Phase I trial of bortezomib and celecoxib in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13051-13051 ◽  
Author(s):  
S. Dunder ◽  
U. B. Chaudhary ◽  
M. Green ◽  
M. Meyer ◽  
F. Brescia ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Treated Patient ◽  
Cell Cancer ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Cox 2

13051 Background: The ubiquitin-proteosome pathway plays an important role in cell cycle regulation, neoplastic growth, and metastasis. Nuclear factor-kB (NF-kB) is a key transcription factor in cancer, primarily regulated by proteosome-mediated degradation of the inhibitor protein I kappa B alpha-associated protein kinase (IkBa). Interruption of this degradative pathway, with the 26S proteosome inhibitor bortezomib, has displayed significant clinical anti-tumor activity, in multiple myeloma and lymphomas. The role of bortezomib in the treatment of advanced solid tumors, however, is unclear at present. Preclinical work in multiple myeloma cell lines has demonstrated synergy in cytotoxicity and growth inhibiton with the combination of bortezomib and the cyclooxygenase (COX)-2 inhibitors. We therefore hypothesized that the combination of the COX-2 inhibitor celecoxib and bortezomib is a potentially active combination in the treatment of advanced solid tumors. Towards this aim, we are conducting a phase I study to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and toxicity profile of bortezomib and celecoxib. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors and an ECOG PS of 0–2 received escalating doses of bortezomib (1.0–1.6 mg/m2), either weekly for 5 of 6 weeks or twice weekly for 2 of 3 weeks, and celecoxib (200–400 mg twice daily). Accrual was planned to a maximum of 6 cohorts, each with a minimum of 3 patients. Only those dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurring during the first cycle were used to define the MTD. DLTs included any grade 4 hematologic toxicity related to therapy, or any grade 3 or 4 non-hematologic toxicity. Results: To date, 10 patients (median age of 63y) have been treated. Represented tumor types include stage IV: colorectal, pancreatic, bladder, leiomyosarcoma, head and neck squamous cell carcinoma, hepatocellular, and renal cell. A median number of 2 cycles were administered. Thus far, no DLTs have been observed. No cumulative toxicities have been noted. No objective tumor response has been observed, however, stable disease was maintained in one heavily pre-treated patient with metastatic papillary renal cell cancer for 5 months. Conclusions: The combination of bortezomib and celecoxib is safe and well tolerated, with no dose-limiting toxicities thus far. [Table: see text]

Phase I and Pharmacokinetic Study of Docetaxel and Irinotecan in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2000 ◽  
Vol 18 (20) ◽  
pp. 3545-3552 ◽  
Author(s):  
Corinne Couteau ◽  
Marie-Laure Risse ◽  
Michel Ducreux ◽  
Florence Lefresne-Soulas ◽  
Alessandro Riva ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

PURPOSE: We conducted a phase I and pharmacokinetic study of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan to determine the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), and the dose at which at least 50% of the patients experienced a DLT during the first cycle, and to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetic profiles in patients with advanced solid tumors. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Patients with only one prior chemotherapy treatment (without taxanes or topoisomerase I inhibitors) for advanced disease were included in the study. Docetaxel was administered as a 1-hour IV infusion after premedication with corticosteroids followed immediately by irinotecan as a 90-minute IV infusion, every 3 weeks. No hematologic growth factors were allowed. RESULTS: Forty patients were entered through the following seven dose levels (docetaxel/irinotecan): 40/140 mg/m2, 50/175 mg/m2, 60/210 mg/m2, 60/250 mg/m2, 60/275 mg/m2, 60/300 mg/m2, and 70/250 mg/m2. Two hundred cycles were administered. Two MTDs were determined, 70/250 mg/m2 and 60/300 mg/m2; the DLTs were febrile neutropenia and diarrhea. Neutropenia was the main hematologic toxicity, with 85% of patients experiencing grade 4 neutropenia. Grade 3/4 nonhematologic toxicities in patients included late diarrhea (7.5%), asthenia (15.0%), febrile neutropenia (22.5%), infection (7.5%), and nausea (5.0%). Pharmacokinetics of both docetaxel and irinotecan were not modified with the administration schedule of this study. CONCLUSION: The recommended dose of docetaxel in combination with irinotecan is 60/275 mg/m2, respectively. At this dose level, the safety profile is manageable. The activity of this combination should be evaluated in phase II studies in different tumor types.

Phi-53: (NCI#7251): Phase I trial of belinostat (PXD101) in combination with 13-cis-retinoic acid (13c-RA) in advanced solid tumor malignancies—A California Cancer Consortium NCI/CTEP sponsored trial.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2526-2526 ◽  
Author(s):  
Thehang H. Luu ◽  
Paul Henry Frankel ◽  
Dean Lim ◽  
Mihaela C. Cristea ◽  
Jan Hendrik Beumer ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Single Agent ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Qtc Interval ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Grade 3

2526 Background: Belinostat has a reported maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of 1,000 mg/m2 given days 1 to 5 every 21 days as a single agent, although in one study in hepatocellular carcinoma belinostat was given at 1,400 mg/m2on the same schedule. Pre-clinical evidence suggests HDAC inhibitors enhance retinoic acid signaling with a synergistic impact in a variety of solid tumors. We conducted a phase I study of belinostat and 13c-RA in advanced solid tumors. Methods: Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as cycle 1 hematologic toxicity: ≥grade 3 that not resolved to <grade 1 within 1 week or non-hematologic toxicity: ≥grade 3. We sought the MTD of belinostat days 1-5 with 13-cRA days 1-14, every 21 days, in patients (pt) with advanced solid tumors. Eligibility criteria included normal organ function and QT/QTc interval; 4 weeks from previous therapy. Results: 51 pt were treated: median age 61 (range 40-80); 29 men; 57% ECOG 0, 41% ECOG 1, 2% ECOG 2; 13 lung, 11 breast, 8 colorectal, 3 pancreatic. 11 dose levels (DL) were tested starting from belinostat 600 mg/m2/day and 13c-RA 50 mg/m2/day to belinostat 2000 mg/m2/day and 13c-RA 100 mg/m2/day. Only two DLTs were observed: a grade 3 hypersensitivity reaction with dizziness and hypoxia at DL 8 (belinostat 1700 mg/m2/day, 13c-RA 100 mg/m2/day); and a grade 3 allergic reaction in a patient with an ECOG PS 2 at DL 11 (belinostat 2000 mg/m2/day, 13c-RA 100 mg/m2/day). The MTD was not reached. Pharmacokinetics of belinostat suggests dose proportionality. Median number of cycles: 2 (range 1–56). 10 patients had SD including: 1 neuroendocrine pancreatic stable for 56 cycles; 1 breast pt for 12 cycles; 1 lung pt 8 cycles. 2 pt had PRs: a keratinizing squamous cell carcinoma (tonsil) and a lung cancer pt. Conclusions: Belinostat 2000 mg/m2 days 1-5and 13-cis-Retinoic acid 100 mg/m2days 1-14, every 21 days, was well-tolerated and an MTD was not reached despite doubling the established single agent MTD. Future studies building on this combination to belinostat are warranted. Support: U01CA062505 and P30CA033572 (City of Hope); U01CA099168 and P30CA047904 (University of Pittsburgh).

Phase I study of safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2536-2536 ◽  
Author(s):  
Bojana Milojkovic Kerklaan ◽  
Martijn P. J. K. Lolkema ◽  
Lot A. Devriese ◽  
Emile E. Voest ◽  
A. Nol-Boekel ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Treated Patient ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Hand Foot Syndrome ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Oral Topotecan

2536 Background: To determine the maximum-tolerated dose (MTD), safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of the oral anti-angiogenic drug pazopanib in combination with oral topotecan, an inhibitor of topoisomerase-I. Methods: Two-stage, two-arm, dose escalation and pharmacokinetic phase I study of pazopanib and oral topotecan in patients with advanced solid tumors, (NCT00732420, www.clinicaltrials.gov). This interim report describes the bioavailability and safety results for daily pazopanib combined with oral topotecan (days 1, 8, 15) in a 28-day cycle. Results: Twenty-eight of 32 patients completed at least one cycle and were evaluable for analysis. Three dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs) occurred: grade 3 hand-foot-syndrome, diarrhea and neutropenia. Pazopanib 800 mg/topotecan 10 mg exceeded the MTD with two DLTs in six patients. The most frequent treatment-related toxicities were grade 3 anemia (3/28), leukocytopenia, neutropenia and fatigue (2/28 each). One death due to hepatic failure occurred at pazopanib 800mg/toptecan 2mg in a heavily pre-treated patient with sarcoma that may have been related to paracetamol ingestion but attribution to the pazopanib can not be excluded. Topotecan AUC0-∞ increased 1.58-fold (90%CI: 1.09–1.29) and Cmax increased 1.78-fold (90%CI: 1.08-2.92) when given with pazopanib compared to single administration (n=7). Pazopanib AUC0-24 and Cmax ratios were not increased when co-administered with topotecan: 0.98 (90%CI: 0.95-1.02) and 0.96 (90%CI: 0.92-1.01). Twenty-three patients were evaluable for response (RECIST): PR (2/23; 9%, both ovarian cancer); SD (13/23; 57%) and PD (8/23; 35%). Pazopanib 800 mg/topotecan 8 mg is currently being explored in an expansion cohort. A second treatment arm of pazopanib 800 mg with topotecan daily x5 is ongoing and will be reported separately. Conclusions: Daily pazopanib and weekly oral topotecan is tolerable with handfoot syndrome, neutropenia and fatigue as dose limited side effects. Pazopanib increased topotecan exposure 1.58-fold (AUC0-∞) and 1.78-fold (Cmax). Clinical trial information: NCT00732420.

A phase I study of an IDO inhibitor (SHR9146) plus camrelizumab and in combination with/without apatinib in patients with advanced solid tumors: Safety and efficacy analysis.

2021 ◽  
Vol 39 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3101-3101
Author(s):  
Ying Cheng ◽  
Ying Liu ◽  
Jinhua Xu ◽  
Jing Zhu ◽  
Ying Wang ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Partial Response ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Renal Cancer ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Safety And Efficacy

3101 Background: IDO is an enzyme of interest in immuno-oncology because of the immunosuppressive effects that result from its role in tryptophan catabolism. Clinical trials of IDO inhibitors with immunotherapy are under active investigation. The addition of angiogenesis inhibitor may further enhance the anti-tumor immune responses. Here we report the safety and efficacy results of SHR9146 (IDO inhibitor) plus camrelizumab (PD-1 antibody) with/without apatinib (VEGFR-2 inhibitor) in patients (pts) with advanced solid cancers who failed standard antitumor therapies. Methods: This was an open-label, phase I study. Eligible puts would receive SHR9146 (escalated dose) plus camrelizumab (200 mg IV, q2w) alone (Cohort A) or in combination with apatinib (250 mg p.o. qd) (Cohort B). Each cohort was conducted according to a 3+3 dose escalation design. The starting dose of SHR9146 was 100mg bid, followed by 200, 400, 600 mg bid. The two primary endpoints were Dose-limiting Toxicity (DLT) and Maximum Tolerated Dose (MDT). The secondary objective was to analysis the incidence of Adverse Events (AEs) and efficacy. Results: As of Oct 31, 2020, 23 pts have been enrolled (Cohort A:14, Cohort B: 9; median age: 54 years; median prior therapies: 2 lines;). Cohort A was escalating at 600mg, and Cohort B was escalating at 400mg. Two pts experienced DLTs: one DLT (G4 hypercalcemia) was observed at 600mg in Cohort A; the other DLT (G3 rash) was observed at 400mg in Cohort B. MDT was not reached and the study was still ongoing. In Cohort A, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 21.4% (3/14, all confirmed) and 42.9% (6/14). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with liver cancer (1/3), renal cancer (1/3), and cervix cancer (1/3). In Cohort B, ORR and DCR in evaluable pts were 33.3%(3/9, all confirmed) and 77.8%(7/9). Partial response was observed in 3 pts with SCLC (1/3), prostate cancer (1/3) and renal cancer (1/3). The incidence of pts with TRAEs and grade>=3 TRAEs were 91.3% (21/23) and 39.1% (9/23) respectively. The most common grade>=3 TRAEs were hypercalcemia (26.1%, 6/23), fatigue (17.4%, 4/23) and nausea (13.0%, 3/23). No fatal AEs were observed. G3 nausea, G3 lipase increased and G2 GGT increased resulted in SHR9146 dose reduction in 3 pts (Cohort A). Conclusions: SHR9146 plus camrelizumab in combination with/without apatinib demonstrated promising anti-tumor activity with acceptable safety in pts with advanced solid tumors. Further study is needed to validate the efficacy and safety. Clinical trial information: NCT03491631.

scholarly journals Preclinical investigations and a first-in-human phase I trial of M4112, the first dual inhibitor of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase 2, in patients with advanced solid tumors

2020 ◽  
Vol 8 (2) ◽  
pp. e000870
Author(s):  
Aung Naing ◽  
Joseph P Eder ◽  
Sarina A Piha-Paul ◽  
Claude Gimmi ◽  
Elizabeth Hussey ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Ex Vivo ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Primary Objective ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Antitumor Effects ◽  
Dual Inhibitor ◽  
Indoleamine 2,3 Dioxygenase

BackgroundM4112 is an oral, potent, and selective indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase 1 (IDO1) and tryptophan 2,3-dioxygenase 2 (TDO2) dual inhibitor. Here, we report preclinical data and first-in-human phase I data, including safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and preliminary efficacy, of M4112 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors.MethodsIn preclinical studies, M4112 was administered to mice with IDO1-expressing tumors to determine tumor IDO1 and liver TDO2 inhibition. In the phase I trial, patients received doses of M4112 two times per day in 28-day cycles until progression, toxicity, or withdrawal of consent. The primary objective was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended phase II dose (RP2D). The primary endpoint was the incidence of dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), and treatment-emergent changes in safety parameters. Other endpoints included pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and antitumor effects.ResultsIn mice, M4112 significantly decreased the kynurenine:tryptophan ratio in the liver and tumor. Fifteen patients received M4112 at five distinct dose levels (three patients per cohort: 100, 200, 400, 600, and 800 mg two times per day orally). Initially, all doses inhibited IDO1 ex vivo, but plasma kynurenine levels returned to or exceeded baseline levels after day 15. Despite initial changes in kynurenine, there was no significant reduction of plasma kynurenine at steady state. There was one DLT (grade 3 allergic dermatitis; 800 mg two times per day) and one grade 2 QT prolongation (800 mg two times per day), resulting in dose reduction (not a DLT). M4112 was well tolerated, and neither the MTD nor the RP2D was established. TEAEs included fatigue, nausea, and vomiting. The best overall response was stable disease (n=9, 60%).ConclusionsThere were no serious safety concerns at any dose. Although M4112 inhibited IDO1 activity ex vivo, plasma kynurenine levels were not reduced despite achieving target exposure.Trial registration numberNCT03306420.

A Phase I/II Trial on Melphalan, Prednisone, Thalidomide and Defribotide Combination in Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma Patients.

Blood ◽  
2007 ◽  
Vol 110 (11) ◽  
pp. 2715-2715
Author(s):  
Antonio Palumbo ◽  
Alessandra Larocca ◽  
Cecilia Rus ◽  
Francesca Gay ◽  
Davide Rossi ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Multiple Myeloma ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Bleeding Risk ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Protective Role ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Studies ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Vein Thrombosis ◽  
Deep Vein

Abstract Defibrotide (DF) showed antithrombotic properties and remarkable activity in Multiple Myeloma (MM), without significant anticoagulant effects and bleeding risk. DF may abrogate tumor cells interaction with marrow stromal cells and enhance sensitivity to chemotherapy, thus improving activities of Melphalan, Prednisone and Thalidomide, while protecting against thrombotic state. We designed a multicenter phase I/II trial to define efficacy and safety of Melphalan, Prednisone, Thalidomide and DF (MPTD) in relapsed/refractory MM. The MPTD treatment consisted of 6 35-days cycles of oral melphalan (0.25 mg/Kg day 1–4), prednisone (1.5 mg/kg day 1–4), thalidomide (50–100 mg/day continuously), DF at 3 dose levels (17 mg/Kg iv or 2.4 g po D 1–4, 1.6 g po D 5–35; 34 mg/Kg iv or 4.8 g po D 1–4, 3.2 g po D 5–35; 51 mg/Kg iv or 7.2 g po D 1–4, 4.8 g po D 5–35), every 35 days, without deep vein thrombosis (DVT) prophylaxis. Safety was assessed by defining dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) and maximum tolerated dose (MTD). DLT was defined as the occurrence of febrile neutropenia, G4 neutropenia >1 week, any other G4 hematologic toxicity, or any >G3 non-hematologic toxicity. MTD was the dose level prior to that resulting in DLT. Efficacy was evaluated according to EBMT/IBMTR criteria. Twenty-four patients were enrolled between March and November 2006 and 19 patients completed at least 1 MPTD (median age 69, excluding primary refractory and/or patients receiving anticoagulation) and were evaluated for toxicity and response. Fourty-two percent of patients achieved at least partial response (PR) after a median of 3 cycles (including 16% very good PR), without significant differences among DF dose. The MTD was not reached. DLTs observed were not considered related to DF and included: G3 ileus (1st dose level) and acute myocardial infarction (AMI) in the 2nd. Toxicities ≥G3 consisted of neutropenia 47%, thrombocytopenia 10%, anemia 21%, whereas <5% of patients experienced non-hematological toxicities ≥G3. No DVTs or significant bleeding were detected. Treatment discontinuation occurred in 3 patients for adverse events: AMI (additional anticoagulation required), ileus (because of the diagnosis of amyloidosis AL and disease progression), and persistent G4 neutropenia (heavily pre-treated patients). In this phase I/II study we confirm the efficacy and feasibility of MPTD in the setting of advanced myeloma patients, interestingly a protective role of DF against thrombosis is also suggested. Pharmacokinetic studies and analysis of surrogates are ongoing. Updated data will be presented at the meeting.

Final results from a phase I trial of ixabepilone in patients with advanced malignancies and lymphoma

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2039-2039
Author(s):  
C. Aghajanian ◽  
O. O’Connor ◽  
M. Cohen ◽  
R. Peck ◽  
H. Burris
Keyword(s):  
Febrile Neutropenia ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Hematologic Toxicity ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3

2039 Background: Ixabepilone is the first analog in a new class of antineoplastic agents, the epothilones, which stabilizes microtubules and induces apoptosis. Ixabepilone has shown clinical activity in a broad range of tumors. Methods: This Phase I trial was designed to establish the maximum tolerated dose (MTD), dose-limiting toxicity (DLT), efficacy, safety, pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of ixabepilone when administered as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks to patients with advanced solid tumors or lymphoma. Eligible patients were aged ≥18 years with histologically/cytologically confirmed non-hematologic cancer, or a pathologic diagnosis of relapsed/primary refractory non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) or relapsed/primary refractory mantle cell lymphoma, with ≤CTC Grade 1 neuropathy. Ixabepilone doses ranged from 7.5–65 mg/m2. Response was assessed every 6 weeks using RECIST. DLT was defined as Grade 4 neutropenia and/or febrile neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, ≥Grade 3 nausea/vomiting and non-hematologic toxicity, or treatment delay of >2 weeks due to delayed recovery. Results: Of 61 patients (median age 58, range 18–81), 75% had solid tumors; 25% had lymphoma. 98% and 67% of patients had received one or ≥ two prior chemotherapy regimens, respectively. The MTD of ixabepilone as a 1-hour infusion every 3 weeks was established as 50 mg/m2. The most common DLTs were neutropenia, myalgia, arthralgia and stomatitis/pharyngitis. A total of eight patients (13%) achieved a durable objective response. Complete responses were achieved in two patients with primary peritoneal cancer and NHL. A partial response was seen in six patients. The most common Grade 3/4 treatment-related adverse events (only observed at doses ≥40 mg/m2) were sensory neuropathy (13%), fatigue (13%), myalgia (10%), arthralgia (7%), nausea (5%), febrile neutropenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Recovery to baseline or ≤Grade 1 neuropathy occurred in some patients. Conclusions: The recommended dose of ixabepilone for the initiation of Phase II studies based on this study is 50 mg/m2 over 1 hour every 3 weeks. Ixabepilone demonstrates promising safety in patients with solid tumors or lymphoma who have failed standard therapy. Encouraging activity was reported in several tumor types. [Table: see text]

A phase I dose escalation study of sunitinib plus capecitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3592-3592 ◽  
Author(s):  
C. Sweeney ◽  
C. Verschraegen ◽  
G. Chiorean ◽  
F. Lee ◽  
S. Jones ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Breast Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Kinase Inhibitor ◽  
Antiangiogenic Therapy ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation Study ◽  
Curative Therapy ◽  
Grade 3

3592 Background: Sunitinib malate (SU) is an oral, multitargeted tyrosine kinase inhibitor of VEGFRs, PDGFRs, KIT, RET, and FLT3, approved internationally for the treatment of advanced RCC and imatinib-resistant or -intolerant GIST. This phase I study assesses the safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics (PK) of SU in combination with capecitabine (C). Methods: Pts with advanced solid tumors not amenable to curative therapy, previously treated with =2 prior chemotherapy regimens, and ECOG PS =1 were eligible. Prior antiangiogenic therapy was not permitted. Three SU schedules were evaluated: 4 wks on treatment followed by 2 wks off in 6-wk cycles (4/2 schedule); 2 wks on followed by 1 wk off in 3-wk cycles (2/1 schedule), and continuous dosing (CD schedule). In all cases C was administered orally bid on days 1–14. SU and C doses were alternately escalated in serial pt cohorts to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of SU for all schedules using a standard 3 + 3 design. PK and antitumor efficacy were also assessed. Results: A total of 50 pts have been enrolled; 28 pts have been treated on the 4/2 schedule: SU 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2, and SU 37.5 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 were not tolerated. Dose limiting toxicities (DLTs) included: grade 3 myalgia (n=1), grade 3 fatigue (n=2), and grade 3 hand- foot syndrome (n=2). The MTD for the 4/2 schedule was SU 37.5 mg/day + C 1,000 mg/m2. No DLTs nor dose reductions were observed among 9 pts treated at the MTD. Preliminary PK data do not indicate drug-drug interactions between SU and C. 3 pts (1 each with breast cancer, neuroendocrine carcinoma, and thyroid carcinoma) achieved confirmed partial responses. On the 2/1 schedule patients are being accrued to SU 37.5 or 50 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 and doses of SU 37.5 mg + C 1,000 mg/m2 or SU 25 mg + C 1,250 mg/m2 are being explored on the CD schedule. Conclusions: The combination of SU 37.5 mg/day (4/2 schedule) with C 1,000 mg/m2 in pts with advanced solid tumors appears tolerable. SU may be administered in combination with C with no apparent drug-drug interaction. Subsequent cohorts will define the MTD of SU administered on the 2/1 and CD schedules. Further studies of this combination in breast cancer are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A first-in-human phase I study of CZ48, a lactone ring protected oral camptothecin, in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2578-2578
Author(s):  
Devalingam Mahalingam ◽  
Montaser F. Shaheen ◽  
John Sarantopoulos ◽  
Steven Weitman ◽  
Beppino C. Giovanella ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Escalation ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Topoisomerase I ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Poor Correlation ◽  
Clinical Activity ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Open Label

2578 Background: CZ48, the 20-O-propionate ester of camptothecin (CPT), is a prodrug of CPT first described by Cao et al. in 1998. The side-chain is enzymatically cleaved in tissues. This gives rise to CPT, a potent inhibitor of topoisomerase I. Methods: An open-label, single-arm, dose-escalation Phase I study was performed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CZ48 in patients with advanced solid tumors. Initial dosing started qd po 80mg/m2, advancing to 2560mg/m2 for 21 consecutive days, followed by 7 days rest. Dosing was restarted in cohorts of 3 patients tid po at 18mg/m2 and escalated to 1g/m2on a 5 days on, 2 days off schedule for 28 days. Patients were prescreened by measuring CPT levels in plasma following a single pilot dose of CZ48. Dose was doubled until occurrence of at least Grade 2 adverse event, at which time 3+3 patient cohorts with a dose escalation of 33%-100% were implemented. DLT in 2/6 patients defined the MTD as the preceding DLT dose. PK parameters were measured prior to dosing, days 1-5, and day 28 of Cycle 1. Results: Poor absorption led to initial qd dosing reaching 2560mg/m2 with no signs of DLT. Subsequent tid dosing showed improved plasma levels and arrival at DLT. 34 patients were treated across 8 dose levels from 18 to 1000 mg/m2. The most frequent study-related adverse effects were cystitis, vomiting, diarrhea and fatigue. Grade IV toxicities observed were febrile neutropenia, anemia, and thrombocytopenia. Preliminary PK data in the qd dosing showed poor correlation between dose and Cmax or AUC, while PK in tid patients showed slightly improved correlation between dose and both CZ48 AUC (Pearson's correlation coefficient ϱ=0.476, p<0.01) and CZ48 Cmax(ϱ =0.51, p<0.01). Evidence of clinical activity with stable disease ≥ 6 months was observed in 2 heavily pre-treated colon and one breast cancer patient. Conclusions: The MTD of tid po CZ48 administered 5 days on, 2 days off of 28-day cycle is between 750 mg/m2 and 576 mg/m2. Overall toxicity is relatively mild, with DLT being cystitis and myelosuppression. Even with tid dosing, PK values correlate poorly to dose. A new formulation with 3-5 fold higher preclinical absorption values is being considered for introduction into the trial. Clinical trial information: NCT00947739.

Phase I study of c-Met inhibitor ARQ197 in combination with FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors.

2013 ◽  
Vol 31 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2544-2544
Author(s):  
Suzanne Fields Jones ◽  
Carla Kurkjian ◽  
Manish R. Patel ◽  
Jeffrey R. Infante ◽  
Howard A. Burris ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Stable Disease ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Standard Dose ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Unknown Primary ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Grade 3

2544 Background: C-Met protein is a receptor tyrosine kinase which is overexpressed or mutated in a variety of tumor types, causing cell proliferation, metastasis, and angiogenesis. Tivantinib is an orally bioavailable small molecule which binds to the c-Met protein. This phase I study was designed to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of tivantinib in combination with standard dose FOLFOX for the treatment of patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors for which FOLFOX (5-FU IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; 5-FU CIV 2400 mg/m2 day 1; Leucovorin IV 400 mg/m2 day 1; Oxaliplatin IV 85 mg/m2 day 1) would be appropriate chemotherapy received escalating doses of tivantinib BID (days 1-14) in a standard 3 + 3 design. Dose-limiting toxicities (DLTs), non-dose-limiting toxicities (NDLTs), safety, and preliminary efficacy were evaluated. Results: Fourteen patients (50% colorectal) were treated across 3 dose levels: 120 mg (n=3); 240 mg (n=5); 360 mg (n=6). No DLTs were observed until the 3rd dose level (treatment delay ≥3 days, secondary to grade 3 neutropenia). Common related adverse events (% grade 1/2; % grade 3/4) included: diarrhea (36%; 0%), neutropenia (0%; 29%), nausea (14%; 14%), vomiting (14%; 14%), dehydration (14%; 7%), and thrombocytopenia (14%; 0%). To date, 7 patients have been evaluated for response including 4 (57%) with stable disease evident at the 8-week evaluation (CRC, 2 patients; unknown primary favoring CRC, 1 patient; esophageal, 1 patient) and 3 (21%) with disease progression. The 4 patients with stable disease are continuing on treatment; three (CRC and unknown primary) had received prior FOLFOX. Conclusions: The addition of tivantinib to standard therapy FOLFOX appears tolerated up to its recommended phase II monotherapy dose of 360 mg. Preliminary efficacy is encouraging, and a phase II study is proceeding with this regimen for the first line treatment of advanced gastroesophageal patients. Clinical trial information: NCT01611857.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document