scholarly journals Dentoskeletal and tooth-size differences between Syrian and Hungarian adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion: a retrospective study

2020 ◽  
Vol 13 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alaa Al Ayoubi ◽  
Alireza Khandan Dezfully ◽  
Melinda Madléna
Keyword(s):  
Retrospective Study ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Tooth Size ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Tooth size discrepancies in Class II division 1 and Class III malocclusion requiring surgical–orthodontic or orthodontic treatment

2014 ◽  
Vol 41 (2) ◽  
pp. 118-123 ◽  
Author(s):  
Timothy P McSwiney ◽  
Declan T Millett ◽  
Grant T McIntyre ◽  
Mark K Barry ◽  
Michael S Cronin
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
Tooth Size ◽  
Class Iii ◽  
Class Iii Malocclusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

scholarly journals Craniofacial characteristics of Syrian adolescents with Class II division 1 malocclusion: a retrospective study

PeerJ ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 8 ◽  
pp. e9545
Author(s):  
Alaa Al Ayoubi ◽  
Daniel Dalla Torre ◽  
Melinda Madléna
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Anterior Tooth ◽  
Tooth Size ◽  
Average Width ◽  
Nasolabial Angle ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Syrian Population ◽  
Standard Deviations ◽  
Class Ii Division 1 ◽  
Craniofacial Characteristics

Background Malocclusion characteristics vary across different ethnic groups and populations. Limited data are available regarding the characteristics of Syrian adolescents with Class II division 1 (Class II-1) malocclusion, and the recent inflow of Syrian refugees and immigrants into Europe and many areas worldwide demonstrate the need for updated studies to discover the craniofacial characteristics of these new immigrants. Objectives The present compound cephalometric and tooth-size study sought to assess the dentofacial morphology, upper-airway dimensions, and tooth-size characteristics of Syrian adolescents with Class II-1 malocclusion and compare the results with established Syrian population norms. Materials and Methods The study sample consisted of 43 Syrian patients including 24 females and 19 males with Class II-1 malocclusion (age: 14.3 (±1.5) years, mean (±SD)). Cephalometric radiographs and orthodontic casts were analyzed using special orthodontic software (OnyxCeph3™) and a universal digital caliper, respectively. Statistics were calculated using the SPSS software. Results In Syrian adolescents with Class II-1 malocclusion, the position of the mandible relative to the nasion perpendicular (mean (95% confidence interval)) was −11.01 (−12.45, −9.57) mm. Facial axis angle showed a negative value: −6.25 (−7.65, −4.85) degrees. An obtuse nasolabial angle was observed: 104.05 (101.77, 106.33) degrees. The average width of the upper pharynx was 11.50 (10.53, 12.47) mm; however, there was no prevalence of an upper-pharyngeal width of 5 mm or less. The average value of the anterior tooth-size ratio was 80.69 (79.85, 81.53) percent. In total, 39.5% of the investigated subjects had anterior ratios outside two standard deviations from Bolton’s norm, while 25.6% of the investigated subjects had anterior ratios outside two standard deviations from Syrian population norm. Conclusions In this study, the inter-maxillary discrepancy of Class II-1 Syrian adolescents was a consequence of their hyperdivergent facial pattern. The observed small pharyngeal widths were not clinically significant, while the anterior tooth-size discrepancy might be clinically relevant.

Perbedaan Analisis Sefalometri Skeletal Sebelum dan Sesudah Perawatan Alat Myofunctional pada Pasien Maloklusi Dentoskeletal Kelas II Divisi I dalam Masa Pertumbuhan dengan Metode Steiner

2019 ◽  
Vol 4 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
Nugroho Ahmad Riyadi
Keyword(s):  
Orthodontic Treatment ◽  
Class Ii ◽  
T Test ◽  
Analytic Study ◽  
Statistic Analysis ◽  
Twin Block ◽  
Normal Occlusion ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Before And After ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The aim of orthodontics treatment is normalization of teeth position in three planes, using various orthodontics appliance to reach the chepalometric standar and normal occlusion. Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients using myofunctional appliance may correct anteroposterior planes of mandibula. This study was a descriptive retrospective analytic study to look at the success of Orthodontic treatment for dentoskeletal class II division 1 in growing patients with myofunctional appliance using chepalometrics analysis Steiner value. The sample used in this study is chepalogram radiographic from patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion in growing patients before and after using myofunctional appliance in PPDGS orthodontics Clinic of Padjadjaran University. Statistic analysis were performed with pair t-test and Wilcoxon. Based on this study, it is concluded that orthodontic treatment with myofunctional appliance such as activator and twin block in growing patient with dentoskeletal class II division 1 malocclusion shows significant changes and compatibility with the normal criteria.

Treatment of Class II Division 1 with Impacted Mandibular Right Second Molar Using Microimplant

2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (4) ◽  
pp. 238-248
Author(s):  
Sun-mi Lee ◽  
Seong-Ryeol Bae ◽  
Hee-Moon Kyung ◽  
Mi-hee Hong ◽  
Hyo-Sang Park
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Second Molar ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

Comparative Dentoskeletal Study of Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 Malocclusion Subjects

2011 ◽  
Vol 1 (1) ◽  
pp. 36-41
Author(s):  
Jyoti Dhakal
Keyword(s):  
Class Ii ◽  
Class Ii Malocclusion ◽  
Basic Difference ◽  
Cephalometric Radiograph ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Division 1 ◽  
Dentoskeletal Morphology ◽  
Division 2 ◽  
Dental Cast ◽  
Class Ii Division 1

The dentoskeletal characteristics of Class II malocclusion subjects were evaluated using cephalometric radiograph and dental cast of 60 untreated patients. The sample included 30 Class II Division 1 and 30 Class II Division 2 malocclusion patients. The inter-canine, inter-premolar, inter-molar, inter-canine alveolar, inter-premolar alveolar, inter-molar alveolar widths are measured on study models. The result showed statistically significant difference between the groups for mandibular inter-canine width only. The cephalometric analysis revealed that SNB angle was responsible for the skeletal sagittal difference between the two groups except for the position of maxillary incisors. No basic difference in dentoskeletal morphology existed between Class II Division 1 and Class II Division 2 malocclusions.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document