Safety and effectiveness of dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with stage II/III breast cancer

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 10622-10622
Author(s):  
S. A. McDaniel ◽  
H. Krontiras ◽  
J. T. Carpenter ◽  
L. M. Nabell ◽  
K. I. Bland ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Newly Diagnosed ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
To Receive

10622 Background: NSABP B-18 randomized women with operable breast cancer to receive chemotherapy either pre- or postoperatively; OS and DSF rates at 9 years were identical. Importantly, pathologic complete response (pCR) was directly proportional to DFS and OS. Recently, dose dense adjuvant chemotherapy has shown a statistically significant improvement in DFS and OS. However, no data is available for the use of dose dense preoperative chemotherapy at this time. Methods: Women enrolled in the I-SPY correlative trial with newly diagnosed breast cancer, T ≥ 3cm, any N, M0 were evaluated to assess response rates and safety to dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy (doxorubicin 60 mg/m2 IV Q2 wks × 4, paclitaxel 175 mg/m2 IV Q2 wks × 4, and cyclophosphamide 600 mg/m2 IV Q2 wks × 4). Results: Since 02/2003, 43 pts have been treated with dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy on the I-SPY trial at UAB (mean age 47.9). 47% of the pts were ER+, 37% were PR+ and 5% were Her2+ by FISH. 2 pts dropped out for personal reasons and 9 pts are actively undergoing treatment. Overall, 32 pts received dose dense chemotherapy and proceeded to surgery. Of those, 31 received dose dense sequential ATC and 1 received dose dense concurrent AC followed by T. 34% had a pCR (breast & nodes) while an additional 10% had a pCR in the breast but residual disease in lymph nodes; 41% had a PR; 9% had SD; and 6% had PD. Hematologic toxicity consisted of grade 3 anemia in 2 pts, febrile neutropenia in 2 pts and no grade 4 thrombocytopenia. Non-hematologic grade 3–4 toxicity consisted of mediport-associated thrombosis in 2 pts, hyperglycemia in 2 pts, syncope in 1 pt, neuropathy in 1 pt, and disseminated varicella in 1 pt. Conclusion: Our results show that dose dense neoadjuvant chemotherapy achieves a pCR (breast & nodes) in about 1/3 of patients (34%) with tolerable toxicity. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

scholarly journals Impact of the Addition of Carboplatin and/or Bevacizumab to Neoadjuvant Once-per-Week Paclitaxel Followed by Dose-Dense Doxorubicin and Cyclophosphamide on Pathologic Complete Response Rates in Stage II to III Triple-Negative Breast Cancer: CALGB 40603 (Alliance)

2015 ◽  
Vol 33 (1) ◽  
pp. 13-21 ◽  
Author(s):  
William M. Sikov ◽  
Donald A. Berry ◽  
Charles M. Perou ◽  
Baljit Singh ◽  
Constance T. Cirrincione ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Stage Ii ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Dense ◽  
The Impact

Purpose One third of patients with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) achieve pathologic complete response (pCR) with standard neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). CALGB 40603 (Alliance), a 2 × 2 factorial, open-label, randomized phase II trial, evaluated the impact of adding carboplatin and/or bevacizumab. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 443) with stage II to III TNBC received paclitaxel 80 mg/m2 once per week (wP) for 12 weeks, followed by doxorubicin plus cyclophosphamide once every 2 weeks (ddAC) for four cycles, and were randomly assigned to concurrent carboplatin (area under curve 6) once every 3 weeks for four cycles and/or bevacizumab 10 mg/kg once every 2 weeks for nine cycles. Effects of adding these agents on pCR breast (ypT0/is), pCR breast/axilla (ypT0/isN0), treatment delivery, and toxicities were analyzed. Results Patients assigned to either carboplatin or bevacizumab were less likely to complete wP and ddAC without skipped doses, dose modification, or early discontinuation resulting from toxicity. Grade ≥ 3 neutropenia and thrombocytopenia were more common with carboplatin, as were hypertension, infection, thromboembolic events, bleeding, and postoperative complications with bevacizumab. Employing one-sided P values, addition of either carboplatin (60% v 44%; P = .0018) or bevacizumab (59% v 48%; P = .0089) significantly increased pCR breast, whereas only carboplatin (54% v 41%; P = .0029) significantly raised pCR breast/axilla. More-than-additive interactions between the two agents could not be demonstrated. Conclusion In stage II to III TNBC, addition of either carboplatin or bevacizumab to NACT increased pCR rates, but whether this will improve relapse-free or overall survival is unknown. Given results from recently reported adjuvant trials, further investigation of bevacizumab in this setting is unlikely, but the role of carboplatin could be evaluated in definitive studies, ideally limited to biologically defined patient subsets most likely to benefit from this agent.

scholarly journals Long-Term Prognostic Risk After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Associated With Residual Cancer Burden and Breast Cancer Subtype

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (10) ◽  
pp. 1049-1060 ◽  
Author(s):  
W. Fraser Symmans ◽  
Caimiao Wei ◽  
Rebekah Gould ◽  
Xian Yu ◽  
Ya Zhang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Validation Cohort ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Free Survival ◽  
Residual Cancer Burden

Purpose To determine the long-term prognosis in each phenotypic subset of breast cancer related to residual cancer burden (RCB) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy alone, or with concurrent human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)–targeted treatment. Methods We conducted a pathologic review to measure the continuous RCB index (wherein pathologic complete response has RCB = 0; residual disease is categorized into three predefined classes of RCB index [RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III]), and yp-stage of residual disease. Patients were prospectively observed for survival. Three patient cohorts received paclitaxel (T) followed by fluorouracil, doxorubicin, and cyclophosphamide (T/FAC): original development cohort (T/FAC-1), validation cohort (T/FAC-2), and independent validation cohort (T/FAC-3). Another validation cohort received FAC chemotherapy only, and a fifth cohort received concurrent trastuzumab (H) with sequential paclitaxel and fluorouracil, epirubicin, and cyclophosphamide (FEC; H+T/FEC). Phenotypic subsets were defined by hormone receptor (HR) and HER2 status at diagnosis, classified as HR-positive/HER2-negative, HER2-positive (HR-negative/HER2-positive or HR-positive/HER2-positive), or triple receptor–negative. Relapse-free survival estimates were determined from Kaplan-Meier analysis and compared using the log-rank test. Results Five cohorts (T/FAC-1 [n = 219], T/FAC-2 [n = 262], T/FAC-3 [n = 342], FAC [n = 132], and H+T/FEC [n = 203]) had median event-free follow-up of 13.5, 9.1, 6.8, 16.4, and 7.1 years, respectively. Continuous RCB index was prognostic within each phenotypic subset, independent of other clinical-pathologic variables. RCB classes stratified prognostic risk overall, within each phenotypic subset, and within yp-stage categories. Estimates of 10-year relapse-free survival rates in the four RCB classes (pathologic complete response, RCB-I, RCB-II, and RCB-III) were 86%, 81%, 55%, and 23% for triple receptor–negative; 83%, 97%, 74%, and 52% for HR-positive/HER2-negative in the combined T/FAC cohorts; and 95%, 77%, 47%, and 21% in the H+T/FEC cohort. Conclusion RCB was prognostic for long-term survival after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in all three phenotypic subsets of breast cancer. Our institutional findings should be externally validated.

scholarly journals Predictors of Distant Metastases in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Without Pathologic Complete Response After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy

2020 ◽  
Vol 18 (3) ◽  
pp. 288-296 ◽  
Author(s):  
William R. Kennedy ◽  
Christopher Tricarico ◽  
Prashant Gabani ◽  
Ashley A. Weiner ◽  
Michael B. Altman ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Triple Negative Breast Cancer ◽  
Distant Metastasis ◽  
Triple Negative ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Hazard Ratio ◽  
Lymphovascular Space Invasion

Background: Pathologic complete response (pCR) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) for triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) predicts decreased distant metastasis. However, most patients do not experience pCR, and other risk factors for distant metastasis after NAC are poorly characterized. This study investigated factors predictive of distant metastasis in TNBC without pCR after NAC. Methods: Women with TNBC treated with NAC, surgery, and radiation therapy in 2000 through 2013 were reviewed. Freedom from distant metastasis (FFDM) was compared between patients with and without pCR using the Kaplan-Meier method. In patients without pCR, univariate and multivariable Cox analyses were used to determine factors predictive of distant metastasis. Results: We identified 153 patients with median follow-up of 4.0 years (range, 0.5–14.0 years). After NAC, 108 had residual disease (pCR, 29%). Five-year FFDM was 98% and 55% in patients with and without pCR, respectively (P<.001). Factors independently predicting FFDM in patients without pCR were pathologic nodal positivity (hazard ratio, 3.08; 95% CI, 1.54–6.14; P=.001) and lymphovascular space invasion (hazard ratio, 1.91; 95% CI, 1.07–3.43; P=.030). Patients with a greater number of factors had worse FFDM; 5-year FFDM was 76.5% for patients with no factors (n=38) versus 54.9% and 27.5% for patients with 1 (n=44) and 2 factors (n=26), respectively (P<.001). Conclusions: Lack of pCR after NAC resulted in worse overall survival and FFDM, despite trimodality therapy. In patients with residual disease after NAC, pathologic lymph node positivity and lymphovascular space invasion predicted worse FFDM.

scholarly journals Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Breast Cancer: Past, Present, and Future

2020 ◽  
Vol 14 ◽  
pp. 117822342098037
Author(s):  
Mariko Asaoka ◽  
Shipra Gandhi ◽  
Takashi Ishikawa ◽  
Kazuaki Takabe
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
Early Stage ◽  
Locally Advanced ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Definitive Surgery ◽  
Individual Drug Response ◽  
The Individual

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) had been developed as a systematic approach before definitive surgery for the treatment of locally advanced or inoperable breast cancer such as inflammatory breast cancer in the past. In addition to its impact on surgery, the neoadjuvant setting has a benefit of providing the opportunity to monitor the individual drug response. Currently, the subject of NAC has expanded to include patients with early-stage, operable breast cancer because it is revealed that the achievement of a pathologic complete response (pCR) is associated with excellent long-term outcomes, especially in patients with aggressive phenotype breast cancer. In addition, this approach provides the unique opportunity to escalate adjuvant therapy in those with residual disease after NAC. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy in breast cancer is a rapidly evolving topic with tremendous interest in ongoing clinical trials. Here, we review the improvements and further challenges in the NAC setting in translational breast cancer research.

scholarly journals Image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy to assess pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients with exceptional response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

2019 ◽  
Vol 5 (suppl) ◽  
pp. 39-39
Author(s):  
Victoria Teoh ◽  
Fiona MacNeill ◽  
Nicola Roche ◽  
Gerald Gui ◽  
Romney Pope ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy ◽  
Invasive Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Ductal Carcinoma ◽  
Residual Disease ◽  
False Negative ◽  
Pathologic Complete Response ◽  
Complete Response ◽  
Her2 Positive ◽  
Image Guided

39 Background: Image-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy (VAB) is increasingly used after completion of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to assess residual disease in the breast, facilitate risk-adaptive surgery and potentially identify exceptional responders who may not require surgical intervention. The aim of this analysis was to investigate the diagnostic performance of a standardized post-NAC VAB protocol, developed following retrospective analysis of institutional data (1). Methods: Prospective cohort study of patients with HER2 positive and triple negative (TN) invasive ductal carcinoma, treated with NAC, who had partial/complete imaging response and underwent post-NAC VAB to aid surgical planning between 02/2018 and 06/2019. The aim of VAB was to sample the site of residual imaging abnormality (breast residuum <2cm) previously marked by clip insertion. Pathologic complete response (pCR) was defined as no residual disease in the breast (ypT0). Diagnostic accuracy of VAB was calculated using final surgical pathology as the reference standard. Simple descriptive statistics were performed. Results: 26 eligible patients underwent post-NAC VAB. This was representative in 23 cases. The overall pCR rate was 46.2% (42.1% for HER2 positive, 57.1% for TN phenotypes). The post-NAC VAB false negative rate (FNR) was 9.1% (95% CI: 0-26.1) and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 90.91% (95% CI: 60.27-98.51) with an overall accuracy of 86.96% (95% CI: 66.41-97.22). Conclusions: This data suggests that post-NAC VAB may reliably predict pCR in patients with HER2 positive and TN invasive ductal carcinoma with good response to NAC. Further technical refinements in VAB technique, standardization in patient selection and prospective trials are warranted to further explore the role of post-NAC VAB in supporting minimal or no surgery trials. References 1. Tasoulis MK, Roche N, Rusby JE, Pope R, Allen S, Downey K, Nerurkar A, Osin P, Wilson R, MacNeill F. Post neoadjuvant chemotherapy vacuum assisted biopsy in breast cancer: Can it determine pathologic complete response before surgery? J Clin Oncol 2018;36 (Supplement): abstr 567.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document