Adjuvant Active Specific Immunotherapy for Stage II and III Colon Cancer With an Autologous Tumor Cell Vaccine: Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Study E5283

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (1) ◽  
pp. 148-148 ◽  
Author(s):  
Jules E. Harris ◽  
Louise Ryan ◽  
Herbert C. Hoover ◽  
Robert K. Stuart ◽  
Martin M. Oken ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Specific Immunotherapy ◽  
Treatment Compliance ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Autologous Tumor Cell ◽  
Autologous Tumor ◽  
Disease Free

PURPOSE: A randomized phase III clinical trial of adjuvant active specific immunotherapy (ASI) with an autologous tumor cell–bacillus Calmette-Guérin (BCG) vaccine was conducted to determine whether surgical resection plus ASI was more beneficial than resection alone in stage II and III colon cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients (n = 412) with colon cancer (297 with stage II disease, 115 with stage III disease) were randomly allocated to an observation arm or to a treatment arm in which they received three weekly intradermal vaccine injections of 107 irradiated autologous tumor cells beginning approximately 4 weeks after surgery. The first two weekly injections also contained 107 BCG organisms. Patients were observed for determination of time to recurrence and disease-free and overall survival. RESULTS: This was a negative study in that after a 7.6-year median follow-up period, there were no statistically significant differences in clinical outcomes between the treatment arms. However, there were disease-free survival (P = .078) and overall survival (P = .12) trends in favor of ASI when treatment compliance was evaluated, ie, patients who received the intended treatment had a delayed cutaneous hypersensitivity (DCH) response to the third vaccination (induration ≥5 mm). Also, the magnitude of the DCH response correlated with improved prognosis. The 5-year survival proportion was 84.6% for those with indurations greater than 10 mm, compared with 45.0% for those with indurations less than 5 mm. CONCLUSIONS: When all randomized patients were evaluated, no significant clinical benefit was seen with ASI in surgically resected colon cancer patients with stage II or III colon cancer. However, there was an indication that treatment compliance with effective immunization results in disease-free and overall survival benefits.

scholarly journals Association of chemotherapy with survival in stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery: a retrospective cohort study

BMC Cancer ◽  
2021 ◽  
Vol 21 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Zhihao Lv ◽  
Yuqi Liang ◽  
Huaxi Liu ◽  
Delong Mo
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Prediction Models ◽  
Radical Surgery ◽  
Survival Rates ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Survival Prediction ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival Rates

Abstract Background It remains controversial whether patients with Stage II colon cancer would benefit from chemotherapy after radical surgery. This study aims to assess the real effectiveness of chemotherapy in patients with stage II colon cancer undergoing radical surgery and to construct survival prediction models to predict the survival benefits of chemotherapy. Methods Data for stage II colon cancer patients with radical surgery were retrieved from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Propensity score matching (1:1) was performed according to receive or not receive chemotherapy. Competitive risk regression models were used to assess colon cancer cause-specific death (CSD) and non-colon cancer cause-specific death (NCSD). Survival prediction nomograms were constructed to predict overall survival (OS) and colon cancer cause-specific survival (CSS). The predictive abilities of the constructed models were evaluated by the concordance indexes (C-indexes) and calibration curves. Results A total of 25,110 patients were identified, 21.7% received chemotherapy, and 78.3% were without chemotherapy. A total of 10,916 patients were extracted after propensity score matching. The estimated 3-year overall survival rates of chemotherapy were 0.7% higher than non- chemotherapy. The estimated 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates of non-chemotherapy were 1.3 and 2.1% higher than chemotherapy, respectively. Survival prediction models showed good discrimination (the C-indexes between 0.582 and 0.757) and excellent calibration. Conclusions Chemotherapy improves the short-term (43 months) survival benefit of stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery. Survival prediction models can be used to predict OS and CSS of patients receiving chemotherapy as well as OS and CSS of patients not receiving chemotherapy and to make individualized treatment recommendations for stage II colon cancer patients who received radical surgery.

scholarly journals Tumor-specific CD8+ T lymphocytes derived from the peripheral blood of prostate cancer patients byin vitro stimulation with autologous tumor cell lines

2002 ◽  
Vol 98 (1) ◽  
pp. 57-62 ◽  
Author(s):  
Franck Housseau ◽  
Daniel A. Langer ◽  
Samuel D. Oberholtzer ◽  
Anitha Moorthy ◽  
Hyam I. Levitsky ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Prostate Cancer ◽  
T Lymphocytes ◽  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Cell Lines ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
Autologous Tumor Cell ◽  
Autologous Tumor ◽  
Tumor Cell Lines ◽  
Cd8 T Lymphocytes

Overall survival (OS) and updated disease-free survival (DFS) results of the NSABP C-08 trial assessing bevacizumab (B) in stage II and III colon cancer.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3508-3508 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. J. Allegra ◽  
G. A. Yothers ◽  
M. J. O'Connell ◽  
S. Sharif ◽  
N. J. Petrelli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis of adjuvant chemotherapy for stage II colon cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3548-3548
Author(s):  
Brandon Matthew Meyers ◽  
Humaid Obaid Al-Shamsi ◽  
Alvaro Tell Figueredo
Keyword(s):  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Cochrane Systematic Review ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

3548 Background: Colon cancer is potentially curable by surgery in the early stages of the disease. Adjuvant chemotherapy improves disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage III disease, but the magnitude of benefit in stage II colon cancer is less clear. A previous Cochrane systematic review and meta-analysis (SR/MA) found improved disease-free, but not overall survival (Figueredo et al., 2008). An updated SR/MA was performed to determine the effects of adjuvant chemotherapy on disease-free and overall survival in patients with stage II colon cancer. Methods: Relevant databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane) were independently searched by all authors, using the same search strategy employed in the original study (1/1988 to 9/2012). Randomized trials containing data on stage II colon cancer patients undergoing adjuvant 5-fluorouracil (5FU) chemotherapy versus observation were included. Pooled results were expressed as hazard ratios (HR) whenever possible, or risk ratios (RR), with 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) using a random effects model. Results: Seven studies were identified, and included in the final SR/MA. Six of the 7 studies were included in the disease-free survival analysis (n=4587). Adjuvant 5FU was associated with better disease-free survival (RR 0.84 (95%CI 0.75-0.94)). All 7 studies (n=5353) were included in the overall survival analysis showing an improvement with adjuvant 5FU (HR 0.87 (95%CI 0.78-0.97)). There was no evidence of heterogeneity across the studies (I2 = 0% for all analyses). Conclusions: In stage II colon cancer, adjuvant 5FU chemotherapy statistically improves both disease-free and overall survival. Our SR/MA demonstrates, for the first time, an overall survival advantage with adjuvant chemotherapy in stage II colon cancer.

Long-term followup of bi-shRNAfurin and GMCSF augmented autologous tumor cell immunotherapy treated colorectal cancer patients in phase I and IIa studies.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e15100-e15100
Author(s):  
Minal A. Barve ◽  
Anton M. Melnyk ◽  
Luisa Manning ◽  
Gladice Wallraven ◽  
Martin Birkhofer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Tumor Cell ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Checkpoint Inhibitors ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Iii ◽  
Autologous Tumor Cell ◽  
Autologous Tumor ◽  
Disease Free

e15100 Background: Vigil is an immuno-stimulatory autologous tumor cell therapy, which uses patient tumor cells transfected with a plasmid encoding genes to upregulate GM-CSF and down regulate TGFβ 1&2. It is administered monthly by intra-dermal injection. In Phase I and IIa trials patients with over 19 different tumor types were safely treated. Rapid and durable systemic immune activation was demonstrated using an IFNγ ELISPOT assay. Methods: Data are summarized for a group of 9 patients with advanced colorectal cancer followed for up to 3.5 years. Results: Six women and 3 men with Stage III or IV colorectal cancer were treated between March, 2010 and September, 2013. Six patients received Vigil as a monotherapy and 3 in combination with FOLFOX chemotherapy. Results: Demographics and treatment details are displayed below. Two patients with Stage III disease received combination therapy after complete surgical resection, and remain disease free over 3 years from surgery. The patients received 9 and 12 Vigil injections with a brisk and durable ELISPOT reactions. Conclusions: Preliminary results suggest that Vigil can be combined safely with FOLOX chemotherapy and still elicit a systemic immune response. Long term disease free survival has been observed in several patients justifying further exploration of this combination. More detailed molecular characterization and neoantigen identification of patient tumor will be undertaken in future studies. A combination with immune checkpoint inhibitors may also be explored. [Table: see text]

Adjuvant Therapy for Stage II Colon Cancer: A Systematic Review From the Cancer Care Ontario Program in Evidence-Based Care’s Gastrointestinal Cancer Disease Site Group

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (16) ◽  
pp. 3395-3407 ◽  
Author(s):  
Alvaro Figueredo ◽  
Manya L. Charette ◽  
Jean Maroun ◽  
Melissa C. Brouwers ◽  
Lisa Zuraw
Keyword(s):  
Systematic Review ◽  
Colon Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Adjuvant Therapy ◽  
Meta Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Stage Ii Colon Cancer ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose To develop a systematic review that would address the following question: Should patients with stage II colon cancer receive adjuvant therapy? Methods A systematic review was undertaken to locate randomized controlled trials comparing adjuvant therapy to observation. Results Thirty-seven trials and 11 meta-analyses were included. The evidence for stage II colon cancer comes primarily from a trial of fluorouracil plus levamisole and a meta-analysis of 1,016 patients comparing fluorouracil plus folinic acid versus observation. Neither detected an improvement in disease-free or overall survival for adjuvant therapy. A recent pooled analysis of data from seven trials observed a benefit for adjuvant therapy in a multivariate analysis for both disease-free and overall survival. The disease-free survival benefits appeared to extend to stage II patients; however, no P values were provided. A meta-analysis of chemotherapy by portal vein infusion has also shown a benefit in disease-free and overall survival for stage II patients. A meta-analysis was conducted using data on stage II patients where data were available (n = 4,187). The mortality risk ratio was 0.87 (95% CI, 0.75 to 1.01; P = .07). Conclusion There is preliminary evidence indicating that adjuvant therapy is associated with a disease-free survival benefit for patients with stage II colon cancer. These benefits are small and not necessarily associated with improved overall survival. Patients should be made aware of these results and encouraged to participate in active clinical trials. Additional investigation of newer therapies and more mature data from the presently available trials should be pursued.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document