scholarly journals Factors associated with non-invasive mechanical ventilation failure in patients with hematological neoplasia and their association with outcomes

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Lídia Miranda Barreto ◽  
◽  
Cecilia Gómez Ravetti ◽  
Thiago Bragança Athaíde ◽  
Renan Detoffol Bragança ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Clinical Judgment ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Orotracheal Intubation ◽  
Icu Mortality ◽  
Factors Associated ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Ventilation Failure

Abstract Background The usefulness of non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) in oncohematological patients is still a matter of debate. Aim To analyze the rate of noninvasive ventilation failure and the main characteristics associated with this endpoint in oncohematological patients with acute respiratory failure (ARF). Methods A ventilatory support protocol was developed and implemented before the onset of the study. According to the PaO2/FiO2 (P/F) ratio and clinical judgment, patients received supplementary oxygen therapy, NIMV, or invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV). Results Eighty-two patients were included, average age between 52.1 ± 16 years old; 44 (53.6%) were male. The tested protocol was followed in 95.1% of cases. Six patients (7.3%) received IMV, 59 (89.7%) received NIMV, and 17 (20.7%) received oxygen therapy. ICU mortality rates were significantly higher in the IMV (83.3%) than in the NIMV (49.2%) and oxygen therapy (5.9%) groups (P < 0.001). Among the 59 patients who initially received NIMV, 30 (50.8%) had to eventually be intubated. Higher SOFA score at baseline (1.35 [95% CI = 1.12–2.10], P = 0.007), higher respiratory rate (RR) (1.10 [95% CI = 1.00–1.22], P = 0.048), and sepsis on admission (16.9 [95% CI = 1.93–149.26], P = 0.011) were independently associated with the need of orotracheal intubation among patients initially treated with NIMV. Moreover, NIMV failure was independently associated with ICU (P < 0.001) and hospital mortality (P = 0.049), and mortality between 6 months and 1 year (P < 0.001). Conclusion The implementation of a NIMV protocol is feasible in patients with hematological neoplasia admitted to the ICU, even though its benefits still remain to be demonstrated. NIMV failure was associated with higher SOFA and RR and more frequent sepsis, and it was also related to poor prognosis.

scholarly journals Children with Congenital Zika Syndrome: the complexity of nursing care during hospitalization

2021 ◽  
Vol 74 (3) ◽  
Author(s):  
Mariana Cardim Novaes ◽  
Monique de Sales Norte Azevedo ◽  
Carolina Fernandes Falsett ◽  
Adriana Teixeira Reis
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Nursing Care ◽  
Health Professionals ◽  
Public Hospital ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Continuous Care ◽  
Airway Clearance ◽  
Congenital Zika Syndrome

ABSTRACT Objectives: to classify the degree of dependence on nursing care required by children with Congenital Zika Syndrome during hospitalization and to analyze their complexity. Methods: this is a descriptive, observational and quantitative study carried out in a pediatric ward of a public hospital in Rio de Janeiro. Data were collected from hospitalization records between June 2017 and April 2018. Results: 54% of the population studied showed a degree of dependence equivalent to semi-intensive care. On 37.5% of hospitalization days, patients required non-invasive or invasive mechanical ventilation; 31.5% had spontaneous breathing requiring airway clearance by aspiration and/or oxygen therapy. Conclusion: Congenital Zika Syndrome represents a challenge for health professionals due to its uniqueness. In this study, it is expressed by demands for complex and continuous care in hospitalization and in preparation for discharge, requiring semi-intensive nursing care.

scholarly journals Trends in the Use and Outcomes of Mechanical Ventilation among Patients Hospitalized with Acute Exacerbations of COPD in Spain, 2001 to 2015

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (10) ◽  
pp. 1621 ◽  
Author(s):  
de Miguel-Diez ◽  
Jiménez-García ◽  
Hernández-Barrera ◽  
Puente-Maestu ◽  
Girón-Matute ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Chronic Obstructive ◽  
Obstructive Pulmonary Disease ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Non Invasive Ventilation ◽  
Acute Exacerbations ◽  
Discharge Database ◽  
Over Time

(1) Background: We examine trends (2001–2015) in the use of non-invasive ventilation (NIV) and invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) among patients hospitalized for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AE-COPD). (2) Methods: Observational retrospective epidemiological study, using the Spanish National Hospital Discharge Database. (3) Results: We included 1,431,935 hospitalizations (aged ≥40 years) with an AE-COPD. NIV use increased significantly, from 1.82% in 2001–2003 to 8.52% in 2013–2015, while IMV utilization decreased significantly, from 1.39% in 2001–2003 to 0.67% in 2013–2015. The use of NIV + invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) rose significantly over time (from 0.17% to 0.42%). Despite the worsening of clinical profile of patients, length of stay decreased significantly over time in all types of ventilation. Patients who received only IMV had the highest in-hospital mortality (IHM) (32.63%). IHM decreased significantly in patients with NIV + IMV, but it remained stable in those receiving isolated NIV and isolated IMV. Factors associated with use of any type of ventilatory support included female sex, lower age, and higher comorbidity. (4) Conclusions: We found an increase in NIV use and a decline in IMV utilization to treat AE-COPD among hospitalized patients. The IHM decreased significantly over time in patients who received NIV + IMV, but it remained stable in patients who received NIV or IMV in isolation

scholarly journals Home Ventilation in Children

2015 ◽  
Vol 35 (1) ◽  
pp. 85-88
Author(s):  
D Gupta ◽  
A Sachdev ◽  
N Gupta ◽  
AK Simalti
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Home Ventilation ◽  
Care Givers ◽  
Complete Health ◽  
Median Period ◽  
Clinical Conditions

Introduction: Home mechanical ventilation (HMV) can prolong survival and improve quality of life. The objectives were to review the challenges, clinical conditions and outcome of children who were discharged from the hospital on respiratory support.Material and Methods: Twenty four patients, who were electively discharged from PICU and had received home ventilatory support for more than 15 days, were enrolled over 11 year study period. Patients were followed up monthly, for two years, for ventilatory requirements, any problems encountered during previous month and for any complication.Results: Twenty four patients with a median age of 3.5 years were discharged home with ventilatory support. HMV was started in 2001 at our hospital. Patents received home ventilation for a median period 5.4 months. Twenty (83.3%) patients received invasive mechanical ventilation via tracheostomy and four (16.7%) patients received non-invasive mechanical ventilation. Twelve (50%) patients received ventilatory support for more than 20 hrs a day and twelve (50%) patients received only during sleep. On follow up for two years for each patient, twenty (83.3%) patients successfully came off from ventilatory support while, two (8.3%) patients died and two (8.3%) lost to follow-up.Conclusion: HMV can be safely applied in selected children with CRF after providing adequate training to the care givers. For its more efficient use, we need to have good social support and medical assistance which can be extended to their homes to meet their complete health care needs.J Nepal Paediatr Soc 2015;35(1):85-88

scholarly journals COVID-19 ICU and mechanical ventilation patient characteristics and outcomes - A systematic review and meta-analysis

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raymond Chang ◽  
Khaled Mossad Elhusseiny ◽  
Yu-Chang Yeh ◽  
Wei-zen Sun
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Ventilatory Support ◽  
Kidney Injury ◽  
Admission Rate ◽  
Resource Planning ◽  
Patient Characteristics ◽  
Icu Mortality

Background Insight into COVID-19 intensive care unit (ICU) patient characteristics, rates and risks of invasive mechanical ventilation (IMV) and associated outcomes as well as any regional discrepancies is critical in this pandemic for individual case management and overall resource planning. Methods and Findings Electronic searches were performed for reports through May 1 2020 and reports on COVID-19 ICU admissions and outcomes were included using predefined search terms. Relevant data was subsequently extracted and pooled using fixed or random effects meta-analysis depending on heterogeneity. Study quality was assessed by the NIH tool and heterogeneity was assessed by I2 and Q tests. Baseline patient characteristics, ICU and IMV outcomes were pooled and meta-analyzed. Pooled odds ratios (pOR) were calculated for clinical features against ICU, IMV mortality. Subgroup analysis was carried out based on patient regions. A total of twenty-eight studies comprising 12,437 COVID-19 ICU admissions from seven countries were meta-analyzed. Pooled ICU admission rate was 21% [95% CI 0.12-0.34] and 69% of cases needed IMV [95% CI 0.61-0.75]. ICU and IMV mortality were 28.3% [95% CI 0.25-0.32], 43% [95% CI 0.29-0.58] and ICU, IMV duration was 7.78 [95% CI 6.99-8.63] and 10.12 [95% CI 7.08-13.16] days respectively. Besides confirming the significance of comorbidities and clinical findings of COVID-19 previously reported, we found the major correlates with ICU mortality were IMV [pOR 16.46, 95% CI 4.37-61.96], acute kidney injury (AKI) [pOR 12.47, 95% CI 1.52-102.7], and acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) [pOR 6.52, 95% CI 2.66-16.01]. Subgroup analyses confirm significant regional discrepancies in outcomes. Conclusions This is the most comprehensive systematic review and meta-analysis of COVID-19 ICU and IMV cases and associated outcomes to date and the only analysis to implicate IMV's associtaion with COVID-19 ICU mortality. The significant association of AKI, ARDS and IMV with mortality has implications for ICU resource planning for AKI and ARDS as well as research into optimal ventilation strategies for patients. Regional differences in outcome implies a need to develop region specific protocols for ventilatory support as well as overall treatment.

scholarly journals Penggunaan Ventilasi Mekanik non Invansif Untuk Mengatasi Kegagalan Pernafasan pada Pasien dengan Edema Pulmo Akut Kardiogenik

2020 ◽  
Vol 1 (2) ◽  
pp. 91-100
Author(s):  
Eva Marti
Keyword(s):  
Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Pulmonary Edema ◽  
Airway Pressure ◽  
Oxygen Therapy ◽  
Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
Invasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Noninvasive Mechanical Ventilation ◽  
Non Invasive ◽  
Bilevel Positive Airway Pressure ◽  
First Choice

Background: Cardiogenic Pulmo edema can cause a heterogeneous syndrome with a mortality rate of up to 9.5% (Aliberti et all., 2018).Objective: The purpose of this paper was to explain how effective the use of non-invasive mechanical ventilation in patients with acute pulmonary edema with respiratory failure. Methods: The literature review was compiled by synthesizing and comparing various relevant scientific articles from the literature search results using the online database of Proquest and Clinicalkey Elsevier that have significance related to the management of acute cardiogenic pulmo edema. Result: Compared with conservative therapy,  noninvasive mechanical ventilation has been shown more effective in improving oxygenation in patients with acute cardiogenic pulmo edema Non-invasive ventilation can reduce dyspnea, acidosis and hypercapnea faster than standard oxygen therapy. Studies show that compared to endotracheal intubation, non-invasive mechanical ventilation is associated with a lower risk of nosocomial infection, lower antibiotic use, shorter length of stay in intensive care units and lower mortality. Study found that there were no differences betwen the two setting of non-invasive mechanical ventilation used, Bilevel positive Airway Pressure (BiPAP) and Continues positive Airway Pressure (CPAP) in  patients outcomes. However, there are absolute and relative contraindications that must be considered, including the effectiveness of the therapy being insignificant when given too late Conclusion: Noninvasive mechanical ventilation can be considered as the first choice in the management of acute cardiogenic pulmonary edema because of its high clinical effectiveness representing a rescue action for patients not improving with conventional oxygen therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document