Phase II study of irinotecan in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in chemotherapy-naive patients and patients pretreated with fluorouracil-based chemotherapy.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (1) ◽  
pp. 251-260 ◽  
Author(s):  
P Rougier ◽  
R Bugat ◽  
J Y Douillard ◽  
S Culine ◽  
E Suc ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE To assess the efficacy of irinotecan (CPT-11) in the treatment of advanced colorectal cancer in both chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred thirteen patients (aged 18 to 75 years) with metastatic colorectal cancer, World Health Organization (WHO) performance status < or = 2, and life expectancy > or = 3 months were treated with CPT-11 350 mg/m2 every 3 weeks. All 178 patients eligible for efficacy analysis had not received more than one prior fluorouracil (5-FU)-based chemotherapy regimen (adjuvant or palliative) and had adequate hematologic, renal, and hepatic function. RESULTS Primary tumor sites were the colon (71%) and rectum (28%). Sixty-six percent of the patients had > or = two metastatic sites. Ninety-eight percent of the patients had undergone previous surgery, and 77.5% had received prior chemotherapy. Thirty-two of 178 eligible patients achieved on objective response (four complete responses [CRs] and 28 partial responses [PRs]; response rate, 18%; 95% confidence interval, 12.6% to 24.4%), 65 were stable, and 59 progressed. The response rate was 17.7% in the pretreated group and 18.8% in the chemotherapy-naive group. Within the former subgroup, response rates of 16.1% were reported in patients who were progressive on prior 5-FU chemotherapy and 19.1% in patients who were progressive off such treatment. The median duration of objective response (9.1 months) and median time to achievement of a response (9.3 weeks) did not differ between chemotherapy-naive and pretreated patients. The most frequent adverse events were neutropenia, which developed in 80% of the patients, delayed diarrhea (87%), alopecia (88%), fatigue (81%), and nausea/vomiting (77%). All these adverse events were manageable. Severe (WHO grade 3 or 4) neutropenia was only observed in 18% of the cycles, leukopenia in 11%, delayed diarrhea in 11%, and nausea and vomiting in 3%. Development of simultaneous grade 3 or 4 neutropenia and delayed diarrhea during 4% of the cycles was the safety issue of greatest concern. CONCLUSION CPT-11 has definite activity in the treatment of advanced metastatic colorectal cancer both in chemotherapy-naive and in pretreated patients who experienced disease progression on 5-FU, which suggests a lack of cross-resistance between CPT-11 and 5-FU. Diarrhea and neutropenia, the major toxicities of CPT-11, contribute to the risk to develop febrile neutropenic sepsis.

Phase II Study of Capecitabine and Oxaliplatin in First- and Second-Line Treatment of Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (7) ◽  
pp. 1759-1766 ◽  
Author(s):  
Markus M. Borner ◽  
Daniel Dietrich ◽  
Roger Stupp ◽  
Rudolf Morant ◽  
Hanspeter Honegger ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Reductions

PURPOSE: To determine the efficacy and tolerability of combining oxaliplatin with capecitabine in the treatment of advanced nonpretreated and pretreated colorectal cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Forty-three nonpretreated patients and 26 patients who had experienced one fluoropyrimidine-containing regimen for advanced colorectal cancer were treated with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 on day 1 and capecitabine 1,250 mg/m2 bid on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks. Patients with good performance status (World Health Organization grade 0 to 1) were accrued onto two nonrandomized parallel arms of a phase II study. RESULTS: The objective response rate was 49% (95% confidence interval [CI], 33% to 65%) for nonpretreated and 15% (95% CI, 4% to 35%) for pretreated patients. The main toxicity of this combination was diarrhea, which occurred at grade 3 or 4 in 35% of the nonpretreated and 50% of the pretreated patients. Grade 3 or 4 sensory neuropathy, including laryngopharyngeal dysesthesia, occurred in 16% of patients on both cohorts. Capecitabine dose reductions were necessary in 26% of the nonpretreated and 45% of the pretreated patients in the second treatment cycle. The median overall survival was 17.1 months and 11.5 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: Combining capecitabine and oxaliplatin yields promising activity in advanced colorectal cancer. The main toxicity is diarrhea, which is manageable with appropriate dose reductions. On the basis of our toxicity experience, we recommend use of capecitabine in combination with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 at an initial dose of 1,250 mg/m2 bid in nonpretreated patients and at a dose of 1,000 mg/m2 bid in pretreated patients.

Biweekly intensified ambulatory chronomodulated chemotherapy with oxaliplatin, fluorouracil, and leucovorin in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (11) ◽  
pp. 2950-2958 ◽  
Author(s):  
F Bertheault-Cvitkovic ◽  
A Jami ◽  
M Ithzaki ◽  
P D Brummer ◽  
S Brienza ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
World Health ◽  
Previously Treated Patients ◽  
Previously Treated ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Health Organization

PURPOSE This study sought to determine the feasibility and antitumor efficacy of an intensified three-drug chronomodulated regimen with maximum delivery at 4:00 AM for fluorouracil (5-FU)-leucovorin (folinic acid [FA]) and at 4:00 PM for oxaliplatin (I-OHP). PATIENTS AND METHODS Fifty patients with metastatic colorectal cancer were enrolled in the trial. The first treatment course consisted of daily administration of 5-FU (700 mg/m2/d), FA (300 mg/m2/d), and L-OHP (25 mg/m2/d) for 4 days with a multichannel programmable pump. Courses were repeated every 14 days, with 5-FU escalation by 100 mg/m2/d if toxicity was less than grade 2. RESULTS World Health Organization (WHO)-modified grade 3 or 4 diarrhea (40% of patients and 7% of courses) or stomatitis (28% of patients and 4% of courses) or grade 2 cumulative peripheral sensitive neuropathy (28% of patients) were dose-limiting. Median 5-FU and L-OHP dose-intensities (DIs), were increased by 32% and 18%, respectively, as compared with our previous 5 days on-16 days off schedule. The overall objective response rate was 48% (95% confidence limits [CL], 34% to 62%), being 40% (24% to 57%) in 37 previously treated patients and 69% (48% to 90%) in 13 chemotherapy-naive patients. A 5-FU DI > 1,400 mg/m2/wk over four courses was associated with a near doubling of the response rate. Residual metastases were surgically removed in 13 patients (26%). Median progression-free survival and survival durations were 9.3 months (95% CL, 6.6 to 11.2) and 17.8 months (95% CL, 14.1 to 21.4), respectively. CONCLUSION This highly effective fully ambulatory outpatient regimen deserves further testing in randomized trials both in chemotherapy-naive patients and before surgery to remove metastases.

First-line single-agent cetuximab in patients with advanced colorectal cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3553-3553 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Pessino ◽  
S. Artale ◽  
A. Guglielmi ◽  
S. Sciallero ◽  
G. Fornarini ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Great Majority ◽  
Skin Toxicity ◽  
Common Adverse Event ◽  
Time To Progression ◽  
Grade 3

3553 Background: The most relevant recent advance in the treatment of metastatic colorectal cancer is the fact that cure is still possible under very selected conditions. However the goal of chemotherapy remains palliative in the great majority of patients, justifying less toxic innovative approaches in so- called “window of opportunity trials”. We have pursued this idea in a phase II study of cetuximab monotherapy in chemo-naive patients with advanced colorectal cancer beyond any possibility of curative resection. Methods: Patients with non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (at least two metastatic sites and/or otherwise inoperable metastatic disease) were treated with cetuximab (400 mg/m2 week 1 and 250 mg/m2 weekly thereafter) until progressive disease (PD) or unacceptable toxicity. The primary end-point was objective response; secondary end-points were: stable disease, time to treatment failure and time to progression. According to Simon’s two-stage design, the number of responses/patients to stop the trial was 0/10 for stage 1 and 3/29 for stage 2. Results: Of the 44 patients screened, 42 (97%) had EGFR-expressing tumors. Thirty-nine patients (median age: 69) initiated the treatment. Two had grade 3 allergic reactions to cetuximab at the first administration leading to treatment discontinuation. The most common adverse event was skin toxicity, which occurred in 90% of the patients ( 31% grade 2, 10 % grade 3). We observed 1 complete response, 3 partial responses, 13 stable diseases (5 of which were minor responses), and 22 PD. The duration of the 4 responses were 12, 9, 9 and 6 months. Median time to progression was 2.0 months. Conclusions: The study is negative because the response rate is low. However, the duration of benefit in the few responding patients is such that it is imperative to find the molecular determinants of cetuximab activity in these cases. [Table: see text]

Apatinib combined with Raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer after failure of standard therapy (AHEAD-311): A single-arm phrase II pilot trial.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15008-e15008
Author(s):  
Haiyan Si ◽  
Miaomiao Gou ◽  
Yong Zhang ◽  
Huan Yan ◽  
Niansong Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Pilot Trial ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Tumor Location ◽  
Nausea And Vomiting ◽  
Grade 3

e15008 Background: To assess the safety and efficacy of apatinib, an oral vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-2 inhibitor, combined with thymidylate synthase inhibitor raltitrexed in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) as a third- or later-line therapy. Methods: Patients with mCRC after at least 2 lines of chemotherapy were enrolled whenever they previously treated with bevacizumab or not. Apatinib was given orally at 250mg or 500mg daily. Raltitrexed was administered intravenously at 3 mg/m2 on day 1 every 3 weeks. The primary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS). The second endpoints were objective response rate (ORR), overall survival (OS) and safety. Results: From August 2017 to November 2018, thirty-one patients were enrolled in Chinese PLA General Hospital. After a median follow-up of 6.4 months, the median treatment cycle was 4. four patient achieved partial response(PR), and 11 patients achieved stable disease (SD) and 16 achieved progression disease (PD) in accordance with RECIST version 1.0, illustrating a DCR of 48.4% and an ORR of 12.9% .The Median PFS was 2.4 months and the median OS was 6.4 months. The most common adverse events were hypertension (n=12, 38.7%), nausea and vomiting (n=11, 33.8%), myelosuppression (n=9, 29.0%). The most common grade 3 to 4 adverse events were hypertension (n=2, 6.4%) and hand-foot syndrome (n=2, 6.4%). Grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicities were rare. One patient died from cardiac arrest after three days treatment. There was no significantly association between PFS or OS, and clinical features including tumor location, KRAS status, and prior surgery or not, and number of metastatic organs. There was no trend showing patients who experienced had hypertension or myelosuppression had longer PFS and OS. Compared to the patients never received bevacizumab, the patients who had previously bevacizumab had the similar PFS and OS (3.9 versus 2.3months, P=0.787; 6.1 versus 6.4months, P=0.287). Grade1-2 nausea and vomiting and age <57 were independent predictors for longer PFS and OS. Conclusions: Apatinib combined with raltitrexed had efficacy but had limited survival benefit in mCRC refractory to standard chemotherapy. This regime showed us a higher risk of adverse event incidence and warrant further exploring of benefit population. Clinical trial information: NCT03344614 .

Encorafenib plus cetuximab with or without binimetinib for BRAF V600E metastatic colorectal cancer: Updated survival results from a randomized, three-arm, phase III study versus choice of either irinotecan or FOLFIRI plus cetuximab (BEACON CRC).

2020 ◽  
Vol 38 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4001-4001 ◽  
Author(s):  
Scott Kopetz ◽  
Axel Grothey ◽  
Eric Van Cutsem ◽  
Rona Yaeger ◽  
Harpreet Singh Wasan ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Standard Of Care ◽  
Braf V600e ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Metastatic Setting ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
And Control

4001 Background: BEACON CRC is a randomized, phase 3 study which evaluated the triplet of encorafenib (ENCO) + binimetinib (BINI) + cetuximab (CETUX) and the doublet of ENCO + CETUX vs. investigator’s choice of irinotecan + CETUX or FOLFIRI + CETUX in patients (pts) with BRAFV600E metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) whose disease had progressed after 1-2 prior regimens in the metastatic setting. Primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR; by blinded central review) for triplet vs control. In a previous interim analysis, triplet and doublet improved OS and ORR versus standard of care. Here we report on an updated analysis. Methods: Updated analysis includes 6 months of additional follow-up and response data for all randomized pts. The study is ongoing. Results: Pts received triplet (n=224), doublet (n=220), or control (n=221). Median OS was 9.3 months (95% confidence interval [CI]:8.2, 10.8) for triplet and 5.9 months (95% CI:5.1-7.1) for control (hazard ratio [HR] (95% CI): 0.60 (0.47-0.75)). Median OS for doublet was 9.3 months (95% CI: 8.0-11.3) (HR vs. control: 0.61 (0.48-0.77). Confirmed ORR was 26.8% (95% CI: 21.1%-33.1%) for triplet, 19.5% (95% CI: 14.5%-25.4%) for doublet, and 1.8% (95% CI: 0.5%-4.6%) for control. Retrospective subgroup analyses suggested some pts may benefit more from triplet than doublet therapy (Table). Both triplet and doublet showed improved OS compared to control in all subgroups. Adverse events were consistent with prior analysis, with grade ≥3 adverse events in 65.8%, 57.4%, and 64.2% for triplet, doublet and control, respectively. Conclusions: The updated analysis of the BEACON CRC study confirmed that encorafenib + cetuximab with or without binimetinib improved OS and ORR in previously treated pts with BRAF V600E mCRC compared with standard chemotherapy. Clinical trial information: NCT02928224 . [Table: see text]

A prospective study of XELOX plus bevacizumab as first-line therapy in Japanese patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (KSCC0902).

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (4_suppl) ◽  
pp. 583-583
Author(s):  
Masaaki Takeuchi ◽  
Yutaka Ogata ◽  
Takaho Tanaka ◽  
Atsushi Kaibara ◽  
Yasunori Emi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Clinical Practice ◽  
Prospective Study ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
The Elderly ◽  
Tolerability Profile ◽  
First Line ◽  
Grade 3

583 Background: XELOX plus bevacizumab (Bev) is one of the standard therapies for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). However there was no clinical practice date in Japan. This study was designed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of XELOX plus Bev in the clinical practice in Japanese mCRC patients (pts) including the elderly. Methods: The study design was multicenter, single-arm, open-label prospective study. The major inclusion criteria were previously untreated mCRC; presence of measurable lesions; age 20 years; ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2; and adequate organ function. Pts received Bev 7.5 mg/kg d1 and XELOX (oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 d1 plus capecitabine 1,000 mg/m2 bid d1-14) q3w. This schedule was repeated until unacceptable toxicity or disease progression occurred. The primary endpoint was RECIST-confirmed objective response rate (ORR). A sample size of 41 was planned for a threshold ORR of 30% and expected value of 50%, with one-sided alpha of 0.05 and beta of approximately 0.2. Results: Of the 47 pts (male/female, 29/18; median age, 66 years (range 38-81); PS 0/1/2, 40/5/2) enrolled from May 2010 to Mar 2011. One patient did not fulfill the eligibility criteria. 46 pts were assessed for response; CR 1 pts, PR 23 pts, SD 15 pts, PD 2 pts, and NE 5 pts. The confirmed ORR was 52.2% (90% CI, 39.2-65.0%). The response rate across all time points without confirmation was 67.4% (95% CI, 52.0-80.5%). Median PFS and OS have not yet been reached. The most common grade 3/4 adverse events were anorexia 12.8%, neutropenia 10.6%, fatigue 8.5%, hypertension 4.3%, thrombocytopenia 4.3%, hand-foot syndrome 2.1% and bleeding 2.1%. Grade 3/4 peripheral neuropathy did not occur. Conclusions: First-line treatment of XELOX + Bev showed a promising response rate and an acceptable tolerability profile in the clinical practice in Japanese mCRC pts including the elderly. Clinical trial information: UMIN000003915.

ZD1694: A novel thymidylate synthase inhibitor with substantial activity in the treatment of patients with advanced colorectal cancer. Tomudex Colorectal Study Group.

1996 ◽  
Vol 14 (3) ◽  
pp. 716-721 ◽  
Author(s):  
J R Zalcberg ◽  
D Cunningham ◽  
E Van Cutsem ◽  
E Francois ◽  
J Schornagel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Advanced Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase Ii Study ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
World Health ◽  
Toxicity Profile ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Synthase Inhibitor

PURPOSE Tomudex (ZD1694; Zeneca Ltd, Macclesfield, United Kingdom) appears to have a favorable toxicity profile (defined in phase I studies) and antitumor activity in a broad range of epithelial tumors. We report here the results of a large phase II study of Tomudex in advanced colorectal cancer (CRC). PATIENTS AND METHODS One hundred seventy-seven patients were entered onto the study between October 1992 and September 1993. Patients were required to have advanced CRC without prior chemotherapy (adjuvant chemotherapy was permissible) and at least one measurable lesion. Tomudex (ZD1694) was administered at a dose of 3 mg/m2 intravenously once every 3 weeks in the absence of toxicity or disease progression. Patients were assessed for objective response, progression, and survival. RESULTS Of 177 patients entered onto the study, 5% had received prior adjuvant chemotherapy and 83% had liver metastases. Objective responses were seen in 26% of patients (95% confidence interval, 19% to 33%; four complete responses [CRs] and 41 partial responses [PRs]) while median time to progression was 4.2 months and median survival 9.6 months. All sites were audited, and responses were reviewed by an independent panel. Common toxicities included mild reversible transaminitis, nausea and vomiting, and asthenia or flu-like symptoms, and World Health Organization (WHO) grade 3 and 4 leukopenia and diarrhea were seen in 6% and 9.8% of patients, respectively. Stomatitis and alopecia were common. CONCLUSION In this large multicenter phase II study of patients with advanced CRC, interesting activity was seen (objective response rate, 26%). In addition, Tomudex has an acceptable toxicity profile and a convenient dosing schedule (single intravenous injection every 3 weeks) and thus appears to offer real potential as a novel agent for the treatment of patients with advanced CRC.

Effectiveness and tolerability of FOLFOXIRI regimen in the third- and subsequent lines of therapy in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15584-e15584
Author(s):  
Kseniya Yakimovich ◽  
Mariya Alaniya ◽  
Polina Shilo ◽  
Anastasia Mochalova ◽  
Evgeny Ledin
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Targeted Therapy ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Primary Resistance ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Medical Histories

e15584 Background: Options of therapy are limited for patients with colorectal cancer who developed disease progression during standard 5-FU-, oxaliplatin-, and irinotecan-contained regimens. There is straight information about synergy of irinotecan (SN-38) and oxaliplatin gained from fundamental and early clinical trials. We aimed to analyze effectiveness and safety of triple drug-combination of 5-FU, oxaliplatin and irinotecan (FOLFOXIRI) in heavily pretreated patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Methods: Patients with a metastatic colorectal cancer who received more than 2 lines of standard 5-FU-, oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based doublet regimens with or without targeted therapy were included. Reinduction of chemotherapy in previous lines was allowed. The retrospective analysis of medical histories was done. Eligible patients had to receive number of cycles that were sufficient for response rate estimation. Disease response was evaluated according to RECIST 1.1 criteria. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. Tolerability was estimated by CTCAE v. 5.0. Results: Forty-six patients were included in retrospective per protocol analysis. The median follow-up was 19 months. The median number of previous lines of chemotherapy was 2 (2-6). Primary resistance to oxaliplatin- and irinotecan-based chemo during previous lines was noted in 20 patients (43%) and 16 patients (35%), respectively, while seven patients (15%) developed the primary resistance to both agents given in a sequential order. All patients were treated with targeted therapy during previous treatment lines. The median of FOLFOXIRI cycles was 8 (range, 2-19). Two patients (4%) were treated with FOLFOXIRI without any targeted agents. The objective response rate was 33% (n = 15). The disease stabilization was reached in 43% (n = 20). The disease control rate was 76% (n = 35). Eleven patients (24%) had the progression of disease at the first follow-up. The median progression free survival and median overall survival were 6 months and 11 months, respectively. Toxicity was evaluated in 35 patients. The most common severe adverse events (grade 3 and 4) were neutropenia (46%) and fatigue (26%). Treatment was delayed in 20 patients (57%), and 13 patients (37%) required dose reduction. One patient had to discontinue treatment due to unacceptable toxicity. Conclusions: According to our study FOLFOXIRI provides the objective response and increased life expectancy in heavily pretreated patients. The further assessment of FOLFOXIRI regimen for refractory colorectal cancer in the prospective trials is needed.

Retreatment of Irinotecan in Later Lines of Therapy for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Retrospective Study

Oncology ◽  
2021 ◽  
pp. 1-8
Author(s):  
Moon Ki Choi ◽  
Yongjun Cha ◽  
Ji Yeon Baek
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Disease Control ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Growth Factor Receptor ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Pretreated Patients ◽  
Epidermal Growth ◽  
Grade 3

<b><i>Background:</i></b> Due to few efficacious options in later lines of therapy in metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC), there has been considerable interest in the possibility of retreatment with previously administered agents. This study investigated the efficacy and safety of irinotecan retreatment (IRI2) in patients with refractory mCRC. <b><i>Methods:</i></b> We performed a retrospective analysis of patients with mCRC who were retreated with irinotecan-based regimens. The retreatment regimens with anti-epidermal growth factor receptor therapies were excluded. <b><i>Results:</i></b> A total of 64 patients were included. Patients had a median age of 56 years and were offered mainly in the setting of third- or fourth-line therapy with IRI2. The disease control rate was 78.2% including an objective response of 23.5%. Median progression-free survival and overall survival were 5.5 and 19.3 months, respectively. The most frequent grade 3 or higher toxicities were nausea/vomiting (27.9%) and neutropenia (25%). <b><i>Conclusion:</i></b> IRI2 might be a reasonable option for heavily pretreated patients with mCRC who achieved disease control with prior irinotecan therapy.

The Role of UGT1A1*28 Polymorphism in the Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of Irinotecan in Patients With Metastatic Colorectal Cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (19) ◽  
pp. 3061-3068 ◽  
Author(s):  
Giuseppe Toffoli ◽  
Erika Cecchin ◽  
Giuseppe Corona ◽  
Antonio Russo ◽  
Angela Buonadonna ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Area Under The Curve ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Nonhematologic Toxicity ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Colorectal Cancer Patients ◽  
A Prospective Study

Purpose UGT1A1*28 polymorphism has been associated with decreased glucuronidation of SN38, the active metabolite of irinotecan. This could increase toxicity with this agent. Patients and Methods In a prospective study, 250 metastatic colorectal cancer patients were treated with irinotecan, fluorouracil, and leucovorin as first-line treatment. UGT1A1*28 polymorphism was investigated with respect to the distribution of hematologic and nonhematologic toxicity, objective response rate, and survival. Pharmacokinetics was investigated in a subgroup of patients (71 of 250) who had been analyzed with respect to toxicity and efficacy. Results UGT1A1*28 polymorphism was associated with a higher risk of grade 3 to 4 hematologic toxicity (odds ratio [OR], 8.63; 95% CI, 1.31 to 56.55), which was only relevant for the first cycle, and was not seen throughout the whole treatment period for patients with both variant alleles TA7/TA7 compared with wild-type TA6/TA6. The response rate was also higher in TA7/TA7 patients (OR, 0.32; 95% CI, 0.12 to 0.86) compared with TA6/TA6. A nonsignificant survival advantage was observed for TA7/TA7 when compared with TA6/TA6 patients (hazard ratio, 0.81; 95% CI, 0.45 to 1.44). Higher response rates were explained by a different pharmacokinetics with higher biliary index [irinotecan area under the curve (AUC)×(SN38 AUC/SN38G AUC)] and lower glucuronidation ratio (SN38G AUC/SN38 AUC) associated with the TA7/TA7 genotype and a higher response rate, indicating that the polymorphism is functionally relevant. Conclusion The results indicate that UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is of some relevance to toxicity; however, it is less important than discussed in previous smaller trials. In particular, the possibility of a dose reduction for irinotecan in patients with a UGT1A1*28 polymorphism is not supported by the result of this analysis.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document