scholarly journals Shortened First-Line High-Dose Chemotherapy for Patients With Poor-Prognosis Aggressive Lymphoma

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2472-2479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Gisselbrecht ◽  
Eric Lepage ◽  
Thierry Molina ◽  
Bruno Quesnel ◽  
Georges Fillet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

PURPOSE: Randomized trial LNH93-3 was conducted on patients who had poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma and were younger than 60 years with two to three factors of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index to evaluate the benefit of early high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized between doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone (ACVBP) chemotherapy followed by sequential consolidation and an experimental shortened treatment consisting of three cycles with escalated doses of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone and collection of peripheral-blood stem cells. On day 60, HDT was administered with 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan followed by ASCT. RESULTS: Eligible patients (n = 370) with aggressive lymphoma were analyzed. For ACVBP (181 patients) and HDT (189 patients), respective complete remission rates were 64% and 63%. With a median follow-up of 60 months, 5-year overall survival and event-free survival for ACVBP and HDT were 60% ± 8% and 46% ± 8% (P = .007) and 52 ± 8% and 39 ± 8% (P = .01), respectively. Survival was independently affected by age greater than 40 years (P = .0003), T-cell phenotype (P = .009), bone marrow involvement (P = .003), and HDT treatment group (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Early HDT with ASCT in high-risk patients was inferior to the ACVBP chemotherapy regimen. These results indicate that the received dose-intensity before HDT was too low when compared with ACVBP and HDT and was given too early.

Clinical and prognostic significance of bone marrow involvement in patients with diffuse aggressive B-cell lymphoma.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (6) ◽  
pp. 1336-1342 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Yan ◽  
W C Chan ◽  
D D Weisenburger ◽  
J R Anderson ◽  
M A Bast ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Bone Marrow ◽  
B Cell ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Significance ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Term Survival

PURPOSE We studied the effect of morphology and extent of bone marrow (BM) infiltrate on the survival of patients with diffuse aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), along with clinical features. PATIENTS AND METHODS Sixty adult patients with diffuse aggressive B-cell NHL and BM involvement at the time of presentation were studied. All patients were uniformly staged and treated with a curative high-dose chemotherapy regimen. BM involvement was assessed according to the cytology, pattern of infiltration, and extent of involvement, and was correlated with overall survival (OS) and failure-free survival (FFS). RESULTS Patients with BM involvement that consisted of > or = 50% large cells or BM involvement of > or = 70% had a poorer OS (P = .065 and P = .055, respectively). Those who presented with an infiltrate of less than 50% large cells and an international prognostic index (IPI) of < or = 3 had a significantly longer postrelapse survival time (P = .003). A diffuse or interstitial pattern of BM involvement was predictive of both poor OS and FFS (P = .008 and .009, respectively). Multivariate analysis indicated that only IPI (P = .0005) and pattern of BM infiltration (P = .009) were independent predictors of OS, and only the former was predictive of FFS (P = .03). CONCLUSION The IPI is predictive of OS and FFS, while BM involvement with a diffuse or interstitial pattern is associated with significantly poorer OS. Patients with BM infiltration that involved > or = 70% of the marrow or contained > or = 50% large cells had poor OS, but more patients need to be studied to determine the significance. Two parameters, IPI < or = 3 and BM large cells less than 50%, identify a group of patients with long-term survival after relapse.

Treatment Outcome of Aggressive Lymphoma with CyclOBEAP (CHOP-Like + Etoposide and Bleomycin): Results of Multicenter Trial.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3303-3303
Author(s):  
Masataka Okamoto ◽  
Nozomi Niitsu ◽  
Sadao Aoki ◽  
Yasunobu Kuraishi ◽  
Hirokazu Okumura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Liver Damage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Total Period

Abstract Introduction: To improve treatment outcome in aggressive lymphoma, a CHOP-like regimen with added etoposide and bleomycin was studied. Patients and Methods: Between April 1997 and March 2003, 126 consecutive patients (pts) with aggressive lymphoma of low-intermediate to high risk disease according to the age adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), age<61 years, and performance status(ECOG)<3 were treated with CyclOBEAP. MCL and ATL/L were excluded from this study. CyclOBEAP was a weekly protocol for a total period of 12 weeks. It consisted of doxorubicin 50mg/m2 given every 2 weeks in combination with either cyclophosphamide 1,000mg/m2 (weeks 1, 5, 9) or etoposide 70mg/m2 qd x4 (weeks 3, 7, 11). During the alternative weeks non-myelosuppressive vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (max. 2.0mg/body) was given either with bleomycin 10mg/m2 (weeks 2, 6, 10) or alone (weeks 4,8,12). Prednisolone 40mg/m2 was administered daily for 14 days during weeks 1–2, 5–6, and 9–10. Protocol dose intensity relative to that of CHOP was 1.5 for DXR, VCR and 1.0 for CPA. G-CSF was prophylactically used. Pts who had had a bulky disease at presentation received 40Gy of local irradiation after chemotherapy. Results: One hundred twenty-six pts were enrolled and 5 were excluded from analysis; 3 due to change of diagnosis ( ATL/L, Hodgkin lymphoma, germ cell tumor), 1 due to PS4 and the other due to drop out. In 121 eligible pts (DLBCL 94, PTCL 11, ALCL 7, nasal NK/T 4, others 5), 7 pts did not complete the full course of the treatment because of pneumonia (3), liver damage (1), intrathoracic hemorrhage (1), and PD response at 8th week (2). Relative given dose intensity was 0.94 for DXR, 0.95 for CPA, 0.86 for VCR, 0.94 for VP16, and 0.96 for BLM. All pts were evaluated. CR (including cCR) was obtained in 106 (88%), PR in 11 and NC/PD in 4. No treatment related death was observed. With a median follow-up of 56 months, 5yr overall survival (OS) rate is 72% and progression-free survival (PFS) rate is 62%. The 5yr OS and PFS within the subgroups defined by IPI and in pts with DLBCL and PTCL are not significantly different (data shown in the table). WHO grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 91 pts and thrombocytepenia in 13 pts. 66 pts required 2 or more units of red cell transfusions (2 – 66 units). Liver damage of grade 3 to 4 was seen in 3 pts. Conclusions: Addition of etoposide and bleomycin to CHOP drugs may enhance the effect of CHOP for aggressive lymphoma, encouraging comparative study between the two treatments. n CR (%) 5yr OS 5yr PFS *OS:Log-Rank 0.578; Wilcoxson 0.616 *PFS:Log-Rank 0.552; Wilcoxson 0.573 #OS:Log-Rank 0.049; Wilcoxson 0.059 #PFS:Log-Rank 0.122; Wilcoxson 0.146 All 121 106 ( 88) 72 % 62 % IPI: L-I* 41 37 ( 90) 69 65 IPI: H-I* 62 56 ( 90) 71 55 IPI: H* 18 13 ( 72) 82 43 DLBCL# 94 82 ( 87) 70 58 PTCL# 11 11 (100) 100 82

Tandem Autotransplants’ Peripheral Blood Stem Cells Following Sequent High-Dose CHEOP Chemotherapy for Aggressive Lymphoma.

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 5510-5510
Author(s):  
Yi Luo ◽  
He Huang ◽  
Zhen Cai ◽  
Maofang Lin
Keyword(s):  
Stem Cells ◽  
Peripheral Blood ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Sequential Chemotherapy ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Single High Dose ◽  
Blood Stem Cells ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract The majority of poor-risk lymphoma patients are not cured with conventional chemotherapy. There is evidence for superiority of single high-dose chemotherapy in such patients, but many still die from recurrent disease. Strategies to improve survival in these poor-risk patients include dose-intensification with high-dose chemotherapy and PBSC support autologous transplantation. These more aggressive strategies are feasible and tolerable. Whether tandem transplantation will prove more effective than current single high-dose therapy in appropriately selected patients remains to be determined. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the effectivity and safety of mobilization regimen, and the effectivity and tolerance of sequential chemotherapy combined with tandem autotransplant in aggressive lymphoma. In this study, the clinical data of 5 patients with recurrent, aggressive lymphoma treated with of sequential chemotherapy combined with tandem autotransplant were analysed respectively. The group included 1 HD and 4 NHL. Mobilization regimen was CHOEP combined with G-CSF (5ug•kg−1•d−1). The conditioning regimen for the tandem transplantation was high-dose CHEOP. The interval of the two autotransplantation was 9(5~31)weeks. In tandem autotransplant, the cell number of MNC which was transfused was 3.05 (ranged from 1.91~4.14) ×108 •kg−1 and 3.55 (ranged from 2.23~6.0) ×108•kg−1; CD34+ was 4.11 (ranged from 2.59~4.94) ×106•kg−1 and 5.70 (ranged from 2.77~10.6) ×106•kg−1; CFU-GM was 2.96 (ranged from 2.01~4.54) ×105•kg−1 and 2.44 (ranged from 1.78~2.9) ×105•kg−1 respectively (P&gt;0.05). All patients reached prompt and sustained hemotopoietic reconstitution. The interval of ANC ≥0.5×109/L was 10 days (ranged from 8~12) and 10.5 days (ranged from 9~12); Pt ≥2.0×109/L was 11 days (ranged from 10~14) and 12.5 days (ranged from 10~15) respectively (P&gt;0.05). Four patients were alive while 3 was in disease-free with median 46 (range 9~88) months. The overall survival was 80%, and the disease-free survival was 60%. In the conclusion, the method of sequential high-dose CHEOP chemotherapy combined with tandem autotransplant of peripheral blood stem cells for aggressive lymphoma is safe and effective.

scholarly journals Immunophenotypic Landscape and Prognosis of Diffuse Large B-Cell Lymphoma with MYC/BCL2 Double Expression: An Analysis of A Prospectively Immunoprofiled Cohort

Cancers ◽  
2020 ◽  
Vol 12 (11) ◽  
pp. 3305
Author(s):  
Bogyeong Han ◽  
Sehui Kim ◽  
Jiwon Koh ◽  
Jeemin Yim ◽  
Cheol Lee ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Response To Therapy ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL) patients with MYC/BCL2 double expression (DE) show poor prognosis and their clinical outcomes after R-CHOP therapy vary immensely. We investigated the prognostic value of DE in aggressive B-cell lymphoma patients (n = 461), including those with DLBCL (n = 417) and high-grade B-cell lymphoma (HGBL; n = 44), in a prospectively immunoprofiled cohort. DE was observed in 27.8% of DLBCLs and 43.2% of HGBLs (p = 0.058). DE-DLBCL patients were older (p = 0.040) and more frequently exhibited elevated serum LDH levels (p = 0.002), higher international prognostic index (IPI; p = 0.042), non-germinal-center B-cell phenotype (p < 0.001), and poor response to therapy (p = 0.042) compared to non-DE-DLBCL patients. In R-CHOP-treated DLBCL patients, DE status predicted poor PFS and OS independently of IPI (p < 0.001 for both). Additionally, in DE-DLBCL patients, older age (>60 years; p = 0.017), involvement of ≥2 extranodal sites (p = 0.021), bone marrow involvement (p = 0.001), high IPI (p = 0.017), CD10 expression (p = 0.006), poor performance status (p = 0.028), and elevated LDH levels (p < 0.001) were significantly associated with poor OS. Notably, DE-DLBCL patients with normal LDH levels exhibited similar PFS and OS to those of patients with non-DE-DLBCL. Our findings suggest that MYC/BCL2 DE predicts poor prognosis in DLBCL. Risk stratification of DE-DLBCL patients based on LDH levels may guide clinical decision-making for DE-DLBCL patients.

scholarly journals Is there any role for transplantation in the rituximab era for diffuse large B-cell lymphoma?

Hematology ◽  
2012 ◽  
Vol 2012 (1) ◽  
pp. 410-416 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Gisselbrecht
Keyword(s):  
B Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Large B Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Large B Cell

Abstract Salvage chemotherapy followed by high-dose therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation is the standard of treatment for chemosensitive relapses in diffuse large B-cell lymphoma. The addition of rituximab to chemotherapy has improved the response rate and failure-free survival after first-line treatment and relapses. Fewer relapses are expected, although there is no consensus on the best salvage regimen. The intergroup Collaborative Trial in Relapsed Aggressive Lymphoma (CORAL) set the limits for this standard of treatment after first comparing 2 salvage regimens: rituximab, ifosfamide, etoposide, and carboplatin (R-ICE) and rituximab, dexamethasone, aracytine, and cisplatin (R-DHAP). There was no difference in response rates or survivals between these salvage regimens. Several factors affected survival: prior treatment with rituximab, early relapse (< 12 months), and a secondary International Prognostic Index score of 2-3. For patients with 2 factors, the response rate to salvage was only 46%, which identified easily a group with poor outcome. Moreover, patients with an ABC subtype or c-MYC translocation responded poorly to treatment. More than 70% of patients will not benefit from standard salvage therapy, and continued progress is needed. Studies evaluating immunotherapy after transplantation, including allotransplantation, new conditioning regimens with radioimmunotherapy and other combinations of chemotherapy based on diffuse large B-cell lymphoma subtype, are discussed herein. Early relapses and/or patients refractory to upfront rituximab-based chemotherapy have a poor response rate and prognosis. A better biological understanding of these patients and new approaches are warranted.

Effective therapy for poor-prognosis non-Hodgkin's lymphoma with 8 weeks of high-dose-intensity combination chemotherapy.

1993 ◽  
Vol 11 (5) ◽  
pp. 943-949 ◽  
Author(s):  
T M Waits ◽  
F A Greco ◽  
J P Greer ◽  
D H Johnson ◽  
S N Wolff ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
High Dose Intensity

PURPOSE Despite substantial advances in the treatment of aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma, therapeutic results with conventional regimens remain poor in some subsets of patients. In an attempt to improve the prognosis of such patients we used an 8-week, multidrug chemotherapy regimen of high dose-intensity. PATIENTS AND METHODS Between April 1986 and April 1991, 70 patients with advanced intermediate- or high-grade non-Hodgkin's lymphoma were treated. The median age was 41 years (range, 18 to 69). Fifty-one patients (73%) had stage IV disease; 37 (53%) were Shipp's category 3; 17 (24%) had small noncleaved-cell lymphoma; 35 (50%) had Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status > or = 2; 24 (34%) had two or more extranodal sites involved; and 17 (24%) had bone marrow involvement. The 8-week regimen included cyclophosphamide, etoposide, doxorubicin, vincristine, bleomycin, methotrexate with leucovorin rescue, and prednisone. RESULTS Sixty-two of 70 patients completed the regimen as planned. Fifty-seven patients (81%) obtained a complete response (CR) and the actuarial 5-year failure-free survival rate is 52%. Thirty-seven patients remain alive and disease-free a median of 35 months (range, 7 to 68) after therapy. Adverse prognostic factors included age more than 50 years, bone marrow involvement, and serum lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) more than 500 IU/L (normal range, 125 to 250). Myelosuppression was responsible for most of the treatment-related toxicity. Severe leukopenia (< 1,000/microL) occurred in all patients and lasted a median of 9 days. Seven patients (10%) died of myelosuppression-related complications; five of these patients were older than 60 years. CONCLUSION This brief but intensive therapy was effective in treating poor-prognosis patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma. With this therapy, patients with small noncleaved-cell lymphoma or Shipp's category 3 disease had treatment outcome similar to the group as a whole. This therapy was not well tolerated by patients older than 60 years, and should not be given to this subgroup. Verification of these results in a randomized trial setting is indicated.

Randomized Comparison of ACVBP and m-BACOD in the Treatment of Patients With Low-Risk Aggressive Lymphoma: The LNH87-1 Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1309-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Tilly ◽  
Nicolas Mounier ◽  
Pierre Lederlin ◽  
Josette Brière ◽  
Brigitte Dupriez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Standard Regimen

PURPOSE: To compare a short intensified regimen followed by sequential consolidation therapy (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone [ACVBP]) to the standard regimen of methotrexate, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (m-BACOD) in patients with low-risk aggressive lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 752 patients with intermediate- or high-grade lymphoma and no adverse prognostic factors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 to 4, ≥ two extranodal sites of disease, tumor burden ≥ 10 cm in largest dimension, bone marrow or CNS involvement, Burkitt’s or lymphoblastic subtypes) were registered. Of 673 eligible patients, 332 received ACVBP and 341 received m-BACOD. RESULTS: The complete remission rate was identical (86%) in the two groups. With a median follow-up duration of 7 years, the 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) rate was 65% in the ACVBP group and 61% in the m-BACOD group (P = .16). The 5-year overall survival rate was 75% in the ACVBP group and 73% in the m-BACOD group (P = .47). ACVBP was responsible for more severe and life-threatening infections (P < .01), but m-BACOD caused more pulmonary toxicity (P < .001). The number of treatment-related deaths did not differ between the two regimens. A multivariate analysis indicated that ACVBP was associated with a longer FFS in patients with two or three risk factors of the International Prognostic Index. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with low-risk aggressive lymphoma, toxicities of the regimens are different, but the rates of response and survival are identical. The survival advantage of ACVBP over standard regimen in patients with advanced disease is suggested by this analysis but remains to be assessed in prospective studies specifically designed for this purpose.

First-MIND: A phase Ib, open-label, randomized study to assess safety of tafasitamab (tafa) or tafa + lenalidomide (LEN) in addition to R-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7540-7540
Author(s):  
David Belada ◽  
Katerina Kopeckova ◽  
Juan Miguel Bergua ◽  
Marc André ◽  
Ernesto Perez Persona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Ecog Ps

7540 Background: Tafasitamab is a humanized, Fc-modified anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody that enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis. It is FDA-approved with LEN for adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. First-MIND (NCT04134936) is a Phase Ib, open-label, randomized study of tafa + R-CHOP or tafa + LEN + R-CHOP in newly diagnosed DLBCL. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥18 years, treatment-naïve, with histologically confirmed DLBCL not otherwise specified, international prognostic index (IPI) 2–5 and ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2. Pts with known double- or triple-hit and transformed lymphoma were excluded. Treatment (Tx) comprised six 21-day cycles of tafa (12 mg/kg IV, Day [D] 1, 8, 15) + R-CHOP (arm A) or tafa (12 mg/kg IV, D1, 8, 15) + LEN (25 mg orally, D1–10) + R-CHOP (arm B). G-CSF and VTE prophylaxis was mandatory. Primary objective is safety; secondary objectives are ORR, PET-CR rate at end of Tx, PFS, long-term safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity. Results: From Dec 2019 to Aug 2020, 83 pts were screened in Europe and the US; 66 were randomized (33 per arm). Data cut-off for this analysis: 9 Dec 2020; study is ongoing. Median age was 64.5 years (range 20–86). Overall, 30% (20/66) of pts were ≥70 years and many had high-risk disease: IPI 2 29%, IPI 3 46%, IPI 4 26%. ECOG PS: 47% of pts were ECOG PS 0, 44% PS 1, 9% PS 2. Most pts had stage III/IV disease (92%); 46% had bulky disease. All pts experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 54.5% and 12.1% (arm A) and 66.7% and 30.3% (arm B) of pts, respectively (Table). Serious TEAEs occurred in 42.4% (arm A) and 51.5% (arm B) of pts. There were three deaths, unrelated to tafa and/or LEN (sepsis, urosepsis, and COVID-19 pneumonia). R-CHOP dose intensity was maintained in both arms. Among 60 pts who completed tumor assessments after cycle 3, ORR was 89.7% (arm A) and 93.5% (arm B). Conclusions: These data suggest R-CHOP + tafa or tafa + LEN is tolerable in pts with Tx-naïve DLBCL and that R-CHOP dosing is not affected. Toxicities are similar to those expected with R-CHOP or R-CHOP + LEN. Updated safety and early efficacy data will be presented at the conference. Clinical trial information: NCT04134936. [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document