Phase I Clinical Trial of Alitretinoin and Tamoxifen in Breast Cancer Patients: Toxicity, Pharmacokinetic, and Biomarker Evaluations

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (10) ◽  
pp. 2754-2763 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia A. Lawrence ◽  
Peter C. Adamson ◽  
Rafael Caruso ◽  
Catherine Chow ◽  
David Kleiner ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Plasma Concentrations ◽  
Density Lipoprotein ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Tamoxifen Therapy ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Mib 1

PURPOSE: To determine the overall and dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) of alitretinoin (9-cis-retinoic acid) in combination with tamoxifen and the pharmacokinetics of alitretinoin alone and when combined with tamoxifen in patients with metastatic breast cancer. The effect of tamoxifen and alitretinoin on MIB-1, a marker of proliferation, in unaffected breast tissue was explored. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Eligible patients had metastatic breast cancer. Previous tamoxifen therapy was allowed. Planned dose levels for alitretinoin ranged from 50 to 140 mg/m2/d with 20 mg/d tamoxifen in all patients after 4 weeks of alitretinoin as a single agent. Plasma concentrations of alitretinoin and retinol were measured at baseline and after 1, 2, and 3 months. Breast core biopsies were obtained at baseline and after 2 months of therapy. RESULTS: Twelve patients with metastatic breast cancer received a total of 86 cycles of therapy. At 90 mg/m2/d, three of five patients experienced a DLT: grade 3 headache, grade 3 hypercalcemia, and grade 3 noncardiogenic pulmonary edema. At 70 mg/m2/d, one of six patients experienced a DLT (headache), and this level was considered the maximal tolerated dose in this study. Three toxicities occurred that had not been reported previously with alitretinoin: an asymptomatic delay in dark adaptation, a marked decrease in high-density lipoprotein cholesterol, and the occurrence of enthesopathy. Two of the nine assessable patients had a durable clinical response: one partial response and stable disease for 18 months and one complete response in continuous remission for 48+ months. Both responding patients were estrogen receptor–positive and had had previous tamoxifen therapy. There was a high degree of interpatient variability of plasma alitretinoin concentrations, although a significant decline in alitretinoin plasma levels over time was observed. MIB-1 scores declined in four of the eight paired breast specimens obtained. CONCLUSION: The combination of tamoxifen and alitretinoin is well tolerated and has antitumor activity in metastatic breast cancer. The recommended phase II dose is 70 mg/m2/d with 20 mg/d tamoxifen.

Safety and Efficacy of Using a Single Agent or a Phase II Agent Before Instituting Standard Combination Chemotherapy in Previously Untreated Metastatic Breast Cancer Patients: Report of a Randomized Study—Cancer and Leukemia Group B 8642

1999 ◽  
Vol 17 (5) ◽  
pp. 1397-1397 ◽  
Author(s):  
Mary E. Costanza ◽  
Raymond B. Weiss ◽  
I. Craig Henderson ◽  
Larry Norton ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Combination Chemotherapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Response Rates ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

PURPOSE: We undertook a prospective, randomized phase III trial to evaluate the safety and efficacy of using a phase II agent before initiating therapy with standard combination chemotherapy in metastatic breast cancer patients. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 365 women with measurable metastatic breast cancer, previously untreated with chemotherapy for their metastatic disease, were randomized to receive either immediate chemotherapy with cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and fluorouracil (CAF) or up to four cycles of one of five sequential cohorts of single-agent drugs: trimetrexate, melphalan, amonafide, carboplatin, or elsamitrucin, followed by CAF. RESULTS: The toxicity of each single agent followed by CAF was comparable to that of CAF alone. The cumulative response rates for the single agent followed by CAF were not statistically different from those of CAF alone (44% v 52%; P = .24). However, in the multivariate analysis, patients with visceral disease had a trend toward lower response rates on the phase II agent plus CAF arm (P = .078). Although survival and response duration also were not statistically significantly different between the two study arms (P = .074 and P = .069, respectively), there was a suggestion of benefit for the CAF-only arm. CONCLUSION: The brief use of a phase II agent, regardless of its efficacy, followed by CAF resulted in response rates, toxicities, durations of response, and survival statistically equivalent to those seen with the use of CAF alone. These findings support the use of a new paradigm for the evaluation of phase II agents in the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer.

Nanoparticle albumin-bound (Nab) paclitaxel (P) in combination with bevacizumab (B) with and without gemcitabine (G): Early experience at the Braman Family Breast Cancer Institute

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10748-10748
Author(s):  
C. F. Lobo ◽  
G. Lopes ◽  
O. Silva ◽  
S. Gluck
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Preliminary Evidence ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hemorrhagic Complication ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Hormone Receptor Positive ◽  
Heavily Pretreated ◽  
Grade 3

10748 Background: Nab-P improves outcomes when compared against single agent cremophor-based P, as does the addition of bevacizumab or gemcitabine to the same agent. There are no available data regarding combinations of Nab-P with B and/or G. Ongoing investigational efforts are evaluating various doublets with these agents, but, to the best of our knowledge, not all 3 of them in the same regimen. All drugs are currently FDA-approved in the treatment of breast cancer. Methods: Review of single-institution experience, evaluating safety and preliminary evidence of activity with the use of Nab-P and B with and without G in heavily pretreated her2neu negative metastatic breast cancer patients. Assessment of response was undertaken by the investigators independently of treating physician. RECIST criteria were used. Three patients received Nab-P and B at the following doses: Nab-P 100 mg/m2, B 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks, and 2 patients received all 3 drugs as follows: Nab-P 100 mg/m2, G 1,000 mg/m2, B 10 mg/kg every 2 weeks. Results: Five women have been evaluated. Median age was 51 (range 34–69). Two patients had hormone-receptor positive disease and 3 had ER/PR/Her2neu-negative cancer. Prior number of regimens was 3 (range 2–7). Four patients had been treated with a taxane. One received both paclitaxel and docetaxel, and 3 docetaxel only. A median of 5 cycles have been administered (range 3–9). First-cycle grade 3/4 toxicity was seen in only one patient who had a baseline grade 2 thrombocytopenia that progressed to grade 3. The thrombocytopenia resolved without requiring transfusion and without any hemorrhagic complication. Another patient developed grade 2 peripheral neuropathy. Two patients are not yet assessable for response. At time of first evaluation 1 patient had progressive disease (Nab-P, B; 7 prior lines of treatment), one had stable disease (Nab-P, B, G; 3 prior lines of therapy, including docetaxel), and 1 had a partial response (Nab-P, B, G; 2 prior therapies, including docetaxel). Conclusions: These very preliminary data suggest that Nab-P in combination with B with and without G is a safe regimen and formal Phase I/II trials are being developed to confirm its clinical activity. [Table: see text]

Gemcitabine and docetaxel combination regimen in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1107-1107
Author(s):  
D. Karacetin ◽  
O. Maral ◽  
O. Aksakal ◽  
B. Okten ◽  
B. Yalçın ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Grade 3

1107 Background: No standart chemotherapy regimen has been estabilished for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The gemcitabine and docetaxel combination has been shown to be synergistic . This study is conducted to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and docetaxel combination therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: 27 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with gemcitabine-docetaxel combination . Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 IV infusion, on day 1 and 8, and docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 1 in 21 day cycles. 4–6 cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate, and survival. Results: The median age was 50 years (range,32–77). Performans status (ECOG) was 0–1. Hormone receptor status: ER+/ER-; 11/16, PR+/PR-; 14/13. Menopausal status were: 11 premenopausal, 16 postmenopausal. Of the 27 evaluable patients, there were 11 (40.7%) partial responses and no complete response. Overall response rate was 40.7%. Median time to progression was 7 months, and median survival was 14 months. Toxicities included grade 3–4 neutropenia in 9 (30%), thrombocytopenia in 6 (22%), anemia in 3(9%). There were no treatment releated deaths Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel has shown favorable toxicity profile and promising activity in metastatic breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly everolimus (RAD001) in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1066-1066
Author(s):  
S. L. Moulder ◽  
E. Rivera ◽  
J. Ensor ◽  
A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
M. Christofanilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Interpatient Variability ◽  
Grade 3

1066 Background: Inhibition of mTOR with everolimus (E) may improve efficacy in combination with docetaxel (D), but both drugs are metabolized by CYP3A4, thus a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction may also exist. Methods: 15 patients (pts) with MBC were treated with docetaxel and everolimus using the continuous reassessment method (CRM) to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Docetaxel doses were 40–75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Everolimus doses were 20–50 mg PO on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (except cycle 2, where only day 8 was given to allow single agent PK analyses of both drugs). Response was measured every 2 cycles using RECIST. Results: Median age= 58 years and 77% of pts had >2 prior chemotherapies for MBC. Initially 2 of 2 pts treated (D= 75 mg/m2, E= 30 mg) developed DLT (neutropenic fever/infection), prompting a mandatory PK evaluation for all pts enrolled in subsequent cohorts. A second cohort of 3 patients (D=60 mg/m2, E=20mg) had no DLT, but no pts received day 8 of E due to grade 3–4 neutropenia. PK analyses demonstrated a 42% lowered (-42%) D clearance at the 60 mg/m2 in the presence of E (n=1). Subsequent cohorts were accrued at D=40 mg/m2 with escalating doses of E (Table). For the entire group, an 18% decrease (-18%) in D clearance was observed when D was administered concomitantly with E. High interpatient variability of D clearance was observed (range +16% to -135%). No pts had CR/PR, but 6 had SD>4 cycles and 2 had SD=8 cycles. Conclusions: Weekly everolimus appears to cause widely variable and unpredictable changes in docetaxel clearance making this combination unfeasible. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

The clinical utility of strict laboratory monitoring of CDK 4/6 inhibitors in metastatic breast cancer patients.

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1062-1062
Author(s):  
Urvi Patel ◽  
Jane Lowe Meisel ◽  
Meagan Spencer Barbee ◽  
Kristina Frinzi ◽  
Elizabeth Sakach ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Quality Of Life ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Financial Burden ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Retrospective Chart Review ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

1062 Background: Cyclin-dependent kinase 4/6 inhibitors (CDK 4/6i) are widely used in the treatment of hormone receptor positive, metastatic breast cancer (MBC). CDK 4/6is are well-tolerated and highly effective, but can cause neutropenia. Therefore, the FDA mandates assessment of the absolute neutrophil count (ANC) every 2 weeks for the first 2 cycles of therapy and monthly thereafter. Strict ANC monitoring is optimal in theory, but presents a challenge in the real world, impacting quality of life for patients (pts) and adding financial burden to the healthcare system. This study aims to evaluate whether strict monitoring of ANC significantly impacts treatment decisions, pt safety, and disease outcomes. Methods: A retrospective chart review of 160 pts with MBC was conducted at the Winship Cancer Institute in pts prescribed CDK 4/6is from Feb 2015 to Jan 2019. The pt’s ANC at C1D1, C1D14, C2D1, C2D14 were recorded along with various pt outcomes. Pts were divided into strict monitoring (SM) or relaxed monitoring (RM) groups. SM is defined as pts who received ANC testing within 72h of C1D14, C2D1, and C2D14. RM was defined as not meeting those criteria. Results: Palbociclib was used in 152 pts; abemaciclib was used in 8. Average age was 58. Study population was 55% Caucasian; 38% African American; 6% Asian. Pts had an average of 3 lines of prior therapy and average of 9 cycles on a CDK 4/6i. 71% of pts suffered neutropenia (40% grade 3, 4% grade 4, 2.5% febrile neutropenia). PFS and OS did not statistically differ between groups (Table), but OS data is immature. Conclusions: This study analyzed a more diverse and heavily pre-treated MBC population than previous CDK 4/6 studies. The prevalence of neutropenia (grade 3/4) aligns with results described in the PALOMA trial. PFS was higher in the RM group than in the SM group, suggesting strict monitoring for neutropenia does not improve PFS. If ANC monitoring parameters could be safely relaxed for CDK 4/6i, it could improve quality of life and decrease financial toxicity across the system. This is a topic worthy of further study. [Table: see text]

Safety and antitumor activity of 3-weekly anti-EpCAM antibody adecatumumab (MT201) in combination with docetaxel for patients with metastatic breast cancer: Results of a multicenter phase Ib trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009
Author(s):  
M. Sebastian ◽  
C. Hanusch ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
N. Marschner ◽  
D. Oruzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Epcam Expression ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Grade 3

1009 Background: The fully human IgG1 antibody adecatumumab (MT201) binds to the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), which is expressed in over 90% of breast cancers and has been associated with poor prognosis. Data from a previous phase II study in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) indicated that single agent MT201 could prolong progression-free survival in a subset of patients with high EpCAM expression. This study tested safety and tolerability of MT201 treatment in combination with standard docetaxel. Methods: Relapsed or primary refractory, EpCAM-positive MBC patients were treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m2 q21d) in combination with MT201 (dose levels 180 mg/m2, and 550 mg/m2 q21d). A loading dose of 100 mg/m2 and 300 mg/m2, respectively, was administered on day 1 and 7. Patients were grouped into high- and low-level EpCAM expression. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; anti-tumor activity according to RECIST was a secondary objective. Results: A total of 22 patients with a median of 3 prior chemotherapy lines were enrolled. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in all patients were leucopenia (90%), neutropenia (77%), lymphopenia (68%), and diarrhea (23%). No evidence for aggravation of grade 3/4 toxicities typically associated with docetaxel was found. The dose level 550 mg/m2 q21d has been determined as MTD in combination with 100 mg/m2 q21d docetaxel. The overall response rate (CR/PR; RECIST) and clinical benefit rate (CR/PR and SD>24wks) in all evaluable patients was 24% and 41%, respectively. Patients with high EpCAM expression showed a response rate of 43%, whereas patients with low EpCAM expression had a response rate of 10%. Median time-to-progression (TTP) in all evaluable patients was 165 days. Conclusions: Combining MT201 with docetaxel for the treatment of MBC appears to be safe and feasible. The DLT of this combination were short and manageable episodes of grade 3 diarrhea. The response rate and TTP observed in this heavily pre-treated population is encouraging and warrant further development of MT201/chemotherapy combinations in patients with tumors of high EpCAM target level. [Table: see text]

Capecitabine maintenance therapy after docetaxel/capecitabine combination chemotherapy in patients with metastatic breast cancer.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e12018-e12018
Author(s):  
Pinar Gursoy ◽  
Zeki Gokhan Surmeli ◽  
Burcu Cakar ◽  
Cagatay Arslan ◽  
Baha Zengel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Maintenance Therapy ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Response To Treatment ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Metastatic Sites

e12018 Background: Addition of capecitabine to docetaxel improves survival outcomes compared with single agent docetaxel in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). In this study we analyzed efficacy of maintenance therapy with single agent capecitabine after six cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine chemotherapy in MBC patients. Methods: Patients with metastatic HER2 negative breast cancer were included. Six cycles of docetaxel (75mg/m2 q3wk) / capecitabine (1650mg/m2/day on days 1 to 14) followed by capecitabine (2000 mg/m2/day on days 1 to 14) were administered. Demographic features, progression free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) and response to treatment were recorded. Results: Fifty-four patients were included. Thirty-five patients (65%) were postmenopausal, and 40 (74%) were ER/PR positive. Median age was 53 (range 28 – 70). Number of metastatic sites was one in 23 patients, two in 21, three or more in 10 patients. Most common metastatic sites were bone (67%), lymph nodes (33%), lungs (30%), liver (13%); 13 patients (24%) had bone only disease. Forty-four (81.5%) patients received treatment in first-line, 10 (18.5%) received in second line setting. Median number of cycles applied (including docetaxel/capecitabine combination) was 9 (range 2 – 31, total 576). Median PFS was 9 months (10.4 for hormone receptor positive, 7.3 for negative patients) and median OS was 28 months. Objective response was assessable in 38 patients. Overall response rate (partial + complete response) was 42.6% (95% CI 29.6 – 55.6) with 1 complete response. Toxicities were evaluated in 41 patients; grade 3/4 neutropenia was observed in 10% and grade 3/4 hand-foot syndrome was observed in 24% of patients. Dose reduction was performed in capecitabine in 37%, and in docetaxel in 20% of patients. Conclusions: Maintenance with single agent capecitabine therapy after six cycles of docetaxel/capecitabine chemotherapy is an effective and tolerable treatment option for HER2 negative MBC patients.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document