Outreach RN: A Nurse-Led Initiative to Improve Transitions in Care for Critically Ill Patients With Cancer

2020 ◽  
Vol 24 (6) ◽  
pp. 605-608
Author(s):  
Valarie Lucas
Clinics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 66 (12) ◽  
pp. 2037-2042 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ludhmila Abrahão Hajjar ◽  
Rosana Ely Nakamura ◽  
Juliano Pinheiro de Almeida ◽  
Julia T. Fukushima ◽  
Paulo Marcelo Gehm Hoff ◽  
...  

JAMA Oncology ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 2 (1) ◽  
pp. 76 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mark G. Shrime ◽  
Bart S. Ferket ◽  
Daniel J. Scott ◽  
Joon Lee ◽  
Diana Barragan-Bradford ◽  
...  

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (24) ◽  
pp. 4003-4010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio Soares ◽  
Jorge I.F. Salluh ◽  
Marilia S. Carvalho ◽  
Michael Darmon ◽  
José R. Rocco ◽  
...  

Purpose To evaluate the outcomes of critically ill patients with cancer and acute renal dysfunction. Patients and Methods Prospective cohort study conducted at a 10-bed oncologic medical-surgical intensive care unit (ICU) over a 56-month period. Results Of 975 patients, 309 (32%) had renal dysfunction and were studied. Their mean age was 60.9 ± 15.9 years; 233 patients (75%) had solid tumors and 76 (25%) had hematologic malignancies. During the ICU stay, 98 patients (32%) received dialysis. Renal dysfunction was multifactorial in 56% of the patients, and the main associated factors were shock/ischemia (72%) and sepsis (63%). Overall hospital and 6-month mortality rates were 64% and 73%, respectively. Among patients who required dialysis, mortality rates were lower in patients who received dialysis on the first day of ICU in comparison with those who required it thereafter. In a multivariable Cox model, age more than 60 years, uncontrolled cancer, impaired performance status, and more than two associated organ failures were associated with increased 6-month mortality. Renal function was completely re-established in 82% and partially re-established in 12%, and only 6% of survivors required chronic dialysis. Conclusion Acute renal dysfunction is frequent in critically ill patients with cancer. Although mortality rates are high, selected patients can benefit from ICU care and advanced organ support. When evaluating prognosis and the appropriateness of dialysis in these patients, older age, functional capacity, cancer status and the severity of associated organ failures are important variables to take into consideration.


2017 ◽  
Vol 34 (10) ◽  
pp. 811-817 ◽  
Author(s):  
Antonio Paulo Nassar ◽  
Aldo Lourenço Abadde Dettino ◽  
Cristina Prata Amendola ◽  
Rodrigo Alves dos Santos ◽  
Daniel Neves Forte ◽  
...  

Background: Patients with cancer represent an important proportion of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions. Oncologists and intensivists have distinct knowledge backgrounds, and conflicts about the appropriate management of these patients may emerge. Methods: We surveyed oncologists and intensivists at 2 academic cancer centers regarding their management of 2 hypothetical patients with different cancer types (metastatic pancreatic cancer and metastatic breast cancer with positive receptors for estrogen, progesterone, and HER-2) who develop septic shock and multiple organ failure. Results: Sixty intensivists and 46 oncologists responded to the survey. Oncologists and intensivists similarly favored withdrawal of life support measures for the patient with pancreatic cancer (33/46 [72%] vs 48/60 [80%], P = .45). On the other hand, intensivists favored more withdrawal of life support measures for the patient with breast cancer compared to oncologists (32/59 [54%] vs 9/44 [21%], P < .001). In the multinomial logistic regression, the oncology specialists were more likely to advocate for a full-code status for the patient with breast cancer (OR = 5.931; CI 95%, 1.762-19.956; P = .004). Conclusions: Oncologists and intensivists share different views regarding life support measures in critically ill patients with cancer. Oncologists tend to focus on the cancer characteristics, whereas intensivists focus on multiple organ failure when weighing in on the same decisions. Regular meetings between oncologists and intensivists may reduce possible conflicts regarding the critical care of patients with cancer.


2017 ◽  
Vol 42 ◽  
pp. 231-237 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ligia S.C.F. Rabello ◽  
Pedro Póvoa ◽  
Jose R. Lapa e Silva ◽  
Luciano C.P. Azevedo ◽  
Fernando Jose da Silva Ramos ◽  
...  

CHEST Journal ◽  
2008 ◽  
Vol 134 (3) ◽  
pp. 520-526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Márcio Soares ◽  
Jorge I.F. Salluh ◽  
Viviane B.L. Torres ◽  
Juliana V.R. Leal ◽  
Nelson Spector

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document