scholarly journals Protocol for the assessment of self-harm in young people: initial audit and training implications

2007 ◽  
Vol 31 (6) ◽  
pp. 224-226 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sarah Huline-Dickens ◽  
Tony Adiele

Aims and MethodsThis paper describes the development and initial audit of a protocol for the assessment of young people up to the age of 18 years who presented to the accident and emergency department (A&E) with self-harm. A key part of the project was education and training.ResultsRegular training of senior house officers (SHOs) in A&E may have contributed to an increase in young people being admitted to a bed for proper assessment (as per the protocol), but psychosocial assessments undertaken by SHOs in A&E were still only partial, and there was no apparent use of the mental state examination.Clinical ImplicationsChild and adolescent mental health services have an important role to play in liaising with local A&E departments in training of junior staff in psychosocial assessment and the use of the mental state examination. This is especially relevant in the light of the new training requirements of the foundation years.

2000 ◽  
Vol 176 (2) ◽  
pp. 126-131 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jane Hurry ◽  
Pamela Storey

BackgroundMany young people who harm themselves have chronic mental health or social problems or are at risk of future self-harm or even suicide. The accident and emergency (A&E) clinic is an important gateway to treatment.AimsTo describe the psychosocial assessment of 12- to 24-year-old patients attending A&E clinics following deliberate self-harm (DSH) and to identify features of service management and provision which maximise specialist assessment.MethodA postal questionnaire was sent to a sample of one in three A&E departments in England. In a representative sample of 18 of these hospitals, staff were interviewed and 50 case notes per hospital were examined.ResultsPsychosocial assessment by non-specialist doctors in A&E departments tended to be of variable quality, focused on short-term risk. Around 43% of patients aged 12–24 were assessed by a specialist; specialist assessment was associated with high admission rates and the presence of on-site psychiatric departments and DSH teams.ConclusionsYoung DSH patients at risk often go unidentified; as a result their psychological problems may not be treated. Hospitals are frequently unaware of the proportion of patients discharged without adequate assessment.


2010 ◽  
Vol 34 (9) ◽  
pp. 385-389 ◽  
Author(s):  
Diane Mullins ◽  
Siobhan MacHale ◽  
David Cotter

Aims and methodTo identify the provision of psychosocial assessments for all people attending an accident and emergency department in Ireland with a presentation indicative of self-harm over 12 months and to investigate whether the National Institute for Health and Clinical Excellence (NICE) guidelines for self-harm were met.ResultsA total of 834 attendances for self-harm were recorded. A psychosocial assessment was undertaken by a member of the liaison psychiatry team in 59% of attendances. Single male patients under 45 years of age represented 39% of those who did not receive a psychosocial assessment.Clinical implicationsSingle men under the age of 45 years represent a vulnerable group in which levels of psychosocial assessment need to be optimised in order to meet the NICE guidelines for standards of care.


2006 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 169-172 ◽  
Author(s):  
Peter Lepping ◽  
Barbara Woodworth ◽  
Lucy Roberts ◽  
Jim Turner

Aims and MethodTo audit whether the introduction of a self-harm pathway and protocol increases the number of psychosocial assessments. All episodes of self-harm in a defined period during 2002 (n=335) and 2004 (n=390) were reviewed before and after the introduction of a self-harm pathway and protocol. Adherence to the protocol was also investigated.ResultsAfter the introduction of the self-harm pathway and protocol, the proportion of psychosocial assessments requested had risen from 57% (2002) to 85% (2004). The proportion of psychosocial assessments completed had risen from 47% to 70%. Over the 2 years, the overall number of self-harm presentations was reduced by 27%.Clinical ImplicationsThe introduction of a self-harm pathway and protocol through a self-harm steering group is feasible, was well accepted and increased the number of psychosocial assessments after self-harm. It may also contribute to a reduction in the number of overall presentations with self-harm to the accident and emergency department.


1998 ◽  
Vol 22 (2) ◽  
pp. 100-101 ◽  
Author(s):  
Elaine Lockhart

The first part of this audit looked at the demographics of young people presenting to Monklands Hospital and the quality of their assessment. Precipitating factors and past psychiatric history were enquired of in the majority of cases but there was a dearth of information regarding alcohol/drug use and family history. A checklist was devised with the aim of improving the quality of these assessments. The second part of the audit cycle completed one year later revealed considerable improvement in all categories. It is hoped that this will be maintained by displaying the checklist in the accident and emergency department and continuing to include teaching about this vulnerable population to all new medical and nursing staff.


2003 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. 34-39 ◽  
Author(s):  
Judith Horrocks ◽  
Sally Price ◽  
Allan House ◽  
David Owens

BackgroundSelf-injury is a neglected area of self-harm research and we know little about its epidemiology, hospital care and outcome.AimsTo provide epidemiological data on self-injury and compare hospital management of self-injury with that for self-poisoning.MethodData were collected on all self-harm attendances to the general hospitals in Leeds over an 18-month period.ResultsPeople attending hospital for self-injury or self-poisoning do not form mutually exclusive groups. There were higher proportions of self-injury episodes compared with self-poisoning, where a history of self-harm or contact with mental health services had been recorded. Fewer psychosocial assessments were carried out after episodes of self-injury compared with self-poisoning but, when they were, follow-up was recommended more often.ConclusionsThe clinical importance of self-injury is not mirrored by the level of psychosocial assessment and after-care provided.


Author(s):  
Jonathan P. Wyatt ◽  
Robin N. Illingworth ◽  
Colin A. Graham ◽  
Kerstin Hogg ◽  
Michael J. Clancy ◽  
...  

Approach to psychiatric problems 602 Glossary of psychiatric terms 603 The psychiatric interview 604 Mental state examination 606 The aggressive patient: background 608 Safe consultations with potentially violent patients 609 Managing aggression 610 Emergency sedation of a violent patient 611 Deliberate self-harm 612 Assessment of suicide risk ...


The clinical interview Setting the scene Interviewing psychiatric patients Discussing management History Mental state examination Case summary Observations of appearance and behaviour Speech Abnormal mood Asking about depressed mood Asking about thoughts of self-harm Asking about elevated mood Anxiety symptoms Asking about anxiety symptoms Abnormal perceptions...


2003 ◽  
Vol 183 (1) ◽  
pp. 28-33 ◽  
Author(s):  
Isaura Gairin ◽  
Allan House ◽  
David Owens

BackgroundThe National Confidential Inquiry into suicides in England and Wales found that a quarter of suicides are preceded by mental health service contact in the year before death. However, visits to accident and emergency departments due to self-harm may not lead to a record of mental health service contact.AimsTo determine the proportion of suicides preceded by accident and emergency attendance in the previous year.MethodWe obtained the list of probable suicides in Leeds for a 38-month period, and examined the records from thecity's accident and emergency departments for a year before each death.ResultsEighty-five (39%) of the 219 people who later died by suicide had attended an accident and emergency department in the year before death, 15% because of non-fatal self-harm. Final visits dueto self-harm were often shortly before suicide (median 38 days), but the National Confidential Inquiry recorded about a fifth of them as‘not in contact’ with local mental health services.ConclusionsAlthough many suicides are preceded by recent attendance at accident and emergency departments due to non-fatal self-harm, local mental health service records may show no recent contact. Suicide prevention might be enhanced were accident and emergency departments and mental health services to work together more closely.


2016 ◽  
Vol 208 (3) ◽  
pp. 286-291 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christabel Owens ◽  
Lorraine Hansford ◽  
Siobhan Sharkey ◽  
Tamsin Ford

BackgroundPresentation at an accident and emergency (A&E) department is a key opportunity to engage with a young person who self-harms. The needs of this vulnerable group and their fears about presenting to healthcare services, including A&E, are poorly understood.AimsTo examine young people's perceptions of A&E treatment following self-harm and their views on what constitutes a positive clinical encounter.MethodSecondary analysis of qualitative data from an experimental online discussion forum. Threads selected for secondary analysis represent the views of 31 young people aged 16–25 with experience of self-harm.ResultsParticipants reported avoiding A&E whenever possible, based on their own and others' previous poor experiences. When forced to seek emergency care, they did so with feelings of shame and unworthiness. These feelings were reinforced when they received what they perceived as punitive treatment from A&E staff, perpetuating a cycle of shame, avoidance and further self-harm. Positive encounters were those in which they received ‘treatment as usual’, i.e. non-discriminatory care, delivered with kindness, which had the potential to challenge negative self-evaluation and break the cycle.ConclusionsThe clinical needs of young people who self-harm continue to demand urgent attention. Further hypothesis testing and trials of different models of care delivery for this vulnerable group are warranted.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document