Phase I study of two different schedules of bortezomib (BORT) and pemetrexed (PEM) in advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 17051-17051
Author(s):  
A. S. Metzger ◽  
P. Lara ◽  
D. Lau ◽  
P. Mack ◽  
P. Gumerlock ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Anti Cancer ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
Purine Pyrimidine

17051 Background: BORT(PS-341) is a small molecule proteasome inhibitor while PEM, a multi-targeted antifolate, inhibits multiple enzymes involved in purine/pyrimidine formation. Both are approved anti-cancer agents. We examined the safety and tolerability of two different schedules of BORT and PEM in patients with advanced solid tumors. Methods: Two dose escalation trials (Arm A and Arm B) were conducted simultaneously. PEM was given every 21 days in both arms (500–600 mg/m2 IV). Arm A: BORT was given D1,4,8 &11 (0.7–1.3 mg/m2). Arm B: BORT was given D1 & 8 (1.0–1.6 mg/m2). All patients received vitamin B12, folic acid and decadron. Dose limiting toxicity (DLT) was defined as: grade (GR) 4 platelets (plts) (≤25K); GR 3 plts (25K-49,999K) with bleeding, requirement for transfusion, or lasting > 7 days; febrile neutropenia; GR3 ANC (ANC ≤1.0 × 109) with documented infection, or any ≥ GR3 non-heme toxicity. Results: 18 patients have been treated on 3 of the 4 planned dose levels. Tumor types included lung (12), prostate (2), breast (1), thymus (1), head & neck (1) and adenoid cystic carcinoma (1). Pt. characteristics: Median age 65 years; Sex M/F = 7/11; Performance Status ≤1/2 = 18/0. There have been no DLTs in either arm (Dose level 3-Arm A: PEM 500 mg/m2, BORT 1.3 mg/m2; Arm B:PEM 500 mg/m2, BORT 1.6 mg/m2). Most common GR3/4 toxicities were: neutropenia 27% and lymphopenia 11%. Of 17 evaluable patients: 1 had partial response, 11 had stable disease, 5 had progressive disease. Mean number of cycles: 4. Arm A had more doses held during the first cycle than Arm B (6 doses held vs. 1 dose held). Accrual to the final dose level in both arms is ongoing. Conclusions: 1) PEM in combination with BORT is feasible and tolerable. 2) Thus far, there are no differences in toxicity between the arms. 3) A randomized, multi-institutional phase II study will examine the efficacy of these two schedules in patients with NSCLC. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I dose escalation trial of ispinesib (SB-715992) administered days 1–3 of a 21-day cycle in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2026-2026 ◽  
Author(s):  
E. I. Heath ◽  
A. Alousi ◽  
J. P. Eder ◽  
M. Valdivieso ◽  
L. S. Vasist ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Pharmacokinetic Data ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Minor Response ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Limiting Toxicity

2026 Background: Ispinesib, a novel cytotoxic agent inhibiting the kinesin spindle protein (KSP) has demonstrated significant antitumor activity in multiple murine tumor models. The primary objectives of the study were to assess the safety and tolerability of SB-715992, to determine the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), and the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). Methods: Ispinesib was administered days 1–3 intravenously over 1 hour every 21 days, starting at a dose of 1 mg/m2/day. Traditional 3-patient cohort trial design was utilized with dose levels of 2, 4, 6, 8 mg/m2/day. Results: Twenty-seven patients (24 Caucasians, 3 African-Americans, 16 males, 11 females) with various tumor types were enrolled; colorectal (7), renal (5), bladder (2), lung (2), pharynx (2), pancreas (2), others (7). Grade 3/4 toxicities were noted starting at the 4 mg/m2 dose level with two patients developing grade 4 neutropenia; one for < 5 days, one for > 5 days (with grade 3 leukopenia). At the 6 mg/m2 dose level, grade 3 neutropenia and leukopenia were reported. At the 8 mg/m2 dose level, 3 of 3 patients had grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia. The 6 mg/m2 dose level was declared the MTD. Toxicities seen in the additional 6 patients included grade 1 fatigue (1/6), grade 1 infusion- related flushing (1/6), grade 3 febrile neutropenia (1/6), and grade 4 neutropenia and leukopenia (1/6). The MTD cohort has been expanded to 10 evaluable patients for confirmation of tolerability and pharmacodynamic endpoints including phosphohistone 3 (PH3), cyclin E, and TUNEL assay on serial tumor biopsies. Preliminary pharmacokinetic data appear linear, but not dose proportional. As predicted, between days 1 and 3, accumulation ranged from 40 to 106%. Exposures appear comparable between cycles 1 and 2. Stable disease in 2 patients with renal cell carcinoma (4 and 5 cycles) and minor response in one patient with bladder cancer were seen. Conclusions: Treatment with ispinesib at the MTD of 6 mg/m2/day x 3 days in patients with advanced solid tumors was well tolerated with consistent dose limiting toxicity of myelosuppression. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

Phase I study of sirolimus plus gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors: A Spanish Group for Research on Sarcomas (GEIS) study.

2012 ◽  
Vol 30 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3096-3096
Author(s):  
Juan Martin Liberal ◽  
Marta Gil ◽  
Laura Jimenez ◽  
Maria Ochoa de Olza ◽  
Carmen Munoz ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Mtor Pathway ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3096 Background: In preclinical studies, combination of sirolimus with gemcitabine enhances apoptosis in vitro and increases anti-tumor efficacy in vivo. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors, age 18-70 years, no prior mTOR inhibitor or gemcitabine, ECOG PS 0-1, and adequate hematological, renal and hepatic function, were enrolled in this phase I study to assess safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and to identify the dose limiting toxicity (DLT), maximum tolerated dose (MTD) and recommended dose (RD) of the combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine. A 3+3 dose escalation design with cohorts of 3-6 patients was used. Sirolimus was given po continuously. Gemcitabine was given iv 10mg/m2/minute on days 1 and 8 every 3 weeks. Dose levels 1, 2 and 3 corresponded to sirolimus 2, 2 and 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800, 1000 and 1000mg/m2 respectively. After observing DLTs at higher dose level and poorer mTOR signaling inhibition at lower doses, a new cohort of sirolimus 5mg/24h plus gemcitabine 800 mg/m2 was added. Skin biopsies pre and post treatment were performed to assess the inhibition of mTOR pathway. Results: 19 patients were enrolled: median age 51 years (36-70); gender 12M, 7F. Median number of cycles was 4. Patients were treated at 4 dose levels, the MTD was reached at level 3 and the RD was: sirolimus 5mg/24h and gemcitabine 800mg/m2. 3 DLTs were observed, 1 at dose level 2 and 2 at dose level 3: transaminitis grade 3, thrombocytopenia grade 3 and thrombocytopenia grade 4. Other toxicities grade 1-2 included anemia, neutropenia, asthenia, mucositis and high cholesterol levels. 2 patients achieved partial response (1 uterine cervix cancer and 1 colon cancer). Immunohistochemistry of pS6 in skin biopsies showed significative inhibition of mTOR pathway at RD. PK parameters estimated were in agreement with those previously reported in the literature. No influence of sirolimus administration on gemcitabine clearance was found. Conclusions: Combination of sirolimus and gemcitabine is feasible and safe, allowing administration of active doses of both agents and achieving mTOR signaling inhibition. A phase II study to assess the activity of this combination in sarcomas is ongoing.

A phase I clinical study of biweekly carboplatin and gemcitabine in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 12024-12024
Author(s):  
P. Kumar ◽  
M. Keshtgarpour ◽  
H. Kumar ◽  
A. Dudek
Keyword(s):  
Performance Status ◽  
Median Number ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Hematological Toxicity ◽  
Ecog Performance Status ◽  
Primary Tumors ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Number Of Cycles ◽  
Tumor Types ◽  
Dose Levels

12024 Background: Carboplatin (CBDCA) and gemcitabine (GEM) in combination is used commonly in lung cancer and is administered on a 21 day cycle. The purpose of this study was to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of CBDCA and GEM administered on a biweekly schedule and to assess safety and efficacy of this schedule. Methods: GEM was given intravenously (IV) over 30 minutes followed by CBDCA also given IV over 30 minutes. This combination was given on day 1 every 2 weeks. The dose levels examined are shown in the Table . A total of 26 patients were studied (18 male, 8 female) with median age of 56 (range 41–83 years); ECOG performance status of 24 patients were 0 (5), 1 (16), 2 (2), 3 (1); prior chemotherapy ranged from 0 to 4 regimens; median number of cycles administered per patient was 3 (range 1–9) with a total of 81 cycles. The primary tumors were lung (11), melanoma (4), head and neck (3), squamous cell penile/toe (2), bladder (2), kidney (1), gastric (1), esophageal (1) and ovary (1). Results: No DLTs were seen in any of these patients and the MTD was not reached. Delay in treatment was seen in total of 6 cycles due to myelosuppression and 1 cycle due to nausea and anorexia. Grade 3/4 hematological toxicity rates: anemia - 3/81 cycles (3.7%), neutropenia - 20/81 cycles (25%), and thrombocytopenia - 4/81 cycles (5%). Non-hematological toxicity was mild. The median time to progression was 40 days (range 4–133) and of 18 evaluable patients partial response or stable disease was seen in 7 (38.8%). Conclusions: Even at maximum tested dose of GEM at 2000 mg/m2 and CBDCA at AUC of 3.0, this schedule is well tolerated. Hematological toxicity such as neutropenia and thrombocytopenia was minimal. We plan to study this schedule of GEM and CBDCA in appropriate tumor types in combination with biologic agents. [Table: see text] [Table: see text]

Phase I, safety, pharmacokinetic and biomarker study of BAY 57–9352, an oral VEGFR-2 inhibitor, in a continuous schedule in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3040-3040
Author(s):  
H. Gelderblom ◽  
J. Verweij ◽  
N. Steeghs ◽  
A. Van Erkel ◽  
L. Van Doorn ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Tyrosine Kinases ◽  
Competitive Inhibitor ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Tumor Patient ◽  
Contrast Enhanced ◽  
Ca Antagonist ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Dose Levels

3040 Background: BAY 57–9352 is a potent competitive inhibitor of the VEGFR-2 (IC50: 6 nM), VEGFR-3 (IC50: 4 nM), PDGFR-β and c-KIT tyrosine kinases. BAY 57–9352 showed tumor efficacy in colon, breast, pancreatic and NSCLC models. Methods: Patients with advanced solid tumors received oral BAY 57–9352 on a continuous basis, in escalating doses. One cycle was defined as 21 days of treatment. Extensive PK and PD (dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI [DCE-MRI]) evaluations were performed. Plasma biomarkers (e.g. VEGF)were also evaluated. Results: Forty patients (median 54 yrs) were enrolled at seven dose levels from 20 mg solution once daily to1500 mg twice daily (bid; 150 mg tablets) for a total of 169 cycles (range 1–17). The most frequent drug-related adverse events were nausea, hypertension, headache, vomiting, hoarseness, rash, dry skin and anorexia. One patient treated at 600 mg bid had a dose-limiting toxicity defined by an increase from grade 2 to 3 hypertension, despite the addition of an ACE-inhibitor and Ca-antagonist on day 8 of cycle 2. Another patient at that same dose level and also on day 8 cycle 2, had grade 3 AST/ALT increase, however this was not assessed as dose-limiting. Both patients continued treatment after dose reductions. Treatment was well tolerated, even at the highest dose levels. One patient with a hemangio-endothelioma (600 mg bid) had a clinical response and one desmoid tumor patient (900 mg bid) had a 53% reduction in tumor volume. BAY 57–9352 AUC increased dose proportionally up to 900 mg bid. The target AUC, based on animal models (5 mg × h/L) was reached in all patients at 900 mg bid. Dose levels exceeding 900 mg bid had similar plasma VEGF biomarker levels. Conclusions: BAY 57–9352 was well tolerated in doses up to 1500 mg bid. Based on safety, PK, PD and biomarker assessments, the recommended dose level is 900 mg bid. A 300 mg tablet is being tested for patient convenience. Combination chemotherapy studies have been started. [Table: see text]

Phase I Study of Oxaliplatin, Full-Dose Gemcitabine, and Concurrent Radiation Therapy in Pancreatic Cancer

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (29) ◽  
pp. 4587-4592 ◽  
Author(s):  
Sameer P. Desai ◽  
Edgar Ben-Josef ◽  
Daniel P. Normolle ◽  
Isaac R. Francis ◽  
Joel K. Greenson ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Radiation Therapy ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Resectable Pancreatic Cancer ◽  
Probability Interval ◽  
Full Dose ◽  
Level 3 ◽  
Gi Toxicity ◽  
Dose Levels

PurposeTo determine a biweekly dose of oxaliplatin for combination with full-dose gemcitabine and concurrent radiation therapy (RT) in pancreatic cancer.Patients and MethodsPatients with previously untreated pancreatic cancer received gemcitabine days 1, 8, and 15, and oxaliplatin days 1 and 15, repeated at 28-day intervals. RT (27 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions) was administered during cycle 1. Dose escalation was guided using the time-to-event continuous reassessment method. Dose levels 1 to 4 included gemcitabine 1 g/m2intravenously (IV) during 30 minutes and oxaliplatin 40, 55, 70, or 85 mg/m2IV during 90 minutes, respectively; for dose levels 5 and 6, oxaliplatin dose remained 85 mg/m2but infusion time for gemcitabine 1 g/m2was increased to 65 or 100 minutes, respectively. The trial objective was to determine the dose level associated with dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) through cycle 2 in ≤ 20% of patients.ResultsForty-four patients were enrolled (median age, 64 years; 27 men, 17 women) with resectable (n = 12), unresectable (n = 29), and metastatic (n = 3) pancreatic cancer. Ten DLTs occurred in nine patients, including grade 4 platelets (n = 4), decline in performance status (n = 2), GI bleeding (n = 2), and GI toxicity (n = 2). The estimated probability of DLT for dose level 3 was .21 (90% posterior probability interval [PI], .12 to .33); for dose level 4, the estimated probability was .24 (90% PI, .14 to .36).ConclusionThe addition of oxaliplatin 85 mg/m2days 1 and 15 to full-dose gemcitabine and radiation therapy was well tolerated. On the basis of these results, a multi-institutional neoadjuvant phase II study in resectable pancreatic cancer is planned.

scholarly journals Phase I Study of Rivoceranib, a Selective VEGFR-2 Angiogenesis Inhibitor, Administered Daily in Patients With Advanced Solid Tumors

2021 ◽  
Author(s):  
Yoon-Koo Kang ◽  
Min-Hee Ryu ◽  
Yong Sang Hong ◽  
Chang-Min Choi ◽  
Tae Won Kim ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Safety Profile ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Angiogenesis Inhibitor ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Potential Clinical Benefit ◽  
Dose Levels

Abstract Rivoceranib is a highly potent and selective inhibitor of VEGFR-2 and subsequent angiogenesis through this receptor signaling pathway. This phase I study was the first global study with rivoceranib outside of China in Korean and Caucasian patients and was designed to determine the safety profile (including maximum tolerated dose), pharmacokinetics, and efficacy in patients with advanced solid tumors. Thirty-one adult patients with advanced malignant solid tumors were enrolled to investigate 6 dose levels of rivoceranib. Twenty-five patients were initially enrolled to 5 dose levels of rivoceranib from 81 to 685 mg and an additional 6 patients were later enrolled in a supplemental study to evaluate the 805 mg dose level. Rivoceranib was very well tolerated. At the 805 mg dose level, 2 dose-limiting toxicities were observed but the 685 mg dose was well tolerated over multiple cycles of therapy. The maximum tolerated dose for rivoceranib was 685 mg (equivalent to 850 mg rivoceranib mesylate) and recommended for further study in patients with advanced solid tumors. The most common adverse events were hypertension (all grades %/≥G3%: 58/29), nausea (42/0), diarrhea (39/0), anorexia (32/3), and fatigue (29/6). Rivoceranib pharmacokinetics were proportional across all dose levels but interpatient variability was high. Of the 31 patients enrolled, 21 were evaluable for efficacy. In this evaluable group, partial response was recorded in 5 patients, stable disease in 10, and disease progression in 6. Results indicate the potential clinical benefit of daily rivoceranib in patients with advanced malignant solid tumors with a tolerable safety profile.Trial registration: NCT01497704 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on December 22, 2011 and NCT02711969 (ClinicalTrials.gov) registered on March 17, 2016.

Phase I trial of combination becatecarin and oxaliplatin in patients with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 2561-2561
Author(s):  
S. Manda ◽  
C. Mauser ◽  
J. Bokar ◽  
M. Cooney ◽  
J. Brell ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase Ii ◽  
Phase I Trial ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Phase Ii Studies ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Level 2

2561 Background: Becatecarin (rebeccamycin analogue-RA) is an anti-tumor antibiotic with inhibitory activity against both topoisomerase II and I as well as DNA intercalating properties. We performed a phase I trial to a) determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD) of RA in combination with oxaliplatin; b) determine the dose limiting toxicities (DLT) (c) obtain data on pharmacokinetics and (d) observe for any antitumor activity. Methods: Eligibility criteria included patients with advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy; performance status 0–2; adequate hematologic, renal and liver function. Patients were treated with RA as a 1 hour infusion daily x 5 and oxaliplatin on day 5 only, after RA infusion. Treatment was repeated q 21 days. The following dose levels were evaluated: Dose level 1: RA 80 mg/m2/d and oxaliplatin 90 mg/m2; Dose level 2: RA 80 mg/m2/d and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2; Dose level 3: RA 110 mg/m2/d and oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2. Results: A total of 15 evaluable patients were enrolled. Median age was 56 (8 male, 7 female). A variety of tumor types were enrolled. A total of 56 cycles were administered. DLT occurred at a dose of RA at 110 mg/m2/d x 5 days and oxaliplatin at 130 mg/m2 and consisted of grade 3 hypophosphatemia and grade 4 atrial fibrillation. At this dose level 2 of 3 enrolled patients also developed grade 3 neutropenia. The MTD and recommended phase II dose was RA at 80 mg/m2/daily x 5 along with oxaliplatin 130 mg/m2 day 5 q 21 days. Three confirmed partial responses were observed in patients with hepatocellular, gallbladder and esophageal cancers. Six patients experienced stable disease. Conclusions: At the MTD combination RA and oxaliplatin is well tolerated and given the response rate and stable diseases observed, phase II studies are recommended. Supported by Grants U01 CA62502, MO1-RR-00080, K23 CA109348–01 from the National Institutes of Health. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of vorinostat (VOR) in combination with capecitabine (CAP) in patients (pts) with advanced solid tumors

2007 ◽  
Vol 25 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 3576-3576 ◽  
Author(s):  
P. Tang ◽  
A. Oza ◽  
C. Townsley ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
G. Pond ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Zinc Ion ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Prior Therapy ◽  
Disease Stabilization ◽  
Grade 3 ◽  
Tumor Types

3576 Background: VOR (suberoylanilide hydroxamic acid; SAHA) is a small molecule inhibitor of histone deacetylase (HDAC) that binds directly to the enzyme’s active site in the presence of a zinc ion. Aberrant HDAC activity has been implicated in a variety of cancers. The combination of 5-fluorouracil and VOR is synergistic in preclinical tumor models. Methods: This phase I study evaluated safety, tolerability, and the recommended phase II dose (RPTD) of VOR and CAP in pts with advanced solid tumors. VOR was administered orally daily while CAP was administered orally bid on days 1–14 of a 21 d cycle. Results: Three dose levels have been evaluated (VOR (mg/d)/CAP (mg/bid)): 300/750, 300/1,000 and 400/1,000. Twenty-three pts have been treated: 6M/17F, median age 59 (range 41–73), ECOG 0:1:2 = 9:13:1, prior therapy 1:2:3 or more = 3:7:13. Pts had colorectal cancer (n=6), nasopharyngeal (n=3) and various other tumors. A total of 104 cycles have been administered, with median = 2 (range 1–15). One dose limiting toxicity (DLT) (grade 3 diarrhea) occurred in 6 patients at dose level 1. No DLT were observed at dose level 2, and 2 DLTs (grade 3 fatigue and grade 3 nausea/vomiting) occurred at dose level 3. RPTD was determined to be VOR 300 mg/d and CAP 1,000 mg/bid. Most common toxicities of any grade and at least possibly attributable (n=22) are: thrombocytopenia (59% of pts), fatigue (55%), nausea (55%), vomiting (50%), hypoalbuminemia (45%), anemia (41%), diarrhea (41%), anorexia (41%), elevated creatinine (36%), lymphopenia (36%), hyponatremia (36%), and hyperglycemia (36%). Common grade 3 toxicities included: hand-foot syndrome (23% of pts), diarrhea (14%), fatigue (14%), and lymphopenia (14%). One pt died on study from ventricular fibrillation due to sotalol and hypocalcemia from pre-existing hypoparathyroidism. Five patients with various tumor types had PR (2 confirmed, 3 unconfirmed) (2 nasopharyngeal, 1 each of ovarian, endometrial and squamous cell carcinoma of head and neck). In addition, disease stabilization was seen in 12 patients. Conclusions: VOR and CAP are well tolerated, and this combination is active in several tumor types. Further evaluations of VOR and CAP are warranted. No significant financial relationships to disclose.

A phase I study of safety and pharmacokinetics of NanoBB-1-Dox in patients with advanced solid tumors.

2017 ◽  
Vol 35 (15_suppl) ◽  
pp. e13537-e13537 ◽  
Author(s):  
Olga Filon ◽  
Petr Krivorotko ◽  
Grigory Kobyakov ◽  
Viktoria Razjivina ◽  
Olga Maximenko ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Dose Dependence ◽  
Maximum Tolerated Dose ◽  
Drug Candidate ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Novel Drug ◽  
Dose Levels ◽  
The Brain

e13537 Background: NanoBB-1-Dox is a novel drug candidate for systemic chemotherapy of glioblastoma multiforme (GBM). It is a nanoparticle-based formulation of doxorubicin, which enables passage of the drug across the blood-brain barrier and delivery to the tumor inside the brain. Preclinical studies demonstrated that NanoBB-1-Dox enabled considerable growth inhibition of an intracranially implanted 101.8 glioblastoma in rats and long-term remission in >20% animals, whereas the conventional doxorubicin formulation was only marginally effective. Methods: 21 patients with advanced solid tumors (18 with advanced breast cancer, 34 with GBM) were enrolled in the study. The objectives of the study were: 1) to evaluate the safety and pharmacokinetics (PK), 2) to determine the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). A standard “3 + 3” design with 7 dose levels (4, 24, 36, 48, 60, 75 and 90 mg/m2) was used. Each patient received a single i.v. infusion of NanoBB-1-Dox. Doxorubicin serum concentrations were measured immediately before the infusion, and 2 min, 10 min, 20 min, 40 min, 1 h, 2 h, 4 h, 6 h, 8 h, 12 h, 24 h, 48 h, 72 h, 168 h after the infusion. Results: The PK analysis demonstrated that AUC0-t of doxorubicin after the NanoBB-1-Dox infusion increased in parallel with the dose level from 121.7 to 2054.4 h x ng/ml. T1/2 varied from 45 to 75 h without dose dependence. NanoBB-1-Dox was well tolerated without dose limiting toxicity even at the highest dose of 90 mg/m2, so the MTD was not achieved. The most common AEs included leukopenia, lymphopenia, neutropenia, thrombocytopenia, anemia, nausea, and alopecia. In general, the AE rate and intensity increased with the dose level reaching the maximum at a dose of 90 mg/m2. Only hematological AEs were severe according to CTCAE 4.03. No SAEs were reported. Conclusions: NanoBB-1-Dox after a single i.v. infusion in patients with advanced solid tumors is well tolerated and is characterized by a non-linear PK profile. NanoBB-1-Dox will be investigated in a phase II study in patients with GBM as a second line therapy. [Table: see text]

A phase I study of the humanized anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) monoclonal antibody (mAb) TheraCIM-h-R3 (nimotuzumab) in patients with advanced solid tumors

2006 ◽  
Vol 24 (18_suppl) ◽  
pp. 13054-13054
Author(s):  
A. M. Brade ◽  
L. Siu ◽  
A. M. Oza ◽  
B. Southwood ◽  
M. De Borja ◽  
...  
Keyword(s):  
Colorectal Cancer ◽  
Phase I ◽  
Solid Tumors ◽  
Dose Level ◽  
Phase I Study ◽  
Performance Status ◽  
Advanced Solid Tumors ◽  
Eligibility Criteria ◽  
Skin Biopsies ◽  
Grade 3

13054 Background: Nimotuzumab is a humanized mAb against the extracellular ligand binding domain of EGFR. Although well tolerated when combined with radiotherapy in previous studies, the pharmacodynamics (PD) of nimotuzumab has not been elucidated. This phase I study was designed to evaluate the safety, tolerability and PD of nimotuzumab. Methods: Eligibility criteria included advanced solid tumors refractory to standard therapy and performance status of ECOG 0–2. Nimotuzumab was administered intravenously weekly × 6 and then every other week (6 weeks = 1 treatment cycle). Tumor and skin biopsies were obtained at baseline and after 2 weeks of treatment. Results: To date, 9 patients (7 m/2 f, median age 60, 7 colorectal cancer, ECOG 0:1:2 = 5:3:1, prior therapy 1:2:3+ = 1:3:5) have been treated on the first 2 dose levels (100 mg and 200 mg) for a total of 13 treatment cycles. The most common toxicities, mainly grade 1- 2, were lymphopenia (n = 8 patients), fatigue (n = 8), abnormal liver function tests (n = 7) and anemia (n = 6). Observed grade 3 toxicities include: pain (n = 3), hyponatremia (n = 2), elevated ALP (n = 2), fatigue (n = 1), hyperglycemia (n = 1) and hyperkalemia (n = 1). One patient at the first dose level experienced grade 3 fatigue, at least possibly attributable to nimotuzumab, and thus considered as a dose-limiting toxicity (DLT). No DLT were observed in the expanded cohort and dose level 2. No skin toxicities were observed. Stable disease was seen in 3 patients with colorectal cancer. PD from tumor and skin biopsies will be presented, and may clarify the reason for the lack of skin toxicity. Conclusions: Overall nimotuzumab was well tolerated, with disease stabilization observed in heavily pretreated patients. Accrual continues at dose level 3 (400 mg) with one further planned dose level (800 mg). [Table: see text]

Sign in / Sign up

Export Citation Format

Share Document