scholarly journals Patients’ satisfaction with long-acting injectable somatostatin analog therapy for neuroendocrine tumors

2021 ◽  
Vol 5 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Christina Darden ◽  
Mark Price ◽  
David Ray ◽  
Grace Goldstein ◽  
Diana Goss ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Nursing Staff ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Treatment Pathways ◽  
Administration Routes ◽  
Long Duration ◽  
High Satisfaction ◽  
Satisfaction With Treatment ◽  
Long Acting

Abstract Background Long-acting somatostatin analogs (LA SSAs) are approved and recommended for the treatment of patients with advanced neuroendocrine tumors (NETs). Given the long duration of therapy and differences in administration routes, it is important to understand patients’ experiences with receiving LA SSA injections. Methods We conducted a serial survey, informed by qualitative interviews with eight patients treated with LA SSAs and two nurses who administer LA SSA injections, among patients undergoing LA SSA treatment over a 28-day period (administered at baseline and 14 days and 28 days after injection). Eligible patients, recruited by the Carcinoid Cancer Foundation, self-reported having received an LA SSA injection for physician-diagnosed NET within the 5 days before the survey. Results 202 patients completed the survey at baseline (82 receiving lanreotide and 120 receiving octreotide), 148 at day 14, and 124 at day 28. Patients reported consistently high satisfaction levels with their most recent LA SSA injection (91.1% at baseline, 85.1% at day 14, and 85.5% at day 28); 68.8% reported that their injection experience differed based on the nursing staff administering the injection. Conclusions Satisfaction with LA SSA injections is high among patients in this population, and specific experiences with LA SSA injections varied based on the nursing staff administering the injection. Evaluations of patients’ experiences and satisfaction with treatment are increasingly important as patients take more active roles in decision-making for their treatment pathways.

scholarly journals Living With Neuroendocrine Tumors: Assessment of Quality of Life Through a Mobile Application

2019 ◽  
pp. 1-10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jared R. Adams ◽  
David Ray ◽  
Renee Willmon ◽  
Sonia Pulgar ◽  
Arvind Dasari
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Mobile Application ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Physical Symptoms ◽  
Measurement Information ◽  
Treatment Change ◽  
Patient Reported ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE To understand the quality of life (QoL) for patients with neuroendocrine tumors (NETs) through comparison of QoL questionnaires and symptom tracking as well as journaling via the Carcinoid NETs Health Storylines mobile application (app). PATIENTS AND METHODS This was a 12-week prospective, observational study of US patients with NET who were taking long-acting somatostatin analogs. National Institutes of Health Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) and European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) questionnaires were administered three times. Patients also monitored symptoms, mood, bowel movements, food, activity, and sleep, and they journaled in their app, which was coded by theme and sentiment for qualitative analysis. RESULTS Of the 120 patients with NET, 78% were women (mean age, 57 years); 76% had gastroenteropancreatic NETs, and 88% had metastases. Lanreotide depot and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) were used by 41% and 59%, respectively. The most common symptoms at baseline were fatigue (76.7%), diarrhea (62.5%), abdominal discomfort (64.1%), and trouble sleeping (57.5%). The majority completed five of six survey assessments (median, 5; mean, 5.1) and tracked four symptoms in the app (median, 4; mean, 5.5); the average frequency was 41.6 days for each symptom (median, 43; mean, 41.6; range, 1 to 84 days [12 weeks]). Without treatment change, most EORTC-assessed physical symptoms decreased from baseline to midpoint (eg, 59.3% at baseline v 33% at midpoint reported “quite a bit” or “very much” diarrhea; P = .002). App-based symptom tracking revealed large day-to-day variation, but weekly averages correlated well with survey scores. Journal entries showed that more patients made predominantly negative unsolicited entries about their injection experience with octreotide LAR compared with lanreotide (13 of 17 v two of 13; P < .001). CONCLUSION Patients with NET experience a large symptom burden that varies daily. A decrease in physical symptoms on QoL surveys suggests an effect from daily app-based monitoring or journaling, which may reduce recall bias and benefit the patient’s experience of symptoms.

scholarly journals Response and relapse rates after treatment with long-acting somatostatin analogs in multifocal or recurrent type-1 gastric carcinoids: A systematic review and meta-analysis

2019 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 140-147 ◽  
Author(s):  
Roberta Elisa Rossi ◽  
Pietro Invernizzi ◽  
Vincenzo Mazzaferro ◽  
Sara Massironi
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Cumulative Relapse Rate

Background Type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors represent a recurring disease and long-acting somatostatin analogs can inhibit both gastrin release and endocrine cell proliferation. The efficacy and timing of this treatment are still unclear. We performed a systematic review of the literature to clarify the role of somatostatin analog treatment in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. Methods A computerized literature search was performed using relevant keywords to identify all the pertinent articles published in the last 15 years. Results Eight studies were included in this systematic review on somatostatin analogs in type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors. A complete response rate ranged from 25–100%. When only the six prospective studies were considered, no significant heterogeneity was observed, and the pooled cumulative complete response rate was 84.5% (confidence interval 73.8–92.8). Three studies evaluated the type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumor recurrence, with a cumulative relapse rate of 30.2% (confidence interval 13.1–50.6) after 34 months. Conclusion Somatostatin analogs, namely lanreotide and octreotide, have an excellent response rate, with a good safety profile in selected type-1 gastric neuroendocrine tumors, which cannot be safely managed by endoscopic follow-up or resection due to multiple or frequently recurring disease. After therapy discontinuation, the cumulative relapse rate observed after a median 34-month follow-up was relatively high (30.2%).

scholarly journals Octreotide promotes apoptosis in human somatotroph tumor cells by activating somatostatin receptor type 2

2006 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 955-962 ◽  
Author(s):  
E Ferrante ◽  
C Pellegrini ◽  
S Bondioni ◽  
E Peverelli ◽  
M Locatelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Tumor Cells ◽  
Cultured Cells ◽  
Somatostatin Receptor ◽  
Hormone Secretion ◽  
Somatostatin Analogs ◽  
Receptor Type ◽  
Apoptotic Activity ◽  
Long Acting ◽  
Induced Apoptosis

Somatostatin analogs currently used in the treatment of acromegaly and other neuroendocrine tumors inhibit hormone secretion and cell proliferation by binding to somatostatin receptor type (SST) 2 and 5. The antiproliferative pathways coupled to these receptors have been only partially characterized. The aim of this study was to evaluate the effect of octreotide and super selective SST2 (BIM23120) and SST5 (BIM23206) analogs on apoptotic activity and apoptotic gene expression in human somatotroph tumor cells. Eight somatotroph tumors expressing similar levels of SST2 and SST5 evaluated by real-time PCR and western blot analyses were included in the study. In cultured cells obtained from these tumors, octreotide induced a dose-dependent increase of caspase-3 activity (160 ± 20% vs basal at 10 nM) and cleaved cytokeratin 18 levels (172 ± 25% vs basal) at concentrations higher than 0.1 nM. This effect was due to SST2 activation since BIM23120 elicited comparable responses, while BIM23206 was ineffective. BIM23120-stimulated apoptosis was dependent on phosphatases, since it was abrogated by the inhibitor orthovanadate, and independent from the induction of apoptosis-related genes, such as p53, p63, p73, Bcl-2, Bax, BID, BIK, TNFSF8, and FADD. In somatotroph tumors, both BIM23120 and BIM2306 caused growth arrest as indicated by the increase in p27 and decrease in cyclin D1 expression. In conclusion, the present study showed that octreotide-induced apoptosis in human somatotroph tumor cells by activating SST2. This effect, together with the cytostatic action exerted by both SST2 and SST5 analogs, might account for the tumor shrinkage observed in acromegalic patients treated with long-acting somatostatin analogs.

scholarly journals 177Lu-DOTATATE Plus Radiosensitizing Capecitabine Versus Octreotide Long-Acting Release as First-Line Systemic Therapy in Advanced Grade 1 or 2 Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors: A Single-Institution Experience

2021 ◽  
pp. 1167-1175
Author(s):  
Swayamjeet Satapathy ◽  
Bhagwant R. Mittal ◽  
Ashwani Sood ◽  
Apurva Sood ◽  
Rakesh Kapoor ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Systemic Therapy ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Gastroenteropancreatic Neuroendocrine Tumors ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Octreotide Lar ◽  
Treatment Naïve ◽  
Long Acting

PURPOSE To compare the efficacy and safety of 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine and octreotide long-acting release (LAR) as first-line systemic therapy in advanced well-differentiated gastroenteropancreatic neuroendocrine tumors (GEP-NETs). MATERIALS AND METHODS Data of consecutive patients of advanced inoperable or metastatic grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs treated with first-line 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine or octreotide LAR from September 2012 to December 2019 were collected and analyzed for response, toxicity, and survival outcomes. RESULTS Seventy-six patients (median age: 53 years; range 14-81 years) with treatment-naïve advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs were included. Thirty-six patients received a median cumulative dose of 27.3 GBq of 177Lu-DOTATATE intravenously at 8-12 weeks' intervals along with 1,250 mg/m2 oral capecitabine on days 0-14 of each cycle of 177Lu-DOTATATE, whereas 40 patients were administered 30 mg octreotide LAR intramuscularly every 4 weeks. Using response evaluation criteria in solid tumor 1.1, the objective response rate was 38% in the 177Lu-DOTATATE arm compared with 15% in the octreotide LAR arm ( P = .025), whereas the disease control rates were 88% and 67% in 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms, respectively ( P = .035). The median durations of progression-free survival in the 177Lu-DOTATATE and octreotide LAR arms were 54 months and 16 months, respectively ( P = .017), whereas the median overall survival was not reached and not significantly different across both the arms. Of the treatment-related adverse events, no major difference was observed in the occurrence of grade 3 or 4 toxicities between the two treatment arms. CONCLUSION First-line systemic 177Lu-DOTATATE plus radiosensitizing capecitabine achieved better radiologic response and longer progression-free survival compared with octreotide LAR in patients with advanced grade 1 or 2 GEP-NETs. Future randomized controlled trials are, however, required to determine the best treatment sequence for the treatment-naïve patients with advanced GEP-NETs.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document