scholarly journals Peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine Hcl versus intravenous pre-incisional lornoxicam in reducing post-tonsillectomy pain: this is a prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study

2021 ◽  
Vol 37 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Reham Farouk Zittoon ◽  
Eman Youssef Hassan ◽  
Ibrahem Hassan Ibrahem ◽  
Maged Mohamed Baher
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Study ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Intraoperative Bleeding ◽  
Peritonsillar Infiltration ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Lidocaine Hcl ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Group 1

Abstract Background Tonsillectomy is one of the most common procedures in otorhinolaryngology practice where analgesics are required for pain-relief especially in children. To compare the efficacy of using peritonsillar infiltration of lidocaine Hcl versus intravenous preincisional lornoxicam in reducing post tonsillectomy pain. Results Prospective, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled study. Ninety-nine patients from age 12 to 18 years old, prepared for tonsillectomy. Patients were randomly subdivided into three groups as 33 patient in each group to receive either lidocaine (group 1), lornoxicam (group 2), or saline as a placebo (group 3). Anesthesia was induced using intravenous fentanyl and propofol, while endotracheal intubation was facilitated with rocuronium and maintenance by halothan. Intraoperative bleeding, pain scores, interval until first order for analgesic. The postoperative complications including bleeding, hypoxia, nausea, and vomiting also were observed. Pain scores at rest were significantly lower in group 2 than groups 1 and 3 at all observation times. Similarly, pain scores were lower in group 2 during the first 5 postoperative hours. The mean time for rescue analgesic was 276 min in group 2, 91 min in group 1, and about 60 min in group 3. No significant differences were noted for intraoperative bleeding. Conclusion The use of lornoxicam 16 mg at preoperative phase gave good control of immediate post tonsillectomy pain. Level of evidence 3b

scholarly journals Transrectal Ultrasound-Guided Prostate Biopsy, Periprostatic Local Anesthesia and Pain Tolerance

2010 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
pp. 66-72 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mustafa Hiroš ◽  
Mirsad Selimović ◽  
Hajrudin Spahović ◽  
Sabina Sadović ◽  
Ediba Spužić-Čelić
Keyword(s):  
Local Anesthesia ◽  
Prostate Biopsy ◽  
Transrectal Ultrasound ◽  
Pain Tolerance ◽  
Ultrasound Guided ◽  
Lidocaine Group ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

We have evaluated objectively pain tolerance in transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy (TRUS) using local periprostatic per rectal anesthesia as compared to the conventional method. From November 2008 to May 2009, 90 patients underwent transrectal ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy at Department of Urology, Clinical Center University Sarajevo. 90 patients who fulfilled the inclusion criteria were randomized into 3 groups of 30 patients each. Group 1 received periprostatic local anesthesia with 2% lidocaine, group 2 received Voltaren supp placed in rectum an hour before biopsy while group 3 received no local anesthesia. Pain scale responses were analyzed for each aspect of the biopsy procedure with a visual analog scale of 0-none to 10-maximal. There was no difference between the 3 groups in pain scores during digital rectal examination, intrarectal injection and probe insertion. The mean pain scores during needle insertion in group 1 receiving periprostatic nerve block and in group 2 receiving Voltaren supp were 3,10 ± 2,32 and 5,15 ± 2,01 respectively. In group 3 (no local anesthesia), mean pain scores were 6,06 ± 2,95 which was found to be significantly different (p < 0,001). However, morbidity after the biopsy was not statistically different between all 3 groups. TRUS-guided prostate biopsy is a traumatic and painful experience, but the periprostatic blockage use is clearly associated with more tolerance and patient comfort during the exam. It is an easy, safe, acceptable and reproducible technique and should be considered for all patients undergoing TRUS biopsy regardless of age or number of biopsies.

scholarly journals Analgesia following Arthroscopic Knee Surgery. A Controlled Study of Intra-articular Morphine, Bupivacaine or Both Combined

1993 ◽  
Vol 21 (2) ◽  
pp. 201-203 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. M. McSwiney ◽  
G. P. Joshi ◽  
P. Kenny ◽  
S. M. McCarroll
Keyword(s):  
Normal Saline ◽  
Arthroscopic Surgery ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

In a double-blind, randomised controlled trial, we studied 40 patients who received one of four intra-articular injections at the end of arthroscopic surgery. Each group contained ten patients. The patients in Group 1 received normal saline 25 ml; those in Group 2 received bupivacaine 0.25% 25 ml; those in Group 3 received morphine 5 mg in normal saline 25 ml; and those in Group 4 received a combination of bupivacaine 0.5% 12.5 ml and 5 mg of morphine made up to 25 ml with normal saline to produce the same bupivacaine concentration as Group 2. At the time the patient awoke, and 30min, Ihr, Ihr 30min, 2hr, 4hr, 8hr, 12hr, and 24hr postoperatively, pain was assessed using a visual analogue scale. The need for supplementary analgesic agents in the first 24 hours was recorded. All pain scores were significantly lower (P< 0.05) in Groups 2, 3 and 4 compared with the control group with the exception of Group 2 at 24 hours. Pain scores were significantly lower (P<0.05) for Group 2 compared with Group 3 for the first 90 minutes postoperatively. At 4, 8, 12 and 24 hours postoperatively the pain scores were significantly lower (P<0.05%) for Group 3 compared with Group 2. Group 4 had the lowest pain scores over the recorded period compared with the other groups. The need for supplemental analgesia was significantly lower (P<0.05) in the treatment Groups 2, 3 and 4 compared to the control Group 1. There was no significant difference in supplemental analgesic requirements between Groups 2, 3 and 4. A combination of bupivacaine and morphine injected intra-articularly following arthroscopy provided superior analgesia compared with that achieved by either drug alone.

Epidural Clonidine or Bupivacaine as the Sole Analgesic Agent during and after Abdominal Surgery 

1999 ◽  
Vol 90 (5) ◽  
pp. 1354-1362 ◽  
Author(s):  
Marc De Kock ◽  
Philippe Gautier ◽  
Athanassia Pavlopoulou ◽  
Marc Jonniaux ◽  
Patricia Lavand'homme
Keyword(s):  
High Dose ◽  
General Anesthetics ◽  
Visual Analogue Pain ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Arterial Blood ◽  
Sedation Scores ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
High Doses ◽  
Group 1

Background The rationale of this study was to compare high-dose epidural clonidine with a more commonly used agent, such as bupivacaine. This was performed to give a more objective idea of the relative analgesic potency of epidural clonidine. Methods Sixty patients undergoing intestinal surgery during propofol anesthesia were studied. At induction, the patients received epidurally a dose of 10 micrograms/kg [corrected] clonidine in 7 ml saline followed by an infusion of 6 micrograms [corrected] x kg(-1) x h(-1) (7 ml/h) (group 1, n = 20), a dose of 7 ml bupivacaine, 0.5%, followed by 7 ml/h bupivacaine, 0.25% (group 2, n = 20), or a dose of 7 ml bupivacaine, 0.25%, followed by 7 ml/h bupivacaine, 0.125% (group 3, n = 20). Intraoperatively, increases in arterial blood pressure or heart rate not responding to propofol (0.5 mg/kg) were treated with intravenous alfentanil (0.05 mg/kg). Additional doses of propofol were given to maintain an adequate bispectral index. The epidural infusions were maintained for 12 h. In cases of subjective visual analogue pain scores up to 5 cm at rest or up to 8 cm during coughing, the patients were given access to a patient-controlled analgesia device. Results During anesthesia, patients in group 1 required less propofol than those in groups 2 and 3 (78 [36-142] mg vs. 229 [184-252] mg and 362 [295-458] mg; P &lt; 0.05) and less alfentanil than patients in group 3 (0 [0-0] mg vs. 11 [6-20] mg; P &lt; 0.05). Analgesia lasted 380 min (range, 180-645 min) in group 1 versus 30 min (range, 25-40 min) in group 2 and 22 min (range, 12.5-42 min) in group 3 (P &lt; 0.05). There was no suggestion of a hemodynamic difference among the three groups except for heart rates that were significantly reduced in patients in group 1. Sedation scores were significantly higher in this group during the first 2 h postoperatively. Conclusion Our results show that high doses of epidural clonidine potentiate general anesthetics and provide more efficient postoperative analgesia than the two bupivacaine dosage regimens investigated.

Postoperative Morphine Use and Hyperalgesia Are Reduced by Preoperative but Not Intraoperative Epidural Analgesia

2003 ◽  
Vol 98 (6) ◽  
pp. 1449-1460 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joel Katz ◽  
Lorenzo Cohen ◽  
Roger Schmid ◽  
Vincent W.S. Chan ◽  
Adarose Wowk
Keyword(s):  
Morphine Consumption ◽  
Gynecologic Surgery ◽  
Control Group ◽  
Epidural Administration ◽  
Blinded Manner ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Double Blinded ◽  
Postoperative Morphine ◽  
Group 1

Background The aim of this study was to evaluate the postoperative morphine-sparing effects and reduction in pain and secondary mechanical hyperalgesia after preincisional or postincisional epidural administration of a local anesthetic and an opioid compared with a sham epidural control. Methods Patients undergoing major gynecologic surgery by laparotomy were randomly assigned to three groups and studied in a double-blinded manner. Group 1 received epidural lidocaine and fentanyl before incision and epidural saline 40 min after incision. Group 2 received epidural saline before incision and epidural lidocaine and fentanyl 40 min after incision. Group 3 received a sham epidural control (with saline injected into a catheter taped to the back) before and 40 min after incision. All patients underwent surgery with general anesthesia. Results One hundred forty-one patients completed the study (group 1, n = 45; group 2, n = 49; group 3, n = 47). Cumulative patient-controlled analgesia morphine consumption at 48 h was significantly lower (P = 0.04) in group 1 (89.8 +/- 43.3 mg) than group 3 (112.5 +/- 71.5 mg) but not group 2 (95.4 +/- 60.2 mg), although the hourly rate of morphine consumption between 24 and 48 h after surgery was significantly lower (P &lt; 0.0009) in group 1 (1.25 +/- 0.02 mg/h) than group 2 (1.41 +/- 0.02 mg/h). Twenty-four hours after surgery, the visual analog scale pain score on movement was significantly less intense (P = 0.005) in group 1 (4.9 +/- 2.2 cm) than group 3 (6.0 +/- 2.6 cm) but not group 2 (5.3 +/- 2.5 cm), and the von Frey pain threshold near the wound was significantly higher (P = 0.03) in group 1 (6.4 +/- 0.6 log mg) than in group 3 (6.1 +/- 0.8 log mg) but not group 2 (6.2 +/- 0.7 log mg). Conclusions Preincisional administration of epidural lidocaine and fentanyl was associated with a significantly lower rate of morphine use, lower cumulative morphine consumption, and reduced hyperalgesia compared with a sham epidural condition. These results highlight the importance of including a standard treatment control group to avoid the problems of interpretation that arise when two-group studies of preemptive analgesia (preincisional vs. postsurgery) fail to find the anticipated effects.

scholarly journals Pre-stenting for Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery: Need and Duration: a Prospective Randomized Clinical Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 3 (2) ◽  
pp. 361-365
Author(s):  
Prakash Chhettri ◽  
Anil Shrestha ◽  
Robin Bahadur Basnet ◽  
Parash Mani Shrestha
Keyword(s):  
Controlled Study ◽  
Retrograde Intrarenal Surgery ◽  
Ureteral Access Sheath ◽  
Access Sheath ◽  
Randomized Clinical Study ◽  
Institutional Review ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Wall Injury ◽  
Group 1

Introduction: To evaluate if retrograde intrarenal surgery with ureteral access sheath requires prestenting. In case pre-stenting becomes an option, how long does it need to be stented.  Materials and Methods: After obtaining approval from Institutional Review Board and informed consent, a prospective randomized controlled study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Bir Hospital for 18 months. All the patients enrolled for retrograde intrarenal surgery were grouped into 3 groups: Group 1 – without pre-stenting, Group 2 – one week of pre-stenting, and Group 3 – two weeks of pre-stenting. Success was defi ned as an ability to accommodate a 10/12 F ureteral access sheath during retrograde intrarenal surgery. Ureteral access sheath induced ureteric wall injury was also taken into consideration.Results: Among 179 cases, 152 cases were included in the study. In 36 patients out of 53 (67.92%) in group 1, 10/12 F ureteral access sheath was negotiable without pre-stenting, marking the frequency of distensible ureters. In 44 patients out of 47 (93.66%) from group 2 and all 52 patients (100%) from group 3, ureteral access sheath placement was successful after one and two weeks of pre-stenting respectively. Ureteric wall injury of grade1 and 2, was found in 9 patients (5.9%).Conclusions: The majority of ureters (67.92%) are distensible, not requiring pre-stenting before retrograde intrarenal surgery. One and two weeks of pre-stenting carries a success rate of 93.66% and 100% respectively.

scholarly journals A randomized, controlled study to compare the effects of intravenous labetalol and esmolol on haemodynamic changes during laryngoscopy and intubation

2017 ◽  
Vol 5 (9) ◽  
pp. 4003
Author(s):  
Atit Kumar ◽  
Prashant Kumar Mishra ◽  
Saurabh Shukla
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Controlled Study ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Randomized Controlled ◽  
Cardiovascular Stress ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Haemodynamic Changes ◽  
Β Blocker ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Direct laryngoscopy and endotracheal intubation frequently induce cardiovascular stress response characterised by hypertension and tachycardia due to reflex sympathetic stimulation. Considering the clinical significance of these changes stress attenuation is needed to blunt these responses. β- blockers are used to reduce the unwanted hemodynamic responses. Esmolol is ultra-short acting cardio selective β blocker. Labetalol is useful in not only attenuating the response to laryngoscopy and intubation but also in preventing perioperative cardiovascular events. Present study compared the efficacy of esmolol and labetalol for attenuation of sympathomimetic response to laryngoscopy and intubation.Methods: It was a prospective, randomized, controlled study carried out in 75 adult patients with ASA 1 and ASA 2 posted for elective surgeries. Patients were allocated randomly into Group-1 (esmolol) and Group-2 (labetalol) and Group-3 (placebo) of 25 patients each. Inj. esmolol (1mg/kg) or Inj. labetalol (0.4 mg/kg) or placebo (0.9NS) dissolved up to 5 ml in distilled water was injected intravenously 5 minutes prior to intubation. All patients premeditated with Inj. glycopyrrolate (4µg/kg). Patient were then induced with Inj. propofol (2mg/kg), Inj. scoline (2mg/kg) given followed by laryngoscopy and intubation. Haemodynamic readings were noted at T0 (baseline before injecting the drug), T1 (1 minute after injecting the drug), T2 (after intubation), T3 (2 minutes after intubation), T4 (4 minutes after intubation), T5 (6 minutes after intubation), T6 (8 minutes after injection), T7 (10 minutes after injection).Results: Gr-1, Gr-2 and Gr-3, when compared with each other for systolic BP, diastolic BP, mean BP, and HR, showed a statistically significant difference at different intervals.Conclusions: Both the drugs are found to be effective in attenuation of hemodynamic reflex without any side effects. Further studies are recommended to substantiate the findings in present study.

EVALUATION OF EFFICACY OF SILODOSIN VERSUS SILODOSIN WITH DEFLAZACORT IN EXPULSION OF LOWER URETERIC CALCULI

2021 ◽  
pp. 30-33
Author(s):  
Dev Yadav ◽  
P.N Agarwal ◽  
Sham Lal Singla ◽  
Kanwar Singh Goel ◽  
R. Talukdar ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Plain Radiograph ◽  
Pharmacological Therapy ◽  
Urinary Stones ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Expulsion Rate ◽  
Ureteric Calculi ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Objectives: To compare the efcacy of silodosin versus silodosin with deazacort in expulsion of lower end ureteric calculi, in terms of episodes of pain,stone expulsion rate,stone expulsion time ,analgesic requirements and side effects Introduction: Ureteric calculi represent 20% of urinary stones. Ureteroscopy and Shock wave lithotripsy proven the method of treatments for lower ureteric stones; however, they are expensive and not risk free. Aconservative approach is becoming more popular as a result of advances in pharmacological therapy which reduces the symptoms and helps in stone expulsion. We performed a randomized controlled prospective study to evaluate the efcacy of Deazacort in combination with alpha blocker silodosin in medical management of symptomatic lower Ureteric stones of ≤8 mm size. Material and methods: A prospective randomised controlled study was conducted on 60 patients, age ≥ 18 , who had unilateral lower ureteric stone of ≤ 8 mm. Patients were divided into three groups. Group 1 received silodosin 8 mg for 14 days,Group 2 received silodosin 8 mg plus deazacort 30mg daily for 14 days and Group 3 (control) received diclofenac potassium (75 mg ) when required. The patients were followed-up by ultrasonography ,plain radiograph KUB and computed tomography (in some cases). Results: There was a higher stone expulsion rate of 95% in Group 2 as compared to Group 1(85%) and Group 3(35%) . Group 2 showed a signicant advantage for stone expulsion time ,decreased pain episodes and analgesic use. Two patients, one in group 1 and group 2, reported retrograde ejaculation. Conclusion: The results showed that silodosin with deazacort , increases the stone expulsion rate, decrease the stone expulsion time, decreases the mean number of pain episodes and decreases the mean analgesic dosage requirement. But larger study is required to establish its efcacy for expulsion rate which will be statistically signicant.

scholarly journals Interpleural Administration of Bupivacaine after Cholecystectomy: A Comparison with Intercostal Nerve Block

1989 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 269-274 ◽  
Author(s):  
D. W. Blake ◽  
G. Donnan ◽  
J. Novella
Keyword(s):  
Local Anaesthetic ◽  
Intercostal Nerve ◽  
Intercostal Nerve Block ◽  
Nerve Blocks ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Lower Pain ◽  
Chest X Ray ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Pethidine requirements and verbal pain scores were recorded in 36 patients after cholecystectomy via subcostal incision. All patients also received 20 ml 0.5% bupivacaine with adrenaline 1/200,000. Group 1 (12 patients) received unilateral intercostal nerve blocks. Interpleural catheters were inserted through the 8th intercostal space in the remaining patients; 12 received local anaesthetic via the catheter immediately after surgery (Group 2) and 12 were given local anaesthetic at three hours (Group 3). Small asymptomatic pneumothoraces were noted on chest X-ray in six of the 24 patients with interpleural catheters. Both types of local anaesthesia produced lower pain scores than pethidine alone (P < 0.05) with 25% of intercostal nerve blocks and 63% of interpleural catheters requiring no pethidine in the following three hours. The provision of catheter ‘top-ups’ between six and 18 hours after surgery also resulted in lower pain scores and a reduction in pethidine requirements (P < 0.05).

scholarly journals Atelocollagen Injection Improves Tendon Integrity in Partial-Thickness Rotator Cuff Tears: A Prospective Comparative Study

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. 232596712090401
Author(s):  
Jong-Ho Kim ◽  
Dong-Jin Kim ◽  
Hyo-Jin Lee ◽  
Baek-Kyu Kim ◽  
Yang-Soo Kim
Keyword(s):  
Rotator Cuff ◽  
Rotator Cuff Tears ◽  
Type I ◽  
Pain Scores ◽  
Partial Thickness ◽  
Functional Scores ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

Background: Ongoing controversy surrounds the best treatment modality for partial-thickness rotator cuff tears. Purpose: To investigate the effects of atelocollagen injection in patients with small, symptomatic, intratendinous rotator cuff tears. Study Design: Randomized controlled trial; Level of evidence, 1. Methods: From January 2014 to December 2017, 94 patients who had small, symptomatic, intratendinous rotator cuff tears were enrolled and randomly allocated to 1 of 3 groups: intratendinous injection with 0.5 mL of type I atelocollagen (group 1, n = 32), intratendinous injection with 1 mL of type I atelocollagen (group 2, n = 30), and no injection of type I atelocollagen (group 3, n = 32). American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score, Constant Shoulder Score, visual analog scale pain score, and range of motion were evaluated before injection; at 3, 6, and 12 months after injection; and at final follow-up. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) was performed at least 6 months after injection to evaluate rotator cuff integrity. Results: Demographic data did not differ significantly among the 3 groups before injection ( P > .05). The mean follow-up period was 24.7 months. The functional and pain scores in groups 1 and 2 were significantly improved at final follow-up ( P < .05). No significant improvement was seen in functional or pain scores at final follow-up in group 3 ( P > .05). Groups 1 and 2 had significantly better functional scores compared with group 3 at final follow-up ( P < .05). The proportion of patients with a decrease in size of the torn tendon on follow-up MRI at least 6 months after atelocollagen injection was significantly higher in group 1 (28.1%; P = .02) and group 2 (36.7%; P = .003) compared with group 3 (6.3%). Conclusion: Atelocollagen injection can improve the functional outcome and integrity of the tendon in intratendinous rotator cuff tears.

scholarly journals Comparison of Four Different Pain Relief Methods during Hysterosalpingography: A Randomized Controlled Study

2015 ◽  
Vol 20 (2) ◽  
pp. 107-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bekir Serdar Unlu ◽  
Mehmet Yilmazer ◽  
Gulengul Koken ◽  
Dagistan Tolga Arioz ◽  
Ebru Unlu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pain Relief ◽  
Visual Analogue Scale ◽  
Analogue Scale ◽  
Cervix Uteri ◽  
Controlled Study ◽  
Group 4 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group 3 ◽  
Group 2 ◽  
Group 1

BACKGROUND: Hysterosalpingography (HSG) is the most commonly used method for evaluating the anatomy and patency of the uterine cavity and fallopian tubes, and is an important tool in the evaluation of infertility. The most frequent side effect is the pain associated with the procedure.OBJECTIVES: To evaluate four analgesic methods to determine the most useful method for reducing discomfort associated with HSG.METHODS: In the present prospective study, 75 patients undergoing HSG for evaluation of infertility were randomly assigned to four groups: 550 mg of a nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug (NSAID) (group 1); 550 mg NSAID + paracervical block (group 2); 550 mg NSAID + paracervical analgesic cream (group 3); or 550 mg NSAID + intrauterine analgesic instillation (group 4). A visual analogue scale was used to assess the pain perception at five predefined steps.RESULTS: Instillation of the liquids used for HSG was found to be the most painful step of HSG, and this step was where the only significant difference among groups was observed. When comparing visual analogue scale scores, group 2 and group 3 reported significantly less pain than the other groups. Group 1 reported significantly higher mean ( ± SD) scores (7.2 ± 1.6) compared with groups 2 and 3 (4.7 ± 2.5 and 3.8 ± 2.4, respectively) (P<0.001). In addition, group 2 reported significantly less pain than group 4 (4.7 ± 2.5 versus 6.7 ± 1.8, respectively) (P<0.02).CONCLUSIONS: For effective pain relief during HSG, in addition to 550 mg NSAID, local application of lidocaine cream to the posterior fornix of the cervix uteri and paracervical lidocaine injection into the cervix uteri appear to be the most effective methods.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document