Oophorectomy and Tamoxifen Adjuvant Therapy in Premenopausal Vietnamese and Chinese Women With Operable Breast Cancer

2002 ◽  
Vol 20 (10) ◽  
pp. 2559-2566 ◽  
Author(s):  
Richard R. Love ◽  
Nguyen Ba Duc ◽  
D. Craig Allred ◽  
Nguyen Cong Binh ◽  
Nguyen Van Dinh ◽  
...  

PURPOSE: In 1992, the Early Breast Cancer Trialists’ Collaborative Group reported that a meta-analysis of six randomized trials in European and North American women begun from 1948 to 1972 demonstrated disease-free and overall survival benefit from adjuvant ovarian ablation. Approximately 350,000 new cases of breast cancer are diagnosed annually in premenopausal Asian women who have lower levels of estrogen than western women. PATIENTS AND METHODS: From 1993 to 1999, we recruited 709 premenopausal women with operable breast cancer (652 from Vietnam, 47 from China) to a randomized clinical trial of adjuvant oophorectomy and tamoxifen (20 mg orally every day) for 5 years or observation and this combined hormonal treatment on recurrence. At later dates estrogen- and progesterone-receptor protein assays by immunohistochemistry were performed for 470 of the cases (66%). RESULTS: Treatment arms were well balanced. With a median follow-up of 3.6 years, there have been 84 events and 69 deaths in the adjuvant treatment group and 127 events and 91 deaths in the observation group, with 5-year disease-free survival rates of 75% and 58% (P = .0003 unadjusted; P = .0075 adjusted), and overall survival rates of 78% and 70% (P = .041 unadjusted) for the adjuvant and observation groups, respectively. Only patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors benefited from the adjuvant treatment. In Vietnam, for women unselected for hormone receptor status, a cost-effectiveness analysis suggests that this intervention costs $350 per year of life saved. CONCLUSION: Vietnamese and Chinese women with hormone receptor–positive operable breast cancer benefit from adjuvant treatment with surgical oophorectomy and tamoxifen.

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 11041-11041
Author(s):  
T. Reimer ◽  
R. Fietkau ◽  
S. Markmann ◽  
A. Stachs ◽  
B. Gerber

11041 Background: Postoperative tumor board recommendations for breast cancer are mainly based on patient characteristics and tumor parameters such as size, histologic grade, lymphovascular invasion (LVI), hormone receptor and HER2/neu status. In the era of potential avoidance of axillary surgery in clinically node-negative patients we evaluate the impact of pathologic nodal status for adjuvant treatment decisions. Methods: The postoperative tumor board records of 207 consecutive breast cancer patients over a 1-year period were rediscussed without knowledge of pathologic nodal status. Differences between the two board recommendations for each patient were classified as major (chemo- and/or radiotherapy: present/absent) or minor (different chemotherapeutic protocols) discrepancies. The disease-free and overall survival rates among subgroups with different recommendations were calculated using Adjuvant! Online tool. The binary logistic regression was performed to analyze the impact of factors for prediction the major discrepancy subgroup. Results: The tumor board without information of pathologic nodal status resulted in treatment changes in 72 of the 207 patients studied (34.8%). Major discrepancies were observed in 37 patients (17.9%) leading to a complete shift of postoperative management. Disease-free and overall survival rates were not significantly different due to a balanced over- and undertreatment in this subgroup (21 cases with under-, 16 cases with overtreatment). The major discrepancies were related to LVI (P=0.001), postmenopausal status (P=0.047), and positive hormone receptor status (P=0.17) in the univariate setting. LVI was an independent parameter to predict the subgroup with major discrepancies performing a multivariate analysis (P=0.006; RR=4.5 [95%CI: 1.5–13.4]). Conclusions: The knowledge of pathologic nodal status is important for postoperative chemotherapy and postmastectomy radiotherapy indications. There is a risk for one third of all patients when avoiding axillary surgery to get an adjuvant therapy which differ from the current treatment guidelines. It is mandatory to know the nodal status for breast tumors with LVI. No significant financial relationships to disclose.


2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (31) ◽  
pp. 4956-4962 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bent Ejlertsen ◽  
Henning T. Mouridsen ◽  
Maj-Britt Jensen ◽  
Nils-Olof Bengtsson ◽  
Jonas Bergh ◽  
...  

Purpose To compare the efficacy of ovarian ablation versus chemotherapy in early breast cancer patients with hormone receptor–positive disease. Patients and Methods We conducted an open, randomized, multicenter trial including premenopausal breast cancer patients with hormone receptor–positive tumors and either axillary lymph node metastases or tumors with a size of 5 cm or more. Patients were randomly assigned to ovarian ablation by irradiation or to nine courses of chemotherapy with intravenous cyclophosphamide, methotrexate, and fluorouracil (CMF) administered every 3 weeks. Results Between 1990 and May 1998, 762 patients were randomly assigned, and the present analysis is based on 358 first events. After a median follow-up time of 8.5 years, the unadjusted hazard ratio for disease-free survival in the ovarian ablation group compared with the CMF group was 0.99 (95% CI, 0.81 to 1.22). After a median follow-up time of 10.5 years, overall survival (OS) was similar in the two groups, with a hazard ratio of 1.11 (95% CI, 0.88 to 1.42) for the ovarian ablation group compared with the CMF group. Conclusion In this study, ablation of ovarian function in premenopausal women with hormone receptor–positive breast cancer had a similar effect to CMF on disease-free and OS. No significant interactions were demonstrated between treatment modality and hormone receptor content, age, or any of the well-known prognostic factors.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document