ZD1694: A novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor with substantial activity in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Study Group.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 716-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
J R Zalcberg ◽  
D Cunningham ◽  
E Van Cutsem ◽  
E Francois ◽  
J Schornagel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Synthase Inhibitor

PURPOSE Tomudex (ZD1694; Zeneca Ltd, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) appears to have a favorable toxicity profile (defined in phase I studies) and antitumor activity in a broad range of epithelial tumors. We report here the results of a large phase II study of Tomudex in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred seventy-seven patients were entered onto the study between October 1992 and September 1993. Patients were required to have advanced CRC without prior chemotherapy (adjuvant chemotherapy was permissible) and at least one measurable lesion. Tomudex (ZD1694) was administered at a dose of 3 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks in the absence of toxicity or disease progression. Patients were assessed for objective response, progression, and survival. RESULTS Of 177 patients entered onto the study, 5% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 83% had liver metastases. Objective responses were seen in 26% of patients (95% confidence interval, 19% to 33%; four complete responses [CRs] and 41 partial responses [PRs]) while median time to progression was 4.2 months and median survival 9.6 months. All sites were audited, and responses were reviewed by an independent panel. Common toxicities included mild reversible transaminitis, nausea and vomiting, and asthenia or flu-like symptoms, and World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 leukopenia and diarrhea were seen in 6% and 9.8% of patients, respectively. Stomatitis and alopecia were common. CONCLUSION In this large multicenter phase II study of patients with advanced CRC, interesting activity was seen (objective response rate, 26%). In addition, Tomudex has an acceptable toxicity profile and a convenient dosing schedule (single intravenous injection every 3 weeks) and thus appears to offer real potential as a novel agent for the treatment of patients with advanced CRC.

Phase II Study of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in First- and Second-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1759-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus M. Borner ◽  
Daniel Dietrich ◽  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Rudolf Morant ◽  
Hanspeter Honegger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced nonpretreated and pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three nonpretreated patients and 26 patients who had experienced one fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen for advanced colorectal cancer were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Patients with good performance status (World Health Organization grade 0 to 1) were accrued onto two nonrandomized parallel arms of a phase II study. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 65%) for nonpretreated and 15% (95% CI, 4% to 35%) for pretreated patients. The main toxicity of this combination was diarrhea, which occurred at grade 3 or 4 in 35% of the nonpretreated and 50% of the pretreated patients. Grade 3 or 4 sensory neuropathy, including laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia, occurred in 16% of patients on both cohorts. Capecitabine dose reductions were necessary in 26% of the nonpretreated and 45% of the pretreated patients in the second treatment cycle. The median overall survival was 17.1 months and 11.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions. On the basis of our toxicity experience, we recommend use of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 at an initial dose of 1,250 mg/m2 bid in nonpretreated patients and at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 bid in pretreated patients.

Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Rougier ◽  
R Bugat ◽  
J Y Douillard ◽  
S Culine ◽  
E Suc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

Toxicity of fluorouracil in patients with advanced colorectal cancer: effect of administration schedule and prognostic factors. Meta-Analysis Group In Cancer.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (11) ◽  
pp. 3537-3541 ◽  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Prognostic Factors ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
World Health ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Data Set ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome

PURPOSE Fluorouracil (5-FU) continuous infusion is superior to 5-FU bolus in patients with advanced colorectal cancer, but the survival difference between the two treatments is small and, therefore, the difference in toxicity profile is crucial in choosing a treatment for individual patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS We conducted a meta-analysis of all randomized trials that compared 5-FU bolus with 5-FU CI, based on individual data from 1,219 patients, to compare the toxicity of the two schedules of 5-FU administration and to identify predictive factors for toxicity. The toxicities considered were World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 to 4 anemia, thrombopenia, leukopenia, neutropenia, nausea/vomiting, diarrhea, mucositis, and hand-foot syndrome. RESULTS Hematologic toxicity, mainly neutropenia, was more frequent with 5-FU bolus than with 5-FU CI (31% and 4%, respectively; P < .0001). Hand-foot syndrome was less frequent with 5-FU bolus than with 5-FU CI (13% and 34%, respectively; P < .0001). There was no difference between the two treatment groups in terms of other nonhematologic toxicities. Independent prognostic factors were age, sex, and performance status for nonhematologic toxicities, performance status, and treatment for hematologic toxicities, and age, sex, and treatment for hand-foot syndrome. CONCLUSION Based on a large data set, this study confirmed and quantified the toxicity profile of the two schedules of administration of 5-FU and allowed the identification of clinical predictors of toxicity.

Mitomycin-C and Lonidamine as Second-Line Therapy for Colorectal Cancer: A Phase II Study

1995 ◽  
Vol 81 (6) ◽  
pp. 435-437 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alberto Zaniboni ◽  
Fausto Meriggi ◽  
Alberto Alghisi ◽  
Stefano Mutti ◽  
Luciana Distefano ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Mitomycin C ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Anticancer Agents ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Human Colon ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Human Colon Cancer

Aims and background Recent preclinical data have suggested that lonidamine may potentiate the activity of mitomycin C in human colon cancer cell lines LoVo and HT29. Study design A phase II study was carried out in 14 patients with advanced colorectal cancer pretreated with fluorouracil and folinic acid. Treatment consisted of lonidamine, 600 mg po, followed after 2 h by mitomycin, 20 mg/m2 by iv bolus, followed by lonidamine, 150 mg tid for 5 days; the cycle was repeated every 6 weeks. Results No objective response was seen. Three patients had stable disease; the median survival for the whole group was 4 months. Although hematologic toxicity was negligible, lonidamine-related side effects were moderate to severe in most patients and mainly represented by myalgia and gastric pain. Discussion Despite a sound preclinical rationale, this schedule of lonidamine and mitomycin C was ineffective and toxic in patients with advanced colorectal cancer. More experimental data about lonidamine are needed in order to design more effective regimens based on the combination of this interesting drug with other anticancer agents.

scholarly journals Cetuximab plus FOLFOX-4 in Untreated Patients with Advanced Colorectal Cancer: A Gruppo Oncologico dell’Italia Meridionale Multicenter Phase II Study

Oncology ◽  
2010 ◽  
Vol 79 (5-6) ◽  
pp. 415-422 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Colucci ◽  
Francesco Giuliani ◽  
Carlo Garufi ◽  
Rodolfo Mattioli ◽  
Luigi Manzione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Multicenter Phase

Phase II Trial of Chronomodulated Infusion of High-Dose Fluorouracil and l-Folinic Acid in Previously Untreated Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (5) ◽  
pp. 1175-1181 ◽  
Author(s):  
H. Curé ◽  
V. Chevalier ◽  
A. Adenis ◽  
N. Tubiana-Mathieu ◽  
G. Niezgodzki ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Folinic Acid ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Fixed Dose ◽  
High Dose

PURPOSE: To study tolerability and efficacy of an intensified chronomodulated schedule of fluorouracil (5-FU) and l-folinic acid (l-FA) as first-line treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer, 5-FU was given near individually determined dose-limiting toxicity in a multicenter phase II trial. PATIENTS AND METHODS: One hundred patients (68 men and 32 women, median age 62 years, World Health Organization performance status ≤ 2) with previously untreated and inoperable metastases received chronomodulated daily infusion of 5-FU/l-FA (from 10:00 pm to 10:00 am with peak at 4:00 am). 5-FU dose was escalated from 900 to 1,100 mg/m2/d with fixed dose of l-FA at 150 mg/m2/d for 4 days every 14 days. RESULTS: 5-FU dose escalation was achieved in 66% of the patients. Grade 3 to 4 toxicities mainly consisted of nausea or vomiting (14% of patients and 1.5% of courses), hand-foot syndrome (38% of patients and 8% of courses), mucositis (26% of patients and 4% of courses), and diarrhea (21% of patients and 2.3% of courses). Objective response rate (ORR) was 41% (95% confidence interval, 31.5% to 50.5%). Twenty patients underwent metastases surgery; among these, 12 had a complete resection. Median progression-free survival was 7 months. Median survival was 17 months; 28% of the patients were alive at 2 years and 18.6% at 3 years. CONCLUSION: The ORR achieved with intensified chronomodulated delivery of 5-FU/l-FA was nearly twice as high as that earlier obtained by our cooperative group using less intensive 5-FU/FA chronotherapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document