scholarly journals Oral health interventions for people living with mental disorders: protocol for a realist systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Amanda Kenny ◽  
Virginia Dickson-Swift ◽  
Mark Gussy ◽  
Susan Kidd ◽  
Dianne Cox ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Health Interventions

scholarly journals Pre and Probiotics Involved in the Modulation of Oral Bacterial Species: New Therapeutic Leads in Mental Disorders?

2021 ◽  
Vol 9 (7) ◽  
pp. 1450
Author(s):  
Yoann Maitre ◽  
Rachid Mahalli ◽  
Pierre Micheneau ◽  
Alexis Delpierre ◽  
Marie Guerin ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Central Nervous System ◽  
Nervous System ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Bacterial Species ◽  
Oral Microbiome ◽  
Oral Microbiota ◽  
Therapeutic Leads

This systematic review aims to identify probiotics and prebiotics for modulating oral bacterial species associated with mental disorders. Using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis guideline, we search the electronic MEDLINE database published till January 2021 to identify the studies on probiotics and/or prebiotics for preventing and treating major oral dysbiosis that provokes mental disorders. The outcome of the search produces 374 records. After excluding non-relevant studies, 38 papers were included in the present review. While many studies suggest the potential effects of the oral microbiota on the biochemical signalling events between the oral microbiota and central nervous system, our review highlights the limited development concerning the use of prebiotics and/or probiotics in modulating oral dysbiosis potentially involved in the development of mental disorders. However, the collected studies confirm prebiotics and/or probiotics interest for a global or targeted modulation of the oral microbiome in preventing or treating mental disorders. These outcomes also offer exciting prospects for improving the oral health of people with mental disorders in the future.

scholarly journals The cost-effectiveness of oral health interventions: A systematic review of cost-utility analyses

2017 ◽  
Vol 46 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-124 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruvini M. Hettiarachchi ◽  
Sanjeewa Kularatna ◽  
Martin J. Downes ◽  
Joshua Byrnes ◽  
Jeroen Kroon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Cost Effectiveness ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Cost Utility ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
The Cost

scholarly journals Mechanisms of Change in Digital Health Interventions for Mental Disorders in Youth: Systematic Review (Preprint)

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthias Domhardt ◽  
Sophie Engler ◽  
Hannah Nowak ◽  
Arne Lutsch ◽  
Amit Baumel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Quality Criteria ◽  
Process Research ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Mechanisms Of Change ◽  
Cochrane Central Register ◽  
Cognitive Mediators ◽  
Intervening Variables

BACKGROUND Digital health interventions (DHIs) are efficacious for several mental disorders in youth; however, integrated, evidence-based knowledge about the mechanisms of change in these interventions is lacking. OBJECTIVE This systematic review aims to comprehensively evaluate studies on mediators and mechanisms of change in different DHIs for common mental disorders in children and adolescents. METHODS A systematic literature search of the electronic databases Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Embase, MEDLINE, and PsycINFO was conducted, complemented by backward and forward searches. Two independent reviewers selected studies for inclusion, extracted the data, and rated the methodological quality of eligible studies (ie, risk of bias and 8 quality criteria for process research). RESULTS A total of 25 studies that have evaluated 39 potential mediators were included in this review. Cognitive mediators were the largest group of examined intervening variables, followed by a broad range of emotional and affective, interpersonal, parenting behavior, and other mediators. The mediator categories with the highest percentages of significant intervening variables were the groups of affective mediators (4/4, 100%) and combined cognitive mediators (13/19, 68%). Although more than three-quarters of the eligible studies met 5 or more quality criteria, causal conclusions have been widely precluded. CONCLUSIONS The findings of this review might guide the empirically informed advancement of DHIs, contributing to improved intervention outcomes, and the discussion of methodological recommendations for process research might facilitate mediation studies with more pertinent designs, allowing for conclusions with higher causal certainty in the future.

The role of psychological theories in oral health interventions: A systematic review and meta‐analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 17 (2) ◽  
pp. 142-152 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hormoz Sanaei Nasab ◽  
Mohsen Yazdanian ◽  
Yaser Mokhayeri ◽  
Marzieh Latifi ◽  
Negin Niksadat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Psychological Theories

scholarly journals Effects of Educational Interventions on Oral Hygiene: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sakineh Dadipoor ◽  
Mohtasham Ghaffari ◽  
Mahsa Mortazavi New ◽  
Abbas Alipour ◽  
Ali Safari-Moradabadi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Oral Hygiene ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Experimental Studies ◽  
Role Playing ◽  
Educational Interventions ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Oral Diseases ◽  
Quasi Experimental

Abstract Background: The objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of school based oral health interventions programs on students’ oral hygiene, in developing countries through systematic review and meta-analysis. Methods: Our investigation was conducted in electronic databases including MEDLINE Ovid), Embase Ovid, Scopus), Web of Science from 2000 to march 2018.The data were extracted based on a standard data collection form specific to observational studies, and entered into RevMan 2014. Inclusion criteria included individually randomized controlled trials (RCTs) or cluster-RCTs including quasi- experimental studies that were related to oral health interventions. Software RevMan 2014was used for meta-analysis. A meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models. Results: Twelve studies of students in this review finally entered the study including five individual RCTs, four cluster-RCTs, and three quasi-experimental studies. The intervention study period ranged from 1 month to 9 month. Interventions described in the studies briefly included oral health education with activities such as lectures, albums, slides, pamphlets, posters, and role playing. Meta-analyses showed a significant difference in knowledge (SMD 3.31, 95% CI 2.52 to 4.11; I 2 = 98; P < 0.001), attitude (SMD 1.99, 95% CI 0. 43 to 3.54; I 2 = 99; P < 0.001), behavior (SMD 4.74, 95% CI 3.70 to 5.77; I 2 = 99; P < 0.001), plaque index (SMD -1.01, 95% CI -1.50 to -0. 51; I 2 = 97; P < 0.001) and Gingival index (SMD 0. 33, 95% CI -0. 36 to 1. 02; I 2 = 98; P = 0.34) for students receiving educational interventions compared to those receiving usual care . Discussion: The systematic review concludes that educational interventions are effective for improving oral health knowledge, attitudes, behaviors, etc., which could potentially lead to improved oral health, reduced oral diseases, and reduced costs from treating oral diseases.

Are maternal mental disorders associated with children's oral health? A systematic review

2020 ◽  
Vol 30 (3) ◽  
pp. 252-264 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marcia Andreola Beber Gomes ◽  
Mariana Gonzalez Cademartori ◽  
Marília Leão Goettems ◽  
Marina Sousa Azevedo
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Children’S Oral Health

scholarly journals Oral Health Interventions for Individuals with Autism: A Systematic Review

2016 ◽  
Vol 97 (10) ◽  
pp. e140
Author(s):  
Lucia Florindez ◽  
Leah I. Stein Duker ◽  
Eunice Hong ◽  
Sharon A. Cermak
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Oral Health ◽  
Health Interventions

scholarly journals Primary care professionals’ attitudes towards digital health interventions for common mental disorders: study protocol for a mixed methods systematic review

BMJ Open ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (6) ◽  
pp. e045657
Author(s):  
Maria Hanf ◽  
Julian Hirt ◽  
Marjan van den Akker
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Primary Care ◽  
Mixed Methods ◽  
Mental Disorders ◽  
Care Setting ◽  
Primary Care Setting ◽  
Digital Health ◽  
Health Interventions ◽  
Mental Health Interventions ◽  
Primary Care Professionals

IntroductionMental disorders such as depression are common, and an estimated 264 million people are affected by them throughout the world. In recent years, studies on digital health interventions to treat mental disorders have shown evidence of their efficacy, and interest in using them has increased as a result. In the primary care setting, depression and anxiety are the two most frequently diagnosed and treated mental disorders. When they do not refer them to specialists, primary care professionals such as general practitioners treat patients with mental disorders themselves but have insufficient time to treat them adequately. Furthermore, there is a shortage of psychotherapists and those that exist have long waiting lists for an appointment. The purpose of this mixed methods systematic review is to explore the attitudes of primary care professionals towards the use of digital health interventions in the treatment of patients with mental disorders. Their attitudes will provide an indication whether digital mental health interventions can effectively complement standard care in the primary care setting.Methods and analysisWe searched for qualitative, quantitative and mixed methods studies published in English, German, Spanish, Russian, French and Dutch after January 2010 for inclusion in the review. The included studies must involve digital mental health interventions conducted via computer and/or mobile devices in the primary care setting. The search was conducted in July 2020 in the following electronic bibliographic databases: MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, PsycINFO and Web of Science Core Collection. Two reviewers will independently screen titles, abstracts and full texts and extract data. We will use the ‘Integrated methodology’ framework to combine both quantitative and qualitative data.Ethics and disseminationEthical approval is not required. We will disseminate the results of the mixed methods systematic review in a peer-reviewed journal and scientific conferences.PROSPERO registration numberCRD42020188879.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document