Overall Survival With Second-Line Pembrolizumab in Patients With Non–Small-Cell Lung Cancer: Randomized Phase III Clinical Trial Versus Propensity-Adjusted Real-World Data

2021 ◽  
pp. 56-65
Author(s):  
Thomas Jemielita ◽  
Xiaoyun (Nicole) Li ◽  
Bilal Piperdi ◽  
Wei Zhou ◽  
Thomas Burke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Real World Data

PURPOSE To compare and characterize overall survival (OS) differences between clinical trial data from the KEYNOTE-010 trial and real-world data (RWD) from the Flatiron Health database in patients with programmed death ligand 1 (PD-L1)–expressing advanced non–small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who received second-line pembrolizumab monotherapy. METHODS Clinical trial data were from the randomized phase II/III KEYNOTE-010 trial that enrolled patients from August 28, 2013, to February 27, 2015. At data cutoff for KEYNOTE-010, the median survival follow-up time for pembrolizumab patients was 11.2 months. RWD were from Flatiron Health advanced NSCLC database and included patients who initiated second-line pembrolizumab from January 26, 2015, to February 28, 2019. At data cutoff for Flatiron, the median survival follow-up time for pembrolizumab-treated patients was 6.1 months. Clinical trial data from KEYNOTE-010 and RWD from Flatiron were analyzed without adjustment, with propensity adjustment, and filtered per the main KEYNOTE-010 eligibility criteria (EC) of histologically/cytologically confirmed PD-L1–positive NSCLC, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0/1, no prior therapy with docetaxel for NSCLC, and laboratory values indicative of adequate organ function in addition to prior line of therapy requirements. RESULTS Among 243 patients from KEYNOTE-010 and 782 from Flatiron, median age was 63 v 68 years, and 64% v 54% were male, respectively. OS data from KEYNOTE-010 and Flatiron were similar without any adjustment (n = 782; hazard ratio [HR], 0.96; 95% CI, 0.80 to 1.15) and after both filtering and propensity adjustment (n = 221; HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.73 to 1.34). CONCLUSION Without any adjustment, as well as after applying similar EC and appropriate statistical methods, RWD demonstrated similar effectiveness for pembrolizumab in second-line NSCLC as observed in randomized clinical trials.

Analysis of patterns of care and benefit of thoracic radiotherapy for patients with stage IV NSCLC in the immunotherapy-era from a national hospital-based registry.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 9123-9123
Author(s):  
Michael Kharouta ◽  
Andrew Jonathan Gross ◽  
Kevin Kelley ◽  
Serah Choi ◽  
Tithi Biswas
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Small Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Cell Lung Cancer ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Median Income ◽  
Thoracic Radiotherapy ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Comorbidity Score

9123 Background: Metastatic non-small cell lung cancer (mNSCLC) has classically been treated with platinum-doublet chemotherapy. Recent studies have established immunotherapy as an integral part of therapy for mNSCLC without targetable mutations. There are limited data on the role of consolidative thoracic radiotherapy (TRT) for patients with mNSCLC in the immunotherapy-era. A secondary analysis of KEYNOTE-001 showed significant improvement in overall survival in patients who received radiotherapy with pembrolizumab compared to patients not previously receiving radiotherapy. Methods: We queried the National Cancer Database (NCDB) for patients with metastatic presentation, stage IVA/IVB non-small cell lung cancer between the ages of 18-90 years treated between 2012-2017 with a combination of chemotherapy, immunotherapy, and thoracic radiotherapy. Patients with unknown treatment status, follow up time, or vital status were excluded. Overall survival (OS) was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method and compared between treatment groups utilizing log-rank testing. A 3:1 nearest-neighbor propensity-score matching was performed utilizing clinical and demographic covariates to reduce the impact of potential confounders of overall survival on the probability of receipt of TRT. Cox proportional hazards regression was used to identify predictors of overall survival. Results: A total of 81,382 patients were identified that met inclusion criteria. The median age was 68 (18-90) years. The majority of patients (n = 51,681, 64%) had chemotherapy, while 7,929 (10%) patients received immunotherapy, and 15,984 (20%) received TRT. The median follow-up was 6.18 (range 0-76.9) months. For the entire cohort of patients receiving immunotherapy, 2 year OS was 29.4% with TRT compared to 32.7% without. Following propensity matching by age, sex, race, and comorbidity score, a total number of 4,264 patients receiving immunotherapy were matched. The 2 year OS was 27.7% in patients receiving TRT and immunotherapy vs. 22.2% in patients with immunotherapy alone (p = 0.004). On multivariable analysis receipt of TRT was a significant predictor of OS after adjustment for age, race, comorbidity score, sex, and median income (p = 0.0003, HR 0.87, 95% CI 0.80 - 0.94). For patients receiving BED10 > 39 Gy (equivalent to 30 Gy in 10 fractions), 2 year OS was significantly improved at 37.0% vs 18.1% (p < 0.0001). Conclusions: In patients with mNSCLC, the addition of TRT to immunotherapy is associated with improved overall survival at 2 years. Receipt of a higher BED10 is associated with further improved survival. Selection of mNSCLC patients receiving immunotherapy for TRT approaching definitive doses warrants further investigation. Data from prospective, randomized trials may better elucidate this benefit and identify a potential mechanism.

Post-Progression Survival Associated with Overall Survival in Patients with Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Receiving Docetaxel Monotherapy as Second-Line Chemotherapy

Chemotherapy ◽  
2017 ◽  
Vol 62 (4) ◽  
pp. 205-213 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mie Kotake ◽  
Yosuke Miura ◽  
Hisao Imai ◽  
Keita Mori ◽  
Reiko Sakurai ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Lung Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Advanced Nsclc ◽  
Small Cell ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Second Line ◽  
Small Cell Lung ◽  
Individual Level ◽  
Second Line Chemotherapy ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Background: In patients with non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the effects of second-line chemotherapy on overall survival (OS) might be confounded by subsequent therapies. Therefore, using individual-level data, we aimed to determine the relationships between progression-free survival (PFS) and post-progression survival (PPS) with OS in patients with advanced NSCLC treated with docetaxel monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy. Methods: Between April 2002 and December 2014, data from 86 patients with advanced NSCLC who underwent second-line docetaxel monotherapy following first-line treatment with platinum combination chemotherapy were analyzed. The relationships of PFS and PPS with OS were analyzed at the individual level. Results: Spearman rank correlation and linear regression analyses showed that PPS was strongly associated with OS (r = 0.86, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.93), whereas PFS was moderately correlated with OS (r = 0.50, p < 0.05, R2 = 0.21). Performance status at the end of second-line treatment and the number of regimens after progression beyond second-line chemotherapy were significantly associated with PPS (p < 0.05). Conclusions: In patients with advanced NSCLC with unknown oncogenic driver mutations undergoing docetaxel monotherapy as second-line chemotherapy, when compared with PFS, PPS had a stronger association with OS. This finding suggests that subsequent treatment after disease progression following second-line docetaxel monotherapy has a significant influence on OS.

The rate of tumor growth, g, as a biomarker for overall survival (OS) in prostate cancer (PC) in clinical trials as well as in real-world data from the Veterans Administration Medical Centers (VAMCs).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5074-5074
Author(s):  
Harshraj Leuva ◽  
Mengxi Zhou ◽  
Julia Wilkerson ◽  
Keith Sigel ◽  
Ta-Chueh Hsu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Clinical Trials ◽  
Tumor Growth ◽  
Real World ◽  
Clinical Trial Data ◽  
Trial Data ◽  
Real World Data ◽  
World Data

5074 Background: Novel assessments of efficacy are needed to improve determination of treatment outcomes in clinical trials and in real-world settings. Methods: Cancer treatments usually lead to concurrent regression and growth of the drug-sensitive and drug-resistant fractions of a tumor, respectively. We have exploited novel methods of analysis that assess these two simultaneous processes and have estimated rates of tumor growth ( g) and regression ( d) in over 30,000 patients (pts) with diverse tumors. Results: In prostate cancer (PC) we have analyzed both clinical trial and real-world data from Veterans. Using clinical trial data from 6819 pts enrolled in 15 treatment arms we have established separately and by combining all the data that g correlates highly (p<0.0001) with overall survival (OS) – slower g associated with better OS. In PC, abiraterone (ABI) and docetaxel (DOC) are superior to placebo, prednisone and mitoxantrone. ABI (median g =0.0017) is superior to DOC ( g=0.0021) in first line (p=0.0013); and ABI in 2nd line ( g=0.0034) is inferior to ABI in 1st line ( g=0.0017; p<0.0001). Finally, using combined clinical trial data as a benchmark we could assess the efficacy of novel therapies in as few as 30-40 patients. Amongst 7457 Veterans, the median g on a taxane ( g=0.0022) was similar to that from clinical trials ( g=0.0012). Although only 258 Veterans received cabazitaxel (CAB), g values for CAB ( g=0.0018) and DOC ( g=0.0023) were indistinguishable (p=0.3) consistent with their identical mechanism of action. Finally, outcomes with DOC in African American (AA) ( g=0.00212) and Caucasian ( g=0.00205) Veterans were indistinguishable (p=0.9) and comparable across all VAMCs. Conclusions: The rate of tumor growth, g, is an excellent biomarker for OS both in clinical trials and in real-world settings. g allows comparisons between trials and for large trial data sets to be used as benchmarks of efficacy. Real-world outcomes in the VAMCs are similar to those in clinical trials. In the egalitarian VAMCs DOC efficacy in PC is comparable in AA and Caucasian Veterans -- indicating inferior outcomes reported in AAs are likely due to differential health care access, not differences in biology.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document