Effect of anti-inflammatory therapy in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma on clinical response

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14500-14500 ◽  
Author(s):  
A. Reichle ◽  
J. Grassinger ◽  
K. Bross ◽  
J. Wilke ◽  
T. Suedhoff ◽  
...  

14500 Background: Interaction among signalling networks from tumor and neighbouring stroma cells in complex disease traits is poorly understood. Methods: Two consecutive multi-centre phase II trials were designed (case calculation according response rate, T. Chen two stage design) to prove the hypothesis, whether the activation of presumably complementary receptor-triggered transcriptional cascades (via pioglitazone, and interferon alpha, IFNa) could result in synergistic clinical effects. Therapy in both trials consisted of low-dose capecitabine 1 g/m2 twice daily po for 14 days, every 3 weeks, day 1+, and rofecoxib 25 mg daily, day 1+ (from 11/04 etoricoxib 60 mg daily instead) plus pioglitazone 60 mg daily, day 1+. In study II low-dose IFNa 4.5 MU sc three times a week, week 1+, was added until disease progression. Results: Eighteen, and 33 patients (pts, 31 eligible for analysis), respectively, with clear cell carcinoma, progressive disease, and ECOG 0–2 were enrolled between 2/02 to 2/03 and 4/03 to 4/05, respectively. Mean Bradley score in both trials was not significantly different, 4.1(I)/4.9(II), however, the rate of previous systemic treatments 33%/19%. Objective response (48%) was exclusively observed in study II (PR 35%, CR 13%), and paralleled by a strong CRP response (after 4 weeks on treatment) in all 29 pts with elevated CRP levels (93%) (study I: no significant CRP response): CRP values decreased from mean 41.3 mg/l, range 8.1 to 221, to 5.1 mg/l, range 2.1 to 15.6, p = 0.005. Stable disease > 2 months (mos) occurred in 50%/48%. Median progression-free survival could be more than doubled from a median of 4.7 mos (95% CI, 1.0 to 10.4) to 11.5 mos (6.8 to 16.2) in study II, p = 0.0000. Median overall survival of population II has not been reached, yet. Toxicities > WHO grade II were reported (study I/II): Hand-foot syndrome (3/3), diarrhoea (2/2), depression (0/1), pneumonia (0/1). Conclusions: (1) Clinical results of anti-inflammatory/angiostatic therapy compare with available immuno-therapies. (2) Improved outcome with additive IFNa argues for a synergistic drug interaction. (3) Control of tumor-associated inflammation is an important therapeutic principle in metastatic clear cell carcinoma. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

2006 ◽  
Vol 1 ◽  
pp. 117727190600100 ◽  
Author(s):  
Albrecht Reichle ◽  
Jochen Grassinger ◽  
Klaus Bross ◽  
Jochen Wilke ◽  
Thomas Suedhoff ◽  
...  

Two consecutive multi-center phase II trials were designed to prove the hypothesis, whether therapeutic modeling of tumor-associated inflammatory processes could result in improved tumor response. Therapy in both trials consisted of low-dose capecitabine 1g/m2 twice daily p.o. for 14 days, every 3 weeks, day 1+, and rofecoxib 25 mg daily p.o., day 1+ (from 11/04 etoricoxib 60 mg daily instead) plus pioglitazone 60 mg daily p.o., day 1+. In study II low-dose IFN-α 4.5 MU sc. three times a week, week 1+, was added until disease progression. Eighteen, and 33 patients, respectively, with clear cell renal carcinoma and progressive disease were enrolled. Objective response (48%) was exclusively observed in study II (PR 35%, CR 13%), and paralleled by a strong CRP response after 4 weeks on treatment, p = 0.0005, in all 29 pts (100%) with elevated CRP levels. Median progression-free survival could be more than doubled from a median of 4.7 months (95% CI, 1.0 to 10.4) to 11.5 months (6.8 to 16.2) in study II, p = 0.00001. Median overall survival of population II was 26 months. Efficacious negative regulation of tumor-associated inflammation by transcription modulators may result in a steep increase of tumor response and survival.


2019 ◽  
Vol 461 ◽  
pp. 102-111 ◽  
Author(s):  
Joseph J. Caumanns ◽  
Anne van Wijngaarden ◽  
Arjan Kol ◽  
Gert J. Meersma ◽  
Mathilde Jalving ◽  
...  

2021 ◽  
pp. ijgc-2021-002973
Author(s):  
Susana Banerjee ◽  
James Stewart ◽  
Nuria Porta ◽  
Christy Toms ◽  
Alexandra Leary ◽  
...  

BackgroundARID1A (AT-rich interactive domain containing protein 1A) loss-of-function mutations have been reported in gynecological cancers, including rarer subtypes such as clear cell carcinoma. Preclinical studies indicate that ARID1A mutant cancers display sensitivity to ATR inhibition while tumors without ARID1A mutations may be sensitive to Ataxia telangiectasia and Rad3 related (ATR) inhibitors in combination with poly-ADP ribose polymerase (PARP) inhibitors.Primary ObjectiveTo determine whether the ATR inhibitor, ceralasertib, has clinical activity as a single agent and in combination with the PARP inhibitor, olaparib, in patients with ARID1A ‘loss’ and ‘no loss’ clear cell carcinomas and other relapsed gynecological cancers.Study HypothesisARID1A deficient clear cell carcinoma of the ovary or endometrium is sensitive to ATR inhibition, while the combination of ATR and PARP inhibition has activity in other gynecological tumors, irrespective of ARID1A status.Trial DesignATARI (ENGOT/GYN1/NCRI) is a multicenter, international, proof-of-concept, phase II, parallel cohort trial assessing ceralasertib activity as a single agent and in combination with olaparib in ARID1A stratified gynecological cancers. Patients with relapsed ovarian/endometrial clear cell carcinoma with ARID1A loss will receive ceralasertib monotherapy (cohort 1A). Relapsed ovarian/endometrial clear cell carcinoma patients with no ARID1A loss (cohort 2) or patients with other histological subtypes (endometrioid, carcinosarcoma, cervical) (cohort 3) will receive combination therapy (olaparib/ceralasertib). Treatment will continue until disease progression.Major Inclusion/Exclusion CriteriaPatients with histologically confirmed recurrent clear cell (ovarian, endometrial, or endometriosis related), endometrioid (ovarian, endometrial, or endometriosis related), cervical (adenocarcinomas or squamous), or carcinosarcomas (ovarian or endometrial) are eligible. Patients progressing after ≥1 prior platinum with evidence of measurable (RECIST v1.1) radiological disease progression since last systemic anticancer therapy and prior to trial entry are eligible. Previous ATR or PARP inhibitor treatment is not permissible.Primary EndpointBest overall objective response rate (RECIST v1.1).Sample SizeA minimum of 40 and a maximum of 116.Estimated Dates for Completing Accrual and Presenting ResultsAccrual is anticipated to be complete by the second quarter of 2022, with reporting of results by the fourth quarter of 2022. Overall accrual targets and reporting timelines are dependent on individual cohort progression to stage 2.Trial Registration NumberNCT0405269.


2013 ◽  
Vol 13 (2) ◽  
pp. 79-80
Author(s):  
Zane Simtniece ◽  
Gatis Kirsakmens ◽  
Ilze Strumfa ◽  
Andrejs Vanags ◽  
Maris Pavars ◽  
...  

Abstract Here, we report surgical treatment of a patient presenting with pancreatic metastasis (MTS) of renal clear cell carcinoma (RCC) 11 years after nephrectomy. RCC is one of few cancers that metastasise in pancreas. Jaundice, abdominal pain or gastrointestinal bleeding can develop; however, asymptomatic MTS can be discovered by follow-up after removal of the primary tumour. The patient, 67-year-old female was radiologically diagnosed with a clinically silent mass in the pancreatic body and underwent distal pancreatic resection. The postoperative period was smooth. Four months after the surgery, there were no signs of disease progression.


Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document