Cyclic 1D matching of time‐ lapse seismic data sets: A case study of the Norne field

Author(s):  
Gboyega Ayeni
Keyword(s):  
Geophysics ◽  
2001 ◽  
Vol 66 (4) ◽  
pp. 1015-1025 ◽  
Author(s):  
J. E. Rickett ◽  
D. E. Lumley

Nonrepeatable noise, caused by differences in vintages of seismic acquisition and processing, can often make comparison and interpretation of time‐lapse 3‐D seismic data sets for reservoir monitoring misleading or futile. In this Gulf of Mexico case study, the major causes of nonrepeatable noise in the data sets are the result of differences in survey acquisition geometry and binning, temporal and spatial amplitude gain, wavelet bandwidth and phase, differential static time shifts, and relative mispositioning of imaged reflection events. We attenuate these acquisition and processing differences by developing and applying a cross‐equalization data processing flow for time‐lapse seismic data. The cross‐equalization flow consists of regridding the two data sets to a common grid; applying a space and time‐variant amplitude envelope balance; applying a first pass of matched filter corrections for global amplitude, bandwidth, phase and static shift corrections, followed by a dynamic warp to align mispositioned events; and, finally, running a second pass of constrained space‐variant matched filter operators. Difference sections obtained by subtracting the two data sets after each step of the cross‐equalization processing flow show a progressive reduction of nonrepeatable noise and a simultaneous improvement in time‐lapse reservoir signal.


Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (4) ◽  
pp. M41-M48 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hongwei Liu ◽  
Mustafa Naser Al-Ali

The ideal approach for continuous reservoir monitoring allows generation of fast and accurate images to cope with the massive data sets acquired for such a task. Conventionally, rigorous depth-oriented velocity-estimation methods are performed to produce sufficiently accurate velocity models. Unlike the traditional way, the target-oriented imaging technology based on the common-focus point (CFP) theory can be an alternative for continuous reservoir monitoring. The solution is based on a robust data-driven iterative operator updating strategy without deriving a detailed velocity model. The same focusing operator is applied on successive 3D seismic data sets for the first time to generate efficient and accurate 4D target-oriented seismic stacked images from time-lapse field seismic data sets acquired in a [Formula: see text] injection project in Saudi Arabia. Using the focusing operator, target-oriented prestack angle domain common-image gathers (ADCIGs) could be derived to perform amplitude-versus-angle analysis. To preserve the amplitude information in the ADCIGs, an amplitude-balancing factor is applied by embedding a synthetic data set using the real acquisition geometry to remove the geometry imprint artifact. Applying the CFP-based target-oriented imaging to time-lapse data sets revealed changes at the reservoir level in the poststack and prestack time-lapse signals, which is consistent with the [Formula: see text] injection history and rock physics.


2019 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Popik ◽  
Roman Pevzner ◽  
Stanislav Glubokovskikh ◽  
Valeriya Shulakova ◽  
Sasha Ziramov

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. M1-M13 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yichuan Wang ◽  
Igor B. Morozov

For seismic monitoring injected fluids during enhanced oil recovery or geologic [Formula: see text] sequestration, it is useful to measure time-lapse (TL) variations of acoustic impedance (AI). AI gives direct connections to the mechanical and fluid-related properties of the reservoir or [Formula: see text] storage site; however, evaluation of its subtle TL variations is complicated by the low-frequency and scaling uncertainties of this attribute. We have developed three enhancements of TL AI analysis to resolve these issues. First, following waveform calibration (cross-equalization) of the monitor seismic data sets to the baseline one, the reflectivity difference was evaluated from the attributes measured during the calibration. Second, a robust approach to AI inversion was applied to the baseline data set, based on calibration of the records by using the well-log data and spatially variant stacking and interval velocities derived during seismic data processing. This inversion method is straightforward and does not require subjective selections of parameterization and regularization schemes. Unlike joint or statistical inverse approaches, this method does not require prior models and produces accurate fitting of the observed reflectivity. Third, the TL AI difference is obtained directly from the baseline AI and reflectivity difference but without the uncertainty-prone subtraction of AI volumes from different seismic vintages. The above approaches are applied to TL data sets from the Weyburn [Formula: see text] sequestration project in southern Saskatchewan, Canada. High-quality baseline and TL AI-difference volumes are obtained. TL variations within the reservoir zone are observed in the calibration time-shift, reflectivity-difference, and AI-difference images, which are interpreted as being related to the [Formula: see text] injection.


Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. B243-B252 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Bergmann ◽  
Artem Kashubin ◽  
Monika Ivandic ◽  
Stefan Lüth ◽  
Christopher Juhlin

A method for static correction of time-lapse differences in reflection arrival times of time-lapse prestack seismic data is presented. These arrival-time differences are typically caused by changes in the near-surface velocities between the acquisitions and had a detrimental impact on time-lapse seismic imaging. Trace-to-trace time shifts of the data sets from different vintages are determined by crosscorrelations. The time shifts are decomposed in a surface-consistent manner, which yields static corrections that tie the repeat data to the baseline data. Hence, this approach implies that new refraction static corrections for the repeat data sets are unnecessary. The approach is demonstrated on a 4D seismic data set from the Ketzin [Formula: see text] pilot storage site, Germany, and is compared with the result of an initial processing that was based on separate refraction static corrections. It is shown that the time-lapse difference static correction approach reduces 4D noise more effectively than separate refraction static corrections and is significantly less labor intensive.


SPE Journal ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 26 (02) ◽  
pp. 1011-1031
Author(s):  
Gilson Moura Silva Neto ◽  
Ricardo Vasconcellos Soares ◽  
Geir Evensen ◽  
Alessandra Davolio ◽  
Denis José Schiozer

Summary Time-lapse-seismic-data assimilation has been drawing the reservoir-engineering community's attention over the past few years. One of the advantages of including this kind of data to improve the reservoir-flow models is that it provides complementary information compared with the wells' production data. Ensemble-based methods are some of the standard tools used to calibrate reservoir models using time-lapse seismic data. One of the drawbacks of assimilating time-lapse seismic data involves the large data sets, mainly for large reservoir models. This situation leads to high-dimensional problems that demand significant computational resources to process and store the matrices when using conventional and straightforward methods. Another known issue associated with the ensemble-based methods is the limited ensemble sizes, which cause spurious correlations between the data and the parameters and limit the degrees of freedom. In this work, we propose a data-assimilation scheme using an efficient implementation of the subspace ensemble randomized maximum likelihood (SEnRML) method with local analysis. This method reduces the computational requirements for assimilating large data sets because the number of operations scales linearly with the number of observed data points. Furthermore, by implementing it with local analysis, we reduce the memory requirements at each update step and mitigate the effects of the limited ensemble sizes. We test two local analysis approaches: one distance-based approach and one correlation-based approach. We apply these implementations to two synthetic time-lapse-seismic-data-assimilation cases, one 2D example, and one field-scale application that mimics some of the real-field challenges. We compare the results with reference solutions and with the known ensemble smoother with multiple data assimilation (ES-MDA) using Kalman gain distance-based localization. The results show that our method can efficiently assimilate time-lapse seismic data, leading to updated models that are comparable with other straightforward methods. The correlation-based local analysis approach provided results similar to the distance-based approach, with the advantage that the former can be applied to data and parameters that do not have specific spatial positions.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document