Safety and antitumor activity of 3-weekly anti-EpCAM antibody adecatumumab (MT201) in combination with docetaxel for patients with metastatic breast cancer: Results of a multicenter phase Ib trial

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1009-1009
Author(s):  
M. Sebastian ◽  
C. Hanusch ◽  
M. Schmidt ◽  
N. Marschner ◽  
D. Oruzio ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Epcam Expression ◽  
Secondary Objective ◽  
Grade 3

1009 Background: The fully human IgG1 antibody adecatumumab (MT201) binds to the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), which is expressed in over 90% of breast cancers and has been associated with poor prognosis. Data from a previous phase II study in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) indicated that single agent MT201 could prolong progression-free survival in a subset of patients with high EpCAM expression. This study tested safety and tolerability of MT201 treatment in combination with standard docetaxel. Methods: Relapsed or primary refractory, EpCAM-positive MBC patients were treated with docetaxel (100 mg/m2 q21d) in combination with MT201 (dose levels 180 mg/m2, and 550 mg/m2 q21d). A loading dose of 100 mg/m2 and 300 mg/m2, respectively, was administered on day 1 and 7. Patients were grouped into high- and low-level EpCAM expression. Primary objectives were safety and tolerability; anti-tumor activity according to RECIST was a secondary objective. Results: A total of 22 patients with a median of 3 prior chemotherapy lines were enrolled. Most frequent grade 3/4 adverse events (AE) in all patients were leucopenia (90%), neutropenia (77%), lymphopenia (68%), and diarrhea (23%). No evidence for aggravation of grade 3/4 toxicities typically associated with docetaxel was found. The dose level 550 mg/m2 q21d has been determined as MTD in combination with 100 mg/m2 q21d docetaxel. The overall response rate (CR/PR; RECIST) and clinical benefit rate (CR/PR and SD>24wks) in all evaluable patients was 24% and 41%, respectively. Patients with high EpCAM expression showed a response rate of 43%, whereas patients with low EpCAM expression had a response rate of 10%. Median time-to-progression (TTP) in all evaluable patients was 165 days. Conclusions: Combining MT201 with docetaxel for the treatment of MBC appears to be safe and feasible. The DLT of this combination were short and manageable episodes of grade 3 diarrhea. The response rate and TTP observed in this heavily pre-treated population is encouraging and warrant further development of MT201/chemotherapy combinations in patients with tumors of high EpCAM target level. [Table: see text]

Randomized Phase II Trial of First-Line Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel and Capecitabine Compared With Trastuzumab Plus Docetaxel inHER2-Positive Metastatic Breast Cancer

2010 ◽  
Vol 28 (6) ◽  
pp. 976-983 ◽  
Author(s):  
Andrew M. Wardley ◽  
Xavier Pivot ◽  
Flavia Morales-Vasquez ◽  
Luis M. Zetina ◽  
Maria de Fátima Dias Gaui ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Grade 3

PurposeTo evaluate trastuzumab (H) and docetaxel (T) with or without capecitabine (X) as first-line combination therapy for human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2) -positive advanced breast cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer were randomly assigned to H (8 mg/kg loading; 6 mg/kg every 3 weeks) plus T (75 mg/m2in HTX arm, 100 mg/m2in HT arm, every 3 weeks) with or without X (950 mg/m2twice per day on days 1 to 14 every 3 weeks). The primary end point was overall response rate (ORR).ResultsIn 222 patients, median follow-up was approximately 24 months. ORR was high with both regimens (70.5% with HTX; 72.7% with HT; P = .717); complete response rate was 23.2% with HTX compared with 16.4% with HT. HTX demonstrated significantly longer progression-free survival: median 17.9 months compared with 12.8 months with HT (hazard ratio, 0.72; P = .045), which translates to a gain of around 5 months. Two-year survival probability was 75% with HTX compared with 66% with HT. Febrile neutropenia (27% v 15%) and grade 3/4 neutropenia (77% v 54%) incidences were higher with HT than HTX. Treatment-related grade 3 hand-foot syndrome (17% v < 1%) and grade 3/4 diarrhea (11% v 4%) occurred more commonly with HTX than HT. One case of congestive heart failure occurred in each arm.ConclusionHTX is an effective and feasible first-line therapy for HER2-positive locally advanced or metastatic breast cancer, although it should be reserved for patients with good performance status who are not receiving long-term steroids.

Dose-intensive vinorelbine with concurrent granulocyte colony-stimulating factor support in paclitaxel-refractory metastatic breast cancer.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (4) ◽  
pp. 1395-1400 ◽  
Author(s):  
R B Livingston ◽  
G K Ellis ◽  
J R Gralow ◽  
M A Williams ◽  
R White ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Growth Factor ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Granulocyte Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Colony Stimulating Factor ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Stimulating Factor

PURPOSE We evaluated weekly single-agent intravenous (IV) vinorelbine as salvage therapy for metastatic breast cancer. After the first five patients, all received elective growth factor support with granulocyte colony-stimulating factor (G-CSF; filgrastim) in an attempt to maximize delivered dose-intensity (DDI). Objective tumor response, DDI, and toxicity were assessed, as well as time to progression (TTP) and survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS This single-center nonrandomized trial enrolled 40 patients. Anthracycline exposure and subsequent progression were common to all patients, and 38 of 40 were paclitaxel-refractory. Vinorelbine was given initially at 30 mg/m2/wk, then at 35 mg/m2/wk in a phase I/II design, which involved first intermittent (6 days of 7) and then continuous (daily) administration of G-CSF at 5 micrograms/kg. RESULTS The maximum-tolerated starting dose was 35 mg/m2/wk with continuous G-CSF support. The mean DDI was 27.7 mg/m2/wk for all patients. There were two complete responses (CRs) and eight partial responses (PRs) in 40 assessable patients for an overall response rate of 25% (95% confidence interval [CI], 13% to 41%). The median TTP was 13 weeks and median survival time 33 weeks. The dose-limiting toxicity was neutropenia, with dose delay or reduction required in 14 of 27 patients entered at 35 mg/m2. Febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization was unusual (three of 40 patients, 8%). There were no treatment-related deaths. Grade 3/4 thrombocytopenia occurred in nine patients (23%) and 26 patients (65%) required RBC transfusions for anemia. Seven patients (18%) had reversible grade 3/4 nonhematologic complications, primarily related to neurotoxicity. Grade > or = 3 mucositis was absent. CONCLUSION Concurrent administration of weekly vinoralbine and daily G-CSF is feasible and permits an increase in DDI for vinorelbine of 43% to 76% over that reported in series without growth factor support. The response rate, TTP, and survival data are encouraging for therapy given to heavily pretreated patients with metastatic breast cancer. Vinorelbine is not cross-resistant with paclitaxel and should be considered for further trials in the dose-intensified mode made possible by G-CSF, alone or combined with other agents.

scholarly journals Single arm, phase two study of low-dose metronomic eribulin in metastatic breast cancer

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Pavani Chalasani ◽  
Kiah Farr ◽  
Vicky Wu ◽  
Isaac Jenkins ◽  
Alex Liu ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Peripheral Neuropathy ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Low Dose ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival

Abstract Background Treatment options for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) refractory to anthracyclines and taxanes are limited. In a phase III trial, eribulin demonstrated a significant improvement in overall survival compared to treatment of physician’s choice, but had limited tolerability because of neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy. Based on prior studies of alternative treatment schedules with other therapies, we hypothesized that a low-dose metronomic schedule of eribulin would permit patients to remain on treatment more consistently without treatment delays, resulting in longer time to progression, and improved toxicity profile. Methods We conducted a multi-site single arm, phase II trial patients with MBC. All patients were treated with metronomic eribulin (0.9 mg/m2 administered intravenously on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle.) Treatment was continued until the patient developed disease progression, unacceptable toxicity, or chose to stop the study. Patients must have had prior taxane exposure. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival. Secondary end points were overall survival, response rate, and clinical benefit rate. Exploratory biomarkers were performed to analyze change in levels of circulating endothelial cells (CECs), circulating endothelial precursors, and carbonic anhydrase IX (CAIX) with response to therapy. Findings We consented 86 patients and 59 were evaluable for final analysis. Median age was 59 years; 78% had HER2 negative tumors. The median progression-free survival (PFS) was 3.5 months with overall survival (OS) of 14.3 months. Objective response rate was 15% with clinical benefit rate of 48%. Reported grade 3 neutropenia and peripheral neuropathy were 18% and 5%, respectively. Treatment discontinuation due to toxicity was seen in 3% of patients. Interpretation Metronomic weekly low-dose eribulin is an active and tolerable regimen with significantly less myelosuppression, alopecia, and peripheral neuropathy than is seen with the approved dose and schedule, allowing longer duration of use and disease control, with similar outcomes compared to the standard dose regimen.

Phase III Study of Intravenous Vinorelbine in Combination With Epirubicin Versus Epirubicin Alone in Patients With Advanced Breast Cancer: A Scandinavian Breast Group Trial (SBG9403)

2004 ◽  
Vol 22 (12) ◽  
pp. 2313-2320 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Sven T. Langkjer ◽  
Jorn Andersen ◽  
Johanna Sjöström ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Complete Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival

Purpose To determine whether the addition of intravenous (IV) vinorelbine to epirubicin increased the progression-free survival in first-line treatment of metastatic breast cancer. Patients and Methods A total of 387 patients were randomly assigned to receive IV epirubicin 90 mg/m2 on day 1 and vinorelbine 25 mg/m2 on days 1 and 8, or epirubicin 90 mg/m2 IV on day 1. Both regimens were given every 3 weeks for a maximum of 1 year but discontinued prematurely in the event of progressive disease or severe toxicity. In addition, epirubicin was discontinued at a cumulative dose of 1,000 mg/m2 (950 mg/m2 from June 1999). Prior anthracycline-based adjuvant chemotherapy and prior chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer was not allowed. Reported results were all based on intent-to-treat analyses. Results Overall response rates to vinorelbine and epirubicin, and epirubicin alone, were 50% and 42%, respectively (P = .15). The complete response rate was significantly superior in the combination arm (17% v 10%; P = .048) as was median duration of progression-free survival (10.1 months v 8.2 months; P = .019). Median survival was similar in the two arms (19.1 months v 18.0 months; P = .50). Leukopenia related complications, stomatitis, and peripheral neuropathy were more common in the combination arm. The incidences of cardiotoxicity and constipation were similar in both arms. Conclusion Addition of vinorelbine to epirubicin conferred a significant advantage in terms of complete response rate and progression-free survival, but not in terms of survival.

Phase III Trial of Epirubicin Plus Paclitaxel Compared With Epirubicin Plus Cyclophosphamide As First-Line Chemotherapy for Metastatic Breast Cancer: United Kingdom National Cancer Research Institute Trial AB01

2005 ◽  
Vol 23 (33) ◽  
pp. 8322-8330 ◽  
Author(s):  
Ruth E. Langley ◽  
James Carmichael ◽  
Alison L. Jones ◽  
David A. Cameron ◽  
Wendi Qian ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Survival Time ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Line Chemotherapy

Purpose To compare the effectiveness and tolerability of epirubicin and paclitaxel (EP) with epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (EC) as first-line chemotherapy for metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Patients and Methods Patients previously untreated with chemotherapy (except for adjuvant therapy) were randomly assigned to receive either EP (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and paclitaxel 200 mg/m2) or EC (epirubicin 75 mg/m2 and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2) administered intravenously every 3 weeks for a maximum of six cycles. The primary outcome was progression-free survival; secondary outcome measures were overall survival, response rates, and toxicity. Results Between 1996 and 1999, 705 patients (353 EP patients and 352 EC patients) underwent random assignment. Patient characteristics were well matched between the two groups, and 71% of patients received six cycles of treatment. Objective response rates were 65% for the EP group and 55% for the EC group (P = .015). At the time of analysis, 641 patients (91%) had died. Median progression-free survival time was 7.0 months for the EP group and 7.1 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.07; 95% CI, 0.92 to 1.24; P = .41), and median overall survival time was 13 months for the EP group and 14 months for the EC group (hazard ratio = 1.02; 95% CI, 0.87 to 1.19; P = .8). EP patients, compared with EC patients, had more grade 3 and 4 mucositis (6% v 2%, respectively; P = .0006) and grade 3 and 4 neurotoxicity (5% v 1%, respectively; P < .0001). Conclusion In terms of progression-free survival and overall survival, there was no evidence of a difference between EP and EC. The data demonstrate no additional advantage to using EP instead of EC as first-line chemotherapy for MBC in taxane-naïve patients.

The financial impact of trastuzumab in metastatic breast cancer: The experience of the Institut Curie

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 663-663
Author(s):  
M. A. Doz ◽  
C. D. Le Tourneau ◽  
M. S. Guilhaume ◽  
V. Dieras ◽  
A. Vincent-Salomon ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Financial Impact ◽  
Her2 Overexpression ◽  
Breast Cancers ◽  
Financing System ◽  
High Level ◽  
The Cost

663 Purpose: To estimate, in term of public health on the scale of a region, the cost of trastuzumab and to point out the financial impact of this new targeted therapy in the adjuvant setting. Methods: To understand the consequences of the spending on of trastuzumab at a macroeconomic level in the French hospital financing system, we decided to focus on an establishment in particular, and to analyze the increasing spending of trastuzumab at a micro-economic level, to provide a cost analysis of patients treated with trastuzumab for HER2-overexpressing metastatic breast cancer. We retrospectively reviewed 137 medical reports of patients who received trastuzumab either in combination with chemotherapy or as a single agent and in maintenance therapy. Median age of the patients was 52 years (range 32- to 79+). Eighty five percent had 3+ HER2 overexpression and fifteen percent had 2+ HER2 (FISH amplified). Results: Median survival from first treatment with trastuzumab was 38.5 months (range 0,04–53,06+). The cost of the first year treatment is in average €43,435.58 per patient, for the second year €36,419.01 and for the third year €37,198.94. Drugs cost represents 78% of the hospital stays cost for a patient and 2.9% of the budget of Institut Curie. Conclusions: This retrospective analysis showed the very high level of expenses of trastuzumab to treat metastatic breast cancers. With the adjuvant use of trastuzumab, it is expected that these expenses are going to increase exponentially. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Gemcitabine and docetaxel combination regimen in metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1107-1107
Author(s):  
D. Karacetin ◽  
O. Maral ◽  
O. Aksakal ◽  
B. Okten ◽  
B. Yalçın ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Cancer Patients ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Menopausal Status ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Combination Regimen ◽  
Breast Cancer Patients ◽  
Grade 3

1107 Background: No standart chemotherapy regimen has been estabilished for the treatment of patients with metastatic breast cancer. The gemcitabine and docetaxel combination has been shown to be synergistic . This study is conducted to verify the clinical efficacy and safety of gemcitabine and docetaxel combination therapy in metastatic breast cancer. Methods: 27 metastatic breast cancer patients were treated with gemcitabine-docetaxel combination . Gemcitabine 1,250 mg/m2 IV infusion, on day 1 and 8, and docetaxel 70 mg/m2 on day 1 in 21 day cycles. 4–6 cycles of chemotherapy were repeated every 3 weeks. The primary endpoint was response rate, and survival. Results: The median age was 50 years (range,32–77). Performans status (ECOG) was 0–1. Hormone receptor status: ER+/ER-; 11/16, PR+/PR-; 14/13. Menopausal status were: 11 premenopausal, 16 postmenopausal. Of the 27 evaluable patients, there were 11 (40.7%) partial responses and no complete response. Overall response rate was 40.7%. Median time to progression was 7 months, and median survival was 14 months. Toxicities included grade 3–4 neutropenia in 9 (30%), thrombocytopenia in 6 (22%), anemia in 3(9%). There were no treatment releated deaths Conclusions: The combination of gemcitabine and docetaxel has shown favorable toxicity profile and promising activity in metastatic breast cancer patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I trial of escalating doses of weekly everolimus (RAD001) in combination with docetaxel for the treatment of metastatic breast cancer (MBC)

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1066-1066
Author(s):  
S. L. Moulder ◽  
E. Rivera ◽  
J. Ensor ◽  
A. Gonzalez-Angulo ◽  
M. Christofanilli ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Entire Group ◽  
Interpatient Variability ◽  
Grade 3

1066 Background: Inhibition of mTOR with everolimus (E) may improve efficacy in combination with docetaxel (D), but both drugs are metabolized by CYP3A4, thus a pharmacokinetic (PK) interaction may also exist. Methods: 15 patients (pts) with MBC were treated with docetaxel and everolimus using the continuous reassessment method (CRM) to determine maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Docetaxel doses were 40–75 mg/m2 IV on day 1 of a 21 day cycle. Everolimus doses were 20–50 mg PO on days 1 and 8 of a 21 day cycle (except cycle 2, where only day 8 was given to allow single agent PK analyses of both drugs). Response was measured every 2 cycles using RECIST. Results: Median age= 58 years and 77% of pts had >2 prior chemotherapies for MBC. Initially 2 of 2 pts treated (D= 75 mg/m2, E= 30 mg) developed DLT (neutropenic fever/infection), prompting a mandatory PK evaluation for all pts enrolled in subsequent cohorts. A second cohort of 3 patients (D=60 mg/m2, E=20mg) had no DLT, but no pts received day 8 of E due to grade 3–4 neutropenia. PK analyses demonstrated a 42% lowered (-42%) D clearance at the 60 mg/m2 in the presence of E (n=1). Subsequent cohorts were accrued at D=40 mg/m2 with escalating doses of E (Table). For the entire group, an 18% decrease (-18%) in D clearance was observed when D was administered concomitantly with E. High interpatient variability of D clearance was observed (range +16% to -135%). No pts had CR/PR, but 6 had SD>4 cycles and 2 had SD=8 cycles. Conclusions: Weekly everolimus appears to cause widely variable and unpredictable changes in docetaxel clearance making this combination unfeasible. [Table: see text] No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase II study of GW786034 (pazopanib) in patients with recurrent or metastatic invasive breast carcinoma: Results after completion of stage I: A trial of the Princess Margaret Hospital Phase II Consortium

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1133-1133 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. K. Taylor ◽  
S. Chia ◽  
S. Dent ◽  
M. Clemons ◽  
P. Grenci ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Adverse Events ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Progressive Disease ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Lesion Size ◽  
Grade 3

1133 Background: Pazopanib, an oral small molecule inhibitor of VEGFR, PDGFR, and KIT, has demonstrated activity in phase I, with a recommended phase II dose of 800 mg/d (Hurwitz H et al, J Clin Oncol. 2005;23[16 suppl]:3012.1). We evaluated the activity of single agent pazopanib in recurrent or metastatic breast cancer (MBC). Methods: In this 2-stage design, patients with recurrent or MBC received pazopanib 800 mg/d. The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) of 20%. Response in 3 out of 18 patients was required to go to stage 2. Treatment was continued until progression. Results: 21 patients entered stage 1; 67% were ER positive and all were HER-2-negative. Prior lines of chemotherapy were 1 in 76% and 2 in 14%. Of the 19 evaluable patients, 2 patients remain on treatment. 14 (74%) stopped due to progressive disease, 2 (10%) due to adverse events, and 1 (5%) due to patient request. Best response was partial response (PR) in 1 (5%), stable disease (SD) in 11 (58%), and progressive disease in 7 (37%). Clinical benefit rate (CR, PR, or SD for ≥ 6 months) was 26%. Median time to progression (TTP) was 3.7 months (95% C.I. 1.7 months - not reached). 9 out of 18 patients (50%) with measurable target lesions had some decrease in target lesion size. Estimated progression-free survival at 3 months was 55%, and 28% at 6 months. Adverse events were grade 3/4 elevations in AST (14%) and ALT (10%), and grade 3 hypertension and neutropenia (14% each). Other common events were grade 1/2 lymphopenia, neutropenia, diarrhea, fatigue, skin hypopigmentation, hypertension, nausea, vomiting, anorexia, and headache. Conclusions: Pazopanib is well tolerated and demonstrates activity in pretreated breast cancer. While the target ORR of 20% has not been met, rates of SD and TTP are comparable to other active agents in this setting, and therefore pazopanib may be an interesting agent for future studies in breast cancer. [Table: see text]

Paclitaxel plus carboplatin versus paclitaxel plus epirubicin as first-line treatment for metastatic breast cancer: Efficacy and safety results of a randomized, phase III trial.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 1087-1087
Author(s):  
Zhongsheng Tong ◽  
Shufen Li ◽  
Yehui Shi ◽  
Xu Wang ◽  
Chen Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Metastatic Breast Cancer ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Metastatic Breast ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
First Line ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Significant Difference

1087 Background: Paclitaxel/carboplatin combinations are highly active in metastatic breast cancer (MBC). We conducted a randomized, phase III, non-inferiority trial comparing paclitaxel/carboplatin (TP) with paclitaxel/epirubicin (TE) as first-line therapy for MBC. Progression-free survival (PFS) was the primary efficacy endpoint. Secondary endpoints included response rate, overall survival, tolerability, and quality of life (QoL). Methods: From June 2009 to January 2015, 231 patients were randomly assigned, 115 of whom were randomized to TP and 116 to TE. Baseline characteristics were relatively well-balanced in the two treatments. Results: After a median follow-up of 29 months, no significant difference was observed between the two treatments in objective response rate (ORR) (38.3% vs. 39.7%, respectively). Both the progression-free survival (p=0.158) and overall survival (p=0.369) were very similar between the two treatments. Both regimens were well tolerated. The main toxicities were myelosuppression, gastrointestinal reactions, and alopecia. TP showed higher grades 3–4 alopecia and higher nausea (p<0.05). TE showed higher incidence of myelosuppression than TP (p<0.05) (Table). Those patients whose epirubicin cumulative dose was more than 1000 mg/m2 did not suffer worse cardiotoxicity. Conclusions: Our study suggests that TP arm is an effective therapeutic alternative for patients with MBC, especially in those previously exposed to epirubicin in the adjuvant setting. TP has some advantages, such as less cost and less side effects (myelosuppression and fatigue). Clinical trial information: NCT02207361. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document