Progress Report of Combined Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Patients With Esophageal Cancer

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (2) ◽  
pp. 866-866 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Al-Sarraf ◽  
K. Martz ◽  
A. Herskovic ◽  
L. Leichman ◽  
J.S. Brindle ◽  
...  

The abstract of the report by Al-Sarraf, et al, entitled, "Progress Report of Combined Chemoradiotherapy Versus Radiotherapy Alone in Patients With Esophageal Cancer: An Intergroup Study" published in the January 1997 issue (J Clin Oncol 15:277–284, 1997) requires a clarification. As was correctly stated on p. 278, the second sentence of the abstract under Materials and Methods should have read: "CT consisted of cisplatin 75 mg/m2 on day 1 and fluorouracil (5FU) 1,000 mg/m2/d on days 1 to 4 every 4 weeks with RT and every 3 weeks post-RT."

Author(s):  
Terufumi Kawamoto ◽  
Naoki Nakamura ◽  
Tetsuo Saito ◽  
Ayako Tonari ◽  
Hitoshi Wada ◽  
...  

Abstract Background International guidelines recommend brachytherapy for patients with dysphagia from esophageal cancer, whereas brachytherapy is infrequently used to palliate dysphagia in some countries. To clarify the availability of palliative treatment for dysphagia from esophageal cancer and explain why brachytherapy is not routinely performed are unknown, this study investigated the use of brachytherapy and external beam radiotherapy for dysphagia from esophageal cancer. Methods Japanese Radiation Oncology Study Group members completed a survey and selected the treatment that they would recommend for hypothetical cases of dysphagia from esophageal cancer. Results Of the 136 invited facilities, 61 completed the survey (44.9%). Four (6.6%) facilities performed brachytherapy of the esophagus, whereas brachytherapy represented the first-line treatment at three (4.9%) facilities. Conversely, external beam radiotherapy alone and chemoradiotherapy were first-line treatments at 61 and 58 (95.1%) facilities, respectively. In facilities that performed brachytherapy, the main reason why brachytherapy of the esophagus was not performed was high invasiveness (30.2%). Definitive-dose chemoradiotherapy with (≥50 Gy) tended to be used in patients with expected long-term survival. Conclusions Few facilities routinely considered brachytherapy for the treatment of dysphagia from esophageal cancer in Japan. Conversely, most facilities routinely considered external beam radiotherapy. In the future, it will be necessary to optimize external beam radiotherapy.


1994 ◽  
pp. 389-392
Author(s):  
M. Al-Sarraf ◽  
K. Martz ◽  
A. Herskovic ◽  
L. Leichman ◽  
J. S. Brindle ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 30 (5) ◽  
pp. 492-497 ◽  
Author(s):  
Adam S. Kader ◽  
Jan T. W. Lim ◽  
Eric Berthelet ◽  
Ross Petersen ◽  
David Ludgate ◽  
...  

Blood ◽  
2015 ◽  
Vol 126 (23) ◽  
pp. 2718-2718
Author(s):  
Yuankai Shi ◽  
Bo Jia ◽  
Xiaohui He ◽  
Youwu Shi ◽  
Mei Dong ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Extranodal natural killer/T-cell lymphoma, nasal type (ENKL) is a rare and distinct subtype of non-hodgkin lymphoma (NHL). The frequency was higher in Asia than in western countries and it has become the most common subtype of peripheral T-cell lymphomas in China. The majority of ENKL patients present with early stage. Optimal treatment modalities and prognostic factors for localized ENKL have not been fully defined. This study aimed to evaluate the optimal treatment strategy and prognostic factors for localized ENKL patients. Methods Between 2003 and 2013, three hundred and five patients with stage IE/IIE ENKL were comprehensively analyzed in this study. A total of 180 patients received combined chemoradiotherapy, with 111 patients received radiotherapy alone and 14 patients recieved chemotherapy alone. Chemotherapy regimens include GDP (gemcitabine, cisplatin, and dexamethasone), CHOP (epirubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, and prednisolone) and other regimens. A total dose of 50 Gy to the primary tumor was considered as radical dose for ENKL, and additional 5 to 10 Gy was administered as a boost to the residual disease. Results The complete response (CR) rate for patients received chemoradiotherapy (n=175) was significantly higher than that for patients received radiotherapy alone (n=102) (89.1 % vs.77.5 %, P = 0.009) or chemotherapy alone (n=14) (89.1 % vs.21.4 %, P< 0.001). The median follow up time for all 305 patients was 38.7 (1.1 to 393) months. For 228 stage IE paranasal extension or IIE patients, 3-year overall survival (OS) in combined chemoradiotherapy (n=154), radiotherapy alone (n=60) and chemotherapy alone (n=14) groups were 85.7%, 73.3% and 57.1% respectively (chemoradiotherapy vs. radiotherapy, P=0.003; chemoradiotherapy vs. chemotherapy, P<0.001). For patients received combined chemoradiotherapy, GDP regimen (n=54) (included 10 patients with pegaspargase) could significantly improve 3-year progression-free survival (PFS) compared with CHOP-like (n=110) (included 10 patients with asparaginase) (88.9% vs. 70.9%, P =0.015).Patients received radiotherapy first followed by chemotherapy (n=84) was associated with superior 3-year PFS compared with patients initially received chemotherapy (n=96) (81.0% vs. 69.8%, P=0.034). But for 54 patients received GDP regimen, induction chemotherapy (n=17) could increase 3-year PFS (100.0% vs. 83.8%, P=0.112) and OS (100.0% vs. 86.5%, P=0.180). We identified 3 risk groups based on 3 prognostic factors (stage II, LDH elevated and paranasal extension) with different survival outcomes. The 3-year OS rates were 93.5%, 85.0% and 62.2% respectively for patients with no risk factors, 1 or 2 factors and 3 factors (P<0.001). Conclusions Combined chemoradiotherapy is the most optimal therapy strategy for stage IE paranasal extension or IIE ENKL patients. GDP or combined with pegaspargase regimen shows promising efficacy, significant superior to the traditional CHOP regimen. The sequence of chemotherapy and radiotherapy for patients received novel chemotherapy regimens still needs further assessment in phase 3 clinical trials. We identified 3 risk groups based on 3 prognostic factors (stage II, LDH elevated and paranasal extension) with different survival outcomes and this novel prognostic model may better predict prognosis than previous International Prognostic Index (IPI) and Korean Prognostic Index (KPI) score for ENKL patients with limited stage. Disclosures No relevant conflicts of interest to declare.


Esophagus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 17 (3) ◽  
pp. 223-229 ◽  
Author(s):  
Keiichi Jingu ◽  
Hodaka Numasaki ◽  
Yasushi Toh ◽  
Kenji Nemoto ◽  
Takashi Uno ◽  
...  

Esophagus ◽  
2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Masayuki Watanabe ◽  
◽  
Yuji Tachimori ◽  
Tsuneo Oyama ◽  
Yasushi Toh ◽  
...  

Abstract Background Esophageal cancer is the eighth most common cause of cancer mortality in Japan. More than 11,000 people had died from esophageal cancer in 2018. The Japan Esophageal Society has collected the data on patients' characteristics, performed treatment, and outcomes annually. Methods We analyzed the data of patients who had first visited the participating hospitals in 2013. In 2019, the data collection method was changed from an electronic submission to a web-based data collection using the National Clinical Database (NCD). Japanese Classification of Esophageal Cancer 10th by the Japan Esophageal Society (JES) and UICC TNM Classification 7th were used for cancer staging Results A total of 8019 cases were registered from 334 institutions in Japan. Squamous cell carcinoma and adenocarcinoma accounted for 87.8% and 6.3%, respectively. The 5-year survival rates of patients treated using endoscopic resection, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, radiotherapy alone, or esophagectomy were 88.3%, 32.4%, 24.4%, and 59.3%, respectively. Esophagectomy was performed in 4910 cases. The operative and the hospital mortality rates were 0.77% and 1.98%, respectively. The survival curves showed a good discriminatory ability both in the clinical and pathologic stages by the JES system. The 5-year survival rate of patients with pStage IV in the UICC classification that included patients with supraclavicular node metastasis was better than that of patients with pStage IVb in JES classification. Conclusion We hope this report contributes to improving all aspects of the diagnosis and treatment of esophageal cancer in Japan.


2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 4565-4565
Author(s):  
D. Zupanc ◽  
A. Roth ◽  
K. Kolaric ◽  
Z. Tometic

4565 Background: To compare the treatment results chemoradiotherapy that include split-course radiotherapy versus continuous radiotherapy for patients with locoregional advanced unresectable esophageal cancer. Methods: The randomized clinical study included 120 patients, of them 107 eligible. The eligible patients with locoregional advanced unresectable esophageal cancer were randomized in two groups. The first group of 55 patients was treated with chemotherapy in combination with split-course radiotherapy and second group of 52 patients received radiation therapy alone.The chemoradiotherapy group was treated with 5-fluorouracil (1,000 mg/m2 i.v. for six hours) and cisplatin (20 mg/m2 i.v.) for four consecutive days at the beginning of each part of therapy plus split-course irradiation (2x20 Gy, 200 cGy daily) separated by a rest of 2 weeks. The patients in radiotherapy group received totally up to 60 Gy, 200 cGy daily. Chemotherapy for clinical recurrence and salvage therapy. Results: The 2-,5-,10- years overall survival rate were 32.2 %, 24.5% and 7.3% in the chemoradiotherapy group and 22.2%,14.5% and 1.9% in the radiotherapy group.Median survival was 15 months in the chemoradiotherapy group and 11.5 months in the radiotherapy group. There was the statistically significant difference (p<0.05) between the groups due to overall survival. The hematological toxicity, nausea and alopecia were more common in the chemoradiotherapy group, but esophagitis and pain in the irradiated region were more common in the radiotherapy group. Conclusions: Chemoradiotherapy with cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and split-course radiotherapy showed superior results to radiotherapy alone and did not produce any severe side effects in patients with locoregional advanced unresectable esophageal cancer. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document