scholarly journals Axicabtagene Ciloleucel in the Non-Trial Setting: Outcomes and Correlates of Response, Resistance, and Toxicity

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (27) ◽  
pp. 3095-3106 ◽  
Author(s):  
Caron A. Jacobson ◽  
Bradley D. Hunter ◽  
Robert Redd ◽  
Scott J. Rodig ◽  
Pei-Hsuan Chen ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
The United States ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Mitt Population ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Medical Centers ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Intent To Treat

PURPOSE Axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for relapsed aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma in part on the basis of durable remission rates of approximately 40% in a clinical trial population. Whether this efficacy, and the rates of toxicity, would be consistent in a postcommercial setting, with relaxed eligibility criteria and bridging therapy, is unknown. This study describes the efficacy and safety correlates and outcomes in this setting. PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred twenty-two patients from 7 medical centers in the United States were treated with axi-cel and were included in a modified intent-to-treat (mITT) analysis. Seventy-six patients (62%) were ineligible for the ZUMA-1 trial. Response and toxicity rates, duration of response (DOR), survival, and covariates are described on the basis of the mITT population. Correlative studies on blood and tumor samples were performed to investigate potential biomarkers of response and resistance. RESULTS Median follow-up was 10.4 months. In the mITT population, the best overall and complete response (CR) rates were 70% and 50%, respectively. Median DOR and progression-free survival (PFS) were 11.0 and 4.5 months in all patients and were not reached (NR) in CR patients. Median overall survival (OS) was NR; 1-year OS was 67% (95% CI, 59% to 77%). Although response rates were similar in the ZUMA-1–eligible and ZUMA-1–ineligible groups (70% v 68%), there was a statistically significant improvement in CR rate (63% v 42%, P = .016), DOR (median, NR v 5.0 months; P = .014), PFS (median, NR v 3.3 months; P = .020), and OS (1-year OS, 89% v 54%; P < .001) in patients who were ZUMA-1 eligible. Rates of grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome and neurotoxicty were 16% and 35%, respectively. CONCLUSION Axi-cel yields similar rates of overall response and toxicity in commercial and trial settings, although CR rates and DOR were more favorable in patients eligible for ZUMA-1.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) combination therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): Subgroup analyses from CheckMate 040.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 512-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiwu Ruth He ◽  
Thomas Yau ◽  
Chiun Hsu ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Tae-You Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

512 Background: NIVO monotherapy is approved in the United States and other countries for pts with HCC treated with sorafenib (SOR) based on CheckMate 040 (NCT01658878) results, which reported 14% objective response rate (ORR) and 16-month median overall survival (mOS; El-Khoueiry et al. Lancet 2017). Primary efficacy and safety of NIVO + IPI in pts with aHCC previously treated with SOR were presented recently (Yau et al. J Clin Oncol 2019). Here, we will present subgroup analyses from this study. Methods: Pts were randomized to 3 arms: [A] NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W (4 doses) or [B] NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W (4 doses), each followed by NIVO 240 mg Q2W, or [C] NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W. Treatment continued until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoints included safety/tolerability, ORR, and duration of response (DOR; investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1). Key secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), OS, and progression-free survival (blinded independent central review [BICR] per RECIST v1.1); key exploratory endpoints included ORR (BICR per RECIST v1.1). Data cutoff was January 2019. Results: A total of 148 pts were randomized. Minimum OS follow-up from last pt randomization date to data cutoff was 28 months. At baseline, 34% of all pts had vascular invasion; 82% had extrahepatic spread; and 91% had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C; 84% discontinued SOR because of disease progression and 14% because of toxicity. For all treated pts, ORR was 31% (7 had complete response), with median DOR of 17 months; DCR was 49%; the 30-month OS rate was 37%. NIVO + IPI was well tolerated; 38% of pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; most common any grade: pruritus and rash; most common grade 3–4: aspartate aminotransferase increase and lipase increase); 5% had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Subgroup analyses based on duration of prior SOR therapy and other pt characteristics will be presented. Conclusions: NIVO + IPI led to clinically meaningful benefits, with a manageable safety profile in pts previously treated with SOR. NIVO + IPI may provide a new treatment option for these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01658878.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Two-year clinical update.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Luisa Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Therapy Option ◽  
Grade 3

4040 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up 13.8 months [mo; range, 9–19]; Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up is presented here. Methods: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed (INV) objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 45 pts with median follow-up of 29.0 mo, ORR (95% CI) increased to 69% (53–82) (Table) from 60% (44.3–74.3); complete response (CR) rate increased to 13% from 7%. The concordance rate of INV and blinded independent central review was 89%. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, and 24-mo rates were 74% and 79%, respectively (Table). Nineteen pts discontinued study treatment without subsequent therapy. An analysis of tumor response post discontinuation will be presented. Ten (22%) pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI continued to show robust, durable clinical benefit with a deepening of response, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L therapy option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NTC02060188 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Keilholz ◽  
Janice M. Mehnert ◽  
Sebastian Bauer ◽  
Hugues Pierre Bourgeois ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

191 Background: Avelumab is a human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody that is approved for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum therapy (US). Here, we report phase 1b data for avelumab in a cohort of patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Methods: Pts with unresectable stage IIIC or IV melanoma progressed after ≥1 line of therapy for metastatic disease received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, 51 pts were treated and followed for a median of 24.2 mo (range 16.1–31.5). Median age was 64 y (range 31–84). Site of primary tumor was cutaneous (n = 28, 54.9%), ocular (n = 16, 31.4%), mucosal (n = 2, 3.9%), or unknown (n = 5, 9.8%). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy for advanced disease (range 0–4), including ipilimumab (n = 26, 51.0%). Confirmed ORR was 21.6% (95% CI 11.3–35.3), with complete response in 7.8% and partial response in 13.7%. In pts with cutaneous melanoma, ORR was 28.6% (95% CI 13.2–48.7). There were no objective responses in pts with ocular melanoma; however, 7 pts (43.8%) had stable disease. In pts with ≤1 (n = 25), 2 (n = 17), or ≥3 (n = 9) prior lines, ORR was 36.0% (95% CI 18.0–57.5), 11.8% (95% CI 1.5–36.4), and 0% (95% CI 0–33.6), respectively. Antitumor activity by PD-L1 status will be presented. Median duration of response was not estimable (NE) (95% CI 2.6 mo–NE). Median PFS was 3.1 mo (95% CI 1.4–6.3) and the 6-mo PFS rate was 39.2% (95% CI 25.2–52.9). Median OS was 18.5 mo (95% CI 9.3–NE) and the 12-mo OS rate was 62.3% (95% CI 46.9–74.4). 39 pts (76.5%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly infusion-related reaction (25.5%), fatigue (17.6%), and chills (11.8%). 4 pts (7.8%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 5 pts (9.8%) had an immune-related AE; all were grade 1/2. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Avelumab showed durable responses, promising survival outcomes, and an acceptable safety profile in pts with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

scholarly journals A randomized phase 3 trial of zanubrutinib vs ibrutinib in symptomatic Waldenström macroglobulinemia: the ASPEN study

Blood ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 136 (18) ◽  
pp. 2038-2050 ◽  
Author(s):  
Constantine S. Tam ◽  
Stephen Opat ◽  
Shirley D'Sa ◽  
Wojciech Jurczak ◽  
Hui-Peng Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase 3 ◽  
Waldenström Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Waldenstrom Macroglobulinemia ◽  
Major Response ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Btk Inhibitor ◽  
Grade 3

Abstract Bruton tyrosine kinase (BTK) inhibition is an effective treatment approach for patients with Waldenström macroglobulinemia (WM). The phase 3 ASPEN study compared the efficacy and safety of ibrutinib, a first-generation BTK inhibitor, with zanubrutinib, a novel highly selective BTK inhibitor, in patients with WM. Patients with MYD88L265P disease were randomly assigned 1:1 to treatment with ibrutinib or zanubrutinib. The primary end point was the proportion of patients achieving a complete response (CR) or a very good partial response (VGPR) by independent review. Key secondary end points included major response rate (MRR), progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response (DOR), disease burden, and safety. A total of 201 patients were randomized, and 199 received ≥1 dose of study treatment. No patient achieved a CR. Twenty-nine (28%) zanubrutinib patients and 19 (19%) ibrutinib patients achieved a VGPR, a nonstatistically significant difference (P = .09). MRRs were 77% and 78%, respectively. Median DOR and PFS were not reached; 84% and 85% of ibrutinib and zanubrutinib patients were progression free at 18 months. Atrial fibrillation, contusion, diarrhea, peripheral edema, hemorrhage, muscle spasms, and pneumonia, as well as adverse events leading to treatment discontinuation, were less common among zanubrutinib recipients. Incidence of neutropenia was higher with zanubrutinib, although grade ≥3 infection rates were similar in both arms (1.2 and 1.1 events per 100 person-months). These results demonstrate that zanubrutinib and ibrutinib are highly effective in the treatment of WM, but zanubrutinib treatment was associated with a trend toward better response quality and less toxicity, particularly cardiovascular toxicity.

First-line treatment of iNHL or MCL patients with BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP: Results of the BRIGHT 5-year follow-up study.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7500-7500 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ian Flinn ◽  
Richard van der Jagt ◽  
Julie E. Chang ◽  
Peter Wood ◽  
Tim E. Hawkins ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Rank Test ◽  
First Line ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Treatment Naïve

7500 Background: BRIGHT, a phase 3, open-label, noninferiority study comparing efficacy and safety of bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) vs rituximab plus cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, vincristine and prednisone (R-CHOP) or rituximab with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (R-CVP) in treatment-naive patients (pts) with indolent non-Hodgkin lymphoma (iNHL) or mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), showed that the complete response rate for first-line BR was statistically noninferior to R-CHOP/R-CVP ( Blood 2014). Pts were monitored for ≥5 years (yr) to assess the overall effect of BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP in a controlled clinical setting. This analysis reports the time-to-event variables of the 5-yr follow-up (FU) study. Methods: Pts with iNHL or MCL randomized to 6-8 cycles of BR or R-CHOP/R-CVP underwent complete assessments at end of treatment, then were monitored regularly. Progression-free survival (PFS), event-free survival (EFS), duration of response (DOR) and overall survival (OS) were compared using a stratified log-rank test. Results: Of 447 randomized pts, 224 received BR, 104 R-CHOP, and 119 R-CVP; 419 entered the FU. The median FU time was 65.0 and 64.1 months for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP, respectively. The 5-yr PFS rate was 65.5% (95% CI 58.5-71.6) and 55.8% (48.4-62.5), and OS was 81.7% (75.7-86.3) and 85% (79.3-89.3) for BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP, respectively. The hazard ratio (95% CI) for PFS was 0.61 (0.45-0.85; P= .0025), EFS 0.63 (0.46-0.84; P= .0020), DOR 0.66 (0.47-0.92; P= .0134), and OS 1.15 (0.72-1.84; P= .5461) comparing BR vs R-CHOP/R-CVP. Similar results were found in iNHL [PFS 0.70 (0.49-1.01; P= .0582)] and MCL [PFS 0.40 (0.21-0.75; P= .0035)], with the strongest effect in MCL. Use of R maintenance was similar, 43% in BR and 45% in R-CHOP/R-CVP. B was included as second-line in 27 (36%) of the 75 pts requiring therapy who originally received R-CHOP/R-CVP. Comparable safety profiles with expected adverse events were observed in the FU study in BR vs R-CHOP/R-CVP. Conclusions: The long-term FU of the BRIGHT study has confirmed that PFS, EFS, and DOR were significantly better for BR, and OS was not statistically different between BR and R-CHOP/R-CVP. The safety profile was as previously reported. Clinical trial information: NCT00877006.

Anlotinib in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Juxiang Xiao ◽  
Wentao Fang ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Loss Of Appetite

95 Background: The treatment option for ESCC patients (pts) progressing after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor involved in tumor angiogenesis and growth, such as vascular endothelia growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2/3, etc. Methods: Eligible pts were advanced ESCC who had progressed after platinum or taxane containing chemotherapy. Between January 6, 2016 and May 22, 2018, a total of 165 pts from 13 centers in China were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to anlotinib arm (n=110), and placebo arm (n=55). Pts were given anlotinib (12 mg/day) or placebo orally from day 1 to day 14 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression or had unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS was 3.0 months with anlotinib and 1.4 months with placebo (HR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<0.0001). Complete response occured in 2 pts with anlotinib and 0 pt with placebo. The objective response rates were 7% in the anlotinib group and 4% in the placebo group (P=0.498), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 64% and 18%, respectively (P<0.0001). In anlotinib arm, median duration of response was 5.8 months (range, 3.1-19.7+). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 36.7% and 11.0% of the two group pts, and grade 5 TRAE were 2.8% and 0%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 TRAE (>5%) in anlotinib arm were hypertension (15.6%) and loss of appetite (5.5%). Median overall survival were similar between the groups (6.1 months vs 7.2 months; HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.8, P=0.4261). The ratio of pts received post study treatments was 41.2% (40/97) in anlotinib arm and 72.7% (40/55) in placebo arm (P=0.0002), including chemotherapy (23.7% vs 54.6%), PD-1 inhibitors (4.1% vs 11.0%), and Apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, (10.3% vs 20.0%), etc. Conclusions: In pretreated advanced ESCC pts, anlotinib significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02649361.

A randomized phase II study comparing cisplatin and gemcitabine with or without berzosertib in patients with advanced urothelial carcinoma.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4507-4507
Author(s):  
Sumanta K. Pal ◽  
Amir Mortazavi ◽  
Matthew I. Milowsky ◽  
Ulka N. Vaishampayan ◽  
Mamta Parikh ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
The United States ◽  
Cytotoxic Therapy ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Perioperative Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Urothelial Cancer ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

4507 Background: Cisplatin with gemcitabine (CG) remains the standard upfront chemotherapy regimen for metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC). Preclinical synergy was noted between cisplatin and berzosertib, a selective ATR inhibitor. The current study sought to determine if the combination of berzosertib and CG could improve clinical outcomes in mUC. Methods: An open-label, randomized study was conducted across 23 centers in the United States through the Experimental Therapeutics Clinical Trials Network of the National Cancer Institute. Key eligibility criteria included confirmed mUC, no prior cytotoxic therapy for metastatic disease, ≥ 12 months since perioperative therapy and eligibility for cisplatin based on standard criteria. Patients (pts) were randomized to receive either CG alone (control arm) or CG plus berzosertib (experimental arm). In the control arm, 70 mg/m2 of cisplatin was given on day 1 and gemcitabine at 1000 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 of a 21-day cycle. In the experimental arm, 60 mg/m2 of cisplatin was given on day 1, gemcitabine at 875 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8 and berzosertib at 90 mg/m2 on days 2 and 9 of a 21-day cycle. The primary endpoint of the study was progression-free survival (PFS), with secondary endpoints including response rate (RR), overall survival (OS) and toxicity. Results: A total of 87 pts (median age 67; M:F 68:19) were randomized; 41 pts received CG alone while 46 received CG with berzosertib. Visceral metastases were present in 49% of pts and 52%, 45% and 3% of pts were Bajorin risk 0, 1 and 2, respectively. Median PFS was 8.0 months for both arms (Bajorin risk adjusted hazard ratio [HR] 1.22, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.72-2.08). RR was 54%(4 CR, 21 PR) in the CG with berzosertib arm and 63% (4 CR, 22 PR) in CG alone arm (P = 0.66). Median OS was shorter with CG with berzosertib as compared to CG alone (14.4 versus 19.8 months; Bajorin risk adjusted HR 1.42, 95%CI 0.76-2.68). Notably higher rates of grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia (59% vs 39%) and neutropenia (37% vs 27%) were observed with CG plus berzosertib compared to CG alone. Higher rates of toxicity-related discontinuation were seen in the experimental arm (24% vs 15%), and the median cumulative cisplatin dose in the experimental arm was 250 mg/m2, as compared to 370 mg/m2 in the control arm (P < 0.001). Conclusions: No improvement in PFS was observed with the addition of berzosertib to CG, and a trend towards inferior survival was observed. These results suggest caution in reducing the starting dose of cytotoxic therapy to accommodate addition of a myelosuppressive agent, as in the experimental arm of this study. Clinical trial information: NCT02567409.

A multicenter phase II study of bendamustine with rituximab in patients with relapsed/refractory diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL).

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8023-8023 ◽  
Author(s):  
Michinori Ogura ◽  
Kiyoshi Ando ◽  
Nozomi Niitsu ◽  
Seok Jin Kim ◽  
Ken Ohmachi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Grade 3

8023 Background: Effective salvage therapies are needed in patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory DLBCL after R-CHOP. Therapy with bendamustine plus rituximab (B-R) was well tolerated and effective in the preceding phase I study in relapsed/refractory aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma, including DLBCL. This phase II study assessed the efficacy and safety of B-R in pts with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Methods: Pts with histologically confirmed DLBCL (excluding transformed disease) and 1-3 prior therapies received rituximab 375 mg/m2 IV on day 1 and bendamustine 120 mg/m2 IV on days 2 and 3 of each 21-day cycle, for up to 6 cycles. Recovery of neutrophil count to ≥1,000/mm3 and platelet count to ≥75,000/mm3 were required prior to the start of each cycle; treatment delays >2 weeks resulted in discontinuation. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR); secondary endpoints included complete response (CR) rate, progression-free survival (PFS), and safety. Results: A total of 63 pts were enrolled; data from 59 pts were available. Median age was 67 (range, 36-75) years with 37 pts over 65 years. The majority of pts (64.4%) had 1 prior therapy; 57 pts (96.6%) were previously treated with rituximab-containing combination chemotherapy and 8 (13.6%) had prior auto-PBSCT. Pts received a median of 4 (range, 1-6) treatment cycles. Sixteen (27.1%) pts completed 6 treatment cycles; most common reasons for early discontinuation were disease progression (n=15) and failure to meet criteria to start the next cycle (n=13). Among 59 pts evaluable for response, ORR was 62.7% with a 37.3% CR rate. The median PFS was 200 days (95% CI, 109-410). Most common grade 3/4 adverse events (AEs) included CD4 lymphocytes decreased (66.1%), neutropenia (54.2%), and thrombocytopenia (10.2%). Four (6.8%) pts discontinued due to serious AEs (cytomegalovirus infection, infection, pneumonia, and pneumonia/respiratory failure). Conclusions: B-R demonstrated promising activity in pts with relapsed/refractory DLBCL. Toxicity was primarily hematologic and generally manageable. These results suggest that B-R is a promising salvage regimen for pts with relapsed/refractory DLBCL after R-CHOP.

A phase II trial of durvalumab with or without tremelimumab in patients with persistent or recurrent endometrial carcinoma and endometrial carcinosarcoma.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 5582-5582 ◽  
Author(s):  
Maria M Rubinstein ◽  
Imogen Caird ◽  
Qin Zhou ◽  
Alexia Iasonos ◽  
Claire Frances Friedman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cytotoxic T Lymphocyte ◽  
Early Death ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Kaplan Meier ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Modest Activity ◽  
Clinical Trial Information

5582 Background: Monoclonal antibodies Durvalumab (D) and Tremelimumab (T) inhibit binding of programmed cell death ligand 1 (PDL1) to PD1 and inhibit activation of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte-associated protein 4 (CTLA4), respectively, resulting in improved tumor immunosurveillance. There is rationale to study D and DT based on recent genomic and tumor microenvironment evaluation of endometrial cancer (EC). Methods: Eligible patients (pts) were randomized to D or DT. Pts received D 1500 mg intravenously (IV) every 4 weeks (wks). DT therapy pts received D 1500 mg IV every 4 wks and T 75 mg IV every 4 wks for 4 cycles, followed by D 1500 mg IV every 4 wks until progression or unacceptable toxicities. Pts were stratified by histology with 10 carcinosarcoma or MSI-H EC pts per arm. Efficacy assessments were every 8 wks and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were assessed per CTCAE v.4.03. The primary endpoint was overall response rate (ORR) by RECIST v1.1. Descriptive statistics and 90% one sided CI are reported. Progression free survival (PFS) rate at 24 wks (PFS24wks) was estimated by Kaplan Meier method. Results: At planned interim analysis, 56 pts were enrolled (28 per arm). 15 pts: carcinosarcoma, 15 pts: endometrioid (3: Gr1), 14 pts: serous, and 12 pts: other histology. 5(9%) pts: MSI-H, 48(86%) pts: microsatellite stable (MSS), 3(5%): unknown. 2 pts were excluded due to early death. 27 pts per arm were evaluable for efficacy. In the D arm: 1 pt had complete response (CR)(MSS) and 3 pts had a partial response (PR) (2:MSS, 1:MSI-H) with an ORR of 14.8% (CI: 6.6-100%). The median PFS was 7.6 wks and PFS24wks was 13.3% (CI 6.1-100%). Median duration of response (DOR) was 16 wks in the D arm. In the DT arm, 2 pts achieved CR (1:MSI-H, 1:MSS) and 1 had PR (MSS). The ORR was 11.1% (CI: 4.2-100%). Median PFS was 8.1 wks, PFS24wks was 18.5% (CI 10.1-100%) and DOR was 8 wks. Grade 3 TRAEs occurred in 2 (7%) pts in D and 9 (32%) pts in DT. Grade 4 TRAEs occurred 1 (4%) pt in D and 3 (11%) pts in DT. 2 pts discontinued due to a TRAE. Most common TRAEs in total were fatigue (23%), diarrhea (20%), nausea (14%), vomiting (13%) and pruritis (11%). Conclusions: D and DT show modest activity in EC. No new safety signals were identified. Second stage accrual is ongoing. Clinical trial information: NCT03015129.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated mesothelioma: Updated phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 166-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffit Hassan ◽  
Anish Thomas ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

166 Background: Avelumab, a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum therapy (US). Here, we report updated phase 1b data for avelumab in patients (pts) with previously treated mesothelioma. Methods: Pts with unresectable pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma whose disease had progressed after platinum and pemetrexed therapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Tumors were assessed every 6 wks (RECIST 1.1). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, 53 pts were treated and followed for a median of 24.8 mos (range 16.8–27.8). Median age was 67 y (range 32–84). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1–8). Confirmed ORR was 9.4% (95% CI 3.1–20.7; complete response in 1.9%, partial response in 7.5%). In pts with 1 (n = 18), 2 (n = 15) or ≥3 (n = 20) prior lines of therapy, ORR was 5.6%, 13.3% and 10.0% respectively. Median duration of response was 15.2 mos (95% CI 11.1–not estimable). 26 pts (49.1%) had stable disease as best response and the disease control rate was 58.5%. Median PFS was 4.1 mos (95% CI 1.4–6.2) and the 6-mo PFS rate was 38.0% (95% CI 24.2–51.7). Median OS was 10.9 mos (95% CI 7.5–21.0) and the 12-mo OS rate was 45.9% (95% CI 31.9–58.8). In evaluable pts with PD-L1+ (n = 16) and PD-L1− (n = 27) tumors (≥5% tumor cell cutoff), ORR was 18.8% (95% CI 4.0–45.6) and 7.4% (95% CI 0.9–24.3), and the 6-mo PFS rate was 37.5% (95% CI 14.1–61.2) and 42.0% (95% CI 23.1–59.8). 43 pts (81.1%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly ( > 10%) infusion-related reaction (35.8%; all grade 1/2), chills (15.1%), fatigue (15.1%) and pyrexia (11.3%). 5 pts (9.4%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 14 pts (26.4%) had an immune-related AE, which was grade ≥3 in 3 pts (5.7%; pneumonitis, colitis, and type 1 diabetes mellitus). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Avelumab showed clinical activity and acceptable safety in pts with previously treated mesothelioma. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document