P- and S-wave velocity models from surface wave dispersion curves data transform

Author(s):  
Valentina Socco ◽  
Farbod Khosro Anjom ◽  
Cesare Comina ◽  
Daniela Teodor
2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. SH11-SH19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Sherif Hanafy

We have developed a skeletonized inversion method that inverts the S-wave velocity distribution from surface-wave dispersion curves. Instead of attempting to fit every wiggle in the surface waves with predicted data, it only inverts the picked dispersion curve, thereby mitigating the problem of getting stuck in a local minimum. We have applied this method to a synthetic model and seismic field data from Qademah fault, located at the western side of Saudi Arabia. For comparison, we have performed dispersion analysis for an active and controlled noise source seismic data that had some receivers in common with the passive array. The active and passive data show good agreement in the dispersive characteristics. Our results demonstrated that skeletonized inversion can obtain reliable 1D and 2D S-wave velocity models for our geologic setting. A limitation is that we need to build layered initial model to calculate the Jacobian matrix, which is time consuming.


1962 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-388
Author(s):  
Eysteinn Tryggvason

ABSTRACT A number of Icelandic records of earthquakes originating in the Mid-Atlantic Seismic Belt between 52° and 70° N. lat. have been investigated. The surface waves on these records are chiefly in the period interval 3–10 sec, and are first mode Love-waves and Rayleigh-waves. The surface wave dispersion can be explained by a three-layered crustal structure as follows. A surface layer of S-wave velocity about 2.7 km/sec covering the whole region studied, a second layer of S-wave velocity about 3.6 km/sec covering Iceland and extending several hundred kilometers off the coasts and a third layer of S-wave velocity about 4.3 km/sec and P-wave velocity about 7.4 km/sec underlying the whole region. The thickness of the surface layer appears to be about 4 km on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge south of Iceland and in western Iceland, 3 km in central Iceland and 7 km northwest of Iceland. The second layer is apparently of similar thickness than the surface layer, while the third layer is thick; and the surface wave dispersion does not indicate any layer of higher wave velocity. This 7.4-layer is supposed to belong to the mantle, although its wave velocity is significantly lower than usually found in the upper mantle


2021 ◽  
pp. 104524
Author(s):  
Yinhe Luo ◽  
Yao Huang ◽  
Yingjie Yang ◽  
Kaifeng Zhao ◽  
Xiaozhou Yang ◽  
...  

Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (6) ◽  
pp. G85-G93 ◽  
Author(s):  
Daniele Boiero ◽  
Paolo Bergamo ◽  
Roberto Bruno Rege ◽  
Laura Valentina Socco

Surface-wave analysis is based on the estimation of surface-wave dispersion curves, which are then inverted to provide 1D S-wave velocity profiles. Surface-wave dispersion curves can be extracted from P-wave records obtained in seismic exploration and used to characterize the ground structure at a shallow depth. Dispersion curve estimation using 2D wavefield transforms is well-established for 2D acquisition schemes (in-line source and receiver spread). It is possible to extract surface-wave dispersion curves using 2D wavefield transforms from 3D seismic data acquired with any acquisition scheme. In particular, we focus on areal geometry and orthogonal geometry, and we provide a method based on the analysis in the offset domain and the [Formula: see text] multiple signal classification (MUSIC) transform. We assess the performance of the method on synthetic and field data concerning 1D sites.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document