Anlotinib in chemotherapy-refractory metastatic esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC): A randomized, double-blind, multicenter phase II trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 95-95 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jing Huang ◽  
Juxiang Xiao ◽  
Wentao Fang ◽  
Ping Lu ◽  
Qingxia Fan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Loss Of Appetite

95 Background: The treatment option for ESCC patients (pts) progressing after chemotherapy is still uncertain. Anlotinib is a multi-target tyrosine kinase inhibitor involved in tumor angiogenesis and growth, such as vascular endothelia growth factor receptor (VEGFR) 2/3, etc. Methods: Eligible pts were advanced ESCC who had progressed after platinum or taxane containing chemotherapy. Between January 6, 2016 and May 22, 2018, a total of 165 pts from 13 centers in China were randomly assigned (in a 2:1 ratio) to anlotinib arm (n=110), and placebo arm (n=55). Pts were given anlotinib (12 mg/day) or placebo orally from day 1 to day 14 in a 21-day cycle until disease progression or had unacceptable toxic effects. The primary end point was progression-free survival (PFS). Results: Median PFS was 3.0 months with anlotinib and 1.4 months with placebo (HR 0.5, 95% CI, 0.3-0.7; P<0.0001). Complete response occured in 2 pts with anlotinib and 0 pt with placebo. The objective response rates were 7% in the anlotinib group and 4% in the placebo group (P=0.498), and the disease control rates (DCR) were 64% and 18%, respectively (P<0.0001). In anlotinib arm, median duration of response was 5.8 months (range, 3.1-19.7+). Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAE) were reported in 36.7% and 11.0% of the two group pts, and grade 5 TRAE were 2.8% and 0%, respectively. The most common grade 3/4 TRAE (>5%) in anlotinib arm were hypertension (15.6%) and loss of appetite (5.5%). Median overall survival were similar between the groups (6.1 months vs 7.2 months; HR 1.2, 95%CI 0.8-1.8, P=0.4261). The ratio of pts received post study treatments was 41.2% (40/97) in anlotinib arm and 72.7% (40/55) in placebo arm (P=0.0002), including chemotherapy (23.7% vs 54.6%), PD-1 inhibitors (4.1% vs 11.0%), and Apatinib, a VEGFR inhibitor, (10.3% vs 20.0%), etc. Conclusions: In pretreated advanced ESCC pts, anlotinib significantly improved PFS and DCR compared with placebo, with a manageable safety profile. Clinical trial information: NCT02649361.

scholarly journals Camrelizumab Plus Apatinib in Patients With Advanced Cervical Cancer (CLAP): A Multicenter, Open-Label, Single-Arm, Phase II Trial

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (34) ◽  
pp. 4095-4106
Author(s):  
Chunyan Lan ◽  
Jingxian Shen ◽  
Yin Wang ◽  
Jundong Li ◽  
Zhimin Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Cervical Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Cervical Cancer ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE Camrelizumab is an antibody against programmed death protein 1. We assessed the activity and safety of camrelizumab plus apatinib, a tyrosine kinase inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2, in patients with advanced cervical cancer. METHODS This multicenter, open-label, single-arm, phase II study enrolled patients with advanced cervical cancer who progressed after at least one line of systemic therapy. Patients received camrelizumab 200 mg every 2 weeks and apatinib 250 mg once per day. The primary end point was objective response rate (ORR) assessed by investigators per RECIST version 1.1. Key secondary end points were progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), duration of response, and safety. RESULTS Forty-five patients were enrolled and received treatment. Median age was 51.0 years (range, 33-67 years), and 57.8% of patients had previously received two or more lines of chemotherapy for recurrent or metastatic disease. Ten patients (22.2%) had received bevacizumab. Median follow-up was 11.3 months (range, 1.0-15.5 months). ORR was 55.6% (95% CI, 40.0% to 70.4%), with two complete and 23 partial responses. Median PFS was 8.8 months (95% CI, 5.6 months to not estimable). Median duration of response and median OS were not reached. Treatment-related grade 3 or 4 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 71.1% of patients, and the most common AEs were hypertension (24.4%), anemia (20.0%), and fatigue (15.6%). The most common potential immune-related AEs included grade 1-2 hypothyroidism (22.2%) and reactive cutaneous capillary endothelial proliferation (8.9%). CONCLUSION Camrelizumab plus apatinib had promising antitumor activity and manageable toxicities in patients with advanced cervical cancer. Larger randomized controlled trials are warranted to validate our findings.

Activity of tivozanib (AV-951) in patients (Pts) with different histologic subtypes of renal cell carcinoma (RCC).

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 327-327 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Bhargava ◽  
B. Esteves ◽  
M. Al-Adhami ◽  
D. Nosov ◽  
O. N. Lipatov ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Control ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Clear Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
Papillary Rcc ◽  
Vegfr Inhibitor ◽  
Histologic Subtypes

327 Background: This phase 2 randomized discontinuation trial evaluated tivozanib, a potent and selective vascular endothelial growth factor receptor (VEGFR)-1, -2, and -3 kinase inhibitor. Median progression-free survival (PFS) in all pts was 11.8 mo, and the objective response rate (ORR) was 27%. Methods: Pts received 1.5 mg/d tivozanib (3 wk on, 1 wk off = 1 cycle). A retrospective analysis evaluated efficacy and safety by histologic subtype. Response was evaluated by independent radiology review using standard RECIST criteria. Results: 272 pts were enrolled: 70% were male; median age was 56 y (range, 26–79). 226 (83%) pts had clear cell (CC) RCC; 46 had non–clear cell (NCC) RCC, including 11 with papillary RCC. Of pts with CC RCC, 176 (78%) had undergone nephrectomy; of pts with NCC RCC, 23 (50%) had undergone nephrectomy. Median treatment duration was 8.5 mo (range, 0.03– 23.8) as of the data cutoff. Median PFS was 12.5 mo (range, 9.9–17.7) for pts with CC RCC, not yet reached for pts with papillary RCC, and 5.4 mo (range, 3.7–12.0) for pts with other NCC subtypes. ORR and disease control rate (DCR; ORR + stable disease), respectively, were 29% and 85% for pts with CC RCC, 18% and 100% for pts with papillary RCC, and 17% and 74% for pts with other NCC subtypes. For pts with CC RCC, median PFS, ORR, and DCR, respectively, were 14.8 mo, 32%, and 88% for those who had undergone nephrectomy and 8.9 mo, 18%, and 76% for those who had not. Among pts with NCC RCC, median PFS was 6.6 mo for pts who had undergone nephrectomy and 7.2 mo for pts without nephrectomy; ORR was 17% for both NCC subgroups, with a DCR of 78% for pts who had undergone nephrectomy and 83% for pts who had not. Common drug- related adverse events (AEs) for pts with CC and NCC RCC, respectively, included hypertension (49% and 48%), dysphonia (22% and 22%), asthenia (12% and 13%), and diarrhea (13% and 9%). The most common grade ≥3 drug-related AE was hypertension (CC, 8%; NCC, 4%). Conclusions: Disease control was observed for pts with all RCC histologic subtypes. The rate of AEs was similar among patients with CC and NCC RCC and consistent with that of a selective VEGFR inhibitor with minimal off-target toxicities. Tivozanib is currently being tested in a phase 3 trial in pts with CC RCC. [Table: see text]

LOTUS (NCT02162719): A double-blind placebo (PBO)-controlled randomized phase II trial of first-line ipatasertib (IPAT) + paclitaxel (P) for metastatic triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009 ◽  
Author(s):  
Rebecca Alexandra Dent ◽  
Sung-Bae Kim ◽  
Seock-Ah Im ◽  
Marc Espie ◽  
Sibel Blau ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Akt Inhibitor ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Median Cumulative Dose

1009 Background: The oral Akt inhibitor IPAT is being evaluated in cancers with a high prevalence of PI3K/Akt pathway activation, including TNBC. Methods: Eligible patients (pts) had measurable inoperable locally advanced/metastatic TNBC previously untreated with systemic therapy. Pts were stratified by prior (neo)adjuvant therapy, chemotherapy-free interval and tumor PTEN status, and randomized 1:1 to P 80 mg/m2 (d1, 8 & 15) with either IPAT 400 mg or PBO (d1–21) q28d until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Co-primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS) in the ITT population and pts with PTEN-low tumors by IHC. Secondary endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), duration of response (DoR) and overall survival in the ITT and IHC PTEN-low populations, efficacy in pts with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN-altered tumors by next-generation sequencing (NGS), and safety. Results: Baseline characteristics were generally balanced between arms. Efficacy is shown below. The most common grade ≥3 AEs (grouped terms) were diarrhea (23% IPAT+P vs 0% PBO+P; no grade 4 or colitis in either arm), neutropenia (18% vs 8%), asthenia (5% vs 6%), peripheral neuropathy (5% vs 5%) and pneumonia (5% vs 0%). More pts receiving IPAT+P than PBO+P had an AE leading to dose reduction of IPAT/PBO (21% vs 6%) or P (38% vs 11%) but median cumulative dose intensity was similar (IPAT/PBO: 99% vs 100%; P: 100% vs 100%). AEs led to IPAT/PBO discontinuation in 13% vs 11% of pts, respectively; 2 pts (3%) discontinued IPAT for grade 3 diarrhea. Conclusions: Adding IPAT to P for TNBC modestly improved PFS in the ITT pts. The effect was more pronounced in the prespecified subgroup with PIK3CA/AKT1/PTEN alterations, warranting further evaluation of IPAT in these pts. AEs were manageable. Clinical trial information: NCT02162719. [Table: see text]

Nivolumab (NIVO) + low-dose ipilimumab (IPI) as first-line (1L) therapy in microsatellite instability-high/mismatch repair-deficient (MSI-H/dMMR) metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Two-year clinical update.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4040-4040 ◽  
Author(s):  
Heinz-Josef Lenz ◽  
Sara Lonardi ◽  
Vittorina Zagonel ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
M. Luisa Limon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Therapy Option ◽  
Grade 3

4040 Background: In the phase 2 CheckMate 142 trial, NIVO + low-dose IPI had robust, durable clinical benefit and was well tolerated as 1L therapy for MSI-H/dMMR mCRC (median follow-up 13.8 months [mo; range, 9–19]; Lenz et al. Ann Oncol 2018;29:LBA18). Longer follow-up is presented here. Methods: Patients (pts) with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC and no prior treatment for metastatic disease received NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + low-dose IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W until disease progression or discontinuation. The primary endpoint was investigator-assessed (INV) objective response rate (ORR) per RECIST v1.1. Results: In 45 pts with median follow-up of 29.0 mo, ORR (95% CI) increased to 69% (53–82) (Table) from 60% (44.3–74.3); complete response (CR) rate increased to 13% from 7%. The concordance rate of INV and blinded independent central review was 89%. Median duration of response (DOR) was not reached (Table). Median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were not reached, and 24-mo rates were 74% and 79%, respectively (Table). Nineteen pts discontinued study treatment without subsequent therapy. An analysis of tumor response post discontinuation will be presented. Ten (22%) pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs); 3 (7%) had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Conclusions: NIVO + low-dose IPI continued to show robust, durable clinical benefit with a deepening of response, and was well tolerated with no new safety signals identified with longer follow-up. NIVO + low-dose IPI may represent a new 1L therapy option for pts with MSI-H/dMMR mCRC. Clinical trial information: NTC02060188 . [Table: see text]

scholarly journals Avelumab in patients with previously treated metastatic melanoma: Phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 191-191 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ulrich Keilholz ◽  
Janice M. Mehnert ◽  
Sebastian Bauer ◽  
Hugues Pierre Bourgeois ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Metastatic Melanoma ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

191 Background: Avelumab is a human anti–PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody that is approved for the treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum therapy (US). Here, we report phase 1b data for avelumab in a cohort of patients (pts) with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Methods: Pts with unresectable stage IIIC or IV melanoma progressed after ≥1 line of therapy for metastatic disease received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, 51 pts were treated and followed for a median of 24.2 mo (range 16.1–31.5). Median age was 64 y (range 31–84). Site of primary tumor was cutaneous (n = 28, 54.9%), ocular (n = 16, 31.4%), mucosal (n = 2, 3.9%), or unknown (n = 5, 9.8%). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy for advanced disease (range 0–4), including ipilimumab (n = 26, 51.0%). Confirmed ORR was 21.6% (95% CI 11.3–35.3), with complete response in 7.8% and partial response in 13.7%. In pts with cutaneous melanoma, ORR was 28.6% (95% CI 13.2–48.7). There were no objective responses in pts with ocular melanoma; however, 7 pts (43.8%) had stable disease. In pts with ≤1 (n = 25), 2 (n = 17), or ≥3 (n = 9) prior lines, ORR was 36.0% (95% CI 18.0–57.5), 11.8% (95% CI 1.5–36.4), and 0% (95% CI 0–33.6), respectively. Antitumor activity by PD-L1 status will be presented. Median duration of response was not estimable (NE) (95% CI 2.6 mo–NE). Median PFS was 3.1 mo (95% CI 1.4–6.3) and the 6-mo PFS rate was 39.2% (95% CI 25.2–52.9). Median OS was 18.5 mo (95% CI 9.3–NE) and the 12-mo OS rate was 62.3% (95% CI 46.9–74.4). 39 pts (76.5%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly infusion-related reaction (25.5%), fatigue (17.6%), and chills (11.8%). 4 pts (7.8%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 5 pts (9.8%) had an immune-related AE; all were grade 1/2. No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Avelumab showed durable responses, promising survival outcomes, and an acceptable safety profile in pts with previously treated metastatic melanoma. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

Mature overall survival (OS) results from the LUME-Meso study of nintedanib (N) + pemetrexed/cisplatin (PEM/CIS) vs placebo (P) + PEM/CIS in chemo-naïve patients (pts) with malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM).

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 8506-8506 ◽  
Author(s):  
Anna K. Nowak ◽  
Federica Grosso ◽  
Nicola Steele ◽  
Silvia Novello ◽  
Sanjay Popat ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Randomized Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Primary Analysis ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Abl Kinases ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Ecog Ps ◽  
To Receive

8506 Background: LUME-Meso is a Phase (Ph) II/III, double-blind, randomized study. N targets MPM by inhibiting VEGFR 1–3, PDGFR α/β, FGFR 1–3, Src and Abl kinases. Primary analysis of the Ph II data demonstrated improved progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR]=0.56; 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.34–0.91; p=0.017). Mature Ph 2 OS and updated PFS results are reported here. Methods: Pts with unresectable MPM (ECOG PS 0–1) were stratified by histology (epithelioid/biphasic) and randomized 1:1 to receive ≤6 cycles PEM (500 mg/m2)/CIS (75 mg/m2) Day 1 + N or P (200 mg bid, Days 2–21), followed by N or P monotherapy until progression or toxicity. The primary endpoint was PFS. The primary OS analysis and updated PFS analysis were performed as predefined. Results: 87 pts were randomly assigned (N=44, P=43). OS benefit favored N over P treatment (HR=0.77; 95% CI 0.46–1.29; p=0.319; 62 [71%] OS events) and was greatest in epithelioid pts (HR=0.70; 95% CI 0.40–1.21; p=0.197) with a median (m) OS gain of 5.4 months (mOS [95% CI]: 20.6 [16.2–28.8] N vs 15.2 [12.2–23.6] P). Updated PFS results (HR=0.54; 95% CI 0.33–0.87; p=0.010) also showed greatest benefit for epithelioid pts (HR=0.49; 95% CI 0.30–0.82; p=0.006) with a mPFS gain of 4.0 months (mPFS [95% CI]: 9.7 [7.2–12.4] N vs 5.7 [5.5–7.0] P). Improved forced vital capacity, objective response rates and duration of response were also observed with N treatment. Drug-related adverse events (AEs) in N- vs P-treated pts were 97.7% vs 97.6%. Grade ≥3 AEs of note included neutropenia (27.3% vs 4.9%), ALT (11.4% vs 0) and GGT (6.8% vs 0) elevations, and diarrhea (6.8% vs 0). AEs led to trial discontinuation in only 3 (6.8%) N vs 7 (17.1%) P pts. Conclusions: Mature Ph II OS data show that adding N to standard 1st-line treatment gives a strong signal towards improved OS. Updated PFS confirmed the primary analysis; AEs were manageable. The greatest clinical benefit was observed in pts with epithelioid histology. Median survival of 20.6 months in epithelioid pts treated with N is unprecedented in advanced MPM trials. Ph III is actively recruiting in this pt population. Clinical trial information: NCT01907100.

Irinotecan, cetuximab, and bevacizumab (CBI) versus irinotecan, cetuximab, and placebo (CI) in irinotecan-refractory metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC): Results from an ACCRU network randomized phase II trial.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 102-102
Author(s):  
Marla Lipsyc-Sharf ◽  
Fang-Shu Ou ◽  
Matthew B. Yurgelun ◽  
Douglas Adam Rubinson ◽  
Deborah Schrag ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Double Blind ◽  
Cox Proportional Hazard Models ◽  
Secondary Endpoints ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Of Therapy

102 Background: Combination irinotecan and cetuximab is approved for irinotecan-refractory mCRC; it is unknown if the addition of bevacizumab would improve outcomes. We studied the efficacy and safety of CBI compared with CI in patients (pts) with RAS wildtype, irinotecan-refractory mCRC. Methods: In this multicenter, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase II trial, pts with RAS wildtype mCRC and no prior anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapy who failed at least 1 irinotecan-based chemotherapy regimen and received bevacizumab in at least 1 prior line of therapy were randomized 1:1 to irinotecan 180 mg/m2 (or previously tolerated dose), cetuximab 500 mg/m2, and bevacizumab 5 mg/kg vs CI every 2 wks until disease progression, intolerable toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary endpoint was progression free survival (PFS). Multivariable Cox proportional hazard models stratified by number of prior lines of therapy and bevacizumab receipt in immediate prior line were performed. Secondary endpoints included overall survival (OS), objective response rate (ORR), and adverse events (AEs). The study was closed early in January 2018 for reasons related to accrual and funding after enrollment of 36 out of a planned 60 pts. Results: Between July 2015 and December 2017, 36 pts were randomized (19 to CBI, 17 to CI). 34 pts (94%) were treated with 2 or more prior chemotherapy regimens. Baseline characteristics were similar between arms. Median PFS was 9.7 vs 5.5 mo for CBI and CI arms, respectively (log-rank P =0.76; multivariable HR = 0.64; 95% CI, 0.25-1.66). Median OS was 19.7 vs 10.2 mo for CBI and CI (log-rank P= 0.04; multivariable HR = 0.41; 95% CI, 0.15-1.09). ORR was 37% for CBI vs 12% for CI ( P =0.13). Grade 3 or higher AEs occurred in 47% of pts receiving CBI vs 35% for CI ( P =0.46). Conclusions: In this prematurely discontinued trial, there were non-significant increases in PFS and ORR and a statistically significant 9.5 mo increase in median OS in favor of CBI compared to CI. Further investigation of CBI for treatment of irinotecan-refractory mCRC is warranted. Clinical trial information: NCT02292758.

Nivolumab (NIVO) + ipilimumab (IPI) combination therapy in patients (pts) with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (aHCC): Subgroup analyses from CheckMate 040.

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 512-512 ◽  
Author(s):  
Aiwu Ruth He ◽  
Thomas Yau ◽  
Chiun Hsu ◽  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Tae-You Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Disease Progression ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
The United States ◽  
Advanced Hepatocellular Carcinoma ◽  
Subgroup Analyses ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3

512 Background: NIVO monotherapy is approved in the United States and other countries for pts with HCC treated with sorafenib (SOR) based on CheckMate 040 (NCT01658878) results, which reported 14% objective response rate (ORR) and 16-month median overall survival (mOS; El-Khoueiry et al. Lancet 2017). Primary efficacy and safety of NIVO + IPI in pts with aHCC previously treated with SOR were presented recently (Yau et al. J Clin Oncol 2019). Here, we will present subgroup analyses from this study. Methods: Pts were randomized to 3 arms: [A] NIVO 1 mg/kg + IPI 3 mg/kg Q3W (4 doses) or [B] NIVO 3 mg/kg + IPI 1 mg/kg Q3W (4 doses), each followed by NIVO 240 mg Q2W, or [C] NIVO 3 mg/kg Q2W + IPI 1 mg/kg Q6W. Treatment continued until intolerable toxicity or disease progression. Primary endpoints included safety/tolerability, ORR, and duration of response (DOR; investigator assessment per RECIST v1.1). Key secondary endpoints included disease control rate (DCR), OS, and progression-free survival (blinded independent central review [BICR] per RECIST v1.1); key exploratory endpoints included ORR (BICR per RECIST v1.1). Data cutoff was January 2019. Results: A total of 148 pts were randomized. Minimum OS follow-up from last pt randomization date to data cutoff was 28 months. At baseline, 34% of all pts had vascular invasion; 82% had extrahepatic spread; and 91% had Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer stage C; 84% discontinued SOR because of disease progression and 14% because of toxicity. For all treated pts, ORR was 31% (7 had complete response), with median DOR of 17 months; DCR was 49%; the 30-month OS rate was 37%. NIVO + IPI was well tolerated; 38% of pts had grade 3–4 treatment-related adverse events (TRAEs; most common any grade: pruritus and rash; most common grade 3–4: aspartate aminotransferase increase and lipase increase); 5% had grade 3–4 TRAEs leading to discontinuation. Subgroup analyses based on duration of prior SOR therapy and other pt characteristics will be presented. Conclusions: NIVO + IPI led to clinically meaningful benefits, with a manageable safety profile in pts previously treated with SOR. NIVO + IPI may provide a new treatment option for these pts. Clinical trial information: NCT01658878.

scholarly journals Apatinib Plus Temozolomide: An Effective Salvage Treatment for Recurrent Glioblastoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 10 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jingjing Ge ◽  
Cheng Li ◽  
Fengjun Xue ◽  
Shaopei Qi ◽  
Zhimeng Gao ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Symptomatic Treatment ◽  
Recurrent Glioblastoma ◽  
Salvage Regimen ◽  
Common Grade ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Endothelial Growth Factor

BackgroundTreatment for recurrent glioblastoma is poor, and there is a need for better therapies. Here we retrospectively assessed the efficacy and toxicity of temozolomide plus apatinib, an oral small-molecule tyrosine kinase inhibitor targeting vascular endothelial growth factor receptor 2 in recurrent glioblastoma.Materials and MethodsA retrospective analysis of patients with recurrent glioblastoma who underwent apatinib plus temozolomide treatment was performed. Apatinib was given at 500 mg once daily. Temozolomide was administered at 200 mg/m2/d on days 1–5 or 50 mg/m2/d continuous daily according to whether they had experienced temozolomide maintenance treatment before. The main clinical data collected included tumor characteristics, status of MGMT promoter, and IDH mutation, number of relapse, response, survival, adverse reactions, and salvage therapies.ResultsFrom April 2016 to August 2019, thirty-one patients were identified. The objective response rate was 26.3%, and the disease control rate was 84.2%. The progression-free survival (PFS) at 6 months and overall survival (OS) at 12 months were 44.6 and 30.2%. The median PFS and OS were 4.9 and 8.2 months, respectively. Two patients achieved long PFS of 30.9 and 38.7+ months. The median survival time after progression of the patients with or without salvage bevacizumab was 5.1 versus 1.2 months. The most common grade 3 or 4 toxicities were hypertension (5.8%), decreased appetite (5.8%), and thrombocytopenia (4.3%), most of which were resolved after symptomatic treatment or dose reduction.ConclusionApatinib plus temozolomide is an effective salvage regimen with manageable toxicities for recurrent glioblastoma and could not reduce the sensitivity to bevacizumab.

Avelumab in patients with previously treated mesothelioma: Updated phase 1b results from the JAVELIN Solid Tumor trial.

2018 ◽  
Vol 36 (5_suppl) ◽  
pp. 166-166 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raffit Hassan ◽  
Anish Thomas ◽  
John J. Nemunaitis ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Jaafar Bennouna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Best Response ◽  
Duration Of Response ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Phase 1B ◽  
Advanced Urothelial Carcinoma ◽  
Grade 3

166 Background: Avelumab, a human anti-PD-L1 IgG1 monoclonal antibody, is approved for treatment of metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma (US and EU) and advanced urothelial carcinoma progressed on platinum therapy (US). Here, we report updated phase 1b data for avelumab in patients (pts) with previously treated mesothelioma. Methods: Pts with unresectable pleural or peritoneal mesothelioma whose disease had progressed after platinum and pemetrexed therapy received avelumab 10 mg/kg IV Q2W until progression, unacceptable toxicity, or withdrawal. Tumors were assessed every 6 wks (RECIST 1.1). Endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events (AEs; NCI CTCAE v4.0). Results: As of Dec 31, 2016, 53 pts were treated and followed for a median of 24.8 mos (range 16.8–27.8). Median age was 67 y (range 32–84). Pts had received a median of 2 prior lines of therapy (range 1–8). Confirmed ORR was 9.4% (95% CI 3.1–20.7; complete response in 1.9%, partial response in 7.5%). In pts with 1 (n = 18), 2 (n = 15) or ≥3 (n = 20) prior lines of therapy, ORR was 5.6%, 13.3% and 10.0% respectively. Median duration of response was 15.2 mos (95% CI 11.1–not estimable). 26 pts (49.1%) had stable disease as best response and the disease control rate was 58.5%. Median PFS was 4.1 mos (95% CI 1.4–6.2) and the 6-mo PFS rate was 38.0% (95% CI 24.2–51.7). Median OS was 10.9 mos (95% CI 7.5–21.0) and the 12-mo OS rate was 45.9% (95% CI 31.9–58.8). In evaluable pts with PD-L1+ (n = 16) and PD-L1− (n = 27) tumors (≥5% tumor cell cutoff), ORR was 18.8% (95% CI 4.0–45.6) and 7.4% (95% CI 0.9–24.3), and the 6-mo PFS rate was 37.5% (95% CI 14.1–61.2) and 42.0% (95% CI 23.1–59.8). 43 pts (81.1%) had a treatment-related (TR)AE, most commonly ( > 10%) infusion-related reaction (35.8%; all grade 1/2), chills (15.1%), fatigue (15.1%) and pyrexia (11.3%). 5 pts (9.4%) had a grade ≥3 TRAE. 14 pts (26.4%) had an immune-related AE, which was grade ≥3 in 3 pts (5.7%; pneumonitis, colitis, and type 1 diabetes mellitus). No treatment-related deaths occurred. Conclusions: Avelumab showed clinical activity and acceptable safety in pts with previously treated mesothelioma. Clinical trial information: NCT01772004.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document