Love-wave waveform inversion in time domain for shallow shear-wave velocity

Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (1) ◽  
pp. R1-R14 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yudi Pan ◽  
Jianghai Xia ◽  
Yixian Xu ◽  
Lingli Gao ◽  
Zongbo Xu
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Time Domain ◽  
Love Wave ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Dispersion Curves ◽  
Gradient Algorithm ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Earth Models

High-frequency surface-wave techniques are widely used to estimate S-wave velocity of near-surface materials. Surface-wave methods based on inversions of dispersion curves are only suitable to laterally homogeneous or smoothly laterally varying heterogeneous earth models due to the layered-model assumption during calculation of dispersion curves. Waveform inversion directly fits the waveform of observed data, and it can be applied to any kinds of earth models. We have used the Love-wave waveform inversion in the time domain to estimate near-surface S-wave velocity. We used the finite-difference method as the forward modeling method. The source effect was removed by the deconvolution technique, which made our method independent of the source wavelet. We defined the difference between the deconvolved observed and calculated waveform as the misfit function. We divided the model into different sizes of blocks depending on the resolution of the Love waves, and we updated the S-wave velocity of each block via a conjugate gradient algorithm. We used two synthetic models to test the effectiveness of our method. A real-world case verified the validity of our method.

Retrieval of shallow S-wave profiles from seismic reflection surveying and traffic-induced noise

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (6) ◽  
pp. EN105-EN117
Author(s):  
Kai Zhang ◽  
Hongyi Li ◽  
Xiaojiang Wang ◽  
Kai Wang
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Surface Waves ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Rayleigh Waves ◽  
Seismic Reflection ◽  
Seismic Energy ◽  
Dispersion Curves ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Wave Velocities

In urban subsurface exploration, seismic surveys are mostly conducted along roads where seismic vibrators can be extensively used to generate strong seismic energy due to economic and environmental constraints. Generally, Rayleigh waves also are excited by the compressional wave profiling process. Shear-wave (S-wave) velocities can be inferred using Rayleigh waves to complement near-surface characterization. Most vibrators cannot excite seismic energy at lower frequencies (<5 Hz) to map greater depths during surface-wave analysis in areas with low S-wave velocities, but low-frequency surface waves ([Formula: see text]) can be extracted from traffic-induced noise, which can be easily obtained at marginal additional cost. We have implemented synthetic tests to evaluate the velocity deviation caused by offline sources, finding a reasonably small relative bias of surface-wave dispersion curves due to vehicle sources on roads. Using a 2D reflection survey and traffic-induced noise from the central North China Plain, we apply seismic interferometry to a series of 10.0 s segments of passive data. Then, each segment is selectively stacked on the acausal-to-causal ratio of the mean signal-to-noise ratio to generate virtual shot gathers with better dispersion energy images. We next use the dispersion curves derived by combining controlled source surveying with vehicle noise to retrieve the shallow S-wave velocity structure. A maximum exploration depth of 90 m is achieved, and the inverted S-wave profile and interval S-wave velocity model obtained from reflection processing appear consistent. The data set demonstrates that using surface waves derived from seismic reflection surveying and traffic-induced noise provides an efficient supplementary technique for delineating shallow structures in areas featuring thick Quaternary overburden. Additionally, the field test indicates that traffic noise can be created using vehicles or vibrators to capture surface waves within a reliable frequency band of 2–25 Hz if no vehicles are moving along the survey line.

Tunnel detection at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona, USA — Part 1: 2D full-waveform inversion experiment

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (1) ◽  
pp. B95-B105 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yao Wang ◽  
Richard D. Miller ◽  
Shelby L. Peterie ◽  
Steven D. Sloan ◽  
Mark L. Moran ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Velocity Profiles ◽  
Infinite Length ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Tunnel Detection ◽  
Full Waveform ◽  
Wave Methods

We have applied time domain 2D full-waveform inversion (FWI) to detect a known 10 m deep wood-framed tunnel at Yuma Proving Ground, Arizona. The acquired seismic data consist of a series of 2D survey lines that are perpendicular to the long axis of the tunnel. With the use of an initial model estimated from surface wave methods, a void-detection-oriented FWI workflow was applied. A straightforward [Formula: see text] quotient masking method was used to reduce the inversion artifacts and improve confidence in identifying anomalies that possess a high [Formula: see text] ratio. Using near-surface FWI, [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] velocity profiles were obtained with void anomalies that are easily interpreted. The inverted velocity profiles depict the tunnel as a low-velocity anomaly at the correct location and depth. A comparison of the observed and simulated waveforms demonstrates the reliability of inverted models. Because the known tunnel has a uniform shape and for our purposes an infinite length, we apply 1D interpolation to the inverted [Formula: see text] profiles to generate a pseudo 3D (2.5D) volume. Based on this research, we conclude the following: (1) FWI is effective in near-surface tunnel detection when high resolution is necessary. (2) Surface-wave methods can provide accurate initial S-wave velocity [Formula: see text] models for near-surface 2D FWI.

P- and S-wave velocity models from surface wave dispersion curves data transform

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Socco ◽  
Farbod Khosro Anjom ◽  
Cesare Comina ◽  
Daniela Teodor
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Dispersion ◽  
Dispersion Curves ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Velocity Models

3D elastic full-waveform inversion of surface waves in the presence of irregular topography using an envelope-based misfit function

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. R1-R11 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dmitry Borisov ◽  
Ryan Modrak ◽  
Fuchun Gao ◽  
Jeroen Tromp
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Objective Function ◽  
Surface Waves ◽  
Large Scale ◽  
Body Wave ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Full Waveform Inversion ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Full Waveform

Full-waveform inversion (FWI) is a powerful method for estimating the earth’s material properties. We demonstrate that surface-wave-driven FWI is well-suited to recovering near-surface structures and effective at providing S-wave speed starting models for use in conventional body-wave FWI. Using a synthetic example based on the SEG Advanced Modeling phase II foothills model, we started with an envelope-based objective function to invert for shallow large-scale heterogeneities. Then we used a waveform-difference objective function to obtain a higher-resolution model. To accurately model surface waves in the presence of complex tomography, we used a spectral-element wave-propagation solver. Envelope misfit functions are found to be effective at minimizing cycle-skipping issues in surface-wave inversions, and surface waves themselves are found to be useful for constraining complex near-surface features.

Advances in surface-wave tomography for near-surface applications

2021 ◽  
Vol 40 (8) ◽  
pp. 567-575
Author(s):  
Myrto Papadopoulou ◽  
Farbod Khosro Anjom ◽  
Mohammad Karim Karimpour ◽  
Valentina Laura Socco
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Seismic Exploration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Near Surface ◽  
Processing Times ◽  
Spatial Coverage ◽  
Wave Tomography

Surface-wave (SW) tomography is a technique that has been widely used in the field of seismology. It can provide higher resolution relative to the classical multichannel SW processing and inversion schemes that are usually adopted for near-surface applications. Nevertheless, the method is rarely used in this context, mainly due to the long processing times needed to pick the dispersion curves as well as the inability of the two-station processing to discriminate between higher SW modes. To make it efficient and to retrieve pseudo-2D/3D S-wave velocity (VS) and P-wave velocity (VP) models in a fast and convenient way, we develop a fully data-driven two-station dispersion curve estimation, which achieves dense spatial coverage without the involvement of an operator. To handle higher SW modes, we apply a dedicated time-windowing algorithm to isolate and pick the different modes. A multimodal tomographic inversion is applied to estimate a VS model. The VS model is then converted to a VP model with the Poisson's ratio estimated through the wavelength-depth method. We apply the method to a 2D seismic exploration data set acquired at a mining site, where strong lateral heterogeneity is expected, and to a 3D pilot data set, recorded with state-of-the-art acquisition technology. We compare the results with the ones retrieved from classical multichannel analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document