At The Bedside: Clinical review of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy for B cell malignancies

2016 ◽  
Vol 100 (6) ◽  
pp. 1265-1272 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olalekan O. Oluwole ◽  
Marco L. Davila
2021 ◽  
Vol 10 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Komal Adeel ◽  
Nathan J. Fergusson ◽  
Risa Shorr ◽  
Harold Atkins ◽  
Kevin A. Hay

Abstract Background Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy has had great success in treating patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies, with CD19-targeting therapies now approved in many countries. However, a subset of patients fails to respond or relapse after CD19 CAR T cell therapy, in part due to antigen loss, which has prompted the search for alternative antigen targets. CD22 is another antigen found on the surface of B cells. CARs targeting CD22 alone or in combination with other antigens have been investigated in several pre-clinical and clinical trials. Given the heterogeneity and small size of CAR T cell therapy clinical trials, systematic reviews are needed to evaluate their efficacy and safety. Here, we propose a systematic review of CAR T cell therapies targeting CD22, alone or in combination with other antigen targets, in B cell malignancies. Methods We will perform a systematic search of EMBASE, MEDLINE, Web of Science, Cochrane Register of Controlled Trials, clinicaltrials.gov, and the International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. Ongoing and completed clinical trials will be identified and cataloged. Interventional studies investigating CD22 CAR T cells, including various multi-antigen targeting approaches, in patients with relapsed or refractory B cell malignancies will be eligible for inclusion. Only full-text articles, conference abstracts, letters, and case reports will be considered. Our primary outcome will be a complete response, defined as absence of detectable cancer. Secondary outcomes will include adverse events, overall response, minimal residual disease, and relapse, among others. Quality assessment will be performed using a modified Institute of Health Economics tool designed for interventional single-arm studies. We will report a narrative synthesis of clinical studies, presented in tabular format. If appropriate, a meta-analysis will be performed using a random effects model to synthesize results. Discussion The results of the proposed review will help inform clinicians, patients, and other stakeholders of the risks and benefits of CD22 CAR T cell therapies. It will identify gaps or inconsistencies in outcome reporting and help to guide future clinical trials investigating CAR T cells. Systematic review registration PROSPERO registration number: CRD42020193027


Author(s):  
Julio C Chavez ◽  
Farah Yassine ◽  
Jose Sandoval-Sus ◽  
Mohamed A Kharfan-Dabaja

Aims: To review recent data and relevant of the role of anti-CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). Methods: Review and compilation of the most recent and relevant data published in full text and abstract forms of anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for B-cell NHL. Results: Different anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy products have been tested and shown significant clinical activity across B-cell NHL patients. The objective responses in relapsed DLBCL, FL and MCL were 50–83%, 83–93% and 93%, respectively. Conclusions: Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy is a viable option for poor risk refractory B-cell NHLs.


2019 ◽  
Vol 290 (1) ◽  
pp. 39-59 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elad Jacoby ◽  
Shilpa A. Shahani ◽  
Nirali N. Shah

2019 ◽  
Vol 20 (20) ◽  
pp. 5010 ◽  
Author(s):  
Moo-Kon Song ◽  
Byeong-Bae Park ◽  
Ji-Eun Uhm

Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy has shown promising clinical impact against hematologic malignancies. CD19 is a marker on the surface of normal B cells as well as most B-cell malignancies, and thus has a role as an effective target for CAR T-cell therapy. In numerous clinical data, successes with cell therapy have provided anticancer therapy as a potential therapeutic option for patients who are resistant to standard chemotherapies. However, recent growing evidence showed the limitations of the treatment such as antigen-positive relapse due to poor CAR T-cell persistence and antigen-negative relapses associated with CAR-driven mutations, alternative splicing, epitope masking, low antigen density, and lineage switching. The understanding of the resistance mechanisms to the cell therapy has developed novel potential treatment strategies, including dual-targeting therapy (dual and tandem CAR), and armored and universal CAR T-cell therapies. In this review, we provide an overview of resistance mechanisms to CD19 CAR T-cell therapy in B-cell malignancies and also review therapeutic strategies to overcome these resistances.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document