelvic plate. In multiple pelvic fractures two specially designed reconstructive plates were applied via 2 endopelvic mini approaches. Elaborated treatment tactics enabled to achieve good anatomical and functional results in the majority of patients.

Download Full-text

Percutaneous Placement of Iliosacral Screws for Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries: Comparison between One and Two C-arm Fluoroscopic Techniques

Journal of Trauma and Acute Care Surgery ◽

10.1097/01.ta.0000200860.01931.9a ◽

2006 ◽

Vol 60 (3) ◽

pp. 602-608 ◽

Cited By ~ 41

Author(s):

Kuo-Ti Peng ◽

Kuo-Chin Huang ◽

Min-Chi Chen ◽

Yen-Yao Li ◽

Robert Wen-Wei Hsu

Keyword(s):

Pelvic Ring ◽

Pelvic Ring Injuries ◽

Iliosacral Screws ◽

Unstable Pelvic Ring Injuries

Download Full-text

Comparison of One-Year Functional Outcomes and Quality of Life between Posterior Pelvic Ring Fixation and Combined Anterior-Posterior Pelvic Ring Fixation after Lateral Compression (B2 Type) Pelvic Fracture

Medicina ◽

10.3390/medicina57030204 ◽

2021 ◽

Vol 57 (3) ◽

pp. 204

Author(s):

Giedrius Petryla ◽

Valentinas Uvarovas ◽

Rokas Bobina ◽

Jaunius Kurtinaitis ◽

Roma Puronaitė ◽

...

Keyword(s):

Quality Of Life ◽

Pelvic Fracture ◽

Functional Outcomes ◽

Pelvic Ring ◽

Pelvic Fractures ◽

Posterior Pelvic Ring ◽

Sf 36 ◽

One Year ◽

Anterior Posterior

Background and Objectives: The treatment algorithm of lateral compression B2 type pelvic fractures are still under debate. Some authors advocate conservative treatment, while others recommend surgical approach. The clear indications for isolated anterior or posterior ring fixation or combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fixation of B2 type fractures remain unclear. The aim of this study was to compare the functional outcomes and quality of life after isolated posterior pelvic ring fixation and combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fixation for the treatment of B2 pelvic fractures. Materials and Methods: Patients aged 18 to 65 years with B2 type pelvic fracture hospitalized in a single trauma centre over a period of 3 years were included in the research. Based on the attending surgeon’s preference, patients were treated with isolated posterior or combined anterior-posterior pelvic fixation. The quality of life and pelvic function were assessed using SF-36 and Majeed questionnaires, respectively. Patients filled in the questionnaires twice: during the first hospitalization (concerning their pre-trauma state—timepoint I) and one-year after the injury (timepoint II). Results: A cohort of 32 patients with B2 type pelvic fracture was enrolled in the analysis: 23 (72%) were female and 9 (28%) were male. The mean age was 35.3 ± 11.9 years. In this cohort 13 (41%) patients underwent isolated posterior pelvic ring fixation (group I) and 19 (59%) patients underwent combined anterior-posterior pelvic ring fixation (group II). No statistically significant differences were observed between the groups in both timepoints concerning Majeed, SF-36 PCS and MCS scores. However, in both groups Majeed and SF-36 PCS scores were statistically significantly lower one year after pelvic fracture compared with pre-trauma state, while SF-36 MCS scores did not differ. Conclusions: No differences were found in quality of life and functional outcomes between isolated posterior pelvic ring fixation and combined anterior-posterior fixation for the treatment of B2 type pelvic fractures.

Download Full-text