scholarly journals Elastic least-squares reverse time migration

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (2) ◽  
pp. S143-S157 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zongcai Feng ◽  
Gerard T. Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Adjoint Equations ◽  
Accurate Estimation ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Wave Migration

We use elastic least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) to invert for the reflectivity images of P- and S-wave impedances. Elastic LSRTM solves the linearized elastic-wave equations for forward modeling and the adjoint equations for backpropagating the residual wavefield at each iteration. Numerical tests on synthetic data and field data reveal the advantages of elastic LSRTM over elastic reverse time migration (RTM) and acoustic LSRTM. For our examples, the elastic LSRTM images have better resolution and amplitude balancing, fewer artifacts, and less crosstalk compared with the elastic RTM images. The images are also better focused and have better reflector continuity for steeply dipping events compared to the acoustic LSRTM images. Similar to conventional least-squares migration, elastic LSRTM also requires an accurate estimation of the P- and S-wave migration velocity models. However, the problem remains that, when there are moderate errors in the velocity model and strong multiples, LSRTM will produce migration noise stronger than that seen in the RTM images.

Elastic least-squares reverse time migration with hybrid l1/l2 misfit function

Geophysics ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 82 (3) ◽  
pp. S271-S291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingluo Gu ◽  
Zhenchun Li ◽  
Peng Yang ◽  
Wencai Xu ◽  
Jianguang Han
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Seismic Data ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Adjoint Equations ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Wave Image

We have developed the theory and synthetic tests of elastic least-squares reverse time migration (ELSRTM). In this method, a least-squares reverse time migration algorithm is used to image multicomponent seismic data based on the first-order elastic velocity-stress wave equation, in which the linearized elastic modeling equations are used for forward modeling and its adjoint equations are derived based on the adjoint-state method for back propagating the data residuals. Also, we have developed another ELSRTM scheme based on the wavefield separation technique, in which the P-wave image is obtained using P-wave forward and adjoint wavefields and the S-wave image is obtained using P-wave forward and S-wave adjoint wavefields. In this way, the crosstalk artifacts can be minimized to a significant extent. In general, seismic data inevitably contain noise. We apply the hybrid [Formula: see text] misfit function to the ELSRTM algorithm to improve the robustness of our ELSRTM to noise. Numerical tests on synthetic data reveal that our ELSRTM, when compared with elastic reverse time migration, can produce images with higher spatial resolution, more-balanced amplitudes, and fewer artifacts. Moreover, the hybrid [Formula: see text] misfit function makes the ELSRTM more robust than the [Formula: see text] misfit function in the presence of noise.

A wavefield-separation-based elastic least-squares reverse time migration

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (3) ◽  
pp. S279-S297 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bingluo Gu ◽  
Zhenchun Li ◽  
Jianguang Han
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
P Wave ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
S Waves ◽  
Numerical Tests ◽  
Time Migration

Elastic least-squares reverse time migration (ELSRTM) has the potential to provide improved subsurface reflectivity estimation. Compared with elastic RTM (ERTM), ELSRTM can produce images with higher spatial resolution, more balanced amplitudes, and fewer artifacts. However, the crosstalk between P- and S-waves can significantly degrade the imaging quality of ELSRTM. We have developed an ELSRTM method to suppress the crosstalk artifacts. This method includes three crucial points. The first is that the forward and backward wavefields are extrapolated based on the separated elastic velocity-stress equation of P- and S-waves. The second is that the separated vector P- and S-wave residuals are migrated to form reflectivity images of Lamé constants [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] independently. The third is that the reflectivity images of [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] are obtained by the vector P-wave wavefields achieved in the backward extrapolation of the separated vector P-wave residuals and the vector S-wave wavefields achieved in the backward extrapolation of the separated vector S-wave residuals, respectively. Numerical tests with synthetic data demonstrate that our ELSRTM method can produce images free of crosstalk artifacts. Compared with ELSRTM based on the coupled wavefields, our ELSRTM method has better convergence and higher accuracy.

From acoustic to elastic inverse extended Born modeling: a first insight in the marine environment

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-73
Author(s):  
Milad Farshad ◽  
Hervé Chauris
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Marine Environment ◽  
Computational Cost ◽  
Physical Parameters ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Physical Density ◽  
Acoustic Approximation

Elastic least-squares reverse time migration is the state-of-the-art linear imaging technique to retrieve high-resolution quantitative subsurface images. A successful application requires many migration/modeling cycles. To accelerate the convergence rate, various pseudoinverse Born operators have been proposed, providing quantitative results within a single iteration, while having roughly the same computational cost as reverse time migration. However, these are based on the acoustic approximation, leading to possible inaccurate amplitude predictions as well as the ignorance of S-wave effects. To solve this problem, we extend the pseudoinverse Born operator from acoustic to elastic media to account for the elastic amplitudes of PP reflections and provide an estimate of physical density, P- and S-wave impedance models. We restrict the extension to marine environment, with the recording of pressure waves at the receiver positions. Firstly, we replace the acoustic Green's functions by their elastic version, without modifying the structure of the original pseudoinverse Born operator. We then apply a Radon transform to the results of the first step to calculate the angle-dependent response. Finally, we simultaneously invert for the physical parameters using a weighted least-squares method. Through numerical experiments, we first illustrate the consequences of acoustic approximation on elastic data, leading to inaccurate parameter inversion as well as to artificial reflector inclusion. Then we demonstrate that our method can simultaneously invert for elastic parameters in the presence of complex uncorrelated structures, inaccurate background models, and Gaussian noisy data.

Reducing artifacts of elastic reverse time migration by the deprimary technique

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (6) ◽  
pp. S569-S577 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yang Zhao ◽  
Houzhu Zhang ◽  
Jidong Yang ◽  
Tong Fei
Keyword(s):  
Complex Function ◽  
Noise Removal ◽  
Pure Mode ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Imaging Condition ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Wavefield Decomposition

Using the two-way elastic-wave equation, elastic reverse time migration (ERTM) is superior to acoustic RTM because ERTM can handle mode conversions and S-wave propagations in complex realistic subsurface. However, ERTM results may not only contain classical backscattering noises, but they may also suffer from false images associated with primary P- and S-wave reflections along their nonphysical paths. These false images are produced by specific wave paths in migration velocity models in the presence of sharp interfaces or strong velocity contrasts. We have addressed these issues explicitly by introducing a primary noise removal strategy into ERTM, in which the up- and downgoing waves are efficiently separated from the pure-mode vector P- and S-wavefields during source- and receiver-side wavefield extrapolation. Specifically, we investigate a new method of vector wavefield decomposition, which allows us to produce the same phases and amplitudes for the separated P- and S-wavefields as those of the input elastic wavefields. A complex function involved with the Hilbert transform is used in up- and downgoing wavefield decomposition. Our approach is cost effective and avoids the large storage of wavefield snapshots that is required by the conventional wavefield separation technique. A modified dot-product imaging condition is proposed to produce multicomponent PP-, PS-, SP-, and SS-images. We apply our imaging condition to two synthetic models, and we demonstrate the improvement on the image quality of ERTM.

An exact adjoint operation pair in time extrapolation and its application in least-squares reverse-time migration

Geophysics ◽  
2009 ◽  
Vol 74 (5) ◽  
pp. H27-H33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jun Ji
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Adjoint Operator ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Forward Modeling ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Product Test ◽  
Least Squares Migration ◽  
Time Extrapolation

To reduce the migration artifacts arising from incomplete data or inaccurate operators instead of migrating data with the adjoint of the forward-modeling operator, a least-squares migration often is considered. Least-squares migration requires a forward-modeling operator and its adjoint. In a derivation of the mathematically correct adjoint operator to a given forward-time-extrapolation modeling operator, the exact adjoint of the derived operator is obtained by formulating an explicit matrix equation for the forward operation and transposing it. The programs that implement the exact adjoint operator pair are verified by the dot-product test. The derived exact adjoint operator turns out to differ from the conventional reverse-time-migration (RTM) operator, an implementation of wavefield extrapolation backward in time. Examples with synthetic data show that migration using the exact adjoint operator gives similar results for a conventional RTM operator and that least-squares RTM is quite successful in reducing most migration artifacts. The least-squares solution using the exact adjoint pair produces a model that fits the data better than one using a conventional RTM operator pair.

Least-squares reverse time migration via linearized waveform inversion using a Wasserstein metric

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 84 (5) ◽  
pp. S411-S423
Author(s):  
Peng Yong ◽  
Jianping Huang ◽  
Zhenchun Li ◽  
Wenyuan Liao ◽  
Luping Qu
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Waveform Inversion ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Gradient Algorithm ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Wasserstein Metric ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Imaging Results ◽  
Primal Dual

Least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM), an effective tool for imaging the structures of the earth from seismograms, can be characterized as a linearized waveform inversion problem. We have investigated the performance of three minimization functionals as the [Formula: see text] norm, the hybrid [Formula: see text] norm, and the Wasserstein metric ([Formula: see text] metric) for LSRTM. The [Formula: see text] metric used in this study is based on the dynamic formulation of transport problems, and a primal-dual hybrid gradient algorithm is introduced to efficiently compute the [Formula: see text] metric between two seismograms. One-dimensional signal analysis has demonstrated that the [Formula: see text] metric behaves like the [Formula: see text] norm for two amplitude-varied signals. Unlike the [Formula: see text] norm, the [Formula: see text] metric does not suffer from the differentiability issue for null residuals. Numerical examples of the application of three misfit functions to LSRTM on synthetic data have demonstrated that, compared to the [Formula: see text] norm, the hybrid [Formula: see text] norm and [Formula: see text] metric can accelerate LSRTM and are less sensitive to non-Gaussian noise. For the field data application, the [Formula: see text] metric produces the most reliable imaging results. The hybrid [Formula: see text] norm requires tedious trial-and-error tests for the judicious threshold parameter selection. Hence, the more automatic [Formula: see text] metric is recommended as a robust alternative to the customary [Formula: see text] norm for time-domain LSRTM.

Least-squares reverse time migration in TTI media using a pure qP-wave equation

Geophysics ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 85 (4) ◽  
pp. S199-S216
Author(s):  
Xinru Mu ◽  
Jianping Huang ◽  
Jidong Yang ◽  
Xu Guo ◽  
Yundong Guo
Keyword(s):  
Wave Equation ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Seismic Imaging ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Transversely Isotropic ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
The Matrix ◽  
The Stability

Anisotropy is a common phenomenon in subsurface strata and should be considered in seismic imaging and inversion. Seismic imaging in a vertical transversely isotropic (VTI) medium does not take into account the effects of the tilt angles, which can lead to degraded migrated images in areas with strong anisotropy. To correct such waveform distortion, reduce related image artifacts, and improve migration resolution, a tilted transversely isotropic (TTI) least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) method is presented. In the LSRTM, a pure qP-wave equation is used and solved with the finite-difference method. We have analyzed the stability condition for the pure qP-wave equation using the matrix method, which is used to ensure the stability of wave propagation in the TTI medium. Based on this wave equation, we derive a corresponding demigration (Born modeling) and adjoint migration operators to implement TTI LSRTM. Numerical tests on the synthetic data show the advantages of TTI LSRTM over VTI RTM and VTI LSRTM when the recorded data contain strong effects caused by large tilt angles. Our numerical experiments illustrate that the sensitivity of the adopted TTI LSRTM to the migration velocity errors is much higher than that to the anisotropic parameters (including epsilon, delta, and tilted angle parameters), and its sensitivity to the epsilon model and tilt angle is higher than that to the delta model.

scholarly journals Attenuation compensation for least-squares reverse time migration using the viscoacoustic-wave equation

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. S251-S262 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gaurav Dutta ◽  
Gerard T. Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Seismic Waves ◽  
Adjoint Equations ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Adjoint State ◽  
Attenuation Models ◽  
Adjoint State Method

Strong subsurface attenuation leads to distortion of amplitudes and phases of seismic waves propagating inside the earth. Conventional acoustic reverse time migration (RTM) and least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) do not account for this distortion, which can lead to defocusing of migration images in highly attenuative geologic environments. To correct for this distortion, we used a linearized inversion method, denoted as [Formula: see text]-LSRTM. During the least-squares iterations, we used a linearized viscoacoustic modeling operator for forward modeling. The adjoint equations were derived using the adjoint-state method for back propagating the residual wavefields. The merit of this approach compared with conventional RTM and LSRTM was that [Formula: see text]-LSRTM compensated for the amplitude loss due to attenuation and could produce images with better balanced amplitudes and more resolution below highly attenuative layers. Numerical tests on synthetic and field data illustrated the advantages of [Formula: see text]-LSRTM over RTM and LSRTM when the recorded data had strong attenuation effects. Similar to standard LSRTM, the sensitivity tests for background velocity and [Formula: see text] errors revealed that the liability of this method is the requirement for smooth and accurate migration velocity and attenuation models.

Least-squares reverse time migration of multiples

Geophysics ◽  
2014 ◽  
Vol 79 (1) ◽  
pp. S11-S21 ◽  
Author(s):  
Dongliang Zhang ◽  
Gerard T. Schuster
Keyword(s):  
Free Surface ◽  
Least Squares ◽  
Synthetic Data ◽  
Time History ◽  
Ocean Bottom ◽  
Virtual Source ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Sea Bed

The theory of least-squares reverse time migration of multiples (RTMM) is presented. In this method, least squares migration (LSM) is used to image free-surface multiples where the recorded traces are used as the time histories of the virtual sources at the hydrophones and the surface-related multiples are the observed data. For a single source, the entire free-surface becomes an extended virtual source where the downgoing free-surface multiples more fully illuminate the subsurface compared to the primaries. Since each recorded trace is treated as the time history of a virtual source, knowledge of the source wavelet is not required and the ringy time series for each source is automatically deconvolved. If the multiples can be perfectly separated from the primaries, numerical tests on synthetic data for the Sigsbee2B and Marmousi2 models show that least-squares reverse time migration of multiples (LSRTMM) can significantly improve the image quality compared to RTMM or standard reverse time migration (RTM) of primaries. However, if there is imperfect separation and the multiples are strongly interfering with the primaries then LSRTMM images show no significant advantage over the primary migration images. In some cases, they can be of worse quality. Applying LSRTMM to Gulf of Mexico data shows higher signal-to-noise imaging of the salt bottom and top compared to standard RTM images. This is likely attributed to the fact that the target body is just below the sea bed so that the deep water multiples do not have strong interference with the primaries. Migrating a sparsely sampled version of the Marmousi2 ocean bottom seismic data shows that LSM of primaries and LSRTMM provides significantly better imaging than standard RTM. A potential liability of LSRTMM is that multiples require several round trips between the reflector and the free surface, so that high frequencies in the multiples suffer greater attenuation compared to the primary reflections. This can lead to lower resolution in the migration image compared to that computed from primaries. Another liability is that the multiple migration image is more down-dip limited than the standard primaries migration image. Finally, if the surface-related multiple elimination method is imperfect and there are strong multiples interfering with the primaries, then the resulting LSRTMM image can be significantly degraded. We conclude that LSRTMM can be a useful complement, not a replacement, for RTM of primary reflections.

Compensating Q effects in viscoelastic media by adjoint-based least-squares reverse time migration

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (2) ◽  
pp. S151-S172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peng Guo ◽  
George A. McMechan
Keyword(s):  
Least Squares ◽  
Adjoint Operator ◽  
Seismic Attenuation ◽  
Quality Factors ◽  
Reverse Time ◽  
Reverse Time Migration ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Viscoelastic Media ◽  
Time Migration ◽  
Attenuation Loss

Low values of P- and S-wave quality factors [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text] result in strong intrinsic seismic attenuation in seismic modeling and imaging. We use a linearized waveform inversion approach, by generalizing least-squares reverse time migration (LSRTM) for viscoelastic media ([Formula: see text]-LSRTM), to compensate for the attenuation loss for P- and S-images. We use the first-order particle velocity, stress, and memory variable equations, with explicit [Formula: see text] in the formulations, based on the generalized standard linear solid, as the forward-modeling operator. The linearized two-way viscoelastic modeling operator is obtained with modulus perturbations introduced for the relaxed P- and S-moduli. The viscoelastic adjoint operator and the P- and S-imaging conditions for modulus perturbations are derived using the adjoint-state method and an augmented Lagrangian functional. [Formula: see text]-LSRTM solves the viscoelastic linearized modeling operator for generating synthetic data, and the adjoint operator is used for back propagating the data residual. With the correct background velocity model, and with the inclusion of [Formula: see text] in the modeling and imaging, [Formula: see text]-LSRTM is capable of iteratively updating the P- and S-modulus perturbations, and compensating the attenuation loss caused by [Formula: see text] and [Formula: see text], in the direction of minimizing the data residual between the observed and predicted data. Compared with elastic LSRTM results, the P- and S-modulus perturbation images from [Formula: see text]-LSRTM have stronger (closer to the true modulus perturbation), and more continuous, amplitudes for the structures in and beneath low-[Formula: see text] zones. The residuals in the image space obtained using the correctly parameterized [Formula: see text]-LSRTM are much smaller than those obtained using the incorrectly parameterized elastic LSRTM. However, the data residuals from [Formula: see text]-LSRTM and elastic LSRTM are similar because elastic Born modeling with a weak reflector in the image produces similar reflection amplitudes with viscoelastic Born modeling with a strong reflector.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document