Treatment Outcome of Aggressive Lymphoma with CyclOBEAP (CHOP-Like + Etoposide and Bleomycin): Results of Multicenter Trial.

Blood ◽  
2004 ◽  
Vol 104 (11) ◽  
pp. 3303-3303
Author(s):  
Masataka Okamoto ◽  
Nozomi Niitsu ◽  
Sadao Aoki ◽  
Yasunobu Kuraishi ◽  
Hirokazu Okumura ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Liver Damage ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Who Grade ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Total Period

Abstract Introduction: To improve treatment outcome in aggressive lymphoma, a CHOP-like regimen with added etoposide and bleomycin was studied. Patients and Methods: Between April 1997 and March 2003, 126 consecutive patients (pts) with aggressive lymphoma of low-intermediate to high risk disease according to the age adjusted International Prognostic Index (IPI), age<61 years, and performance status(ECOG)<3 were treated with CyclOBEAP. MCL and ATL/L were excluded from this study. CyclOBEAP was a weekly protocol for a total period of 12 weeks. It consisted of doxorubicin 50mg/m2 given every 2 weeks in combination with either cyclophosphamide 1,000mg/m2 (weeks 1, 5, 9) or etoposide 70mg/m2 qd x4 (weeks 3, 7, 11). During the alternative weeks non-myelosuppressive vincristine 1.4mg/m2 (max. 2.0mg/body) was given either with bleomycin 10mg/m2 (weeks 2, 6, 10) or alone (weeks 4,8,12). Prednisolone 40mg/m2 was administered daily for 14 days during weeks 1–2, 5–6, and 9–10. Protocol dose intensity relative to that of CHOP was 1.5 for DXR, VCR and 1.0 for CPA. G-CSF was prophylactically used. Pts who had had a bulky disease at presentation received 40Gy of local irradiation after chemotherapy. Results: One hundred twenty-six pts were enrolled and 5 were excluded from analysis; 3 due to change of diagnosis ( ATL/L, Hodgkin lymphoma, germ cell tumor), 1 due to PS4 and the other due to drop out. In 121 eligible pts (DLBCL 94, PTCL 11, ALCL 7, nasal NK/T 4, others 5), 7 pts did not complete the full course of the treatment because of pneumonia (3), liver damage (1), intrathoracic hemorrhage (1), and PD response at 8th week (2). Relative given dose intensity was 0.94 for DXR, 0.95 for CPA, 0.86 for VCR, 0.94 for VP16, and 0.96 for BLM. All pts were evaluated. CR (including cCR) was obtained in 106 (88%), PR in 11 and NC/PD in 4. No treatment related death was observed. With a median follow-up of 56 months, 5yr overall survival (OS) rate is 72% and progression-free survival (PFS) rate is 62%. The 5yr OS and PFS within the subgroups defined by IPI and in pts with DLBCL and PTCL are not significantly different (data shown in the table). WHO grade 4 neutropenia was observed in 91 pts and thrombocytepenia in 13 pts. 66 pts required 2 or more units of red cell transfusions (2 – 66 units). Liver damage of grade 3 to 4 was seen in 3 pts. Conclusions: Addition of etoposide and bleomycin to CHOP drugs may enhance the effect of CHOP for aggressive lymphoma, encouraging comparative study between the two treatments. n CR (%) 5yr OS 5yr PFS *OS:Log-Rank 0.578; Wilcoxson 0.616 *PFS:Log-Rank 0.552; Wilcoxson 0.573 #OS:Log-Rank 0.049; Wilcoxson 0.059 #PFS:Log-Rank 0.122; Wilcoxson 0.146 All 121 106 ( 88) 72 % 62 % IPI: L-I* 41 37 ( 90) 69 65 IPI: H-I* 62 56 ( 90) 71 55 IPI: H* 18 13 ( 72) 82 43 DLBCL# 94 82 ( 87) 70 58 PTCL# 11 11 (100) 100 82

First-MIND: A phase Ib, open-label, randomized study to assess safety of tafasitamab (tafa) or tafa + lenalidomide (LEN) in addition to R-CHOP in patients with newly diagnosed DLBCL.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7540-7540
Author(s):  
David Belada ◽  
Katerina Kopeckova ◽  
Juan Miguel Bergua ◽  
Marc André ◽  
Ernesto Perez Persona ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Randomized Study ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Phase Ib ◽  
Ecog Ps

7540 Background: Tafasitamab is a humanized, Fc-modified anti-CD19 monoclonal antibody that enhances antibody-dependent cellular cytotoxicity and phagocytosis. It is FDA-approved with LEN for adult patients (pts) with relapsed/refractory (R/R) DLBCL ineligible for autologous stem cell transplantation. First-MIND (NCT04134936) is a Phase Ib, open-label, randomized study of tafa + R-CHOP or tafa + LEN + R-CHOP in newly diagnosed DLBCL. Methods: Eligible pts were ≥18 years, treatment-naïve, with histologically confirmed DLBCL not otherwise specified, international prognostic index (IPI) 2–5 and ECOG performance status (PS) 0–2. Pts with known double- or triple-hit and transformed lymphoma were excluded. Treatment (Tx) comprised six 21-day cycles of tafa (12 mg/kg IV, Day [D] 1, 8, 15) + R-CHOP (arm A) or tafa (12 mg/kg IV, D1, 8, 15) + LEN (25 mg orally, D1–10) + R-CHOP (arm B). G-CSF and VTE prophylaxis was mandatory. Primary objective is safety; secondary objectives are ORR, PET-CR rate at end of Tx, PFS, long-term safety, pharmacokinetics, immunogenicity. Results: From Dec 2019 to Aug 2020, 83 pts were screened in Europe and the US; 66 were randomized (33 per arm). Data cut-off for this analysis: 9 Dec 2020; study is ongoing. Median age was 64.5 years (range 20–86). Overall, 30% (20/66) of pts were ≥70 years and many had high-risk disease: IPI 2 29%, IPI 3 46%, IPI 4 26%. ECOG PS: 47% of pts were ECOG PS 0, 44% PS 1, 9% PS 2. Most pts had stage III/IV disease (92%); 46% had bulky disease. All pts experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Grade ≥3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia occurred in 54.5% and 12.1% (arm A) and 66.7% and 30.3% (arm B) of pts, respectively (Table). Serious TEAEs occurred in 42.4% (arm A) and 51.5% (arm B) of pts. There were three deaths, unrelated to tafa and/or LEN (sepsis, urosepsis, and COVID-19 pneumonia). R-CHOP dose intensity was maintained in both arms. Among 60 pts who completed tumor assessments after cycle 3, ORR was 89.7% (arm A) and 93.5% (arm B). Conclusions: These data suggest R-CHOP + tafa or tafa + LEN is tolerable in pts with Tx-naïve DLBCL and that R-CHOP dosing is not affected. Toxicities are similar to those expected with R-CHOP or R-CHOP + LEN. Updated safety and early efficacy data will be presented at the conference. Clinical trial information: NCT04134936. [Table: see text]

Randomized Comparison of ACVBP and m-BACOD in the Treatment of Patients With Low-Risk Aggressive Lymphoma: The LNH87-1 Study

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (6) ◽  
pp. 1309-1315 ◽  
Author(s):  
Hervé Tilly ◽  
Nicolas Mounier ◽  
Pierre Lederlin ◽  
Josette Brière ◽  
Brigitte Dupriez ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Group Performance ◽  
Remission Rate ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Tumor Burden ◽  
Low Risk ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Standard Regimen

PURPOSE: To compare a short intensified regimen followed by sequential consolidation therapy (doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone [ACVBP]) to the standard regimen of methotrexate, bleomycin, cyclophosphamide, and etoposide (m-BACOD) in patients with low-risk aggressive lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 752 patients with intermediate- or high-grade lymphoma and no adverse prognostic factors (Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 2 to 4, ≥ two extranodal sites of disease, tumor burden ≥ 10 cm in largest dimension, bone marrow or CNS involvement, Burkitt’s or lymphoblastic subtypes) were registered. Of 673 eligible patients, 332 received ACVBP and 341 received m-BACOD. RESULTS: The complete remission rate was identical (86%) in the two groups. With a median follow-up duration of 7 years, the 5-year failure-free survival (FFS) rate was 65% in the ACVBP group and 61% in the m-BACOD group (P = .16). The 5-year overall survival rate was 75% in the ACVBP group and 73% in the m-BACOD group (P = .47). ACVBP was responsible for more severe and life-threatening infections (P < .01), but m-BACOD caused more pulmonary toxicity (P < .001). The number of treatment-related deaths did not differ between the two regimens. A multivariate analysis indicated that ACVBP was associated with a longer FFS in patients with two or three risk factors of the International Prognostic Index. CONCLUSION: In this population of patients with low-risk aggressive lymphoma, toxicities of the regimens are different, but the rates of response and survival are identical. The survival advantage of ACVBP over standard regimen in patients with advanced disease is suggested by this analysis but remains to be assessed in prospective studies specifically designed for this purpose.

scholarly journals Shortened First-Line High-Dose Chemotherapy for Patients With Poor-Prognosis Aggressive Lymphoma

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2472-2479 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Gisselbrecht ◽  
Eric Lepage ◽  
Thierry Molina ◽  
Bruno Quesnel ◽  
Georges Fillet ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Poor Prognosis ◽  
Bone Marrow Involvement ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
High Dose Chemotherapy ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Phenotype ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Peripheral Blood Stem Cells

PURPOSE: Randomized trial LNH93-3 was conducted on patients who had poor-prognosis aggressive lymphoma and were younger than 60 years with two to three factors of the age-adjusted International Prognostic Index to evaluate the benefit of early high-dose therapy (HDT) with autologous stem-cell transplantation (ASCT). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients were randomized between doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone (ACVBP) chemotherapy followed by sequential consolidation and an experimental shortened treatment consisting of three cycles with escalated doses of cyclophosphamide, epirubicin, vindesine, bleomycin, and prednisone and collection of peripheral-blood stem cells. On day 60, HDT was administered with 1,3-bis(2-chloroethyl)-1-nitrosourea, etoposide, cytarabine, and melphalan followed by ASCT. RESULTS: Eligible patients (n = 370) with aggressive lymphoma were analyzed. For ACVBP (181 patients) and HDT (189 patients), respective complete remission rates were 64% and 63%. With a median follow-up of 60 months, 5-year overall survival and event-free survival for ACVBP and HDT were 60% ± 8% and 46% ± 8% (P = .007) and 52 ± 8% and 39 ± 8% (P = .01), respectively. Survival was independently affected by age greater than 40 years (P = .0003), T-cell phenotype (P = .009), bone marrow involvement (P = .003), and HDT treatment group (P = .04). CONCLUSION: Early HDT with ASCT in high-risk patients was inferior to the ACVBP chemotherapy regimen. These results indicate that the received dose-intensity before HDT was too low when compared with ACVBP and HDT and was given too early.

scholarly journals Clinical characteristics and outcomes of primary versus secondary gastrointestinal mantle cell lymphoma

2021 ◽  
Vol 11 (1) ◽  
Author(s):  
Alessia Castellino ◽  
Aung M. Tun ◽  
Yucai Wang ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Rebecca L. King ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Mantle Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Cell Lymphoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Local Therapy ◽  
Progression Free Survival ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Multiple Lesions ◽  
Mantle Cell

AbstractPrimary gastrointestinal (GI) mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) is rare and the optimal management is unknown. We reviewed 800 newly diagnosed MCL cases and found 22 primary (2.8%) and 79 (9.9%) secondary GI MCL cases. Age, sex, and performance status were similar between primary and secondary cases. Secondary cases had more elevations in lactate dehydrogenase (28% vs 0%, P = 0.03) and a trend for a higher MCL international prognostic index (P = 0.07). Observation or local therapy was more common for primary GI MCL (29% vs 8%, P < 0.01), and autologous stem-cell transplant was more common for secondary GI MCL (35% vs 14%, P < 0.05). The median follow-up was 85 months. Primary and secondary GI MCL had similar 5-year progression-free survival (PFS) (30% vs 28%, P = 0.59) and overall survival (OS) (65% vs 66%, P = 0.83). The extent of GI involvement in primary GI MCL affected treatment selection but not outcome, with a 5-year PFS of 43% vs 14% vs 31% (P = 0.48) and OS of 57% vs 71% vs 69% (P = 0.54) in cases with single lesion vs multiple lesions in 1 organ vs multiple lesions in ≥2 organs. Less aggressive frontline treatment for primary GI MCL is reasonable. It is unknown whether more aggressive treatment can result in improved outcomes.

Real-world (RW) treatment (tx) patterns and outcomes of 3,455 previously untreated mantle cell lymphoma (MCL) patients (pts) in U.S. routine clinical practice.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 7504-7504
Author(s):  
Peter Martin ◽  
Michael Wang ◽  
Anita Kumar ◽  
Keqin Qi ◽  
Katherine Daly ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
High Risk ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Community Setting ◽  
Cell Transplant ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Non Hodgkin Lymphoma ◽  
Community Oncology ◽  
Mantle Cell ◽  
Ecog Ps

7504 Background: MCL is a non-Hodgkin lymphoma with heterogeneous biology and outcomes. We characterized RW tx patterns and outcomes of MCL pts to identify factors associated with outcomes in the US. Methods: This retrospective study included adult MCL pts diagnosed Jan 2011-Nov 2020 in the nationwide Flatiron Health EHR-derived deidentified database. Pt characteristics, tx patterns, time to next tx (rwTTNT, defined as start of first-line [1L] tx to subsequent tx or death) and rwOS were evaluated. Results: 3455 pts were included, 85.3% from a community oncology setting. In 2946 (85.2%) pts with documented 1L MCL tx, median age was 69.5 y (range 27.7-85.3); 9.5% had blastoid/pleomorphic MCL. 262 (39.6%) and 235 (35.6%) of 661 pts with available MCL international prognostic index (MIPI) had intermediate and high risk, respectively. 150/1253 pts (12.0%) with available ECOG PS had PS ≥ 2. Chemoimmunotherapy was the most common 1L tx, including BR in 1223 (41.5%), R-CHOP in 512 (17.4%) and cytarabine (ara-C)-containing tx in 414 (14.1%). 667 pts received R maintenance (MR). In 1036 pts < 65 y, 243 pts received 1L stem cell transplant (SCT), mainly autologous. In 1L-treated pts, with median follow-up of survivors of 45.3 mos (range 0.03-117.2), median rwTTNT was 24 mos; 36-mo rwOS was 67%. The Table shows tx received and outcomes by age and SCT status. MVA analyses showed age ≥ 65 y, ECOG PS ≥ 2, LDH/ULN ≥ 1, WBC ≥ 10 × 109/L, bulky disease (≥ 5 cm) and blastoid/pleomorphic morphology were associated with shorter rwTTNT and rwOS; MR was independently associated with longer rwTTNT and rwOS. In pts < 65 y who were alive and did not initiate subsequent tx within 6 mos of 1L tx (“SCT-eligible”), 36-mo rwTTNT and rwOS were similar between pts treated with vs without SCT: 65% vs 59% and 86% vs 85%, respectively. Conclusions: In this large RW cohort of primarily community-based US practices, median 1L rwTTNT for MCL pts was ̃ 2 y. BR was the most commonly used 1L tx. SCT was uncommon even in pts < 65 y, suggesting RW considerations may influence SCT eligibility and availability. Also, SCT was not clearly associated with rwOS. As with other reports, older age and high-risk disease features were predictive of worse outcome in RW, while MR appeared to be associated with better outcomes. Outcomes across the board appear worse than prospective trials, suggesting a need to focus on developing tx that can be delivered effectively in the community setting.[Table: see text]

scholarly journals International Prognostic Index for aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma is valid for all malignancy grades

Blood ◽  
1995 ◽  
Vol 86 (4) ◽  
pp. 1460-1463 ◽  
Author(s):  
J Hermans ◽  
AD Krol ◽  
K van Groningen ◽  
PM Kluin ◽  
JC Kluin-Nelemans ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Clinical Trial ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Population Based ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Intermediate Grade ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

An International Prognostic Index (IPI) for patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL) has recently been published. The IPI is based on pretreatment clinical characteristics and developed on clinical trial patients, classified as intermediate grade according to the Working Formulation (WF). We applied this IPI in a population-based registry of NHL patients. This registry does not have the restrictions that usually hold for patients in clinical trials, eg, with respect to age and performance status. Moreover, it covers all the three WF classes (low, intermediate, and high). The IPI turned out to be of prognostic value for response rate and survival in our unselected cohort of 744 patients, as well. In each of the three WF classes separately, the four IPI classes showed going from low to high substantially decreasing response rates and survival percentages. For our cohort of WF intermediate grade patients 5-year survival levels were lower in all four IPI classes (59%, 34%, 14%, and 10%, respectively), probably reflecting the selection of clinical trial patients in the original study (73%, 51%, 43%, and 26%).

Elderly patients with aggressive non-Hodgkin's lymphoma: disease presentation, response to treatment, and survival--a Groupe d'Etude des Lymphomes de l'Adulte study on 453 patients older than 69 years.

1997 ◽  
Vol 15 (8) ◽  
pp. 2945-2953 ◽  
Author(s):  
Y Bastion ◽  
J Y Blay ◽  
M Divine ◽  
P Brice ◽  
D Bordessoule ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Elderly Patients ◽  
Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Hodgkin's Lymphoma ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Prognostic Parameters ◽  
Aggressive Disease ◽  
Non Hodgkin’S Lymphoma ◽  
Non Hodgkin's Lymphoma

PURPOSE To clarify disease characteristics and optimal treatment for elderly patients with non-Hodgkin's lymphoma (NHL), we performed a randomized trial in 453 patients older than 69 years with aggressive lymphoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred twenty patients received cyclophosphamide 750 mg/m2, teniposide (VM-26) 75 mg/m2, and prednisone 40 mg/m2/d for 5 days (CVP) and 233 patients received CVP plus pirarubicin (THP-doxorubicin) 50 mg/m2 (CTVP), each for six courses every 3 weeks. RESULTS The median age was 75 years. Most patients had clinically aggressive disease; 30% had one and 53% two or three adverse prognostic parameters as defined by the International Prognostic Index. More patients on the CTVP arm had an elevated lactic dehydrogenase (LDH) level, but the two groups were otherwise well balanced. CTVP treatment was more frequently associated with leukopenia, thrombocytopenia, and infectious complications. Death during chemotherapy occurred in 16% and 21% of patients on the CVP and CTVP arms, respectively (not significant). Forty percent of patients achieved a complete response (CR): 47% on CTVP and 32% on CVP (chi2 = 20.98, P = .0001). The median time to treatment failure (TTF) was 7 months for CTVP versus 5 months for CVP (log-rank test, P < .05). The median survival time was 13 months in both groups; however, the 5-year survival rate was 26% with CTVP versus 19% with CVP (chi2 = 4.68, P < .05). Lymphoma progression was the primary cause of death. CONCLUSION Elderly patients with aggressive lymphoma have an aggressive disease with adverse prognostic parameters at the time of diagnosis. Slightly longer survival was observed for patients treated with an anthracycline-containing regimen.

A Phase II Trial of 200% ProMACE-CytaBOM in Patients With Previously Untreated Aggressive Lymphomas: Analysis of Response, Toxicity, and Dose Intensity

Blood ◽  
1999 ◽  
Vol 94 (10) ◽  
pp. 3307-3314 ◽  
Author(s):  
Leo I. Gordon ◽  
Mary Young ◽  
Edie Weller ◽  
Thomas M. Habermann ◽  
Jane N. Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Dose Intensity ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Aggressive Lymphoma ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

We showed in a phase I trial that the maximum tolerated dose of the ProMACE-CytaBOM regimen in patients with aggressive lymphoma was 200% (Gordon et al, J Clin Oncol 14:1275, 1996). Based on these observations, we initiated a phase II trial designed to determine response, toxicity, and dose intensity using this regimen. We analyzed 74 patients with advanced-stage (III or IV) or bulky stage II aggressive lymphoma. The overall complete response rate was 69% (72% in evaluable patients). With a median follow-up of 4.5 years, the median survival has not yet been reached. The 4-year survival rate is 73% (95% confidence interval [CI] 62, 83%) and no difference was observed among International Prognostic Index (IPI) groups. The 4-year disease-free survival was 71% (95% CI 58, 84%) with no statistical difference between patients with IPI 0 to 1 versus 2 to 4. The toxicity was acceptable, though the grade 4 hematologic toxicity rate for this regimen was 100%. Grade 4 nonhematologic toxicity was 36%. Three cases of either myelodysplastic syndrome or acute leukemia occurred at 7 months, 3.4 years, and 4.2 years after registration. Cytogenic analysis was available in two cases, showing inv(16) without French American British classification (FAB) M4 EO histology in one patient and a 5q-syndrome in the other. These data suggest that 200% ProMACE-CytaBOM with either granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) or G-CSF results in a high complete remission rate and a disease-free survival comparable to any prior risk-based analysis in aggressive lymphoma. Before using this regimen in general practice, phase III clinical trials should be conducted.

Phase III Study of R-CVP Compared With Cyclophosphamide, Vincristine, and Prednisone Alone in Patients With Previously Untreated Advanced Follicular Lymphoma

2008 ◽  
Vol 26 (28) ◽  
pp. 4579-4586 ◽  
Author(s):  
Robert Marcus ◽  
Kevin Imrie ◽  
Philippe Solal-Celigny ◽  
John V. Catalano ◽  
Anna Dmoszynska ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Response Duration ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Phase Iii ◽  
Term Outcome ◽  
Bulky Disease ◽  
Long Term Outcome ◽  
Trial Treatment

PurposeTo compare the long-term outcome of patients with previously untreated follicular lymphoma (FL) needing therapy, after treatment with cyclophosphamide, vincristine and prednisone (CVP) versus CVP plus rituximab (R-CVP) and to evaluate the predictive value of known prognostic factors after treatment with R-CVP.Patients and MethodsPatients with previously untreated CD20-positive stage III/IV FL were randomly assigned to eight cycles of R-CVP (n = 159) or CVP alone (n = 162). The median follow-up period was 53 months.ResultsThe primary end point—time to treatment failure (TTF), which included patients without a response after four cycles as an event—was significantly prolonged in patients receiving R-CVP versus CVP (P < .0001). Improvements in all other end points, including overall and complete response rates (P < .0001), time to progression (TTP; P < .0001), response duration (P < .0001), time to next antilymphoma treatment (P < .0001), and overall survival (OS; P = .029; 4-year OS: 83% v 77%;) were achieved with R-CVP versus CVP alone. Univariate analyses demonstrated an improvement in TTP with R-CVP versus CVP irrespective of the Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) subgroup, the International Prognostic Index (IPI) subgroup, baseline histology, and the presence or absence of B symptoms or bulky disease. By multivariate analysis, FLIPI retains a strong predictive power for TTP in the presence of the trial treatment effect.ConclusionAnalysis of all outcome measures, including OS, confirm the benefit of adding R to CVP in the front-line treatment of FL.

The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) Predicts Treatment Outcome in Patients with Advanced Stage Follicular Lymphoma Treated Front-Line with Rituximab and the Combination of Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone (R-CHOP).

Blood ◽  
2005 ◽  
Vol 106 (11) ◽  
pp. 925-925 ◽  
Author(s):  
Christian Buske ◽  
Eva Hoster ◽  
Martin Dreyling ◽  
Joerg Hasford ◽  
Michael Unterhalt ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Treatment Outcome ◽  
Relative Risk ◽  
High Risk ◽  
Follicular Lymphoma ◽  
Risk Group ◽  
International Prognostic Index ◽  
Prognostic Index ◽  
Intermediate Risk ◽  
Advanced Stage ◽  
Front Line

Abstract Background: The Follicular Lymphoma International Prognostic Index (FLIPI) has been developed to predict prognosis and to allow risk adapted treatment decisions in patients with follicular lymphoma (FL) before the widely use of Rituximab. However, the addition of Rituximab to standard induction chemotherapy with its long-term beneficial effects has profoundly changed the treatment outcome in patients with advanced stage FL and has become the new standard in the first line therapy of this disease. Therefore, we addressed the question, whether the prognostic value of the FLIPI could be reconfirmed in patients with advanced stage FL treated initially with a rituximab/chemotherapy combination. Methods: The FLIPI index was tested in patients treated with Rituximab and CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone, R-CHOP) in a prospective multicenter phase 3 trial of the GLSG using the time to treatment failure (TTF) as target parameter. Results: 362 Patients treated with R-CHOP were evaluable for TTF. Of the 338 patients evaluable for all FLIPI risk factors, 14% of patients were classified as low, 41% as intermediate and 45% as high risk. After a median follow-up time of 20 months, patients with low risk and intermediate risk FLIPI had almost identical TTF (2-years TTF 92% vs 90%, 95% C.I., 83% to 100% and 84% to 96%, respectively). In contrast, the TTF was significantly shorter in the high risk FLIPI group (2-years TTF 67%, 95% C.I., 58% to 76%) as compared to the combined low/intermediate risk FLIPI group (relative risk 3.0, 95% C.I., 1.7 to 5.1; p &lt; 0.0001). In addition, responding patients with high risk FLIPI had a significantly shorter progression free survival as compared to the low/intermediate risk group (relative risk 3.3, 95% C.I., 1.8 to 6.0; p &lt; 0.0001). When postremission treatment was taken into account, the FLIPI separated the high risk group from the low/intermediate risk group in 65 patients treated with autologous stem cell transplantation (relative risk 6.0, 95% C.I., 1.4 to 25.2) as well as in 242 patients who had received IFN-α maintenance or no postremission therapy (relative risk 3.2, 95% C.I., 1.8 to 5.8). As the FLIPI was able to separate the high from the low/intermediate risk group in patients with advanced follicular lymphoma treated initially with Rituximab and CHOP we next performed a multivariate analysis to determine the impact of the individual parameters incorporated in the FLIPI on the TTF. The serum LDH level greater than the upper normal limit (relative risk 2.6, 95% C.I., 1.5 to 4.5) and the hemoglobin level below 12 g/dl (relative risk 2.5, 95% C.I., 1.4 to 4.3) were independently associated with a shorter TTF in these patients, whereas the age and the number of nodal areas were not discriminant. Conclusion: Taken together, these data indicate that the FLIPI is a valid prognostic index for identifying high-risk patients in FL, also after front-line combined immuno-chemotherapy. The index will remain an important tool to adjust treatment decisions in individual patients according their risk profile and to design clinical trials for the different risk groups in the era of antibody-based therapy.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document