Reply by author to discussion by Michael Schoenberger.
Keyword(s):
The principal assertion of Schoenberger’s discussion appears to be that (3), which is correctly derived from equations in Section IV and corresponds to a space shift, should instead be written as (4), corresponding to a space sample. However, the space‐convolution operator corresponding to a seismometer is indeed meant to be a space‐shift operator. An array of seismometers is used as a weighted sum of space‐shift operators, just as a time‐domain, sample‐point operator is made up of a weighted sum of time‐shift operators. Equation (5.2), which Schoenberger indicates as being related to his (4), actually comes from (3) with x and y set to zero.
1997 ◽
Vol 12
(01)
◽
pp. 171-176
◽
Keyword(s):
1980 ◽
Vol 21
(8)
◽
pp. 1967-1972
◽
2013 ◽
Vol 23
(01)
◽
pp. 1350010
◽
2019 ◽
Vol 2019
◽
pp. 1-9
Keyword(s):
1980 ◽
Vol 21
(8)
◽
pp. 1973-1976
◽
2021 ◽
Vol 13(62)
(2)
◽
pp. 423-432
Keyword(s):
2021 ◽
Vol ahead-of-print
(ahead-of-print)
◽
Keyword(s):