scholarly journals Reduced work/academic performance and quality of life in patients with allergic rhinitis and impact of allergen immunotherapy

Author(s):  
A. Roger ◽  
E. Arcalá Campillo ◽  
M. C. Torres ◽  
C. Millan ◽  
I. Jáuregui ◽  
...  
2002 ◽  
Vol 109 (1) ◽  
pp. S121-S121
Author(s):  
S Echechipia ◽  
BE Garcia ◽  
MT Lizaso ◽  
MT Aldunate ◽  
JM Olaguibel ◽  
...  

2020 ◽  
Vol 41 (4) ◽  
pp. 271-277
Author(s):  
Andrzej Bozek ◽  
Anna Cudak ◽  
Giorgio Walter Canonica

Background: The effect of prolonged allergen immunotherapy is still insufficiently known, especially in elderly patients. Objective: The effect after a 3-year course of injected allergen-specific immunotherapy (AIT) for grass pollen allergy in elderly patients with allergic rhinitis was observed. Methods: Thirty-eight elderly patients (mean ± standard deviation, 66.2 ± 2.7 years old) who received preseasonal injected AIT or placebo for grass pollen allergy were monitored for 3 years and compared with a placebo group. The combined symptom medication score (CSMS), serum level of immunoglobulin G4 (IgG4) to phleum pratense 5 (Phl p5) and quality of life were assessed immediately after AIT and 3 years later. Results: After AIT, the CSMS was significantly decreased from 2.15 (range, 1.27‐3.00) to 1.13 (range, 0.79‐1.36) (p = 0.03) and remained lower (1.41 ± 0.72 versus 2.41 ± 1.11) than that in the placebo group during the 3 years after AIT. Serum-specific IgG4 against increased during the course of AIT and remained at a high level during further observation. Quality of life, based on the Rhinoconjunctivitis Quality of Life Questionnaire, was significantly decreased in the patients who received AIT from 1.51 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.21‐1.84) to 1.01 (95% CI, 0.93‐1.87) (p < 0.05) and was decreased to 0.97‐1.26 (95% CI, 0.88‐1.82) during the 3 years after discontinuation of AIT. Conclusion: A prolonged positive effect after AIT for grass pollen allergy was observed in elderly patients with allergic rhinitis. Further trials are needed to confirm this effect.Clinical trial MC56871/12, <ext-link xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" ext-link-type="uri" xlink:href="http://www.clinicaltrials.gov">www.clinicaltrials.gov</ext-link>.


2020 ◽  
Vol 27 (4) ◽  
pp. 657-663
Author(s):  
Magdalena Brodowicz-Król ◽  
Ewa Guz ◽  
Dorota Hawryluk ◽  
Ewa Kulbaka ◽  
Lech Panasiuk ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Boris Stuck ◽  
Karl Hörmann ◽  
Joachim Maurer ◽  
Anna-Eva Hagner ◽  
Julia Johnson ◽  
...  

Author(s):  
Ludger Klimek ◽  
William E. Berger ◽  
Jean Bousquet ◽  
Paul K. Keith ◽  
Peter Smith ◽  
...  

Allergic rhinitis (AR) is prevalent, and many patients present with moderate-to-severe symptomatic disease. The majority of patients are not satisfied with their AR treatment, despite the use of concurrent medications. These gaps underscore the need for treatment with more effective options for moderate-to-severe AR. The authors’ objective was to review systematically the efficacy and safety of MP-AzeFlu for the treatment of AR. The primary outcomes studied were nasal, ocular, and total symptoms. Other outcomes included time to onset and of AR control, quality of life, and safety. Searches of PubMed and Cochrane databases were conducted on May 14, 2020, with no date restrictions, to identify publications reporting data on MP-AzeFlu. Clinical studies of any phase were included. Studies were excluded if they were not in English, were review articles, did not discuss the safety and efficacy of MP-AzeFlu for AR symptoms. Treatment of AR with MP-AzeFlu results in effective, sustained relief of nasal and ocular symptoms, and faster onset and time to control compared with intranasal azelastine or fluticasone propionate. Long-term use of MP-AzeFlu was safe, with benefits in children, adults, and adults aged ≥65 years. Other treatment options, including fluticasone propionate and azelastine alone or the combination of intranasal corticosteroids and oral antihistamine, do not provide the same level of efficacy as MP-AzeFlu in terms of rapid and sustained relief of the entire AR symptom complex. Furthermore, MP-AzeFlu significantly improves patient quality of life. MP-AzeFlu is a currently available combination that may satisfy all these patient needs and expectations.


Author(s):  
Inmaculada García-Martínez ◽  
José María Augusto Landa ◽  
Samuel P. León

(1) Background: Academic engagement has been reported in the literature as an important factor in the academic achievement of university students. Other factors such as emotional intelligence (EI) and resilience have also been related to students’ performance and quality of life. The present study has two clearly delimited and interrelated objectives. First, to study the mediational role that engagement plays in the relationship between EI and resilience on quality of life. Secondly, and similarly, to study the mediational role of engagement in the relationship between EI and resilience, but in this case on academic achievement. (2) Methods: For this purpose, four scales frequently used in the literature to measure emotional intelligence, resilience, academic engagement and quality of life were administered to 427 students of the University of Jaén undertaking education degrees. In addition, students were asked to indicate their current average mark as a measure of academic performance. Two mediational models based on structural equations were proposed to analyse the relationships between the proposed variables. (3) Results: The results obtained showed that emotional intelligence and resilience directly predicted students’ life satisfaction, but this direct relationship did not result in academic performance. In addition, and assuming a finding not found so far, engagement was shown to exert an indirect mediational role for both life satisfaction and academic performance of students. (4) Conclusions: The findings of the study support the importance of engagement in the design and development of instructional processes, as well as in the implementation of any initiative.


2014 ◽  
Vol 6 (6) ◽  
pp. 541 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jeong Hee Kim ◽  
Young Mee Ahn ◽  
Hyung Jin Kim ◽  
Dae Hyun Lim ◽  
Byong Kwan Son ◽  
...  

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document