scholarly journals Use of anti-dementia drugs and delayed care home placement: an observational study

2011 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 384-388 ◽  
Author(s):  
Emad Salib ◽  
Jessica Thompson
Keyword(s):  
Survival Analysis ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Observational Data ◽  
Cholinesterase Inhibitors ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Clinical Implications ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Home Placement

Aims and methodTo examine the association between the use of cholinesterase inhibitors (ChEIs) and time to care home placement. We compared patients who were prescribed ChEIs in 2006 with those who were not with respect to their placement in care homes over a 4-year period, using survival analysis.ResultsDuring the first 30 months of follow-up there was a delay in care home placement by a median of 12 months in those who took ChEIs compared with those who did not. However, at the end of the follow-up there was no significant reduction in the probability of being in a care home setting between those who had taken ChEIs compared with those who had not (hazard ratio 0.75, 95% CI 0.25–6, P = 0.1).Clinical implicationsThe study provides some evidence to suggest that prescribing ChEIs may be associated with a delay in the timing of care home placement as observed in the first 2.5 years of treatment. However, based on purely observational data, no conclusion can be made as to whether such association is causal.

scholarly journals Assessment of fracture risk tools in care home residents: a multi-centre observational pilot study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
F. Ihama ◽  
A. Pandyan ◽  
C. Roffe
Keyword(s):  
Pilot Study ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Fragility Fractures ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Regression Analyses ◽  
Observational Cohort ◽  
Comorbidity Index ◽  
Participant Outcomes ◽  
Study Setting

Abstract Background Fragility fractures are common in care home residents but established tools have not been tested in this population. Aim:To identify the most practicable tool for use. Methods Design Multicentre prospective observational cohort pilot study. Setting: 18 care homes in Boston, UK. Assessments: fragility risk score at baseline with FRAX, QFractureScore, Garvan nomogram, body mass index and TUGT for each participant. Outcomes: falls, fractures, combined falls & fractures. Follow-up; 12 months. Results 217/618 (35%) residents in the 18 care homes were enrolled. 147 (68%) had mental capacity,70 (32%) did not. There were 325 falls and 10 fractures in participants during the study. At the same time there were 1671 falls and 103 fractures in residents not participating in the study. Multiple regression analyses showed that only age had a statistically significant association with falls (χ2(1) = 5.7775, p = 0.0162), fractures (χ2(1) = 4.7269, p = 0.0297) and combined falls & fractures (χ2(1) = 4.7269, p = 0.0297). C-statistics were: falls; FRAX 0.544, BMI 0.610, QFractureScore 0.554, Garvan nomogram 0.579, TUGT 0.656, fractures; FRAX 0.655, BMI 0.708, QFractureScore 0.736, Garvan nomogram 0.712, TUGT 0.590, combined falls and fractures, c-statistics were same as for fractures. Fifty-four participants (25%) died during follow-up. Charlson comorbidity index predicted mortality, R2 = 0.021 (p = 0.034). Conclusions QFractureScore, BMI and Garvan nomogram were good predictors of fractures and combined falls and fractures Only age had statistically significant association with the outcomes. No tool was good predictor of falls.

scholarly journals Comparing proxy rated quality of life of people living with dementia in care homes

2019 ◽  
Vol 50 (1) ◽  
pp. 86-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Robertson ◽  
C. Cooper ◽  
J. Hoe ◽  
K. Lord ◽  
P. Rapaport ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Neuropsychiatric Symptoms ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Multilevel Modelling ◽  
Native English Speakers ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
English Speakers ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Home Placement

AbstractBackgroundImproving quality of life (QOL) for people with dementia is a priority. In care homes, we often rely on proxy ratings from staff and family but we do not know if, or how, they differ in care homes.MethodsWe compared 1056 pairs of staff and family DEMQOL-Proxy ratings from 86 care homes across England. We explored factors associated with ratings quantitatively using multilevel modelling and, qualitatively, through thematic analysis of 12 staff and 12 relative interviews.ResultsStaff and family ratings were weakly correlated (ρs = 0.35). Median staff scores were higher than family's (104 v. 101; p < 0.001). Family were more likely than staff to rate resident QOL as ‘Poor’ (χ2 = 55.91, p < 0.001). Staff and family rated QOL higher when residents had fewer neuropsychiatric symptoms and severe dementia. Staff rated QOL higher in homes with lower staff:resident ratios and when staff were native English speakers. Family rated QOL higher when the resident had spent longer living in the care home and was a native English. Spouses rated residents’ QOL higher than other relatives. Qualitative results suggest differences arise because staff felt good care provided high QOL but families compared the present to the past. Family judgements centre on loss and are complicated by decisions about care home placement and their understandings of dementia.ConclusionProxy reports differ systematically between staff and family. Reports are influenced by the rater:staff and family may conceptualise QOL differently.

scholarly journals Probiotics for Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhoea (PAAD): a prospective observational study of antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (including Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhoea) in care homes

2014 ◽  
Vol 18 (63) ◽  
pp. 1-84 ◽  
Author(s):  
Kerenza Hood ◽  
Jacqui Nuttall ◽  
David Gillespie ◽  
Victoria Shepherd ◽  
Fiona Wood ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clostridium Difficile ◽  
Observational Study ◽  
Health Technology Assessment ◽  
Technology Assessment ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Health Technology ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Antibiotic Prescribing ◽  
Stage 1 ◽  
Antibiotic Associated Diarrhoea

BackgroundAntibiotic prescribing rates in care homes are higher than in the general population. Antibiotics disrupt the normal gut flora, sometimes causing antibiotic-associated diarrhoea (AAD).Clostridium difficile(Hall and O’Toole 1935) Prévot 1938 is the most commonly identified cause of AAD. Little is known either about the frequency or type of antibiotics prescribed in care homes or about the incidence and aetiology of AAD in this setting.ObjectivesThe Probiotics for Antibiotic-Associated Diarrhoea (PAAD) study was designed as a two-stage study. PAAD stage 1 aimed to (1) prospectively describe antibiotic prescribing in care homes; (2) determine the incidence ofC. difficilecarriage and AAD (includingC. difficile-associated diarrhoea); and (3) to consider implementation challenges and establish the basis for a sample size estimation for a randomised controlled trial (RCT) of probiotic administration with antibiotics to prevent AAD in care homes. If justified by PAAD stage 1, the RCT would be implemented in PAAD stage 2. However, as a result of new evidence regarding the clinical effectiveness of probiotics on the incidence of AAD, a decision was taken not to proceed with PAAD stage 2.DesignPAAD stage 1 was a prospective observational cohort study in care homes in South Wales with up to 12 months’ follow-up for each resident.SettingRecruited care homes had management and owner’s agreement to participate and three or more staff willing to take responsibility for implementing the study.ParticipantsEleven care homes were recruited, but one withdrew before any residents were recruited. A total of 279 care home residents were recruited to the observational study and 19 withdrew, 16 (84%) because of moving to a non-participating care home.Main outcome measuresThe primary outcomes were the rate of antibiotic prescribing, incidence of AAD, defined as three or more loose stools (type 5–7 on the Bristol Stool Chart) in a 24-hour period, andC. difficilecarriage confirmed on stool culture.ResultsStool samples were obtained at study entry from 81% of participating residents. Over half of the samples contained antibiotic-resistant isolates, with Enterobacteriaceae resistant to ciprofloxacin in 47%. Residents were prescribed an average of 2.16 antibiotic prescriptions per year [95% confidence interval (CI) 1.90 to 2.46]. Antibiotics were less likely to be prescribed to residents from dual-registered homes. The incidence of AAD was 0.57 (95% CI 0.41 to 0.81) episodes per year among those residents who were prescribed antibiotics. AAD was more likely in residents who were prescribed co-amoxiclav than other antibiotics and in those residents who routinely used incontinence pads. AAD was less common in residents from residential homes.ConclusionsCare home residents, particularly in nursing homes, are frequently prescribed antibiotics and often experience AAD. Antibiotic resistance, including ciprofloxacin resistance, is common in Enterobacteriaceae isolated from the stool of care home residents. Co-amoxiclav is associated with greater risk of AAD than other commonly prescribed antibiotics.Trial registrationCurrent Controlled Trials ISRCTN 7954844.FundingThis project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Technology Assessment programme and will be published in full inHealth Technology Assessment; Vol. 18, No. 63. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.

scholarly journals Are we allowed to visit now? Concerns and issues surrounding vaccination and infection risks in UK care homes during COVID-19

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Clarissa Marie Giebel ◽  
Kerry Hanna ◽  
Jacqueline Cannon ◽  
Paul Marlow ◽  
Hilary Tetlow ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Scientific Evidence ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Home Visitation ◽  
Control Measures ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Family Carers ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
The Uk ◽  
The Impact

Background: Vaccination uptake in the UK and increased care home testing are likely affecting care home visitation. With scant scientific evidence to date, the aim of this longitudinal qualitative study was to explore the impact of both (vaccination and testing) on the conduct and experiences of care home visits. Methods: Family carers of care home residents with dementia and care home staff from across the UK took part in baseline (October/November 2020) and follow-up interviews (March 2021). Public advisers were involved in all elements of the research. Data were analysed using thematic analysis. Results: Across 62 baseline and follow-up interviews with family carers (n=26; 11) and care home staff (n=16; 9), five core themes were developed: Delayed and inconsistent offers of face-to-face visits; Procedures and facilitation of visits; Frustration and anger among family carers; Variable uptake of the COVID-19 vaccine; Misinformation, education, and free choice. The variable uptake in staff, compared to family carers, was a key factor seemingly influencing visitation, with a lack of clear guidance leading care homes to implement infection control measures and visitation rights differently. Conclusions: We make five recommendations in this paper to enable improved care home visitation in the ongoing, and in future, pandemics. Visits need to be enabled and any changes to visiting rights must be used as a last resort, reviewed regularly in consultation with residents and carers and restored as soon as possible as a top priority, whilst more education needs to be provided surrounding vaccination for care home staff.

Experience of use of advance care planning in care homes

2018 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maggie Stobbart-Rowlands ◽  
Mandy Thorn
Keyword(s):  
Advance Care Planning ◽  
Best Practice ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Training Programme ◽  
Best Interests ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Care Planning ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
People With Dementia ◽  
Advance Care

This chapter describes the care home setting, aspects that have an impact on use of Advance care planning (ACP) in care homes, examples of challenges and best practice, use of ACP in the GSF Care Homes Training Programme, ACP with people with dementia, and culture change. Many people in care homes are in the last year/s of life, and ACP discussions are especially important for them to ensure that the care they receive is in line with what they want. Care homes lead the way in their extensive use of ACP discussions. ACP is more routinely used by care home staff than is often recognized, and can be easier to introduce in care homes than in other settings. Key challenges include poor means of communication due to dementia/cognitive impairment or physical deterioration, and how staff address the expectations of families, and ensure any interventions are in the best interests of the person.

scholarly journals Six-month reviews for stroke survivors: a study of the modified Greater Manchester Stroke Assessment Tool with care home residents

2020 ◽  
Vol 34 (5) ◽  
pp. 677-687
Author(s):  
Emma Patchwood ◽  
Kate Woodward-Nutt ◽  
Katy Rothwell ◽  
Catherine Perry ◽  
Pippa Tyrrell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Observational Study ◽  
Unmet Needs ◽  
Assessment Tool ◽  
Qualitative Interviews ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Stroke Survivors ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Organizational Barriers ◽  
Stroke Assessment

Objectives: To explore the feasibility of using a stroke-specific toolkit for six-month post-stroke reviews in care homes to identify unmet needs and actions. Design: An observational study including qualitative interviews to explore the process and outcome of reviews. Setting: UK care homes. Participants: Stroke survivors, family members, care home staff (review participants) and external staff involved in conducting reviews (assessors). Interventions: Modified Greater Manchester Stroke Assessment Tool (GM-SAT). Results: The observational study provided data on 74 stroke survivors across 51 care homes. In total, out of 74, 45 (61%) had unmet needs identified. Common unmet needs related to blood pressure, mobility, medicine management and mood. We conducted 25 qualitative interviews, including 13 review participants and 12 assessors. Three overarching qualitative themes covered acceptability of conducting reviews in care homes, process and outcomes of reviews, and acceptability of modified GM-SAT review toolkit. The modified GM-SAT review was positively valued, but stroke survivors had poor recall of the review event including the actions agreed. Care home staff sometimes assisted with reviews and highlighted their need for training to support day-to-day needs of stroke survivors. Assessors highlighted a need for clearer guidance on the use of the toolkit and suggested further modifications to enhance it. They also identified organizational barriers and facilitators to implementing reviews and communicating planned actions to GPs and other agencies. Conclusion: The modified GM-SAT provides a feasible means of conducting six-month reviews for stroke survivors in care homes and helps identify important needs. Further modifications have enhanced acceptability. Full implementation into practice requires staff training and organizational changes.

PP102 Developing A Contextually-Informed Deprescribing Intervention

2018 ◽  
Vol 34 (S1) ◽  
pp. 104-105
Author(s):  
Charlene Ronquillo ◽  
Ken Stein
Keyword(s):  
Health Care Professionals ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Stakeholder Involvement ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Successful Implementation ◽  
Allied Health Professionals ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Stakeholder Consultation ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
Local Stakeholder

Introduction:Deprescribing – a process for reducing or stopping drugs when the balance of benefits and harms may no longer be in a person's interests – is a key aspect of managing multimorbidity and polypharmcacy in older people. Several deprescribing interventions have been developed (e.g. in Australia and Canada), although significant challenges for successful implementation remain. Through key stakeholder consultation in the care home setting in South West England, we take the initial steps to develop a context-informed deprescribing approach. Engaging stakeholders from the outset gains insight into acceptability, feasibility, and relevance of deprescribing interventions developed elsewhere informing co-production of an effective, implementable approach.Methods:Consultation workshops were held with two groups of stakeholders: (i) care home residents and their families; (ii) care home staff and health care professionals (general practitioners, medical specialists, pharmacists, nurses, allied health professionals). Focus groups were held with each group separately to understand perspectives on: deprescribing in general; contextual considerations; and, perspectives on deprescribing interventions developed in other countries. A combined focus group then considered components of a deprescribing intervention for care homes. Qualitative data were audio recorded, transcribed, and thematically coded.Results:Participants described the nature of local relationships, dynamics, structures, and resources, as important considerations in the development of a deprescribing approach in care homes. Perspectives and concerns around deprescribing among the stakeholder groups varied, although the importance of eliciting local stakeholder feedback in the early stages of developing a deprescribing intervention was a common thread.Conclusions:Early engagement and co-production are crucial in developing an approach to deprescribing in care homes. The combination of stakeholder involvement and qualitative research is important for developing an effective, contextually relevant intervention as the balance between interests can be incorporated into the approach. Leveraging the experience in other countries is a novel and valuable step.

scholarly journals Implementation of the National Early Warning Score in UK care homes: a qualitative evaluation

2020 ◽  
Vol 70 (700) ◽  
pp. e793-e800
Author(s):  
Siân Russell ◽  
Rachel Stocker ◽  
Robert Oliver Barker ◽  
Jennifer Liddle ◽  
Joy Adamson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Early Warning ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Qualitative Evaluation ◽  
Acute Illness ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Early Warning Score ◽  
Normalisation Process Theory ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Care Home Staff ◽  
National Early Warning Score

BackgroundThe National Early Warning Score (NEWS) is a tool for identifying and responding to acute illness. When used in care homes, staff measure residents’ vital signs and record them on a tablet computer, which calculates a NEWS to share with health services. This article outlines an evaluation of NEWS implementation in care homes across one clinical commissioning group area in northern England.AimTo identify challenges to implementation of NEWS in care homes.Design and settingQualitative analysis of interviews conducted with 15 staff members from six care homes, five health professionals, and one clinical commissioning group employee.MethodInterviews were intended to capture people’s attitudes and experiences of using the intervention. Following an inductive thematic analysis, data were considered deductively against normalisation process theory constructs to identify the challenges and successes of implementing NEWS in care homes.ResultsCare home staff and other stakeholders acknowledged that NEWS could enhance the response to acute illness, improve communication with the NHS, and increase the confidence of care home staff. However, the implementation did not account for the complexity of either the intervention or the care home setting. Challenges to engagement included competing priorities, insufficient training, and shortcomings in communication.ConclusionThis evaluation highlights the need to involve care home staff and the primary care services that support them when developing and implementing interventions in care homes. The appropriateness and value of NEWS in non-acute settings requires ongoing monitoring.

scholarly journals Older care home residents’ and their relatives’ knowledge, understanding and views of shift handovers: an exploratory, focused-ethnographic qualitative study using interviews and observations

BMJ Open ◽  
2019 ◽  
Vol 9 (12) ◽  
pp. e032189
Author(s):  
Katharine Orellana ◽  
Valerie Lipman ◽  
Jill Manthorpe ◽  
Jo Moriarty ◽  
Caroline Norrie ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Older People ◽  
Care Home ◽  
Care Homes ◽  
Clinical Settings ◽  
Study Participation ◽  
Underlying Assumption ◽  
Home Setting ◽  
Evidence Review ◽  
Administrative Procedures ◽  
South East England

ObjectivesTo investigate residents’ and relatives’ views and experiences of handovers in care homes. This paper reports residents’ and relatives’ awareness of handovers, knowledge of and views on handover practices and purpose, and views on handover effectiveness. Outcomes, safety and satisfaction in clinical settings are influenced by shift handovers. Despite this link with quality, residents’ increasing support needs and the provision of 24 hours care in care homes for older people, little is known about handovers in these settings from a resident and visiting relative perspective.SettingFive purposively sampled care homes for older people in South East England.ParticipantsHome managers (n=5), residents (n=16) relatives of residents (n=10) were interviewed; residents (n=15) and their interactions with staff were observed during handover periods. Participation was voluntary and subject to consent. Residents were identified by managers as having mental capacity to take a decision about participation which was then assessed. An ethnographic approach to data collection was taken, preceded by an evidence review.ResultsShift handovers were largely invisible processes to participating residents and relatives, many of whom had given little thought to handover practice, logistics or effectiveness prior to study participation. Their awareness and understanding of handovers, handover practices, and handover purpose and effectiveness varied. There appeared to be an underlying assumption that administrative procedures in care homes would operate without input from residents or relatives. A small number of residents, however, were highly aware of the routine of handovers and the implications of this for the timing of and response to their requests for care or support.ConclusionsThe care home setting and perspectives of the effectiveness of handovers may influence awareness of, knowledge of and levels of interest in involvement in handovers.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document