Locoregional Control of Clinically Diagnosed Multifocal or Multicentric Breast Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy and Locoregional Therapy

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (31) ◽  
pp. 4971-4975 ◽  
Author(s):  
Julia L. Oh ◽  
Mark J. Dryden ◽  
Wendy A. Woodward ◽  
Tse-Kuan Yu ◽  
Welela Tereffe ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Locoregional Control ◽  
Locoregional Therapy ◽  
Cancer Center ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose The purpose was to assess whether patients with clinical multifocal or multicentric (MFMC) breast cancer determined by mammogram, ultrasound, or physical examination have inferior outcome compared with patients with clinical unicentric lesions. Patients and Methods We retrospectively analyzed 706 consecutive patients with stages I-III breast cancer treated at the M.D. Anderson Cancer Center (Houston, TX) from 1976 to 2003 who received neoadjuvant anthracycline-based chemotherapy followed by breast conservation therapy (BCT), mastectomy alone, or mastectomy plus postmastectomy radiation therapy. Results The mean follow-up was 66 months. At presentation, 97 of 706 patients had clinically MFMC disease (13.7%). The 5-year rate of locoregional failure was 10% for unicentric disease compared with 7% for MFMC disease (P = .78). Subset analyses of patients by treatment groups confirmed no statistical difference in locoregional control regardless of the type of locoregional treatment. Among patients with multifocal disease treated with BCT, there were no in-breast recurrences and one supraclavicular recurrence. Five-year disease-free survival and overall survival was equivalent between patients with MFMC and unicentric breast cancers. Conclusion Patients with clinical MFMC breast cancer at the time of diagnosis treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by locoregional therapy have similar 5-year rates of locoregional control, disease-free survival, and overall survival as those with unicentric disease. Clinically detected MFMC disease did not predict for inferior outcome.

Single-center experiences of neoadjuvant systemic therapy in breast cancer: Individualization of the treatment

2009 ◽  
Vol 27 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e11628-e11628
Author(s):  
M. Gumus ◽  
B. O. Ustaalioglu ◽  
M. Seker ◽  
A. Bilici ◽  
T. Salman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Survival Rate ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

e11628 Background: Neoadjuvant chemotherapy is one of the standard treatment options for patients with locally advanced breast cancer for twenty five years. In this study, we evaluate results of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer patients. Methods: We retrospectively analyzed 68 patients with locally advanced breast cancer. Anthracycline/taxane-based chemotherapy regimens were prescribed mostly for neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Before chemotherapy was given, patients were examined for distant metastasis by radiologic methods thereafter if patient had distant metastasis, they were excluded. Patients with breast cancer received neoadjuvant chemotherapy were analyzed according to age, menopausal status, type of surgery, response to the treatment, histopathological properties and survival. After 3 to 6 cycle of chemotherapy patients were reevaluated by clinically and radiologically for response. Surgery was performed for appropriate patient thereafter adjuvant locoregional and systemic chemotherapy were continued. Results: Median age was 47 (29–43) years. 17,6 % of them were younger than 35 years and 42,6 % were premenopausal. Median follow-up time was 19 month. After 3 to 6 cycle of neoadjuvant chemotherapy 64 of patients responded to therapy (94,1 %). Breast conserving surgery was performed for 15,6 % patients. In histopathologic analysis most of patients were invasive ductal carcinoma and there was lymph node invasion for 84,9 %. Estrogen and progesterone receptor status were negative for 18,6 % of patients and cerbB2 was positive for 14,8 % of patients. Median disease free survival time was 44 month (SE: 9; 95% CI: 25–62) but median overall survival time could not be reached. Three years disease free survival rate and overall survival rate were 55,3% and 90,1% respectively. According to Cox regression analyses; we did not find any demographic and pathologic characteristic of breast cancer that is related to prognosis. Conclusions: In recent years neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is increasingly being used for early stage disease. Further study will be facilitated establishment of guidelines for preselecting patients for neoadjuvant chemotherapy and will provide beneficial effect on treatment option and survival. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Young Women with Locally Advanced Breast Cancer Who Achieve Breast Conservation after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Have a Low Local Recurrence Rate

2011 ◽  
Vol 77 (7) ◽  
pp. 850-855 ◽  
Author(s):  
Raeshell S. Sweeting ◽  
Nancy Klauber-Demore ◽  
Michael O. Meyers ◽  
Allison M. Deal ◽  
Emily M. Burrows ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Young Women ◽  
Locally Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Ajcc Stage ◽  
Disease Free

Women with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC) who are breast conservation (BCT) candidates after neoadjuvant chemotherapy have the best long-term outcome and low local-regional recurrence (LRR) rates. However, young women are thought to have a higher risk of LRR based on historical data. This study sought to evaluate LRR rates in young women who undergo BCT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We identified 122 women aged 45 years or younger with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) Stage II to III breast cancer, excluding T4d, treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy from 1991 to 2007 from a prospective, Institutional Review Board-approved, single-institution database. Data were analyzed using Fisher eExact test, Wilcoxon tests, and the Kaplan-Meier method. Median follow-up was 6.4 years. Fifty-four (44%) patients had BCT and 68 (56%) mastectomy. Forty-six per cent were estrogen receptor-positivity and 28 per cent overexpressed Her2. Mean pretreatment T size was 5.6 cm in the BCT group and 6.7 cm in the mastectomy group ( P = 0.04). LRR rates were no different after BCT compared with mastectomy (13 vs 18%, P = 0.6). Higher posttreatment N stage ( P < 0.001) and AJCC stage ( P = 0.008) were associated with LRR but not pretreatment staging. Disease-free survival was better for patients achieving BCT, with 5-year disease-free survival rates of 82 per cent (95% CI, 69 to 90%) compared with 58 per cent (95% CI, 45 to 69%) for mastectomy ( P = 0.03). Young women with LABC who undergo BCT after neoadjuvant chemotherapy appear to have similar LRR rates compared with those with mastectomy. This suggests that neoadjuvant chemotherapy may identify young women for whom BCT may have an acceptable risk of LRR.

Breast conservation surgery (BCS) for breast cancer in a resource limited country- Are we upto the challenge!

2022 ◽  
Vol 71 (12) ◽  
pp. 2748-2754
Author(s):  
Nida Javed ◽  
Bushra Rehman ◽  
Ejaz Iqbal ◽  
Sidra Afzal ◽  
Aun Jamal ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Breast Conservation ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Conservation Surgery ◽  
Progesterone Receptor Status ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Conservation Surgery ◽  
Disease Free

Objective: To analyse outcomes of breast conservation surgery and to identify the factors that could have affected the outcomes. Method: The retrospectively study was conducted at the Shaukat Khanum Memorial Cancer Hospital and Research Centre, Lahore, Pakistan, and comprised data of breast conservation surgery cases done between January 2011 and October 2014 in order to cover up for the 5-year follow-up of the last enrolled patient. Data, obtained through the institutional information and database system, included disease-recurrence, 5-year disease-free survival and overall survival. Data was statistically analysed using SPSS 20. Results: Of the 553 cases, 417(75%) had no loco-regional recurrence or distant metastasis, while 136(25%) had some form of loco-regional, distant or contralateral metastasis at 5-year follow-up. In patients who had recurrence or metastasis, only progesterone receptor status, nodal status and mode of treatment showed significant association (p<0.05). Mortality at 5-year follow-up was 77(14%). Amongst the patients who died, only progesterone receptor status and nodal status had significant association (p<0.05). Five-year overall survival for the cohort was 476(86%), whereas 5-year disease-free survival was 409(74%). Conclusion: Breast conservation surgery was found to have favourable outcomes, while progesterone status, nodal involvement and mode of treatment significantly affected the outcome. Key Words:  Breast cancer, Breast conserving surgery, 5-year disease free survival, 5-year overall survival Continuous...

Is Surgery Necessary After Complete Clinical Remission Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Breast Cancer?

2003 ◽  
Vol 21 (24) ◽  
pp. 4540-4545 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Ring ◽  
A. Webb ◽  
S. Ashley ◽  
W.H. Allum ◽  
S. Ebbs ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Local Recurrence ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Surgery Group ◽  
Complete Clinical Remission ◽  
Radiotherapy Alone ◽  
Disease Free

Purpose: This retrospective analysis aimed to identify whether breast cancer patients receiving radiotherapy alone following a complete clinical remission (cCR) to neoadjuvant chemotherapy had a worse outcome than those treated with surgery. Patients and Methods: One hundred thirty-six patients who had achieved a cCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy for early breast cancer were identified from a prospectively maintained database of 453 patients. Of these, 67 patients had undergone surgery as their primary locoregional therapy, and 69 patients had radiotherapy alone. Outcome was assessed in relation to local recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival, and overall survival. Results: Median follow-up was 63 months in the surgery group and 87 months in the no surgery group. Prognostic characteristics were well balanced between the two groups. For surgery and no surgery, respectively, there were no significant differences in disease-free survival or overall survival (5-year, 74% v 76%; 10-year, 60% v 70%, P = .9) between the two groups. There was a nonsignificant trend toward increased locoregional-only recurrence for the no surgery group (21% v 10% at 5 years; P = .09), but no long-term failures of local control. Patients in the no surgery group who also achieved an ultrasound complete remission had a 5-year local recurrence rate of only 8%. Conclusion: In patients achieving a cCR to neoadjuvant chemotherapy, radiotherapy alone achieve survival rates as good as with surgery, but with higher local recurrence rates. Ultrasound may identify a low recurrence rate subgroup for assessing no surgery in a prospective trial.

Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy with Taxotere-Epirubicin-5-Fluorouracil (TEF) in Local-Regionally Advanced Breast Cancer: A Preliminary Report

2002 ◽  
Vol 88 (6) ◽  
pp. 474-477 ◽  
Author(s):  
Eşmen Baltali ◽  
M Kadri Altundağ ◽  
Demir Ali Onat ◽  
Osman Abbasoğlu ◽  
Yavuz Özişik ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Advanced Breast Cancer ◽  
Chemotherapy Regimen ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Advanced Breast ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
The Mean ◽  
Disease Free

Aims and background Sixty-three patients with local-regionally advanced breast cancer were treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy consisting of docetaxel (Taxotere), epirubicin, and 5-fluorouracil (TEF). Methods and study design Preoperatively, patients received four cycles of Taxotere (80 mg/m2), epirubicin (60 mg/m2), and 5-fluorouracil (500 mg/m2), repeated every 21 days. Following completion of four cycles of chemotherapy, appropriate surgery was performed. After the surgery, patients received one cycle of the TEF chemotherapy regimen; following chemotherapy, radiotherapy was applied, and at the end two more cycles of TEF chemotherapy regimen were given. Results Sixty-three patients with locally advanced breast cancer were treated. Three patients were excluded from the study before the evaluation of response. Median age of the patients was 50 years (range, 25–77). Twenty-seven and 33 patients were premenopausal and postmenopausal, respectively. Thirty-nine patients were in stage IIIA and 21 in stage IIIB. Complete and partial responses were observed in 15 (25%) and 42 (70%) of the patients following four cycles of preoperative TEF chemotherapy regimen, respectively. Overall response was 95%, and primary lesion progressed only in 3 (5%) patients. The mean disease-free survival was 15.9 ± 6.8 (range, 3.5–28) months and the mean overall survival was 18.6 ± 7.2 (range, 5–30) months. The most frequent side effects were nausea-vomiting, mucositis, alopecia and leukopenia. Conclusions TEF therapy is a treatment with a high overall response rate and toxicities similar to other taxotere combinations. A longer follow-up of patients is necessary for the determination of disease-free survival and overall survival.

scholarly journals Disease-free and overall survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer: breast-conserving surgery compared to mastectomy in a large single-centre cohort study

2020 ◽  
Author(s):  
Janine M. Simons ◽  
Julien G. Jacobs ◽  
Joost P. Roijers ◽  
Maarten A. Beek ◽  
Leandra J. M. Boonman-de Winter ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Overall Survival ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Multivariable Analysis ◽  
Disease Free Survival ◽  
Breast Conserving Surgery ◽  
Prognostic Indicators ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Disease Free

Abstract Purpose The extended role of breast-conserving surgery (BCS) in the neoadjuvant setting may raise concerns on the oncologic safety of BCS compared to mastectomy. This study compared long-term outcomes after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) between patients treated with BCS and mastectomy. Methods All breast cancer patients treated with NAC from 2008 until 2017 at the Amphia Hospital (the Netherlands) were included. Disease-free and overall survival were compared between BCS and mastectomy with survival functions. Multivariable Cox proportional hazard regression was performed to determine prognostic variables for disease-free survival. Results 561 of 612 patients treated with NAC were eligible: 362 (64.5%) with BCS and 199 (35.5%) with mastectomy. Median follow-up was 6.8 years (0.9–11.9). Mastectomy patients had larger tumours and more frequently node-positive or lobular cancer. Unadjusted five-year disease-free survival was 90.9% for BCS versus 82.9% for mastectomy (p = .004). Unadjusted five-year overall survival was 95.3% and 85.9% (p < .001), respectively. In multivariable analysis, clinical T4 (cT4) (HR 3.336, 95% CI 1.214–9.165, p = .019) and triple negative disease (HR 5.946, 95% CI 2.703–13.081, p < .001) were negative predictors and pathologic complete response of the breast (HR 0.467, 95% CI 0.238–0.918, p = .027) and axilla (HR 0.332, 95% CI 0.193–0.572, p = .001) were positive predictors for disease-free survival. Mastectomy versus BCS was not a significant predictor for disease-free survival when adjusted for the former variables (unadjusted HR 2.13 (95%CI: 1.4–3.24), adjusted HR 1.31 (95%CI: 0.81–2.13)). In the BCS group, disease-free and overall survival did not differ significantly between cT1, cT2 or cT3 tumours. Conclusion BCS does not impair disease-free and overall survival in patients treated with NAC. Tumour biology and treatment response are significant prognostic indicators.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document