scholarly journals Variation in practice for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis: a survey from an academic tertiary referral center in the United States

2021 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Ailaney ◽  
Elizabeth Zielinski ◽  
Michelle Doll ◽  
Gonzalo M. Bearman ◽  
Stephen L. Kates ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Antibiotic surgical prophylaxis is a core strategy for prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). Despite best practice guidelines and known efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing SSI risk, there is often wide variation in its use. This study was designed to determine the individual perspectives of perioperative providers at an academic tertiary referral center regarding their knowledge of preoperative antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing. Methods A prospective survey was conducted amongst surgical and anesthesia team members involved in preoperative antibiotic decision making. The survey addressed ten key principles relating to preoperative antibiotic use, including antibiotic choice, timing and rate of infusion, and dosing. The survey was distributed among orthopaedic surgeons, residents, and anesthesia providers at their respective monthly service line meetings between August 2017 to June 2019. The data was stored and analyzed in a Microsoft Excel worksheet. Results A total of 73 providers completed the survey. Twenty-two (30 %) of the providers agreed and 47 (64 %) disagreed that both vancomycin and cefazolin are equally effective for antibiotic prophylaxis. As for antibiotic choice in patients with penicillin allergies, 37 (51 %) agreed with vancomycin, 21 (29 %) agreed with clindamycin, and 15 (21 %) disagreed with both alternatives. When providers were surveyed regarding the appropriateness of standard versus weight adjusted dosing, 67 (92 %) agreed that vancomycin should be weight adjusted and 63 (86 %) agreed that cefazolin should be weight adjusted. Conclusions There is no clear consensus amongst providers for which antibiotic to administer for antibiotic prophylaxis despite existing guidelines. Discrepancy also exists between orthopaedic surgery and anesthesia providers in regards to appropriate antibiotic choice for patients with reported penicillin allergies. Institutions should implement evidence-based protocols for preoperative antibiotic prophylaxis and continue to prospectively monitor compliance in order to identify any inconsistencies that could result in inappropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for patients.

2018 ◽  
Vol 27 (3) ◽  
pp. 410-417 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariantonia Ferrara ◽  
Laura Eggenschwiler ◽  
Andrew Stephenson ◽  
Alyssa Montieth ◽  
Nakhoul Nakhoul ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nikhil Ailaney ◽  
Elizabeth Zielinski ◽  
Michelle Doll ◽  
Gonzalo M. Bearman ◽  
Stephen L. Kates ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Antibiotic surgical prophylaxis is a core strategy for the prevention of surgical site infections (SSI). Despite best practice guidelines and known efficacy of antibiotic prophylaxis in decreasing SSI risk, there is often wide variation in its use. We performed this study to assess antibiotic prophylaxis perspectives of orthopaedic surgery and anesthesiology teams at our institution regarding preoperative antibiotic choice, dosing, and timing.Methods An IRB approved questionnaire was distributed amongst orthopaedic surgery and anesthesia team members involved in preoperative antibiotic decision making from August 2017 to June 2019. The questionnaire addressed ten key practices relating to preoperative antibiotic use, including antibiotic choice, timing, rate of infusion, and dosing. Provider and service type responses were also compared using Chi-square tests. Results Two nurse practitioner (NP), 22 resident, and 23 attending orthopaedic surgery providers completed the survey. Twelve nurse anesthetist (CRNA), 6 resident, and 8 attending anesthesiology providers completed the survey. Only 30% of all providers agreed that both vancomycin and cefazolin are equally effective for the purpose of antibiotic prophylaxis. As for the antibiotic choice in patients with penicillin allergies, 50% agreed with vancomycin, 28% agreed with clindamycin, and 22% disagreed with both alternatives. Furthermore, resident physicians more frequently agreed with vancomycin (71%) compared to NPs (29%), and attendings physicians (35%) (p=0.014). A majority of providers agreed with the necessity of weight-based dosing and timely infusion of vancomycin.Conclusions There is no clear consensus amongst providers for which antibiotic to administer for antibiotic prophylaxis despite existing guidelines. Discrepancy exists between orthopaedic and anesthesia providers for which antibiotic to administer in patients with penicillin allergies. Institutions should evaluate antibiotic prophylaxis perspectives amongst their perioperative staff in order to identify any inconsistencies that could result in inappropriate antibiotic prophylaxis for patients. A multifactorial quality improvement strategy that includes development of a protocol, displaying prophylaxis guidelines in perioperative areas, educational training, a preoperative checklist, and optimizing the electronic medical record should be implemented to standardize prophylaxis practices. It is also integral to involve both the orthopaedic and the anesthesia staff in the quality improvement process otherwise discrepancies may continue to persist.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document