Interleukin-2, interferon alpha and 5-fluorouracil immunochemotherapy with and without 13-cis-retinoic acid in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma: Results of a prospective randomized trial

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 14571-14571
Author(s):  
S. Bierer ◽  
M. E. Bode ◽  
O. A. Brinkmann ◽  
L. Hertle
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Group B

14571 Background: Combined immunochemotherapy with interleukin 2, interferon alpha and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma has shown objective response rates up to 30% and more. The therapeutic effect of adding 13-cis-retinoic acid still remains controversial. Methods: Between 05/2001 and 11/2003 we randomly assigned patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma either to receive a combined immunochemotherapy of interleukin 2 (s.c.), interferon alpha (s.c.) and 5-fluorouracil (i.v.) = group A or the same regimen plus 3 × 20 mg 13-cis-retinoic acid daily (p.o.) = group B. 83 patients were eligible (41 in group A and 43 in group B). All patients had ECOG 0 or 1 and no prior systemic therapy. Objective response (OR = Complete response, CR + Partial response, PR + Stable disease, SD), time to progression (TTP) and median survival were determined. Results: Patient characteristics were well balanced between both groups. There was no significant difference in objective response between both groups (A/B: CR 2%/2%, PR 22%/5%, SD 46%/69%, p = 0.8). The responders in both groups showed no significant difference in TTP (A/B: 11.5/9.5 months, p = 0.4). Median survival was 23 months for all patients with no significant difference between the two groups (A/B: 26/22 months, p = 0.42). Slightly more therapeutic side effects (e.g. mucositis) were seen in group B. Conclusions: The addition of 13-cis-retinoic acid to a combined immunochemotherapy of interleukin 2, interferon alpha and 5-fluorouracil in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma does not seem to have a therapeutic benefit. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Activity of retreatment with sorafenib for metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

2011 ◽  
Vol 29 (7_suppl) ◽  
pp. 404-404 ◽  
Author(s):  
M. Nozawa ◽  
N. Matsumura ◽  
M. Yasuda ◽  
Y. Okuda ◽  
H. Uemura
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Clinical Benefit ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Severe Toxicity ◽  
Sorafenib Therapy ◽  
Significant Difference

404 Background: Treatment options for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) have increased. Complete remission is, however, rarely seen and patients are treated with multiple sequential therapies. We assessed clinical activity of sorafenib rechallenge after progressing on other therapies. Methods: Patients with mRCC who received a second course of sorafenib therapy after failure of prior sorafenib and other agents were retrospectively identified. RECIST-defined objective response rate and progression-free survival (PFS) and toxicity were analyzed. Results: Fourteen patients with mRCC who were retreated with sorafenib were identified and twelve patients were assessable for this study. 92% were male. Median age at first systemic therapy was 63 years. Prior nephrectomy was performed in 92% of patients. 42% of patients had favorable or intermediate risk, 17% poor, and the rest not available per MSKCC criteria. Eighty-three percent of patients were treated with other agents before initial sorafenib therapy, including 75% interferon-alpha (IFN-alpha), 50% interleukin-2 (IL-2), and 17% sunitinib. First sorafenib therapy began a median of 9.0 months after the diagnosis of mRCC and produced a clinical benefit (PR + SD) rate of 75% and a median PFS of 5.0 months. 67% of patients discontinued initial sorafenib for disease progression and 33% for adverse events. Interval between discontinuation of initial sorafenib and rechallenge was a median of 7.6 months. During the intervening period, 50% of patients were treated with sunitinib, 33% with everolimus, 25% with VEGFR1 vaccine, and others. Clinical benefit rate of 67% and a median PFS of 4.3 months were obtained on sorafenib rechallenge. There was no significant difference in outcome to sorafenib rechallenge based on duration between sorafenib treatments or number or type of intervening treatments. No new severe toxicity was observed during rechallenge. Conclusions: Sorafenib rechallenge has potential to achieve clinical benefits, is well-tolerated, and may be considered after multiple sequential therapies in select mRCC patients. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Multicenter phase II trial of interleukin-2, interferon-alpha, and 13-cis-retinoic acid in patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma.

1998 ◽  
Vol 16 (5) ◽  
pp. 1820-1825 ◽  
Author(s):  
W M Stadler ◽  
T Kuzel ◽  
M Dumas ◽  
N J Vogelzang
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Retinoic Acid ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Median Survival ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Minor Response

PURPOSE To determine the response rate and toxicity of oral 13-cis-retinoic acid (CRA) added to an outpatient regimen of subcutaneous interleukin-2 (IL2) and interferon-alpha (IFNA) in previously untreated patients with metastatic renal-cell carcinoma (RCC). PATIENTS AND METHODS Eligibility included a performance status of 2 or better, no significant end-organ dysfunction, and written informed consent. Characteristics of 47 of 48 assessable patients included a median performance status of 0, prior nephrectomy in 68% of patients, one metastatic site in 30% of patients, and lung-only metastatic disease in 21% of patients. Therapy consisted of IL2 11 x 10(6) IU 4 days per week for 4 weeks, IFNA 9 x 10(6) IU 2 days per week for 4 weeks, and CRA 1 mg/kg daily on a 6-week cycle. RESULTS Eight of 47 patients (17%) responded (one complete response, seven partial responses). Three partial responders were rendered disease free by subsequent surgical resection. Four additional patients experienced a minor response in lung or soft tissue metastases. The median duration of response, which included minor responses, was 42 weeks, and median survival was 74 weeks (17 months). Grades 3 or greater toxicities during the first cycle included flu-like symptoms (21% of patients), fatigue (6% of patients), and nausea and vomiting (15% of patients). Significant cumulative toxicities were hyperlipidemia (four of 18 patients), and cardiomyopathy (one of 18 patients). There was one therapy-related death. CONCLUSION Outpatient CRA plus IL2 and IFNA is feasible and modestly effective in metastatic RCC. The prolonged median survival is encouraging, but randomized trials are required to show that the combination represents an improvement over single-agent immunotherapy.

A Randomized Study of Low-Dose Interleukin-2 Subcutaneous Immunotherapy versus Interleukin-2 plus Interferon-Alpha as First Line Therapy for Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma

1993 ◽  
Vol 79 (6) ◽  
pp. 397-400 ◽  
Author(s):  
Paolo Lissoni ◽  
Sandro Barni ◽  
Antonio Ardizzoia ◽  
Marco Andres ◽  
Epifanio Scardino ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Response Rate ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Subcutaneous Immunotherapy ◽  
Significant Difference ◽  
Metastatic Rcc

Aims and Background IL-2 given subcutaneously in combination with interferon-alpha 2b (IFN) appears to induce a response rate comparable to that obtained with IL-2 intravenous injection in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) but with lower toxicity. The role of IFN when combined with IL-2 has however still to be defined. The present study was performed to draw some preliminary conclusions about the effect of IFN in combination with IL-2 in metastatic RCC. Methods The study included 30 consecutive patients with metastatic RCC who were randomized to treatment with IL-2 subcutaneous therapy (3 million IU twice/daily for 5 days/week for 6 weeks) or with IL-2 plus IFN (5 million U/m2 subcutaneously thrice weekly). In patients without progressive disease, a second cycle was repeated after a 28-day rest period. Results No significant difference in partial response rate was found between patients treated with IL-2 alone and those given IL-2 plus IFN (5/15 vs 4/15). Similarly, no difference was seen in the percentage of stable disease (7/15 vs 7/15). Toxicity was higher in patients who received IL-2 plus IFN. Lymphocyte and eosinophil mean increase was higher in patients treated with IL-2 alone than in those treated with IL-2 plus IFN, without however any significant difference. Conclusions The present results, which require confirmation in a larger series, indicate that combination with IFN does not increase the efficacy of IL-2 subcutaneous immunotherapy in metastatic RCC but only the toxicity of treatment.

Results of treatment of 255 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma who received high-dose recombinant interleukin-2 therapy.

1995 ◽  
Vol 13 (3) ◽  
pp. 688-696 ◽  
Author(s):  
G Fyfe ◽  
R I Fisher ◽  
S A Rosenberg ◽  
M Sznol ◽  
D R Parkinson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
High Dose ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Median Response

PURPOSE To determine the efficacy and toxicity of a high-dose interleukin-2 (IL-2) regimen in patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS Two hundred fifty-five assessable patients were entered onto seven phase II clinical trials. Proleukin (aldesleukin; Chiron Corp, Emeryville, CA) 600,000 or 720,000 IU/kg was administered by 15-minute intravenous (i.v.) infusion every 8 hours for up to 14 consecutive doses over 5 days as clinically tolerated with maximum support, including pressors. A second identical cycle of treatment was scheduled following 5 to 9 days of rest, and courses could be repeated every 6 to 12 weeks in stable or responding patients. RESULTS The overall objective response rate was 14% (90% confidence interval [CI], 10% to 19%), with 12 (5%) complete responses (CRs) and 24 (9%) partial responses (PRs). Responses occurred in all sites of disease, including bone, intact primary tumors, and visceral metastases, and in patients with large tumor burdens or bulky individual lesions. The median response duration for patients who achieved a CR has not been reached, but was 19.0 months for those who achieved a PR. Baseline Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) was the only predictive prognostic factor for response to IL-2. While treatment was associated with severe acute toxicities, these generally reversed rapidly after therapy was completed. However, 4% of patients died of adverse events judged to be possibly or probably treatment-related. CONCLUSION High-dose IL-2 appears to benefit some patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma by producing durable CRs or PRs. Despite severe acute treatment-associated toxicities, IL-2 should be considered for initial therapy of patients with appropriately selected metastatic renal cell carcinoma.

Treatment of metastatic papillary renal cell carcinoma with immunochemotherapy with interleukin-2, interferon-alpha and 5- fluorouracil

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 15644-15644 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. Herrmann ◽  
O. A. Brinkmann ◽  
M. E. Bode ◽  
S. Bierer ◽  
T. Köpke ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Interferon Alpha ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Interleukin 2 ◽  
Papillary Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
First Line ◽  
Histologic Subtype ◽  
First Line Therapy

15644 Background: Combined immunochemotherapy with interleukin-2 (IL-2), interferon-alpha (IFN-a) and 5-fluorouracil (5-FU) is an established first-line therapy for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC). However, data on histologic parameters predictive of clinical benefit are rare. Methods: Treatment courses of 164 patients consisted of IFN-a at 9 x 106 IU on day 1 of weeks 1 and 4 and days 1, 3, 5 of weeks 2 and 3; and at 18 x 106 IU on days 1, 3, 5 of weeks 5–8. Interleukin-2 was administrated at 18 x 106 IU twice daily on days 3–5 of weeks 1 and 4; and at 9 x 106 IU on days 1, 3, 5 of weeks 2 and 3. Additionally, patients received 5-FU at 750 mg m-2 on day 1 of weeks 5–8. In 153 patients, radical nephrectomy had revealed 22 cases of papillary RCC (pRCC, 13.4%) and 131 cases of clear cell RCC (ccRCC, 79.9%). In the remaining 11 (6.7%) their disease was inoperable. The overall response rates were evaluated according to WHO criteria. Results: For ccRCC and inoperable disease, responses of 34.4% and 27.3% after one cycle and 28.8% and 16.7% after two cycles, respectively, were noted. In contrast, no patient with pRCC showed any response after two cycles of combined immunochemotherapy. Conclusions: No objective response was seen in patients with pRCC. Hence, immunotherapeutic agents must be questioned in this histologic subtype. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A prospective, open label, multicenter, randomized phase II trial: Sequential therapy with bevacizumab, RAd001 (everolimus) and axitinib in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) (BERAT study).

2019 ◽  
Vol 37 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e16097-e16097
Author(s):  
Viktor Grünwald ◽  
Lothar Bergmann ◽  
Peter J. Goebell ◽  
Arne Strauss ◽  
Johannes Meiler ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Metastatic Renal Cell Carcinoma ◽  
Renal Cell ◽  
Phase Ii Trial ◽  
Objective Response ◽  
Line Treatment ◽  
Open Label ◽  
Significant Difference

e16097 Background: Inhibitors of the vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), its receptor (Ri) or mammalian target of rapamycin (mTORi) are components of systemic treatment in metastatic renal cell carcinoma (mRCC) and are applied in sequence. We compared the efficacy of VEGFRi and mTORi in 2nd line after failure of bevacizumab/interferon in a phase II trial. Methods: Key inclusion criteria were: measurable mRCC (all histologies), ECOG 0-1, IMDC risk: good or intermediate, adequate organ function. Tumor status was assessed in week 11 and q12 wks., thereafter. Measures of Health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) utilized FKSI-10 and was assessed in week 4, 10 and q12 wks., thereafter. 1st line consisted of bevacizumab 10mg/kg q2wks. + interferon 9*106 IE 3x/week (BEV/IFN). Upon progression or intolerance, patients were re-screened and randomized between VEGFRi (axitinib 5 mg BID, dose-escalation permitted; sunitinib 50 mg OD, 4-2 regimen) and everolimus (EVE) treatment (10 mg OD). Cross-over occurred at time of progression or intolerance. Improvement of 2nd line PFS-rate at 6 mo. from 50% to 65% was the primary endpoint. Secondary endpoints were PFS, total PFS, ORR, OS, safety and HR-QoL. Results: Between November 2012 and June 2015 a total of 22 of 100 patients were included and at that time stopped for poor accrual. 10 pts. (46%) were randomized to receive 2nd line treatment with everolimus (n = 5) or VEGFRi (n = 5). At study entry (2/10) 20% had nephrectomy. ECOG 0 was recorded in 20% (EVE) and 60% (VEGFRi), respectively. Objective response rate (ORR) to 1st line BEV/IFN was 20%. In 2nd line treatment all patients experienced adverse events (AE). Grade ≥3 AEs occurred in 2/5 (40%) (EVE) and 4/5 (80%) (VEGFRi) pts., respectively. SAEs occurred in 3/5 (60%) in each arm. ORR was 1/5 (20%) for axitinib and 0/5 (0%) for EVE. PFS rate at 180 days was 20% in each arm. Median PFS was 3.7 (EVE) and 2.2 mo. (VEGFRi) HR 1.0 (95%CI 0.26-3.85; p = 0.997). OS was comparable between arms HR 1.12 (95%CI 0.27-4.61; P = 0.872). 7 pts. crossed over to 3rd line treatment. Conclusions: The small number of pts. randomized to EVE or VEGFRi is a major limitation of our trial, but may mirror the current change of treatment reality. However, no significant difference was detected for the PFS rate at 6 mo., indicating the limited activity of EVE or VEGFRi in 2nd line treatment. Clinical trial information: NCT01731158.

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document