Measurement of the shear slowness of slow formations from monopole logging-while-drilling sonic logs

Geophysics ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 85 (1) ◽  
pp. D45-D52
Author(s):  
Yuanda Su ◽  
Xinding Fang ◽  
Xiaoming Tang

Acoustic logging-while-drilling (LWD) is used to measure formation velocity/slowness during drilling. In a fast formation, in which the S-wave velocity is higher than the borehole-fluid velocity, monopole logging can be used to obtain P- and S-wave velocities by measuring the corresponding refracted waves. In a slow formation, in which the S-wave velocity is less than the borehole-fluid velocity, because the fully refracted S-wave is missing, quadrupole logging has been developed and used for S-wave slowness measurement. A recent study based on numerical modeling implies that monopole LWD can generate a detectable transmitted S-wave in a slow formation. This nondispersive transmitted S-wave propagates at the formation S-wave velocity and thus can be used for measuring the S-wave slowness of a slow formation. We evaluate a field example to demonstrate the applicability of monopole LWD in determining the S-wave slowness of slow formations. We compare the S-wave slowness extracted from a monopole LWD data set acquired in a slow formation and the result derived from the quadrupole data recorded in the same logging run. The results indicated that the S-wave slowness can be reliably determined from monopole LWD sonic data in fairly slow formations. However, we found that the monopole approach is not applicable to very slow formations because the transmitted S-wave becomes too weak to detect when the formation S-wave slowness is much higher than the borehole-fluid slowness.

Geophysics ◽  
2018 ◽  
Vol 83 (1) ◽  
pp. D9-D16 ◽  
Author(s):  
Xinding Fang ◽  
Arthur Cheng

Acoustic logging-while-drilling (LWD) is a technology that is used to measure formation elastic properties during drilling. When the formation shear slowness is smaller than the borehole fluid slowness (i.e., fast formation), monopole logging can be used to obtain formation compressional and shear slownesses by measuring the corresponding refracted waves. In a slow formation in which the shear slowness is larger than the borehole fluid slowness, other logging methods, such as quadrupole LWD, are used instead for shear slowness measurement due to the lack of a fully refracted S-wave. Through modeling analysis, we find that the transmitted S-wave generated by a monopole LWD tool in a slow formation can be detected and used to measure the formation shear slowness. This phenomenon can be explained by Huygens’ principle, which states that every point on a wavefront can be considered as a secondary source that induces particle motion. It is hard to discern the transmitted S-wave in monopole wireline data because it strongly interferes with the Stoneley mode in wireline logging. However, the transmitted S-wave decouples from the Stoneley in the LWD environment because the drill collar slows down the low-frequency part of the Stoneley mode. The nondispersive nature of the transmitted S-wave makes it suitable for shear slowness extraction using time semblance analysis, but sophisticated signal preprocessing might be needed because this wave is generally weak compared with the Stoneley wave. Moreover, our study helps us better understand how the Stoneley mode behaves and interferes with other modes in a slow formation under LWD conditions.


Geophysics ◽  
2016 ◽  
Vol 81 (5) ◽  
pp. D553-D560 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yuan-Da Su ◽  
Can Jiang ◽  
Chun-Xi Zhuang ◽  
Song Xu ◽  
Xiao-Ming Tang

We have developed a joint inversion method for logging-while-drilling (LWD) multipole acoustic data processing to simultaneously determine the formation of P- and S-wave velocities. The presence of the LWD tool strongly influences the dispersion characteristics of quadrupole and monopole leaky-P-waves, especially in unconsolidated slow formations. We have verified that an equivalent-tool theory can be adequately used to model the LWD multipole wave dispersion characteristics and can therefore be used to do forward modeling for the inversion. A major advantage of jointly inverting the multipole data sets, as compared with separately inverting each individual data set, is the reduction of uncertainties in the estimated formation of P- and S-wave velocities. We have applied the method to field data processing. The results found that the method not only corrected the dispersion effect in the quadrupole and leaky-P-wave data but also simultaneously obtained the formation of P- and S-wave velocities.


Geophysics ◽  
1994 ◽  
Vol 59 (1) ◽  
pp. 87-92 ◽  
Author(s):  
Gary Mavko ◽  
Diane Jizba

Seismic velocity dispersionin fluid-saturated rocks appears to be dominated by tow mecahnisms: the large scale mechanism modeled by Biot, and the local flow or squirt mecahnism. The tow mechanisms can be distuinguished by the ratio of P-to S-wave dispersions, or more conbeniently, by the ratio of dynamic bulk to shear compliance dispersions derived from the wave velocities. Our formulation suggests that when local flow denominates, the dispersion of the shear compliance will be approximately 4/15 the dispersion of the compressibility. When the Biot mechanism dominates, the constant of proportionality is much smaller. Our examination of ultrasonic velocities from 40 sandstones and granites shows that most, but not all, of the samples were dominated by local flow dispersion, particularly at effective pressures below 40 MPa.


Geophysics ◽  
2000 ◽  
Vol 65 (5) ◽  
pp. 1446-1454 ◽  
Author(s):  
Side Jin ◽  
G. Cambois ◽  
C. Vuillermoz

S-wave velocity and density information is crucial for hydrocarbon detection, because they help in the discrimination of pore filling fluids. Unfortunately, these two parameters cannot be accurately resolved from conventional P-wave marine data. Recent developments in ocean‐bottom seismic (OBS) technology make it possible to acquire high quality S-wave data in marine environments. The use of (S)-waves for amplitude variation with offset (AVO) analysis can give better estimates of S-wave velocity and density contrasts. Like P-wave AVO, S-wave AVO is sensitive to various types of noise. We investigate numerically and analytically the sensitivity of AVO inversion to random noise and errors in angles of incidence. Synthetic examples show that random noise and angle errors can strongly bias the parameter estimation. The use of singular value decomposition offers a simple stabilization scheme to solve for the elastic parameters. The AVO inversion is applied to an OBS data set from the North Sea. Special prestack processing techniques are required for the success of S-wave AVO inversion. The derived S-wave velocity and density contrasts help in detecting the fluid contacts and delineating the extent of the reservoir sand.


2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jerome Fortin ◽  
Cedric Bailly ◽  
Mathilde Adelinet ◽  
Youri Hamon

<p>Linking ultrasonic measurements made on samples, with sonic logs and seismic subsurface data, is a key challenge for the understanding of carbonate reservoirs. To deal with this problem, we investigate the elastic properties of dry lacustrine carbonates. At one study site, we perform a seismic refraction survey (100 Hz), as well as sonic (54 kHz) and ultrasonic (250 kHz) measurements directly on outcrop and ultrasonic measurements on samples (500 kHz). By comparing the median of each data set, we show that the P wave velocity decreases from laboratory to seismic scale. Nevertheless, the median of the sonic measurements acquired on outcrop surfaces seems to fit with the seismic data, meaning that sonic acquisition may be representative of seismic scale. To explain the variations due to upscaling, we relate the concept of representative elementary volume with the wavelength of each scale of study. Indeed, with upscaling, the wavelength varies from millimetric to pluri-metric. This change of scale allows us to conclude that the behavior of P wave velocity is due to different geological features (matrix porosity, cracks, and fractures) related to the different wavelengths used. Based on effective medium theory, we quantify the pore aspect ratio at sample scale and the crack/fracture density at outcrop and seismic scales using a multiscale representative elementary volume concept. Results show that the matrix porosity that controls the ultrasonic P wave velocities is progressively lost with upscaling, implying that crack and fracture porosity impacts sonic and seismic P wave velocities, a result of paramount importance for seismic interpretation based on deterministic approaches.</p><p>Bailly, C., Fortin, J., Adelinet, M., & Hamon, Y. (2019). Upscaling of elastic properties in carbonates: A modeling approach based on a multiscale geophysical data set. Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth, 124. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019JB018391</p>


Geophysics ◽  
1993 ◽  
Vol 58 (5) ◽  
pp. 713-719 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ghassan I. Al‐Eqabi ◽  
Robert B. Herrmann

The objective of this study is to demonstrate that a laterally varying shallow S‐wave structure, derived from the dispersion of the ground roll, can explain observed lateral variations in the direct S‐wave arrival. The data set consists of multichannel seismic refraction data from a USGS-GSC survey in the state of Maine and the province of Quebec. These data exhibit significant lateral changes in the moveout of the ground‐roll as well as the S‐wave first arrivals. A sequence of surface‐wave processing steps are used to obtain a final laterally varying S‐wave velocity model. These steps include visual examination of the data, stacking, waveform inversion of selected traces, phase velocity adjustment by crosscorrelation, and phase velocity inversion. These models are used to predict the S‐wave first arrivals by using two‐dimensional (2D) ray tracing techniques. Observed and calculated S‐wave arrivals match well over 30 km long data paths, where lateral variations in the S‐wave velocity in the upper 1–2 km are as much as ±8 percent. The modeled correlation between the lateral variations in the ground‐roll and S‐wave arrival demonstrates that a laterally varying structure can be constrained by using surface‐wave data. The application of this technique to data from shorter spreads and shallower depths is discussed.


2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (6) ◽  
pp. 3622-3633
Author(s):  
Rufus D. Catchings ◽  
Mark R. Goldman ◽  
Jamison H. Steidl ◽  
Joanne H. Chan ◽  
Amir A. Allam ◽  
...  

Abstract The 2019 Ridgecrest, California, earthquake sequence included Mw 6.4 and 7.1 earthquakes that occurred on successive days beginning on 4 July 2019. These two largest earthquakes of the sequence occurred on orthogonal faults that ruptured the Earth’s surface. To better evaluate the 3D subsurface fault structure, (P- and S-wave) velocity, 3D and temporal variations in seismicity, and other important aspects of the earthquake sequence, we recorded aftershocks and ambient noise using up to 461 three-component nodal seismographs for about two months, beginning about one day after the Mw 7.1 mainshock. The ∼30,000Mw≥1 earthquakes that were recorded on the dense arrays provide an unusually large volume of data with which to evaluate the earthquake sequence. This report describes the recording arrays and is intended to provide metadata for researchers interested in evaluating various aspects of the 2019 Ridgecrest earthquake sequence using the nodal data set.


Geophysics ◽  
1996 ◽  
Vol 61 (2) ◽  
pp. 437-443 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ningya Cheng ◽  
Chuen Hon Cheng

Field data sets collected by an array monopole acoustic logging tool and a shear wave logging tool are processed and interpreted. The P‐ and S‐wave velocities of the formation are determined by threshold detection with cross‐correlation correction from the full waveform and the shear‐wave log, respectively. The array monopole acoustic logging data are also processed using the extended Prony’s method to estimate the borehole Stoneley wave phase velocity and attenuation as a function of frequency. The well formation between depths of 2950 and 3150 ft (899 and 960 m) can be described as an isotropic elastic medium. The inverted [Formula: see text] from the Stoneley wave phase velocity is in excellent agreement with the shear‐wave log results in this section. The well formation between the depths of 3715 and 3780 ft (1132 and 1152 m) can be described as a porous medium with shear‐wave velocity anisotropy about 10% to 20% and with the symmetry axis perpendicular to the borehole axis. The disagreement between the shear‐wave velocity from the Stoneley wave inversion and the direct shear‐wave log velocity in this section is beyond the errors in the measurements. Estimated permeabilities from low‐frequency Stoneley wave velocity and attenuation data are in good agreement with the core measurements. Also it is proven that the formation permeability is not the cause of the discrepancy. From the estimated “shear/pseudo‐Rayleigh” phase velocities in the array monopole log and the 3-D finite‐difference synthetics in the anisotropic formation, the discrepancy can best be explained as shear‐wave anisotropy.


Geophysics ◽  
2011 ◽  
Vol 76 (3) ◽  
pp. E59-E68 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hua Wang ◽  
Guo Tao

Propagating wavefields from monopole, dipole, and quadrupole acoustic logging-while-drilling (LWD) tools in very slow formations have been studied using the discrete wavenumber integration method. These studies examine the responses of monopole and dipole systems at different source frequencies in a very slow surrounding formation, and the responses of a quadrupole system operating at a low source frequency in a slow formation with different S-wave velocities. Analyses are conducted of coherence-velocity/slowness relationships (semblance spectra) in the time domain and of the dispersion characteristics of these waveform signals from acoustic LWD array receivers. These analyses demonstrate that, if the acoustic LWD tool is centralized properly and is operating at low frequencies (below 3 kHz), a monopole system can measure P-wave velocity by means of a “leaky” P-wave for very slow formations. Also, for very slow formations a dipole system can measure the P-wave velocity via a leaky P-wave and can measure the S-wave velocity from a formation flexural wave. With a quadrupole system, however, the lower frequency limit (cutoff frequency) of the drill-collar interference wave would decrease to 5 kHz and might no longer be neglected if the surrounding formation becomes a very slow formation, with S-wave velocities at approximately 500 m/s.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document