scholarly journals Coordinating across correctional, community, and VA systems: applying the Collaborative Chronic Care Model to post-incarceration healthcare and reentry support for veterans with mental health and substance use disorders

2019 ◽  
Vol 7 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Bo Kim ◽  
Rendelle E. Bolton ◽  
Justeen Hyde ◽  
B. Graeme Fincke ◽  
Mari-Lynn Drainoni ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Between 12,000 and 16,000 veterans leave incarceration annually. As is known to be the case for justice-involved populations in general, mental health disorders (MHDs) and substance use disorders (SUDs) are highly prevalent among incarcerated veterans, and individuals with MHDs and SUDs reentering the community are at increased risk of deteriorating health and recidivism. We sought to identify opportunities to better coordinate care/services across correctional, community, and VA systems for reentry veterans with MHDs and SUDs. Methods We interviewed 16 veterans post-incarceration and 22 stakeholders from reentry-involved federal/state/community organizations. We performed a grounded thematic analysis, and recognizing consistencies between the emergent themes and the evidence-based Collaborative Chronic Care Model (CCM), we mapped findings to the CCM’s elements – work role redesign (WRR), patient self-management support (PSS), provider decision support (PDS), clinical information systems (CIS), linkages to community resources (LCR), and organizational/leadership support (OLS). Results Emergent themes included (i) WRR – coordination challenges among organizations involved in veterans’ reentry; (ii) PSS – veterans’ fear of reentering society; (iii) PDS – uneven knowledge by reentry support providers regarding available services when deciding which services to connect a reentry veteran to and whether he/she is ready and/or willing to receive services; (iv) CIS – lapses in MHD/SUD medications between release and a first scheduled health care appointment, as well as challenges in transfer of medical records; (v) LCR – inconsistent awareness of existing services and resources available across a disparate reentry system; and (vi) OLS – reentry plans designed to address only immediate transitional needs upon release, which do not always prioritize MHD/SUD needs. Conclusions Applying the CCM to coordinating cross-system health care and reentry support may contribute to reductions in mental health crises and overdoses in the precarious first weeks of the reentry period.

2013 ◽  
Vol 35 (2) ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Thomas McLellan ◽  
Joanna L. Starrels ◽  
Betty Tai ◽  
Adam J. Gordon ◽  
Richard Brown ◽  
...  

2009 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 2-13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Lisa C. Dierker ◽  
Eve M. Sledjeski ◽  
Stephanie Marshall ◽  
Sarah Johnson

2016 ◽  
Vol 50 (2) ◽  
pp. 239-246 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daiane Medeiros da Silva ◽  
Hérika Brito Gomes de Farias ◽  
Tereza Cristina Scatena Villa ◽  
Lenilde Duarte de Sá ◽  
Maria Eugênia Firmino Brunello ◽  
...  

Abstract OBJECTIVE: To analyze the care provided to tuberculosis cases in primary health care services according to the elements of the Chronic Care Model. METHOD: Cross-sectional study conducted in a capital city of the northeastern region of Brazil involving 83 Family Health Strategy professionals.A structured tool adapted to tuberculosis-related care in Brazil was applied.Analysis was based on the development of indicators with capacity to produce care varying between limited and optimum. RESULTS: The organization of care for tuberculosis and supported self-care presented reasonable capacity.In the coordination with the community, the presence of the community agent presented optimum capacity.Partnership with organizations of the community and involvement of experts presented limited capacity.The qualification of professionals, the system for scheduling and monitoring tuberculosis in the community, and the clinical information system presented basic capacity. CONCLUSION: The capacity of the primary health care services to produce tuberculosis-related care according to the elements of the Chronic Care Model is still limited.Overcoming the fragmentation of care and prioritizing a systemic operation between actions and services of the health care network remains as a major challenge.


2010 ◽  
Vol 25 (S4) ◽  
pp. 586-592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith L. Bowen ◽  
David P. Stevens ◽  
Connie S. Sixta ◽  
Lloyd Provost ◽  
Julie K. Johnson ◽  
...  

2010 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
pp. 71-90 ◽  
Author(s):  
Chris Ham

AbstractThe purpose of this paper is to describe the characteristics of the high-performing chronic care system and the four implementation strategies needed to achieve such a system. The paper starts with a description of the Chronic Care Model and summarises evidence on its impact. This is followed by a review of international evidence on gaps in the quality of chronic care. These gaps suggest that, useful and influential as the Chronic Care Model is, more is needed to help health care decision makers bring about the reorientation required to meet the needs of populations in which chronic diseases predominate. The second half of the paper therefore sets out the ten characteristics and four implementation strategies required to achieve a high-performing chronic care system. In doing so, it provides practical guidance to policy makers and health care leaders on the most promising strategies for improving the provision of chronic care, drawing on evidence from the experience of England, New Zealand and USA.


2019 ◽  
Vol 25 (3) ◽  
pp. 419-446 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jette Marcussen ◽  
Lise Hounsgaard ◽  
Poul Bruun ◽  
Merete Golles Laursen ◽  
Frode Thuen ◽  
...  

The experience of parental death concomitant with parental divorce occurs for 46% of Danish children and 50% of American children who lose a parent to death. This experience of loss and double bereavement compounds increased risk of mental health problems. The aim of this study was to explore nursing interventions for double bereaved children that promoted their well-being. A phenomenological–hermeneutic approach was used to conduct 20 interviews with nurses in family cancer care. Ricoeur’s theoretical framework was followed with naïve reading, structural analysis, and critical interpretation, resulting in the formulation of a new model of nursing care for these children: the Divorced Family–Focused Care Model. Four themes were apparent: (a) collection of information about family structure, (b) assessment of support needs, (c) initiation of well-being support, and (d) coordination and follow-up focused on the child’s well-being. The new intervention model has implications for health care education and implementation of health care policies.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document