scholarly journals Protocol for a mixed methods process evaluation of a hybrid implementation-effectiveness trial of a scaled-up whole-school physical activity program for adolescents: Physical Activity 4 Everyone (PA4E1)

Trials ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Matthew Mclaughlin ◽  
Jed Duff ◽  
Rachel Sutherland ◽  
Elizabeth Campbell ◽  
Luke Wolfenden ◽  
...  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rachel C. Whooten ◽  
Christine Horan ◽  
Jack Cordes ◽  
Anna Nicole Dartley ◽  
Annabelle Aguirre ◽  
...  

2008 ◽  
Vol 5 (5) ◽  
pp. 675-687 ◽  
Author(s):  
Nicola Lauzon ◽  
Catherine B. Chan ◽  
Anita M. Myers ◽  
Catrine Tudor-Locke

Background:Limited process evaluation of pedometer-based interventions has been reported.Methods:Feedback via focus groups (n = 38) and exit questionnaires (n = 68) was used to examine participants’ experiences in a group-based, pedometer-based physical activity (PA) program delivered in the workplace.Results:The pedometer was described as a useful tool for increasing awareness of PA, providing motivation and visual feedback, and encouraging conversation and support among participants and others such as family and friends. Group meetings provided motivation and social support, as did participation by coworkers. Self-selected goals, self-selected PA strategies, and recording of steps/d were also important.Conclusions:Given the importance of social support as a mediating variable in changing PA behavior, future pedometer-based programs might benefit from including a group-based component.


Author(s):  
Shelby Carr ◽  
Amanda Burke ◽  
Angel Marie Chater ◽  
Neil Howlett ◽  
Andy Jones

Background: Community-based physical activity programs typically evolve to respond to local conditions and feedback from stakeholders. Process evaluations are essential for capturing how programs are implemented, yet often fail to capture delivery evolution over time, meaning missed opportunities for capturing lessons learned. Methods: This research paper reports on a staged approach to a process evaluation undertaken within a community-based UK 12-month physical activity program that aimed to capture change and adaptation to program implementation. Twenty-five one-to-one interviews and 12 focus groups took place over the 3 years of program delivery. Participants included program participants, management, and service deliverers. Results: Program adaptations that were captured through the ongoing process evaluation included changes to the design of promotional material, program delivery content, ongoing training in behavior change, and the addition of regular participant community events. The authors address how these strands evolved over program delivery, and how the process evaluation was able to capture them. Conclusion: The pragmatic evaluation approach enabled changes in response to the local context, as well as improvements in the program to be captured in a timely manner, allowing the delivery to be responsive and the evaluation flexible.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document