Treatment-Induced Pathologic Necrosis: A Predictor of Local Recurrence and Survival in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Therapy for High-Grade Extremity Soft Tissue Sarcomas

2001 ◽  
Vol 19 (13) ◽  
pp. 3203-3209 ◽  
Author(s):  
Fritz C. Eilber ◽  
Gerald Rosen ◽  
Jeffery Eckardt ◽  
Charles Forscher ◽  
Scott D. Nelson ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: To determine whether treatment-induced pathologic necrosis correlates with local recurrence and overall survival in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy for high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Four hundred ninety-six patients with intermediate- to high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas received protocol neoadjuvant therapy. All patients underwent surgical resection after neoadjuvant therapy and had pathologic assessment of tumor necrosis in the resected specimens. RESULTS: The 5- and 10-year local recurrence rates for patients with ≥ 95% pathologic necrosis were significantly lower (6% and 11%, respectively) than the local recurrence rates for patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis (17% and 23%, respectively). The 5- and 10-year survival rates for the patients with ≥ 95% pathologic necrosis were significantly higher (80% and 71%, respectively) than the survival rates for the patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis (62% and 55%, respectively). Patients with less than 95% pathologic necrosis were 2.51 times more likely to develop a local recurrence and 1.86 times more likely to die of their disease as compared with patients with ≥ 95% pathologic necrosis. The percentage of patients who achieved ≥ 95% pathologic necrosis increased to 48% with the addition of ifosfamide as compared with 13% of the patients in all the other protocols combined. CONCLUSION: Treatment-induced pathologic necrosis is an independent predictor of both local recurrence and overall survival in patients who receive neoadjuvant therapy for high-grade extremity soft tissue sarcomas. A complete pathologic response (≥ 95% pathologic necrosis) correlated with a significantly lower rate of local recurrence and improved overall survival.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10012-10012
Author(s):  
Ken Herrmann ◽  
Matthias R. Benz ◽  
Johannes Czernin ◽  
Martin Auerbach ◽  
William D. Tap ◽  
...  

10012 Background: Neoadjuvant therapy is associated with considerable toxicity and limited survival benefits in patients with soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We prospectively evaluated whether 18F-FDG PET/CT (PET) imaging after the initial cycle and after end of neoadjuvant therapy could predict overall survival in these patients. Methods: 76 patients (primary STS: n=57; metastatic disease: n=19) with high grade STS were included in this study. PET was performed prior to (n=76), after one cycle (n=52) and after the end of neoadjuvant therapy (n=74). Overall survival was correlated with changes of SUVpeak, RECIST, histopathological response and other parameters predictive of STS survival. Results: One-, two- and five- year survival rates were 95±3.0%, 86±4.6% and 68±6.6% for primary STS. Corresponding one- and two- year survival rates for recurrent/metastatic STS were 77±10.0% and 47±12.1%. Optimal cut-off for early decreases in SUV peak were significant predictors of survival in log-rank test (p=0.027 and p=0.043). However, late decreases in SUV peak were only predictive in primary STS (SUV peak decrease 57%; p=0.035) but not in recurrent/metastatic STS (SUV peak decrease 52%; p=0.057). In primary STS, 7/15 early PET non-responders but only 4/24 early PET responders died during follow up (p=0.068). Conclusions: 18F-FDG-PET seems feasible to predict survival after the initial cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in both patients with primary STS and recurrent/metastatic STS and can potentially serve as an intermediate endpoint biomarker in clinical research and patient care.


2015 ◽  
Vol 39 (5) ◽  
pp. 935-941 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julie Willeumier ◽  
Marta Fiocco ◽  
Remi Nout ◽  
Sander Dijkstra ◽  
William Aston ◽  
...  

1994 ◽  
Vol 12 (6) ◽  
pp. 1137-1149 ◽  
Author(s):  
V Bramwell ◽  
J Rouesse ◽  
W Steward ◽  
A Santoro ◽  
H Schraffordt-Koops ◽  
...  

PURPOSE To evaluate the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy in adult patients with soft tissue sarcomas. The principal end points were freedom from local recurrence and/or metastases and overall survival. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between January 1977 and June 1988, 468 patients entered this randomized study and 317 were considered eligible. Following complete surgical resection with or without radiotherapy, outcome in 145 eligible patients receiving cyclophosphamide 500 mg/m2 intravenously (IV) bolus on day 1, vincristine 1.4 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, doxorubicin (Adriamycin; Adria Laboratories, Columbus, OH) 50 mg/m2 IV bolus on day 1, and dacarbazine (DTIC) 400 mg/m2 by 1-hour infusion on days 1 to 3 (CYVADIC) cycles repeated every 28 days for eight courses was compared with that in 172 control patients. RESULTS With a median follow-up duration of 80 months (range, 39 to 165), actuarial percentage survival figures at 7 years were compared. Relapse-free survival rates were higher for CYVADIC, 56% versus 43% (P = .007), and local recurrence was significantly reduced in the CYVADIC arm at 17% versus 31% (P = .004). In contrast, distant metastases occurred with similar frequency in both arms, 32% for CYVADIC versus 36% for control patients (P = .42), and overall survival rates were not significantly different at 63% versus 56% (P = .64). A reduction in local recurrence was only apparent in the group of head, neck, and trunk sarcomas (P = .002), but not in limb tumors (P = .31). CONCLUSION Adjuvant chemotherapy with CYVADIC cannot be recommended outside the context of a clinical trial. Experience from this study has been used to plan a trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with doxorubicin/ifosfamide, which is currently in progress.


Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (9) ◽  
pp. 2560
Author(s):  
Annika Bilgeri ◽  
Alexander Klein ◽  
Lars H. Lindner ◽  
Silke Nachbichler ◽  
Thomas Knösel ◽  
...  

Background: The significance of surgical margins after resection of soft tissue sarcomas in respect to local-recurrence-free survival and overall survival is evaluated. Methods: A total of 305 patients with deep-seated, G2/3 soft tissue sarcomas (STS) of the extremity, the trunk wall, or the pelvis were reviewed. The margin was defined according to the Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer (FNCLCC) classification system (R0-2), the Union Internationale Contre le Cancer (UICC) classification (R + 1 mm) for which a margin <1 mm is included into the R1 group, and in groups of <1 mm, 1–5 mm, >5 mm, or >10 mm. Results: Of these patients, 31 (10.2%) had a contaminated margin, 64 (21%) a margin of <1 mm, 123 (40.3%) a margin of 1–5 mm, 47 (15.4%) a margin of >5 mm, and 40 (13.1%) a margin of >10 mm. The 5-year local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) was 81.6%. Overall survival (OS) at 5 years was 65.9%. Positive margins worsened LRFS and OS. A margin of >10 mm did not improve LRFS and OS as compared to one of >5 mm. Conclusions: A resection margin of <1 mm showed a trend but not significantly better LRFS or OS compared to a contaminated margin. This finding supports use of the UICC classification. A margin of more than 10 mm did not improve LRFS or OS.


2018 ◽  
Vol 17 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Muhamad Firdaus bin Zainudin

Introduction: Patients with soft tissue sarcoma are treated following the standardized guidelines, however it is not guaranteed patient will remain free from local recurrence (LR) and metastasis. This study was conducted to determine the association between microscopic marginal status with local recurrence, metastasis and the survival of the patient. Materials and Methods: This retrospective study was conducted from January 2015 to December 2017 in Hospital Sultan Ismail, Johor Bahru. All patients underwent complete standadized resection of the tumour and had been follow up for 5 years. An operating and follow-up records of 70 cases who fulfill the inclusion and exclusion criteria were collected and analysed using Pearson chi square test and Kaplan-Meier curves. Results: Of the 70 patients, 52 were males and 18 were females. The age of the patients were between 16 and 73 years with the means age of 48.8 years old. Sixty eight patients underwent limb salvage surgery and 2 had amputation. 42 of them had positive post-operative microscopic surgical margin (PMSM) while 28 were negative. Local recurrence was noted in 28 and metastasis in 30 patients. Patient who had PMSM has higher risk to get local recurrence and metastasis compared to patient with negative margin (p-value <0.001). The overall median survival was 23 months. Overall survival rates for 3 years was 80% and for 5 years was 65%. Conclusion: In our study, patient with positive post-operative microscopic surgical margin had higher possibility to develop local recurrence, metastases and decrease overall survival rate.


Author(s):  
Paolo Spinnato ◽  
Andrea Sambri ◽  
Tomohiro Fujiwara ◽  
Luca Ceccarelli ◽  
Roberta Clinca ◽  
...  

: Myxofibrosarcoma is one of the most common soft tissue sarcomas in the elderly. It is characterized by an extremely high rate of local recurrence, higher than other soft tissue tumors, and a relatively low risk of distant metastases.Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is the imaging modality of choice for the assessment of myxofibrosarcoma and plays a key role in the preoperative setting of these patients.MRI features associated with high risk of local recurrence are: high myxoid matrix content (water-like appearance of the lesions), high grade of contrast enhancement, presence of an infiltrative pattern (“tail sign”). On the other hand, MRI features associated with worse sarcoma specific survival are: large size of the lesion, deep location, high grade of contrast enhancement. Recognizing the above-mentioned imaging features of myxofibrosarcoma may be helpful to stratify the risk for local recurrence and disease-specific survival. Moreover, the surgical planning should be adjusted according to the MRI features


2019 ◽  
Vol 19 (3) ◽  
pp. 281-290
Author(s):  
Rebecca Thorpe ◽  
Heather Drury-Smith

AbstractBackground:This review evaluates whether brachytherapy can be considered as an alternative to whole breast irradiation (WBI) using criteria such as local recurrence rates, overall survival rates and quality of life (QoL) factors. This is an important issue because of a decline in local recurrence rates, suggesting that some women at very low risk of recurrence may be incurring the negative long-term side effects of WBI without benefitting from a reduction in local recurrence and greater overall survival. As such, the purpose of this literature review is to evaluate whether brachytherapy is a credible alternative to external beam radiation with a particular focus on the impact it has on patient QoL.Methods:The search terms used were devised by using the Population Intervention Comparison Outcome framework, and a literature search was carried out using Boolean connectors and Medical Subject Headings in the PubMed database. The resultant articles were manually assessed for relevance and appraised using the Scottish Intercollegiate Guidelines Network tool. Additional papers were sourced from the citations of articles found using the search strategy. Government guidelines and regulations were also used following a manual search on the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence website. This process resulted in a total of 30 sources being included as part of the review.Results:Three types of brachytherapy were the foundation for the majority of the papers found: interstitial multi-catheter brachytherapy, intra-cavity brachytherapy and permanent seed implantation. The key themes that arose from the literature were that brachytherapy is equivalent to WBI both in terms of 5-year local recurrence rates and overall survival rates at 10–12 years. The findings showed that brachytherapy was superior to WBI for some QoL factors such as being less time-consuming and equal in terms of others such as breast cosmesis. The results did also show that brachytherapy does come with its own local toxicities that could impact upon QoL such as the poor breast cosmesis associated with some brachytherapy techniques.Conclusion:In conclusion, brachytherapy was deemed a safe or acceptable alternative to WBI, but there is a need for further research on the long-term local recurrence rates, survival rates and quality of life issues as the volume of evidence is still significantly smaller for brachytherapy than for WBI. Specifically, there needs to be further investigation as to which patients will benefit from being offered brachytherapy and the influence that factors such as co-morbidities, performance status and patient choice play in these decisions.


2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10510-10510
Author(s):  
T. R. Donahue ◽  
M. W. Kattan ◽  
S. D. Nelson ◽  
W. D. Tap ◽  
F. R. Eilber ◽  
...  

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10017-10017
Author(s):  
V. Evilevitch ◽  
W. A. Weber ◽  
W. D. Tap ◽  
K. Chow ◽  
M. Allen-Auerbach ◽  
...  

10017 Background: Change in size by RECIST (Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors) has been the standard to assess response to therapy in non-GIST soft tissue sarcomas (STS). Although recent studies have demonstrated that Positron Emission Tomography with F18-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) may be used to assess response, there has not been a direct comparison between these modalities. The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate whether a change in quantitative FDG-PET or a change in size [computed tomography(CT)] was more accurate at predicting histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy in patients with high grade STS using a combined FDG-PET/CT scan. Methods: From 1/05 - 12/06 58 patients with resectable biopsy proven high grade STS scheduled to undergo neoadjuvant chemotherapy were prospectively enrolled in this study. Patients underwent FDG-PET/CT prior to and after neoadjuvant treatment (prior to surgery). Tumor FDG-uptake was quantified by standardized uptake values (SUV). Changes in tumor size were quantified according to RECIST. Following tumor resection, response was assessed histopathologically. Patients with = 10% viable tumor cells were classified as responders. To date, 36 patients have completed the study and are the subject of this analysis. Results: In histopathologic responders (n=10, 28%), reduction of tumor FDG-uptake was significantly greater (-64%) than in histopathologic non-responders (-37%), (p=0.005). Using a 50% decrease in tumor SUV as a threshold value resulted in a sensitivity of 90% and a specificity of 58% for assessment of histopathologic response (p=0.01). Response assessment per RECIST showed no significant correlation with histopathologic response (sensitivity 20%, specificity 89%, p=0.4). There was no correlation between changes in tumor size and histopathologic response (area under the ROC curve = 0.6, p=0.1). Conclusions: In patients with high grade STS, quantitative FDG-PET was significantly more accurate than size based criteria for assessment of histopathologic response to neoadjuvant therapy. FDG-PET should be considered as a modality to monitor treatment response is patients with high grade STS. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document