scholarly journals Skeletonized inversion of surface wave: Active source versus controlled noise comparison

2016 ◽  
Vol 4 (3) ◽  
pp. SH11-SH19 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Li ◽  
Sherif Hanafy
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Dispersion ◽  
Dispersion Analysis ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Western Side ◽  
Geologic Setting

We have developed a skeletonized inversion method that inverts the S-wave velocity distribution from surface-wave dispersion curves. Instead of attempting to fit every wiggle in the surface waves with predicted data, it only inverts the picked dispersion curve, thereby mitigating the problem of getting stuck in a local minimum. We have applied this method to a synthetic model and seismic field data from Qademah fault, located at the western side of Saudi Arabia. For comparison, we have performed dispersion analysis for an active and controlled noise source seismic data that had some receivers in common with the passive array. The active and passive data show good agreement in the dispersive characteristics. Our results demonstrated that skeletonized inversion can obtain reliable 1D and 2D S-wave velocity models for our geologic setting. A limitation is that we need to build layered initial model to calculate the Jacobian matrix, which is time consuming.

P- and S-wave velocity models from surface wave dispersion curves data transform

2017 ◽  
Author(s):  
Valentina Socco ◽  
Farbod Khosro Anjom ◽  
Cesare Comina ◽  
Daniela Teodor
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Wave Dispersion ◽  
Dispersion Curves ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Velocity Models

Crustal structure of the Iceland region from dispersion of surface waves

1962 ◽  
Vol 52 (2) ◽  
pp. 359-388
Author(s):  
Eysteinn Tryggvason
Keyword(s):  
Surface Layer ◽  
Surface Wave ◽  
Surface Waves ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Crustal Structure ◽  
Wave Dispersion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Mid Atlantic Ridge

ABSTRACT A number of Icelandic records of earthquakes originating in the Mid-Atlantic Seismic Belt between 52° and 70° N. lat. have been investigated. The surface waves on these records are chiefly in the period interval 3–10 sec, and are first mode Love-waves and Rayleigh-waves. The surface wave dispersion can be explained by a three-layered crustal structure as follows. A surface layer of S-wave velocity about 2.7 km/sec covering the whole region studied, a second layer of S-wave velocity about 3.6 km/sec covering Iceland and extending several hundred kilometers off the coasts and a third layer of S-wave velocity about 4.3 km/sec and P-wave velocity about 7.4 km/sec underlying the whole region. The thickness of the surface layer appears to be about 4 km on the Mid-Atlantic Ridge south of Iceland and in western Iceland, 3 km in central Iceland and 7 km northwest of Iceland. The second layer is apparently of similar thickness than the surface layer, while the third layer is thick; and the surface wave dispersion does not indicate any layer of higher wave velocity. This 7.4-layer is supposed to belong to the mantle, although its wave velocity is significantly lower than usually found in the upper mantle

Surface-wave dispersion spectrum inversion method applied to Love and Rayleigh waves recorded by distributed acoustic sensing

Geophysics ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 86 (1) ◽  
pp. EN1-EN12 ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhenghong Song ◽  
Xiangfang Zeng ◽  
Clifford H. Thurber
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Love Wave ◽  
Wave Dispersion ◽  
Dynamic Strain ◽  
Inversion Method ◽  
Data Sets ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Acoustic Sensing ◽  
Distributed Acoustic Sensing

Recently, distributed acoustic sensing (DAS) has been applied to shallow seismic structure imaging providing dense spatial sampling at a relatively low cost. DAS on a standard straight fiber-optic cable mostly records axial dynamic strain, which makes it difficult to separate the Rayleigh and Love wavefields. As a result, the mixed Rayleigh and Love wave signals cannot be used in the conventional surface-wave dispersion inversion method. Therefore, it is often ensured that the source and the cable are in the same line and only Rayleigh wave dispersion is used, which limits the constraints on structure and model resolution. We have inverted surface-wave dispersion spectra instead of dispersion curves. This inversion method can use mixed Rayleigh and Love waves recorded when the source and receiver array are not aligned. The multiple-channel records are transformed to the frequency domain, and a slant stack method is used to construct the dispersion spectra. The genetic algorithm method is used to obtain an optimal S-wave velocity model that minimizes the difference between theoretical and observed dispersion spectra. A series of synthetic tests are conducted to validate our method. The results suggest that our method not only improves the flexibility of the acquisition system design, but the Love wave data also provide additional constraints on the structure. Our method is applied to the active source and ambient noise data sets acquired at a geothermal site and provides consistent results for different data sets and acquisition geometries. The sensitivity of the dispersion spectra to layer thickness, density, and P-wave velocity is also discussed. With our method, the amount of usable data can be increased, helping deliver better subsurface images.

scholarly journals Joint Body‐ and Surface‐Wave Tomography of Yucca Flat, Nevada, Using a Novel Seismic Source

2019 ◽  
Vol 109 (5) ◽  
pp. 1922-1934 ◽  
Author(s):  
Liam D. Toney ◽  
Robert E. Abbott ◽  
Leiph A. Preston ◽  
David G. Tang ◽  
Tori Finlay ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Phase Velocity ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Velocity Structure ◽  
Joint Inversion ◽  
P Wave ◽  
S Wave ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Phase Velocity Dispersion

Abstract In preparation for the next phase of the Source Physics Experiments, we acquired an active‐source seismic dataset along two transects totaling more than 30 km in length at Yucca Flat, Nevada, on the Nevada National Security Site. Yucca Flat is a sedimentary basin which has hosted more than 650 underground nuclear tests (UGTs). The survey source was a novel 13,000 kg modified industrial pile driver. This weight drop source proved to be broadband and repeatable, richer in low frequencies (1–3 Hz) than traditional vibrator sources and capable of producing peak particle velocities similar to those produced by a 50 kg explosive charge. In this study, we performed a joint inversion of P‐wave refraction travel times and Rayleigh‐wave phase‐velocity dispersion curves for the P‐ and S‐wave velocity structure of Yucca Flat. Phase‐velocity surface‐wave dispersion measurements were obtained via the refraction microtremor method on 1 km arrays, with 80% overlap. Our P‐wave velocity models verify and expand the current understanding of Yucca Flat’s subsurface geometry and bulk properties such as depth to Paleozoic basement and shallow alluvium velocity. Areas of disagreement between this study and the current geologic model of Yucca Flat (derived from borehole studies) generally correlate with areas of widely spaced borehole control points. This provides an opportunity to update the existing model, which is used for modeling groundwater flow and radionuclide transport. Scattering caused by UGT‐related high‐contrast velocity anomalies substantially reduced the number and frequency bandwidth of usable dispersion picks. The S‐wave velocity models presented in this study agree with existing basin‐wide studies of Yucca Flat, but are compromised by diminished surface‐wave coherence as a product of this scattering. As nuclear nonproliferation monitoring moves from teleseismic to regional or even local distances, such high‐frequency (>5  Hz) scattering could prove challenging when attempting to discriminate events in areas of previous testing.

Using Deep Learning to Derive Shear-Wave Velocity Models from Surface-Wave Dispersion Data

2020 ◽  
Vol 91 (3) ◽  
pp. 1738-1751
Author(s):  
Jing Hu ◽  
Hongrui Qiu ◽  
Haijiang Zhang ◽  
Yehuda Ben-Zion
Keyword(s):  
Surface Wave ◽  
Shear Wave ◽  
Wave Velocity ◽  
Shear Wave Velocity ◽  
Southern California ◽  
Wave Dispersion ◽  
Surface Wave Dispersion ◽  
Velocity Models ◽  
Dispersion Data ◽  
Phase Group

Abstract We present a new algorithm for derivations of 1D shear-wave velocity models from surface-wave dispersion data using convolutional neural networks (CNNs). The technique is applied for continental China and the plate boundary region in southern California. Different CNNs are designed for these two regions and are trained using theoretical Rayleigh-wave phase and group velocity images computed from reference 1D VS models. The methodology is tested with 3260 phase–group images for continental China and 4160 phase–group images for southern California. The conversions of these images to velocity profiles take ∼23  s for continental China and ∼30  s for southern California on a personal laptop with the NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 core and a memory of 6 GB. The results obtained by the CNNs show high correlation with previous studies using conventional methods. The effectiveness of the CNN technique makes this fast method an important alternative for deriving shear-wave velocity models from large datasets of surface-wave dispersion data.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document